SECOND FIVE-YEAR REVIEW REPORT FOR
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER
SUPERFUND SITE
ALLEGAN AND KALAMAZOO COUNTIES, MICHIGAN
^tDsrX
&
$
<
30
\
V PRO^
ro
z
Hi
O
-------
TABLE OF CONTENTS
List of Acronyms 6
Executive Summary 7
Five-Year Review Summary Form 9
I. Introduction 14
II. Site Chronology 15
III. Background 17
A. Site History 17
B. Operable Units 20
B.1. Operable Unit 1 20
Physical Characteristics 20
Land and Resource Use 20
History of Contamination 20
Response Activities 22
Basis for Taking Action 23
B.2. Operable Unit 2 24
Physical Characteristics 24
Land and Resource Use 24
History of Contamination 25
Response Activities 25
Basis for Taking Action 26
B.3. Operable Unit 3 27
Physical Characteristics 27
Land and Resource Use 28
History of Contamination 28
Response Activities 29
Basis for Taking Action 29
B.4. Operable Unit 4 31
Physical Characteristics 31
Land and Resource Use 31
History of Contamination 32
Response Activities 32
Basis for Taking Action 32
B.5. Operable Unit 5 33
Physical Characteristics 33
Land and Resource Use 33
History of Contamination 34
Response Activities 35
Basis for Taking Action 36
2
-------
B.6. Operable Unit 7 36
Physical Characteristics 36
Land and Resource Use 36
History of Contamination 37
Response Activites 37
Basis for Taking Action 38
IV. Remedial Actions 39
A. Operable Unit 2 39
Remedy Selection 39
Remedy Implementation 40
Institutional Controls 40
B. Operable Unit 3 41
Remedy Selection 41
Remedy Implementation 42
Institutional Controls 43
System Operations and O&M Costs 46
C. Operable Unit 4 47
Remedy Selection 47
Remedy Implementation 48
Institutional Controls 48
V. Progress Since the Last Review 49
VI. Five-Year Review Process 53
Administrative Components of the Five-Year Review Process 53
Community Notification and Involvement 54
Document Review 54
Data Review 54
Site Inspection 54
VII. Technical Assessment 56
A. Operable Unit 2 56
Question A: Is the remedy functioning as intended by the decision documents? 56
Question B: Are the exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels,
and remedial action objectives used at the time of remedy selection still valid?... 57
Question C: Has any other information come to light that could call into question
the protectiveness of the remedy? 57
B. Operable Unit 3 57
Question A: Is the remedy functioning as intended by the decision documents'? 57
Question B: Are the exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels,
and remedial action objectives used at the time of remedy selection still valid?... 58
Question C: Has any other information come to light that could call into question
the protectiveness of the remedy? 58
3
-------
C. Operable Unit 4 58
Question A: Is the remedy functioning as intended by the decision documents? 58
Question B: Are the exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels,
and remedial action objectives used at the time of remedy selection still valid?... 58
Question C: Has any other information come to light that could call into question
the protectiveness of the remedy? 59
VIII. Issues 59
IX. Recommendations and Follow-Up Actions 61
X. Protectiveness Statements 62
XI. Next Review 63
Tables
Table 1: Chronology of Site Events
Table 2: Institutional Controls Summary for OU2
Table 3: Institutional Controls Summary for OU3
Table 4: Institutional Controls Summary for OU4
Table 5: Actions Taken at OU3 Since the Last Five-Year Review
Table 6: Actions Taken at OU4 Since the Last Five-Year Review
Table 7: Issues Identified at OU3
Table 8: Issues Identified at OU4
Table 9: Recommendations and Follow-up Actions for OU3
Table 10: Recommendations and Follow-up Actions for OU4
Attachments
Attachment 1 Site Maps (Figures 1-11)
Figure 1 Site Location Map
Figure 2 OU1 Location Map
Figure 3: OU1 Site Plan
Figure 4: OU2 Location Map
Figure 5: OU2 Site Plan
Figure 6: OU3 Location Map
Figure 7: OU3 Site Plan
Figure 8: OU4 Location Map
Figure 9: OU4 Site Plan
Figure 10: OU5 Site Map
Figure 11: OU7 Location Map
Attachment 2: Post-Closure Monitoring Groundwater Sample Results 2007-2012
Attachment 2A: OU3 Results
Attachment 2B: OU4 Results
4
-------
Attachment 3: Photos Documenting Site Conditions
Attachment 3A: Inspection Photos from King Highway Landfill - OU3
Attachment 3B: Inspection Photos from Willow Boulevard/A-Site Landfill - OU2
Attachment 3C: Inspection Photos from 12th Street Landfill - OU4
Attachment 4: Site Inspection Report
Attachment 5: Restrictive Covenant for OU2
Attachment 6: Restrictive Covenant for OU4
Attachment 7: Restrictive Covenant for OU7
Appendices
Appendix A Newspaper Public Notices
Appendix B List of Documents Reviewed for the Five-Year Review
Appendix C List of Data Reviewed for the Five-Year Review
5
-------
AOC
BRA
BERA
CD
CERCLA
C.F.R.
EPA
FRDL
FS
GSI
HHRA
HRDL
ICs
KRSG
KSSS
MDEQ
MDNR
MDOT
mg/kg
NCP
NREPA
NPL
O&M
OU
PCBs
ppm
PRP
RAOs
RA
Rl)
RD/RA
RI
Rl/FS
ROD
RPM
Site
SMOA
SVOCs
TBERA
ug/L
UU/UE
VOCs
LIST OF ACRONYMS
Administrative Order on Consent
Baseline Risk Assessment
Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment
Consent Decree
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act
Code of Federal Regulations
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
Former Residual Dewatering Lagoons
Feasibility Study
Groundwater Surface Water Interface
Human Health Risk Assessment
Historic Residual Dewatering Lagoon
Institutional Controls
Kalamazoo River Study Group
King Street Storm Sewer
Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
Michigan Department of Natural Resources
Michigan Department of Transportation
Milligrams per Kilogram
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan
Environmental Remediation, of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act,
1994PA451
National Priorities List
Operation & Maintenance
Operable Unit
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
Parts per Million
Potentially Responsible Party
Remedial Action Objectives
Remedial Action
Remedial Design
Remedial Design/Remedial Action
Remedial Investigation
Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study
Record of Decision
Remedial Project Manager
Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site
Superfund Memorandum of Agreement
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds
Terrestrial Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment
Micrograms per Liter
Unlimited Use and Unrestricted Exposure
Volatile Organic Compounds
6
-------
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The Allied Paper Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund site (Site) is located in Allegan
and Kalamazoo Counties, Michigan. The Site includes disposal areas, paper mill properties,
approximately 80 miles of the Kalamazoo River (from Morrow Dam to Lake Michigan),
adjacent river banks and contiguous floodplains, as well as a 3-mile stretch of Portage Creek.
The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has identified six operable units (OUs) for
response action at the Site including:
• OU1 - Allied Paper, Inc./Bryant Mill Pond;
• OU2 - Willow Boulevard/A-Site Landfill;
• OU3 - King Highway Landfill;
. OU4-12th Street Landfill;
• OU5 - 80-miles of the Kalamazoo River including a 3-mile stretch of Portage Creek;
and
• OU7 - Former Plainwell Paper Mill Property.
The Site currently does not have an operable unit 6. If source investigation activities at any of
the remaining paper mill properties (the former Allied Paper Company Monarch Mill property,
portions of the former Allied Paper Company Bryant Mill property, and the former Allied Paper
Company King Mill property and King Street Storm Sewer area) results in a determination that a
specific paper mill property is a source of contamination at the Site, EPA will designate that
(those) paper mill property (properties) as OU6. On June 30, 2009, EPA approved Georgia-
Pacific's Source Investigation Report that documents the Georgia-Pacific Corporation
Kalamazoo Mill and former Hawthorne Mill property is not a source of contamination at the
Site. The investigation of the remaining three mill properties listed above has not yet begun.
This is the second five-year review for the Site. The triggering action for this statutory review is
the completion of the first five-year review on October 18, 2007. This second five-year review
report includes a protectiveness determination for OU2, OU3, and OU4. This report does not
include a protectiveness determination for OU1, OU5, or OU7 because remedial action (RA)
work has not yet started at those OUs. However, all six OUs are discussed in this site-wide five-
year review report and any future remedies at OU1, OU5 and OU7 will be reviewed on the same
five-year review schedule.
The remedy at OU2 is expected to be protective of human health and the environment upon
completion of the remedy, and in the interim, exposure pathways that could result in
unacceptable risks are being controlled. The RA for OU2 began in April 2011 and is expected to
be completed in 2013. During 2011, the waste at the Willow Boulevard Landfill portion of OU2
was consolidated and covered with an impermeable cap. The vegetated soil cover for this
portion of OU2 was installed in 2012. EPA expects the installation of the impermeable cover at
the A-Site portion of OU2 to be completed in 2012 and the installation of the OU2-wide
groundwater monitoring system to be completed in 2013. Institutional controls restricting the
use of site groundwater, site use, and for protection of the remedy were recorded and filed in
2010. Once the RA is completed EPA expects the remedy at OU2 to be protective of human
health and the environment. EPA will make that determination by inspecting the landfill cover
and evaluating groundwater and methane monitoring data. In addition, there is a restrictive
covenant in place that restricts certain use of the property including use that interferes with
7
-------
measures necessary to assure the effectiveness and integrity of the remedial action and use of site
groundwater.
The remedy at OU3 currently protects human health and the environment in the short term. The
landfill cap is generally in good condition and prevents PCB-contaminated material in the
landfill from migrating, via erosion or surface water runoff, into the Kalamazoo River. The cap
is also an effective barrier that prevents exposure, via direct contact, to the contaminated material
by on-site workers, trespassers, and anglers. The cap also minimizes infiltration of rainwater and
reduces the potential for leachate generation and the potential for polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs) in groundwater to migrate into the Kalamazoo River. Public access to the landfill is
restricted by a locked chain-link fence and sheet pile, which prevents people from being exposed
to the contaminated material. Methane generated within the landfill is passively managed and
mitigated by gas collection trenches installed outside of the landfill. These trenches are largely
effective with methane only occasionally detected at off-site probes beyond the lateral extent of
the trenches. Additional trenching (or some alternative) may need to be installed to extend the
lateral capture of methane migration at the OU3 boundary. Some institutional controls (ICs) are
in place at OU3, but require revision, while other ICs are not yet in place. In order for the
remedy to be protective in the long term, the following actions will need to be taken: (1)
implement revised and new ICs; (2) mitigate any off-site migration of methane gas, and (3)
properly maintain the landfill. Long-term protectiveness requires compliance with effective ICs.
EPA will ensure that long-term stewardship of OU3, as well as every other operable unit of the
Site, includes implementation and maintenance of each component of the selected remedy,
including any necessary ICs, and proper maintenance of the landfill.
The remedy at OU4 currently protects human health and the environment in the short term. The
remedy has been constructed, and exposure pathways that could result in unacceptable risks are
being controlled. The following issues need to be addressed as part of operation and
maintenance (O&M) at OU4: 1) erosion is occurring at the toe of the landfill where water exits
the soil cover drainage feature, and 2) the current access controls do not prevent trespass.
Weyerhaeuser, a potentially responsible party (PRP) for OU4, will evaluate additional access
controls. Evaluation of groundwater monitoring data will continue until sufficient data is
available to determine contaminant trends. Long-term protectiveness requires compliance with
existing ICs. Since the last five-year review, the ICs at OU4 have been modified to include a
groundwater use prohibition. EPA will ensure that long-term stewardship of OU4, as well as
every other operable unit of the Site, includes implementation and maintenance of each
component of the selected remedy, including any necessary ICs.
8
-------
Five Year Review Summary Form
9
-------
Five-Year Review Summary Form (continued)
Issues/Recommendations
OU(s) without Issues/Recommendations Identified in the Five-Year Review:
OU2
Issues and Recommendations Identified in the Five-Year Review:
OU(s): 3
Issue Category: Institutional Controls
Issue:
Effective ICs are needed on all site properties and need to be monitored and
maintained. Institutional controls are needed for the landfill property and the land
located within the site security fence that is currently owned by MDOT and the
City of Kalamazoo. Additionally, MDEQ will not approve the Final Completion of
Construction Report and the Final O&M Plan until the MDOT and City of
Kalamazoo property ownership issues are resolved. Until these reports are
approved, MDEQ cannot issue a Certification of Completion of Construction for
the landfill and without this certification, under the terms of the agreement
between MDEQ and Georgia-Pacific, the appropriate restrictive covenants
cannot be recorded with the Kalamazoo County Register of Deeds.
Recommendation:
Submit a plan to MDEQ and EPA for 1) resolving property ownership issues with
respect to the MDOT and City of Kalamazoo properties, 2) finalizing the Final
Completion of Construction Report and the Final O&M Plan, and 3) implementing
all required ICs.
Affect Current
Protectiveness
Affect Future
Protectiveness
Implementing
Party
Oversight
Party
Milestone
Date
No
Yes
PRP
State/EPA
October 2013
OU(s): 3
Issue Category: Remedy Performance
Issue:
Methane gas has migrated off-site in concentrations that exceed threshold
criteria and will need to be mitigated.
Recommendation:
Submit an updated landfill gas mitigation plan to MDEQ that will satisfy its
concerns about the off-site mitigation of methane gas at the south end of the
landfill.
Affect Current
Protectiveness
Affect Future
Protectiveness
Implementing
Party
Oversight
Party
Milestone
Date
No
Yes
PRP
State/EPA
October 2013
10
-------
OU(s): 4
Issue Category: Site Access/Security
Issue:
Access controls are inadequate. A chain-link fence is present along the south
side of the landfill but there is no fence on the north, east, or west sides of the
landfill. Trespassers and anglers can freely enter the property and use the river
banks to fish and have access to the landfill cap and associated gas vents.
Additionally, the fence on the southern side of the landfill does not restrict foot
traffic. The current access configuration does not prevent vandals from
damaging the remedy.
Recommendation:
Complete evaluation of access controls along with evaluation of potential use of
OU4 as an eco-park (i.e., wildlife viewing area) so that final decisions about long-
term access controls can be made.
Affect Current
Protectiveness
Affect Future
Protectiveness
Implementing
Party
Oversight
Party
Milestone
Date
No
Yes
PRP
EPA/State
December 2012
OU(s): 4
Issue Category: Operations and Maintenance
Issue:
Ongoing erosion at the toe of the landfill over the pore water collection discharge
area.
Recommendation:
Repair or reconstruct drainage feature at toe of landfill.
Affect Current
Protectiveness
Affect Future
Protectiveness
Implementing
Party
Oversight
Party
Milestone
Date
No
Yes
PRP
EPA/State
October 2013
11
-------
Protectiveness Statement(s)
Operable Unit: Protectiveness Determination:
2 Will be Protective
Protectiveness Statement:
The remedy at OU2 is expected to be protective of human health and the environment upon
completion of the remedy, and in the interim, exposure pathways that could result in
unacceptable risks are being controlled. The RA for OU2 began in April 2011 and is
expected to be completed in 2013. During 2011, the waste at the Willow Boulevard Landfill
portion of OU2 was consolidated and covered with an impermeable cap. The vegetated soil
cover for this portion of OU2 was installed in 2012. EPA expects the installation of the
impermeable cover at the A-Site portion of OU2 to be completed in 2012 and the installation
of the OU2-wide groundwater monitoring system to be completed in 2013. Institutional
controls restricting the use of site groundwater, site use, and for protection of the remedy
were recorded and filed in 2010. Once the RA is completed EPA expects the remedy at OU2
to be protective of human health and the environment. EPA will make that determination by
inspecting the landfill cover and evaluating groundwater and methane monitoring data. In
addition, there is a restrictive covenant in place that restricts certain use of the property
including use that interferes with measures necessary to assure the effectiveness and
integrity of the remedial action and use of site groundwater.
Operable Unit: Protectiveness Determination:
3 Short-term Protective
Protectiveness Statement:
The remedy at OU3 currently protects human health and the environment in the short term.
The landfill cap is generally in good condition and prevents PCB-contaminated material in the
landfill from migrating, via erosion or surface water runoff, into the Kalamazoo River. The cap
is also an effective barrier that prevents exposure, via direct contact, to the contaminated
material by on-site workers, trespassers, and anglers. The cap also minimizes infiltration of
rainwater and reduces the potential for leachate generation and the potential for PCBs in
groundwater to migrate into the Kalamazoo River. Public access to the landfill is restricted by
a locked chain-link fence and sheet pile, which prevents people from being exposed to the
contaminated material. Methane generated within the landfill is passively managed and
mitigated by gas collection trenches installed outside of the landfill. These trenches are
largely effective with methane only occasionally detected at off-site probes beyond the lateral
extent of the trenches. Additional trenching (or some alternative) may need to be installed to
extend the lateral capture of methane migration at the OU3 boundary. Some ICs are in place
at OU3, but require revision, while other ICs are not yet in place. In order for the remedy to
be protective in the long term, the following actions will need to be taken: (1) implement
revised and new ICs; (2) mitigate any off-site migration of methane gas, and (3) properly
maintain the landfill. Long-term protectiveness requires compliance with effective ICs. EPA
will ensure that long-term stewardship of OU3, as well as every other operable unit of the
Site, includes implementation and maintenance of each component of the selected remedy,
including any necessary ICs, and proper maintenance of the landfill.
12
-------
Operable Unit: Protectiveness Determination:
4 Short-term Protective
Protectiveness Statement:
The remedy at OU4 currently protects human health and the environment in the short term.
The remedy has been constructed, and exposure pathways that could result in unacceptable
risks are being controlled. The following issues need to be addressed as part of O&M at
OU4: 1) erosion is occurring at the toe of the landfill where water exits the soil cover
drainage feature, and 2) the current access controls do not prevent trespass. Weyerhaeuser,
a PRP for OU4, will evaluate additional access controls. Evaluation of groundwater
monitoring data will continue until sufficient data is available to determine contaminant trends.
Long-term protectiveness requires compliance with existing ICs. Since the last five-year
review, the ICs at OU4 have been modified to include a groundwater use prohibition. EPA
will ensure that long-term stewardship of OU4, as well as every other operable unit of the
Site, includes implementation and maintenance of each component of the selected remedy,
including any necessary ICs.
13
-------
Five-Year Review Report
I. Introduction
EPA has conducted a five-year review of the remedial actions implemented at the Allied Paper,
Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site. The Michigan Department of
Environmental Quality (MDEQ) assisted EPA in providing an analysis of information in support
of this five-year review. The five-year review was conducted from February 2012 through
October 2012, and is the second five-year review conducted at this Site. This report documents
the results of the review.
The purpose of five-year reviews is to determine whether the remedial actions that have allowed
hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants to remain at a site are protective of human
health and the environment. The methods, findings, and conclusions of reviews are documented
in five-year review reports. In addition, five-year review reports identify issues found during the
review, if any, and recommendations to address them.
This review is required by statute. EPA must implement five-year reviews consistent with the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA) and the
National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP). CERCLA §121(c),
as amended, states:
If the President selects a remedial action that results in any hazardous
substances, pollutants, or contaminants remaining at the site, the President shall
review such remedial action no less often than each jive years after the initiation
of such remedial action to assure that human health and the environment are
being protected by the remedial action being implemented. In addition, if upon
such review it is the judgment of the President that action is appropriate at such
site in accordance with section [104] or [106], the President shall take or
require such action. The President shall report to the Congress a list of
facilities for which such review is required, the results of cdl such reviews, and
any actions taken as a result of such reviews.
EPA interpreted this requirement further in the NCP; 40 C.F.R. §300.430(f)(4)(ii) states:
If a remedial action is selected that results in hazardous substances, pollutants, or
contaminants remaining at the site above levels that allow for unlimited use and
unrestricted exposure, the lead agency shall review such action no less often than every
five years after the initiation of the selected remedial action.
This is the second five-year review for the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River
Site. The triggering action for this statutory review is the completion of the first five-year review
on October 18, 2007. This five-year review is required due to the fact that the remedial actions
tor OU2, OU3, and OU4 leave hazardous substances, pollutants, or contaminants on site at levels
14
-------
that do not allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure (UU/UE).
The Site consists of six OUs including:
• OU1 - Allied Paper, Inc./Bryant Mill Pond;
• OU2 - Willow Boulevard/A-Site Landfill;
• OU3 - King Highway Landfill;
• OU4-12th Street Landfill;
• OU5 - 80-miles of the Kalamazoo River including a 3-mile stretch of Portage Creek; and
• OU7 - Former Plainwell Paper Mill Property.
The Site currently does not have an operable unit 6. If source investigation activities at any of
the remaining paper mill properties (the former Allied Paper Company Monarch Mill [Monarch
Mill property], portions of the former Allied Paper Company Bryant Mill [Bryant Mill property],
and the former Allied Paper Company King Mill and King Street Storm Sewer area [King Mill
property]) results in a determination that a specific paper mill property is a source of
contamination at the Site, EPA will designate that (those) paper mill property (properties) as
OU6. On June 30, 2009, EPA approved Georgia-Pacific's Source Investigation Report that
documents the Georgia-Pacific Corporation Kalamazoo Mill and former Hawthorne Mill
[Hawthorne Mill property] is not a source of contamination at the Site. The investigation of the
three remaining mill properties listed above has not yet begun.
All OUs are in various stages of the Superfund cleanup process. OU1, OU5, and OU7 are in the
Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study (RI/FS) stage. A Record of Decision (ROD) containing
the selected cleanup remedy has been issued for OU2, OU3, and OU4. The remedial action was
completed at OU3 and OU4 and is underway at OU2. EPA's five-year review guidance requires
remedies to be evaluated for protectiveness at only those OUs where on-site construction of the
RA has started (i.e., OU2, OU3, and OU4 at this Site). However, all six OUs are discussed in
this site-wide five-year review report; background information on OU1, OU5 and OU7 is
included to help the reader better understand the nature and extent of the contamination at the
Site in general. Any future remedies at OU1, OU5, and OU7 will be reviewed on the same five-
year review schedule.
II. Site Chronology
Table 1 below lists the chronology of events for the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo
River Site.
15
-------
Table I: Chronology of Site Events
Month/Year
Events and Milestones
April 1970-1971
Initial discovery of problem or contamination
August 30, 1990
EPA placed Site on the National Priorities List (NPL)
December 1990
Administrative agreement signed between the Michigan
Department of Natural Resources (MDNR) and certain PRPs for
RI/FS work at the Site
July 1993
RI/FS start at OU4
July/September 1994
RI/FS complete at OU3
July 1997
RI/FS complete at OU4
February 1998
ROD issued by MDEQ (successor to MDNR) for OU3, with EPA
concurrence
June 1998
122(h) cash-out agreement signed between EPA and Millennium
Holdings for Time-Critical Removal Action at Bryant Mill Pond of
OUl
June 1998
Remedial Design (RD) Start at OU3
1998-1999
Removal Action at Bryant Mill Pond of OUl
February 2000
Administrative agreement signed between MDEQ and Georgia-
Pacific for implementation of the Remedial Design/Remedial
Action (RD/RA) at OU3
September 2001
ROD Issued by MDEQ for 0U4, with EPA concurrence
January/February 2002
Site-Specific Amendment to 2002 Superfund Memorandum of
Agreement(SMOA) signed between EPA and MDEQ
September 2002
Remedial Design complete at OU3
October 2002
Construction Start at OU3
December 2004
Consent Decree (CD) signed by the United States and
Weyerhaeuser Company for RD/H4 at OU4 andfor RI/FS and
RD/RA at 0U7
January 2006
RI/FS complete at OU2
September 2006
ROD issued by EPA for OU2, with MDEQ concurrence
February 2007
Administrative Order on Consent (AOC) signedfor Time-Critical
Removal Action at Plainwell Impoundment Area of OU5
Februaiy 2007
AOC signed for Supplemental RI/FS for OU5
March 2007
Removal Action start at Plainwell Impoundment Area of OU5
Februaiy 2007
0U5 Area 1 Supplemental RI/FS initiated
November 2007
Emergency Response Action for Former Plainwell Mill
(OU7) banks start
16
-------
March 2008
OU1 RI approved by EPA
May 2008
RI start at OU7
November 2008
Emergency Response Action for OU7 completed
Mav2009
CD signed by the United States and Georgia-Pacific for RD/RA at
OU2
June 2009
Removal Action at Plaimvell Impoundment of OU5 complete
June 2009
AOC signedfor Time-Critical Removal Action at Plaimvell 2 Dam
Impoundment of OU5
August 2009
Removal Action start at Plaimvell 2 Dam Impoundment of OU5
March 2010
RD complete at OU 4
April 2010
Remedial Action construction start at OU4
December 2010
Removal Action complete at Plaimvell Dam Impoundment in Area
1 of OU 5
December 2010
Supplemental RI/FS start in Area 2 of OU 5
April 2011
Remedial Design complete at OU2
April 2011
Remedial Action start at OU2
Julv 2011
Action Memorandum signed to conduct Time-Critical Removal
Action at Portage Creek Area of OU 5
September 2011
Removal Action construction start at Portage Creek of OU 5
May 2012
Supplemental RI/FS start in Area J of OU 5
October 2012
Remedial Action completion at OU4
III. Background
A. Site History
The Site is located in both Allegan and Kalamazoo Counties of Michigan. The Site includes
disposal areas, paper mill properties, approximately 80 miles of the Kalamazoo River (from
Morrow Lake Dam to Lake Michigan), adjacent river banks and floodplains, as well as a 3-mile
stretch of Portage Creek (see Figure 1, Site Location Map). EPA placed the Site on the National
Priorities List on August 30, 1990.
The Site is primarily contaminated with PCBs from former paper mills, although other former
industrial operations also used PCBs along the Kalamazoo River. The former paper mills
recycled and/or de-inked and repulped carbonless copy waste paper which, between the 1950s
and 1970s, contained PCBs as an ink carrier. The wastewater from the paper manufacturing
17
-------
operations was historically discharged to the Kalamazoo River. Processed residuals were placed
into on-site lagoons for dewatering or into disposal areas directly on the land. The former
lagoons and disposal areas later became known as the landfill OUs.
The MDNR (predecessor to MDEQ) first became concerned about the presence of PCBs in the
Kalamazoo River in 1971, after routine surface water and biota sampling at the mouth of the
river indicated that PCBs were discharging to Lake Michigan via the Kalamazoo River and that
the PCBs were widely bioavailable for uptake by fish and aquatic organisms.
The Site comprises six OUs:
• OU1 - Allied Paper, Inc./Bryant Mill Pond;
• OU2 - Willow Boulevard/A-Site Landfill;
• OU3 - King Highway Landfill;
• OU4-12th Street Landfill;
• OU5 - 80-miles of the Kalamazoo River including a 3-mile stretch of Portage Creek; and
• OU7 - former Plainwell Paper Mill Property.
In addition to OU7, four other former paper mill properties (the Monarch, Bryant, King, and
Hawthorne Mill properties) were associated with the Superfund site. Pursuant to the AOC for a
Supplemental RI/FS for OU5 executed between certain PRPs and EPA in February 2007, these
four former paper mill properties are to be investigated to determine whether any of the mill
properties is a source of PCBs to the Site. If any mill property is a source of PCBs to the Site,
then EPA will designate that mill property as OU6. The OU will then be investigated under the
Superfund RI/FS process. The Hawthorne Mill property has been investigated and EPA
determined that it is not a source of contamination to the Site. Accordingly, EPA has determined
that no additional investigation of the Hawthorne Mill property is required for the Site.
Six former hydroelectric dams, three owned by the State of Michigan and three by private
companies, are also located within the Superfund Site. One of the dams, the Lake Allegan Dam,
is an operating hydropower dam; the remaining five dams are no longer operational. In the
1970s, the State of Michigan partially dismantled its three dams (Plainwell, Otsego and Otsego
City). As the state dismantled the dams, the water level in the river dropped and the
contaminated sediment that was once underwater became exposed on the riverbanks and
floodplain areas behind the state-owned dams. EPA and MDEQ currently estimate that the Site
contains approximately 113,000 lbs of PCBs in the river sediment and floodplain soil.
When the Site was listed on the NPL in 1990, it was designated a state-lead site for purposes of
conducting the RI/FS. On December 28, 1990, MDNR signed an administrative agreement with
several PRPs, pursuant to which the PRPs agreed to perform an RI/FS for the entire Site. Three
PRPs signed the administrative agreement with MDNR, including Millennium Holdings LLC
(formerly HM Holdings), Georgia-Pacific LLC (formerly known as Georgia-Pacific
Corporation), and Plainwell Inc. (formerly Simpson Plainwell Paper Company). (Plainwell Inc.
and Millennium Holdings LLC later filed for bankruptcy.) These three PRPs formed a group and
18
-------
were collectively known as the Kalamazoo River Study Group (KRSG). Although not officially
identified as a PRP by the State of Michigan, the Fort James Corporation joined the KRSG and
agreed to help fund the RI/FS for the Site. EPA later identified another PRP, the Weyerhaeuser
Company, in 2002.
In 1998, EPA signed a cash-out agreement with Millennium Holdings LLC for a time-critical
removal action at the Bryant Mill Pond area of OU1. EPA conducted the time-critical removal
action using the funds from the cash out agreement and supplemental federal funds. The
removal action is discussed in more detail in Section III.B.l of this five-year review report.
In 2002, certain areas of the Site were re-designated as federal-lead due to the agencies' belief
that re-designation of certain areas of the Site was in the best interest of the public. Roles and
responsibilities for each OU are outlined in a February 2002 Site-Specific Amendment to the
Enforcement Agreement for State-Enforcement Lead Sites in Michigan, under the Superfund
Memorandum of Agreement between MDEQ and EPA. Since 2002, EPA has been the lead
agency on all OUs except OU3 (King Highway Landfill); MDEQ has retained the lead on OU3.
In accordance with an April 2007 Site-Specific Amendment to the 2002 Site-Specific
Amendment to the SMOA, EPA acquired the lead for OU 1 (Allied Paper, Inc./Bryant Mill Pond)
in 2008 after EPA accepted the state-approved RI Report and determined that no additional
response activities were necessary to complete the RI.
In 2007 an AOC was signed between Georgia-Pacific LLC, Millennium Holdings LLC, MDEQ
and EPA to implement a time-critical removal action in the Plainwell dam area of the Kalamazoo
River in OU5. Work began in March 2007 and was completed in June 2009. A total of 130,000
cubic yards of contaminated in-stream and bank sediment were removed by this action.
In 2007 another AOC was signed between Georgia-Pacific LLC, Millennium Holdings LLC and
EPA to conduct a Supplemental RI/FS for OU5, which includes the Kalamazoo River and
Portage Creek from Morrow Dam to the confluence of Lake Michigan. OU5 consists of seven
discreet areas, each requiring its own supplemental RI/FS.
On January 6, 2009, Lyondell Chemical Company and 79 affiliated debtors filed for bankruptcy
under Chapter 11 reorganization. One of the debtors was Millennium Holdings, LLC. In
January 2009, Millennium Holdings ceased all work at the Site. On April 23, 2010, the U.S.
Bankruptcy Court approved Lyondell's reorganization plan. EPA received approximately $100
million (of its court-approved claim of more than $900 million) to be used at the Site from the
U.S.'s settlement with the debtors in the bankruptcy action. Georgia-Pacific continues
addressing its obligations to complete the supplemental RI/FS according to the 2007 AOC.
In June 2009, Georgia-Pacific LLC and EPA entered into an AOC to conduct a time-critical
removal action in the Plainwell 2 Dam area of OU5. This removal project began in August 2009
and was completed in December 2010. Approximately 18,000 cubic yards of soil and debris
were removed by this action.
19
-------
In July 2011, EPA issued an Action Memorandum to complete a time-critical removal action
along Portage Creek, in a 1.8-mile stretch immediately downstream of OU1 to the confluence of
the Kalamazoo River. The removal work began in September 2011 and will take two to four
years to complete. EPA anticipates that this project will remove approximately 17,000 cubic
yards of contaminated soil and sediment.
B. Operable Units
B.1. Operable Unit 1
Physical Characteristics
The Allied Paper Inc./Bryant Mill Pond (OU1) encompasses 89 acres along Portage
Creek in the City of Kalamazoo in Kalamazoo County, Michigan. OU1 is bordered by
Cork Street to the south, Alcott Street to the north, a Conrail Railroad line to the west,
and residential/commercial properties to the east (see Figure 2, OU1 Location Map).
Land and Resource Use
According to the MDEQ RI Report, OU1 and areas in the vicinity of OU1 are zoned for
industrial, commercial, and residential purposes. Industrial and commercial properties
are located to the north and south of OU 1 and along portions of the east and west sides of
OU 1. Residential properties are located along a portion of the east side of OU 1 and to
the west beyond the railroad tracks. OU 1 is an inactive disposal area, but groundwater is
being collected along collection sumps and treated prior to being discharged to the City
of Kalamazoo Wastewater Treatment Plant. Wetlands are present at OU 1.
History of Contamination
When the former paper mills on the Kalamazoo River recycled and/or de-inked and
repulped waste paper that included carbonless copy paper, PCBs and other contaminants
were present in the wastewater produced from the paper manufacturing process. The
wastewater contained large quantities of suspended particles - primarily cellulose and
clay. PCBs adsorb to the suspended particles in the wastewater. PCBs were present in
the manufacturing process from at least 1957 until well after production of carbonless
copy paper containing PCBs stopped in the 1970s. In the 1950s, the mills began building
primitive clarifiers and dewatering or settling lagoons to remove solid particles, and the
clarified wastewater was discharged to the rivers and creeks (i.e., Portage Creek at OU1).
OU 1 is divided into individual study areas based on former historic operations (see
Figure 3, OU1 Site Plan). According to the RI Report, these areas include the former
operational areas, which include the following: the Bryant Historic Residuals Dewatering
Lagoon (HRDL) and Former Residuals Dewatering Lagoons (FRDLs), Monarch HRDL,
Type III Landfill, Western Disposal Area, and the Alcott Street Properties. All areas
20
-------
received processed wastewater and/or dewatered paper residuals from paper
manufacturing operations at the former Bryant and Monarch mills. In addition to
receiving the processed wastewater and/or dewatered paper residuals, the Type III landfill
area received non-process industrial wastes (such as cardboard, packing strips, waste paper
and demolition materials). The operational history and volume of contamination for each
area of OU1 are discussed below.
• Former Operational Areas (Bryant HRDL and FRDLs, Monarch HRDL, Type
III Landfill, and Western Disposal Area).
o Bryant HRDL and FRDLs - This area consists of six lagoons covering
approximately 22 acres. The lagoons were used to settle out residuals
from the wastewater generated at the Bryant mills. A clarifier and the
earthen-diked HRDL were the primary treatment system, built in 1954.
The series of five FRDLs were later added to dewater residuals. The
HRDL was filled and has not been used for disposal since the late 1970s .
The FRDLs have not been used for disposal since 1989 .
o Monarch HRDL - This 7-acre lagoon was used as part of the initial
primary treatment facility for process waste from the Monarch Mill. The
facility consisted of a clarifier and an earthen-diked dewatering lagoon.
After clarification, the wastewater supernatant was discharged to Portage
Creek and the settled residuals were pumped to the Monarch HRDL for
dewatering. The Monarch HRDL was used from the early 1950s until the
1960s.
o Type III Landfill - This 13-acre area was originally licensed as a landfill
in 1966 to receive non-process wastes pursuant to State of Michigan
requirements. It was then licensed as a Type II landfill and later the
designation was changed to a Type III landfill in 1985 to receive residuals
and demolition wastes (Type II landfills can accept municipal solid waste,
while Type III landfills can accept construction/demolition and industrial
wastes). Over the period of use (1966 until the late 1980s), the landfill
area received various types of industrial waste and residuals.
o Western Disposal Area - This area covers approximately 19 acres and is
located along the western edge of the Bryant HRDL, southwest of the
former Type III landfill. According to the RI Report, this area was used as
a disposal area for dewatered residuals mined from the HRDLs and
FRDLs. By 1986 most of the areas were filled in, and vegetation was
established by 1991.
* The only exception to this was EPA's time-critical removal action at the Bryant Mill Pond area in 1998-1999. All
contaminated materials excavated during the removal action were consolidated in the Bryant HRDL and FRDLs.
21
-------
• Former Bryant Mill Pond - Particles in the wastewater discharged from the
mills to Portage Creek settled out in the 29-acre Bryant Mill Pond. As explained
in more detail below, EPA conducted a time-critical removal action between 1998
and 1999 to address PCBs in the sediment.
• Residential/Commercial Areas (including but not limited to the following:
former Panelyte property and marsh, Stryker Corporation property, Conrail
property, clay seam area, and east bank area).
o Panelyte Property and Marsh - This area encompasses approximately 23
acres and contains a fill area located at the southwestern end of the
property. This property is a Brownfields Site which is being addressed
under a state grant. Surface water from the Panelyte fill area and Western
Disposal area drains toward the Panelyte marsh.
o Stryker Corporation Property - The parking lots of the Stryker property
were constructed over parts of the former Bryant Mill Pond.
o Conrail Property - The railroad property extends along the western edge
ofOUl.
o Clay Seam Area - The clay seam is a body of residuals covering
approximately a quarter of an acre that is present as a small, nearly vertical
bluff on the east side of Portage Creek. Native soils underlie the clay
seam at the elevation of the water line. The clay seam extends up to
approximately 80 feet inland from the bank of Portage Creek.
o East Bank Area - A floodplain area along the eastern bank of Portage
Creek. Approximately 1,700 cubic yards of residuals were removed from
this area in 2002 by the PRPs as a voluntary interim response measure (see
below).
Response Activities
Voluntary Response Activities
Between 2000 and 2005, the PRPs conducted a number of interim response
measures to stop or prevent the migration of PCBs from OU1 into Portage Creek.
The interim response measures were voluntarily conducted by the PRPs, and not
under an administrative order with MDEQ or EPA. The interim response
measures included the installation of sheetpile along the Bryant HRDL and
FRDLs to stabilize the existing berm and prevent the Bryant Mill Pond residuals
from eroding back into Portage Creek, capping the Bryant HRLD and FRDLS to
22
-------
prevent erosion and infiltration of rainwater, and installation of a groundwater
recovery system. The puipose of the groundwater recovery system was to
maintain groundwater levels within a foot of the historic norm behind the
sheetpile to mitigate the potential for raised groundwater levels to saturate
previously unsaturated residuals. In addition, a wastewater treatment plant was
installed in the fall of 2004 and began operation in February 2005 to treat
recovered groundwater at OU1.
EPA Time-Critical Removal Action
In 1999, pursuant to a cash-out agreement with Millennium Holdings LLC, EPA
completed a time-critical removal action at the Bryant Mill Pond area, the pond
that received wastewater discharged by the former Bryant Mills. Approximately
150,000 cubic yards of PCB-contaminated sediment were excavated from the
Bryant Mill Pond in an effort to clean up this upstream area, since it served as a
significant source of PCBs to the Kalamazoo River. In 2003, an additional 1,000
cubic yards of contaminated material were removed from the Portage Creek
floodplains. All contaminated material excavated during the time-critical removal
action was consolidated in the OU 1 Bryant HRDL and FRDLs.
Basis for Taking Action
The RI/FS for OU 1 has not yet been completed nor a ROD issued, so EPA has not yet
documented a basis for taking action at OU1. The remedial status of OU1 is discussed
below.
Remedial Status
On October 26, 2006, MDEQ disapproved the OU 1 Revised RI Report prepared
by Millennium Holdings, LLC and decided to complete the report internally.
MDEQ submitted a state-modified RI Report for OU 1 to EPA in March 2007.
EPA approved the RI Report in March 2008 and became the lead agency, in
accordance with the process discussed in Section III. A. of this five-year review
report. Millennium Holdings, LLC was developing the FS Report, but ceased
activities on the Site in January 2009 with the bankruptcy filing. EPA assumed
responsibility for completing the FS and expects to finalize the FS Report in the
fall of 2012. EPA anticipates issuing a ROD for OU1 in 2013.
Since a ROD has not been issued for OU1, there is no remedial action to discuss or
evaluate; therefore, OU1 is not discussed further in this five-year review report.
23
-------
B.2. Operable Unit 2
Physical Characteristics
The Willow Boulevard/A-Site Landfill (OU2) is located southeast of the intersection of
Business 1-94 and Highway M-96 in Kalamazoo Township, Michigan. OU2 is bordered
by the Kalamazoo River to the north and northwest, Davis Creek to the east, and Willow
Boulevard Road, former Olmstead Creek, and residential areas to the south (see Figure 4,
OU2 Location Map).
OU2 is approximately 32-acres in size and consists of two disposal areas: the Willow
Boulevard Landfill and the A-Site Landfill. OU2 also includes impacted areas adjacent
to and/or near the Willow Boulevard/A-Site Landfills (see Figure 5, OU2 Site Plan).
The A-Site Landfill occupies approximately 22-acres and contains approximately
475,400 cubic yards of PCB-contaminated material. The Willow Boulevard Landfill
(including the Drainageway Area) occupies approximately 11-acres and contains an
estimated volume of 152,100 cubic yards of contaminated residuals. Impacted areas
adjacent to and/or near the landfills include the area east of Davis Creek, the area south of
the A-Site berm (including former Olmstead Creek), and the area near monitoring well
AMW-3A. The area east of Davis Creek is approximately 3.5 acres in size with an
estimated volume of 3,800 cubic yards of contaminated materials. The area south of the
A-Site berm is approximately 2.5 acres in size with an estimated volume of 2,900 cubic
yards of contaminated materials. The AMW-3A area is approximately 0.25 acres in size
with an estimated volume of 100 cubic yards of PCB-contaminated residual, soil, and
sediment.
Land and Resource Use
Land use in the vicinity of OU2 includes industrial, commercial, and residential
properties. The A-Site Landfill and Willow Boulevard Landfill are zoned for industrial
use. The land south of OU2 is zoned residential and industrial. OU2 is currently an
inactive landfill. Wetland areas are also present at OU2.
No private, commercial, or industrial water wells were identified within 'A mile of OU2.
However, ten wells were identified within '/2 mile of OU2. Four of the ten wells are
public water supply wells owned by the City of Kalamazoo. Four are domestic wells,
one well is an industrial well, and the usage of the last well is not known. It is not known
whether any of the domestic wells within V2 mile of OU2 are being used for drinking
water, though groundwater is migrating north toward the Kalamazoo River and not
toward the residential area to the south.
24
-------
History of Contamination
The Willow Boulevard and A-Site landfills were used to dispose of dewatered paper-
making residuals from the former Allied Paper King Mill and the Georgia-Pacific
Kalamazoo Mill, both located in Kalamazoo, Michigan. PCBs were part of the paper
mills' waste streams between the 1950s and 1980s. Process residuals from the paper
manufacturing operations were disposed at the Willow Boulevard and A-Site landfills.
Over time, PCB-contaminated residuals from the landfills eroded and migrated into the
soil and sediment of adjacent areas and/or into the Kalamazoo River. Surface water
runoff from the landfills and adjacent areas also transported PCBs directly into the
Kalamazoo River. Therefore, the landfills and adjacent areas are sources of PCBs to the
river and Davis Creek, which empties into the Kalamazoo River.
The A-Site Landfill was originally a series of dewatering (or drainage) lagoons. Paper
waste from the King Mill was piped to the A-Site lagoons, and water was allowed to
settle out. Paper residuals accumulated within the lagoons, and over time, the A-Site
became known as the A-Site Landfill. The A-Site lagoons were active between 1960 and
1967. Operations at the King Mill ended in 1971, and the mill was demolished in 1978.
Georgia-Pacific purchased the A-Site in 1975 and used it to dispose of paper waste dug
up from the King Highway dewatering lagoons until 1977. From 1977 to 1987, the A-
Site received dewatered paper-making waste from the Kalamazoo King Mill filter
presses. The A-Site ceased to be an active disposal area in 1987, when the King
Highway Landfill operations began. The Willow Boulevard Landfill was acquired by
Georgia-Pacific from the Kalamazoo Paper Company in 1967. From mid-1960 until
1975, dewatered paper residuals from the Kalamazoo Mill and the King Highway
Lagoons were disposed at the Willow Boulevard Landfill. Disposal activities occurred
from the mid-1960s until operations stopped in 1975.
Response Activities
Voluntary Response Activities
Between 1992 and 1999, Georgia-Pacific conducted a number of interim response
measures to eliminate or reduce erosion of PCB-containing residual and soil from
the landfill into the Kalamazoo River. The interim response measures were
voluntarily conducted by Georgia-Pacific, and not under an administrative order
with MDEQ or EPA.
In 1992, GP installed a chain-link fence around the landfill and reseeded the
western portion of the A-Site Landfill to promote vegetative growth. In 1998,
approximately 1,500 linear feet of sheet pile was installed between the A-Site and
the Kalamazoo River to stabilize the earthen berm along the river and mitigate
soil erosion. In 1999, approximately 7,000 cubic yards of PCB-contaminated
residual and sediment were excavated from the western bank of the Kalamazoo
25
-------
River adjacent to the landfill. The excavated material was placed into the eastern
side of the Willow Boulevard portion of OU2. The landfill was then regraded to
promote drainage and covered with 6 inches of clean sand as a temporary cover.
A portion of the river's edge was also backfilled to create a sand berm along the
Kalamazoo River. Geotextile and riprap were placed along a portion of the
river's edge to reduce erosion of the riverbanks.
EPA Time-Critical Removal Action
On November 7, 2006, Georgia-Pacific signed an AOC with EPA to perform a
time-critical removal action at the former Refuse Area of the former Georgia-
Pacific Kalamazoo Mill property and at the Oxbow Area of the former Hawthorne
Mill property. The former Kalamazoo Mill and Hawthorne Mill property is
located north of OU2, across the Kalamazoo River. During the removal action,
Georgia-Pacific removed approximately 33,203 cubic yards of PCB-containing
soil/residual from the Refuse Area and approximately 17,488 cubic yards of PCB-
containing soil/residual from the Oxbow Area. Georgia-Pacific also removed
contaminated soil from a transformer pad, wastewater pipeline, and from an
underground pipe that was located at the former Kalamazoo Mill property.
Material excavated from the transformer pad was sent to an off-site licensed
landfill for disposal and material excavated from the wastewater pipeline and
underground pipe was consolidated into the A-Site. The removal action started in
November 2006 and was completed in June 2007. The portion of the A-Site that
received the contaminated residual/soil was covered and a berm was constructed
to keep surface water runoff from entering Davis Creek and the Kalamazoo River.
Basis for Taking Action
PCBs are the primary contaminant of concern and primary risk-driver at OU2. The
media of concern are PCB-contaminated residuals within the Willow Boulevard and A-
Site Landfills and PCB-contaminated residual, soil, and/or sediment in areas adjacent to
the landfills including the Willow Drainageway, the area south of the A-Site Berm, the
area east of Davis Creek, and the area near monitoring well AMW-3A.
The RI for OU2 was conducted between 1993 and 2000. The maximum PCB
concentration in surficial residuals at the Willow Boulevard Landfill was 270 milligrams
per kilogram (mg/kg), and the maximum concentration in subsurface residuals was 160
mg/kg. Surficial soil samples were not collected at the Willow Drainageway. The
maximum PCB concentration in subsurface soil at the Drainageway was 30 mg/kg. The
maximum PCB concentration in surface soil at the Area South of the A-Site berm was 14
mg/kg, and the maximum concentration in subsurface soil was 73 mg/kg. The maximum
PCB concentration in surface sediment at the Former Olmstead Creek was 7.6 mg/kg.
The maximum PCB concentration in surface residual, soil, and sediment at the area east
of Davis Creek was 36 mg/kg; no subsurface soil samples were collected at this area
26
-------
during the RI. The maximum PCB concentration in surface soil at the AMW-3A area
was 5.9 mg/kg, and the maximum concentration in subsurface soil was 62 mg/kg. PCB
concentrations in surface soil samples collected at residential properties adjacent to the
landfills were either not-detect or below the State of Michigan residential cleanup criteria
of 4.0 mg/kg.
A quantitative risk assessment was not conducted at OU2. Instead, potential risks
associated with exposure pathways at OU2 were qualitatively assessed to determine
which media would need to be targeted for remediation. Exposure pathways assessed in
the qualitative risk assessment conducted at OU2 included the following: ingestion of
and dermal contact with contaminated residuals, soil, and sediment; inhalation of
airborne releases; and erosion into aquatic habitat. Media evaluated included air, surface
soils, residuals and sediment, subsurface soils, surface water, and groundwater/leachate.
Potential risks associated with exposure pathways were qualitatively assessed by
comparing maximum PCB concentrations detected during the RI with cleanup criteria
based on future land use and protective ranges established in the Final (Revised) Baseline
Ecological Risk Assessment dated April 2003 (BERA). State of Michigan Part 201
Generic Cleanup Criteria were used in the qualitative assessment of potential risk at OU2.
Based upon the results of the RI and the qualitative assessment of risk to human health
and ecological receptors, a response action at OU2 was deemed to be warranted because
PCB concentrations in residuals, soil, and sediment at OU2 exceeded the Part 201
Generic Commercial II/Industrial Land Use Criteria of 16 mg/kg PCB (in soil) protective
of human health for on-site workers and/or trespassers, the Generic Residential Land Use
Criteria of 4 mg/kg PCB (in soil) protective of human health for residential land use,
and/or the cleanup range of 5.5 to 8.1 mg/kg PCB (in soil) for the protection of ecological
receptors (American Robin) established in the BERA. Additionally, a response action at
OU2 was also deemed to be warranted because of the potential migration of PCBs from
the landfills and adjacent areas (via erosion or surface water runoff) into the Kalamazoo
River and because PCB concentrations in sediment of the wetland areas may present an
unacceptable risk to people or animals (e.g., mink) who consume fish.
Because a ROD was issued that selected a remedial action for OU2, this OU is further
discussed in the remaining sections of this five-year review report.
B.3. Operable Unit 3
Physical Characteristics
The King Highway Landfill (OU3) is located within the City of Kalamazoo, Kalamazoo
Township, Michigan. OU3 includes the King Highway Landfill, the King Street Storm
Sewer (KSSS) floodplain, and contaminated river sediments adjacent to the landfill. The
OU3 ROD requires the cleanup of these areas, as well as five former waste lagoon areas
located at the Georgia-Pacific Mill in Kalamazoo (herein referred to as the "Mill
27
-------
Lagoons"). Waste material from the Mill Lagoons was excavated and disposed in the
King Highway Landfill. The Mill Lagoons are located north of the landfill across the
Kalamazoo River (see Figure 6, OU3 Location Map, and Figure 7, OU3 Site Plan).
The King Highway Landfill occupies approximately 15 acres. The Mill Lagoons occupy
approximately 7 acres, and the KSSS occupies approximately 1 acre. OU3 is bordered by
King Highway (M-96) to the south, the Grand Trunk Railroad right-of-way to the west,
and the KSSS floodplain and the Kalamazoo River to the north and to the east.
Land and Resource Use
The King Highway Landfill is zoned for industrial or secondary commercial use. The
land immediately adjacent to the south and southwest of the landfill is classified for
industrial or secondary commercial use. The land that contains the Mill Lagoons, located
at the Georgia-Pacific Mill Property, is zoned for industrial use.
Future land use at the King Highway Landfill property will remain industrial.
Institutional controls were required by the ROD. Some ICs are in place, but require
revision, while other ICs are not yet in place. The landfill or areas with waste includes
multiple parcels, some of which may have ICs in place. As part of the Institutional
Control Plan for OU3, appropriate restrictive covenants will be recorded on all deeds for
all the parcels which make up OU3. GP is working with the City of Kalamazoo to grant
access for a bike path along the border of the property.
The Georgia-Pacific Lagoons were addressed as a part of the OU3 ROD. The projected
land use at the Georgia-Pacific Mill Lagoons is expected to be restricted to industrial use
with no public access.
History of Contamination
During a 15-year period, Georgia-Pacific de-inked office waste paper, which contained
carbonless copy paper contaminated with PCBs, at two of the mills located at the
Georgia-Pacific Kalamazoo Mill property. Originally, the Kalamazoo Paper Mill
consisted of five mills, three for making paper products, and two for finishing and
converting. Mills 1 and 3 both performed de-inking operations starting in the early
1950s. Mill 3 discontinued de-inking in the late 1960s, was refurbished, and resumed
operations in 1975. Mill 1 de-inked continuously until the late 1970s. Raw paper waste
from all the mills was routed to a clarifier. The clarifier effluent was pumped directly
into the Kalamazoo River until 1964, at which time it was rerouted to the City of
Kalamazoo Wastewater Treatment Plant.
The underflow Irom the clarifier was dewatered and disposed at various locations over
the years. From the mid-1950s until the late 1950s, residuals were placed in the Mill
Lagoons on the Georgia-Pacific Kalamazoo Mill property. In the late 1950s residuals
28
-------
were sent for dewatering to the King Highway lagoons, which later became the King
Highway Landfill. The Mill Lagoons were then only used as an emergency backup
system. Georgia-Pacific dewatered residuals in the King Highway lagoons until 1977.
After 1977, the King Highway lagoons were not utilized until the lagoons were licensed
in 1983 by the MDEQ as a landfill for disposal of paper-making residuals. From 1987 to
1998, Georgia-Pacific used the King Highway Landfill for the disposal of dewatered
paper-making residuals. Over time, the contaminated residuals migrated, via erosion or
surface water runoff, from the landfills into adjacent areas and/or the Kalamazoo River.
The King Highway Landfill is a mono-fill of paper residuals. The landfill covers 15
acres and consists of four cells: Cells 1, 2, 3, and 4. The total volume of residuals in the
landfill is estimated at 282,000 cubic yards. Cells 1, 2, and 3 were first licensed by the
MDEQ in 1983 under the Michigan Solid Waste Management Action (Act 641) as a
Type III landfill. Cell 4 was never permitted as an operating landfill. The majority of
residuals in Cell 4 were submerged in a pond formed by the transport of water from the
other three cells to Cell 4 through a culvert in the dikes. The four cells were separated by
dikes approximately 10 to 20 feet high. These dikes were constructed of sand and gravel
in the 1950s and were used as access roads. Access roads and no-fill areas comprise 7.9
acres of the King Highway Landfill. During construction of the sedimentation basin,
nearby well installation, and during installation of landfill gas cutoff trenches, residuals
contiguous with the landfill cells were encountered. Residuals were also encountered on
parts of those no-fill areas as well as on property not owned by GP (i.e., City of
Kalamazoo and MDOT).
Response Activities
Voluntary Response Activities
Pre-ROD interim measures were voluntarily conducted by Georgia-Pacific, and
not under an administrative order with MDEQ. In 1994 and 1996, approximately
1,000 linear feet of sheet piling was installed to stabilize the berm along the
northern sides of Cells 1, 2, and 3 of the landfill. The purpose of this interim
measure was to prevent berm failure and subsequent migration of contaminated
residuals from the landfill into the Kalamazoo River. In 1998, PCB-contaminated
material was excavated from the King Street Storm Sewer, the Mill Lagoons, and
from areas directly adjacent to the landfill cells. This included a portion of the
Kalamazoo River directly adjacent to the sheet piling. Though these actions were
required in the ROD for OU3, they are considered to be voluntary actions as they
were conducted prior to the February 9, 2000, AOC for response actions at OU3.
All known materials were consolidated back into the landfill from those areas.
Basis for Taking Action
The RI for OU3 was conducted in 1993. The maximum PCB concentration in the landfill
29
-------
surface residuals was 3.6 mg/kg. PCB concentrations generally increase with depth
through the residuals. However, PCB concentrations in the top eight feet of residuals in
Cell 4 are as high as 69 mg/kg. Tests of the residuals that were added to the landfill later
in its operational history did not detect PCBs with the exception of one sample in 1987
that contained 6.5 mg/kg PCBs. The maximum PCB concentration found in the top 16
feet of residuals in Cells 1, 2, and 3 was 8.8 mg/kg. Concentrations exceeding 50 mg/kg
PCB were detected at depths of 16 to 30 feet. The maximum concentration in the
subsurface residuals was 310 mg/kg. Soil below the King Highway Landfill has a
maximum PCB concentration of 9.9 mg/kg.
Total PCB concentrations from samples collected in the KSSS ftoodplain had PCB
concentrations ranging from 0.37 mg/kg to 99 mg/kg. The maximum PCB concentration
found in the berms adjacent to the landfill was 77 mg/kg. Analytical results from
samples collected at the Mill Lagoons showed PCB concentrations in surface residuals
ranging from 0.2 to 110 mg/kg. PCBs were detected in three subsurface residual samples
in the Mill Lagoons at concentrations ranging from 3.4 to 70 mg/kg. Five soil samples
were collected below the Mill Lagoons. PCBs from native soils, below the lagoons,
ranged from 0.043 to 2.9 mg/kg.
PCBs were not detected in groundwater at OU3 above performance standards. However,
PCBs were detected in a leachate sample collected from Monitoring Well 1 OR at a
concentration of 1.4 micrograms per liter (ug/L). One surface water sample was
collected from the pond in Cell 4 and analyzed for PCBs. The analytical results show a
PCB concentration of 0.026 ug/L.
The presence of PCB-contaminated residuals, soils, and sediment in areas outside the
landfill and the Mill Lagoons is evidence that PCBs were migrating, via erosion or
surface water runoff, from the landfill and the Mill Lagoons, into adjacent areas and the
Kalamazoo River. Additionally, the landfill berms were eroding by surface water run-off
and the continued flow of the Kalamazoo River. As a result of the information gained
during the RI, the state concluded that OU3 and the Mill Lagoons are sources and
potential sources of PCB contamination to the Kalamazoo River and its floodplain in the
vicinity of OU3 and the Mill Lagoons.
A Baseline Risk Assessment (BRA) was conducted at OU3 to evaluate risks to human
health and the environment under unremediated conditions. Because the waste at OU3 is
identical (i.e., the wastes was generated from the same source at similar concentrations)
to the wastes at the Mill Lagoons, and because the routes of exposure and the receptors
are also the same, the MDEQ determined that the BRA for OU3 is applicable to the Mill
Lagoons. Therefore, a separate BRA for the Mill Lagoons was not conducted. The BRA
concluded that the primary migration pathway for the release of PCBs into the river is
erosion of residuals from the landfill berms and floodplains and the Mill Lagoons. The
largest potential risk and migration pathway is the release of PCB-contaminated residuals
due to failure of the landfill berms.
30
-------
Based upon the results of the RI and BRA, a response action at OU3 and the Mill
Lagoons was necessary to eliminate or reduce the potential migration of PCBs to the
Kalamazoo River. The largest potential risks identified for ecological receptors were due
to past releases of PCBs from the landfill, its berms, and floodplains of the Mill Lagoons.
The ecological risk assessment recognized that organisms and fish in the Kalamazoo
River bioaccumulate PCBs and pass them up the food chain to other organisms which
would feed upon them. The bioaccumulation food chain effects present the greatest
potential risk to ecological and human health, via consumption of fish from the
Kalamazoo River.
Because a ROD was issued that selected a remedial action for OU3, this OU is further
discussed in the remaining sections of this five-year review report.
B.4. Operable Unit 4^
Physical Characteristics
The 12th Street Landfill (OU4) is located in Otsego Township, approximately Vi mile
northwest of the City of Plainwell in Allegan County, Michigan. The landfill occupies
approximately 6.5 acres and is bordered by the Kalamazoo River to the east, by wetlands
to the north and west, by industrial developed land to the south and southeast, and by a
gravel pit operation to the south and southwest (see Figure 8, OU4 Location Map, and
Figure 9, OU4 Site Plan).
The 12th Street Landfill is located within an environmentally sensitive area. The adjacent
woodlands, wetlands, and the former powerhouse discharge channel provide suitable
habitat for fish, turtles, and amphibians. Small mammals (i.e., mice, squirrels,
woodchucks, mink, raccoons, fox and muskrats) and birds inhabit the areas surrounding
the landfill. The Kalamazoo River is part of a bird migratory fly way route for waterfowl
species, and the areas surrounding the 12th Street Landfill provide a migratory stopover
that attracts and supports waterfowl. During nesting season, vegetation in the area
provides cover and materials for nesting. Larger mammals, such as white-tailed deer,
also use the landfill as evidenced by deer paths running over the top and along the sides
of the landfill. Muskrat dens have been observed in the wetlands and there is evidence of
extensive burrowing into the sides of the landfill by fox and woodchuck.
Land and Resource Use
Land use in the immediate vicinity of OU4 is characterized as industrial with residential
property to the south and southwest. Wetlands are present north and northwest of the OU
and the Kalamazoo River and former Plainwell Dam are located to the east and southeast.
31
-------
The 12th Street Landfill is zoned industrial and will remain industrial in the future. A
restrictive covenant running with the land from the owner of the landfill property to
MDEQ as the grantee (MDEQ Reference No: RC-RRD-03-052 on USEPA Site No.
059B) is already in place (see Attachment 6, Restrictive Covenant for OU4). EPA is a
third party beneficiary of this restrictive covenant. The restrictive covenant was recorded
with the Allegan County Registry of Deeds on March 25, 2005, to restrict future land use
at the landfill property. The existing restrictive covenant was amended on July 15, 2012,
to prohibit the use of groundwater at the OU.
History of Contamination
The 12th St. Landfill was used from 1955 to 1981 for disposal of PCB-containing paper
residuals consisting mostly of water, wood fiber, and mineral matter. PCBs were
introduced into some of the residuals as a result of the paper manufacturing operations at
the former Plainwell Paper Mill between 1957 and 1962. Over time, the contaminated
residuals migrated, via erosion or surface water runoff, from the landfill into the adjacent
wetlands, woodland areas, adjacent property, and into the powerhouse channel of the
Kalamazoo River. The landfill is comprised mostly of paper residuals with some
concrete rubble, construction debris, waste lumber, and corroded steel drums. The 12th
Street Landfill contains an estimated 208,000 cubic yards of PCB-contaminated residuals.
The 12th Street Landfill was closed in 1984 and covered with soil and seeded to promote
vegetation.
Response Activities
No voluntary response actions were taken at OU4.
Basis for Taking Action
Sampling during the December 1996 RI confirmed the presence of paper residuals in the
berm, in the adjacent wetland area, and in the former powerhouse discharge channel.
Soil/residual samples were collected from soil and monitoring well borings that were
located outside the landfill perimeter, and from two sediment cores collected in the
former powerhouse discharge channel adjacent to the east side of the landfill. Elevated
PCB concentrations were reported in 24 of the 45 samples analyzed, including both
samples collected from the former powerhouse discharge channel, with a maximum PCB
concentration of 158 mg/kg. Elevated concentrations of inorganic compounds were also
detected in several samples at levels exceeding applicable criteria. Trace concentrations
of volatile organic compounds (VOCs), semi-volatile organic compounds (SVOCs) and
pesticides were also reported.
Groundwater samples were collected from 15 monitoring wells and analyzed for VOCs,
SVOCs, inorganic compounds, pesticides, and PCBs. PCBs were not detected and all
other results were either non-detect or below the Part 201 Industrial and Commercial
32
-------
Drinking Water Criteria and Groundwater Surface Water Interface (GSI) Criteria, with
the exception of bis(2-ethuylhexyl) phthalate, which was detected in groundwater at a
concentration of 290 ug/L. In 1995, a second round of groundwater samples was
collected from each monitoring well. In that round of sampling, groundwater analysis
was limited to PCBs only, and the results indicated non-detectable concentrations.
Three leachate wells were sampled in 1993 and again in 1995. Analytical results trom
the 1993 sampling event indicated that trace concentrations of various VOCs, SVOCs,
and aldrin were present as well as an elevated concentration of toluene (680 ug/L) in
leachate collected from one leachate well. The toluene concentration exceeded GSI
criteria. In 1995, leachate samples were analyzed only for PCBs. Results indicated that
leachate collected from one well had a PCB concentration of 1.4 ug/L.
Due to the similarities between the King Highway Landfill (OU3) and the 12th Street
Landfill (OU4), such as similar waste (PCB-contaminated residuals generated from the
same paper recycling process at similar concentrations), identical routes of exposure, and
identical receptors, it was assumed that there was a similar level of unacceptable risk at
the 12th Street Landfill as at OU3. Therefore, the King Highway Landfill BRA was used
to assess the risks to human health and ecological receptors at OU4.
Based upon the results of the RI and BRA, a response action at OU4 was necessary to
eliminate or reduce the potential migration of PCBs to the Kalamazoo River. The largest
potential risks identified for ecological receptors were due to past releases of PCBs from
the landfill into the Kalamazoo River. The ecological risk assessment recognized that
organisms and fish in the Kalamazoo River bioaccumulate PCBs and pass them up the
food chain to other organisms which would feed upon them. The bioaccumulation food
chain effects present the greatest potential risk to ecological and human health, via
consumption of fish from the Kalamazoo River.
Because a ROD was issued that selected a remedial action for OU4, this OU is further
discussed in the remaining sections of this five-year review report.
B.5. Operable Unit 5
Physical Characteristics
Operable Unit 5 is located in Allegan and Kalamazoo Counties in southwestern
Michigan. OU5 includes approximately 80 miles of the Kalamazoo River and a 3-mile
stretch of Portage Creek (see Figure 10, OU5 Site Map).
Land and Resource Use
The Kalamazoo River is used for recreational purposes (i.e., swimming, boating, and
fishing). River water is not used as a drinking water source and is not expected to be
33
-------
used as a drinking water source in the future. Wetland areas are present along areas of
the river. Land use in the floodplains adjacent to the river includes a mix of recreational,
agricultural, residential and commercial use.
History of Contamination
Former paper mill operations, as previously discussed, were the source of the PCB
contamination. Although PCB use in the manufacture of carbonless copy paper was
discontinued in 1971, the waste streams of the Kalamazoo area paper mills most likely
contained PCBs for at least a decade alter 1971. The PCB-contaminated wastes from
these paper mills were initially discharged directly to the Kalamazoo River and Portage
Creek. Later, waste effluents were sent to clarifiers prior to being discharged to the river
and creek. The bottom sludge from these clarifiers was placed in at least four disposal
areas (landfills) along the river. Because the PCBs were associated with suspended fine
clay particles, the clarifiers were ineffective in stopping the discharge of PCBs. The
soils, sediment, water column, groundwater, and biota in and adjacent to an 80-mile
stretch of the Kalamazoo River and a 3-mile stretch of Portage Creek are contaminated
with PCBs.
EPA and MDEQ estimate that approximately 113,000 lbs of PCBs are currently located
in the aquatic system. Today, the ongoing, uncontrolled erosion of contaminated paper
wastes and soils from the river banks is the most significant source of PCB loading to the
Kalamazoo River. Further, the presence of PCB-contaminated paper wastes in the river
system, including streambed sediments and adjacent floodplain sediments, continues to
expose ecological receptors, and human receptors who consume fish at unacceptable
levels. A fish advisory, which is currently a published and posted warning to humans to
not consume the fish in the Kalamazoo River, has been in place since the 1970s.
In 2003, MDEQ completed a Site-Wide Final (Revised) Human Health Risk Assessment
(HHRA) and Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for OU5. The HHRA quantitatively
assessed potential risk to human health for different exposure pathways, including the
consumption of fish, direct contact with contaminated floodplain soils, and inhalation of
dust and volatile emissions from floodplain soils behind the state-owned dams. The
HHRA concluded the most significant exposure pathway is the consumption of fish from
the river because fish bioaccumulate PCBs from exposure to PCB-contaminated material,
surface water, and prey. Recreational activities, including swimming, boating, and
wading in the river, do not pose a health risk to people. The BERA concluded that
sensitive consumers, such as mink, are the most at risk compared to other ecological
receptors. Birds (represented by the American Robin) that consume a substantial amount
ot earthworms are also at significant risk if foraging takes place in the contaminated
areas, and terrestrial mammals (represented by the red fox) may be at some risk if
foraging is concentrated in river areas whose prey reside in contaminated areas and have
taken up substantial amounts of PCBs.
34
-------
Consistent with the 2007 AOC between EPA, Georgia-Pacific LLC, and Millennium
Holdings, LLC, the risk assessments (HHRA and BERA) can be revised in each area-
wide RI/FS for OU5. A new Terrestrial Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment (TBERA)
was developed for Area 1 of OU5, building upon information from the BERA. The
TBERA also concluded that risks to ecological receptors may exist. EPA approved the
TBERA as part of the Area 1 RI in June 2012.
Response Activities
EPA Time-Critical Removal Action: Plaimvell Dam
On February 27, 2007, Georgia-Pacific and Millennium Holdings, LLC signed an
AOC with EPA and the State of Michigan to conduct a time-critical removal
action in an area of the Kalamazoo River called the "Plainwell Impoundment."
Work began in March 2007 and was completed in June 2009. A total of 130,000
cubic yards of contaminated in-stream and bank sediment were removed by this
action. Consistent with the federal Toxic Substances Control Act, sediments
containing PCB concentrations greater than 50 parts per million (ppm, equivalent
to mg/kg) were disposed at Environmental Quality Co.'s Wayne Disposal Landfill
in Belleville, Michigan. Sediments with concentrations less than 50 ppm, which
represent 80 percent of the waste material, were disposed at Allied Waste's C and
C Landfill near Marshall, Michigan, and its Ottawa Farms Landfill near
Coopersville, Michigan. The estimated cost of this project was $30 million. This
project also rerouted the Kalamazoo River to its original channel and removed the
dam near Plainwell. The Kalamazoo River is now free-flowing from Kalamazoo
to Otsego City, Michigan, with the exception of the diversion structures
associated with the Plainwell Dam #2.
EPA Time-Critical Removal Action: Plainwell 2 Dam
In June 2009, Georgia-Pacific LLC and EPA entered into a legal agreement
committing Georgia-Pacific to conduct a time-critical removal action in the
Plainwell #2 Dam area. This second removal action project began in August 2009
approximately three miles upstream of the earlier Plainwell Dam cleanup,
and included a two-mile stretch of the Kalamazoo River. The project was
completed in December 2010. Approximately 11,000 linear feet of riverbank was
cleared, excavated and restored, with approximately 18,000 cubic yards of soil
and debris disposed off-site at the Allied Waste C&C Landfill in Marshall,
Michigan, and at Ottawa County Farms Landfill in Coopersville, Michigan.
EPA Time-Critical Removal Action: Portage Creek
In July 2011, EPA signed an action memorandum to conduct a time-critical
removal action along a 1.8-mile stretch of Portage Creek from Alcott Street to the
35
-------
confluence of the Kalamazoo River. EPA began implementing this PCB hot-spot
excavation project in September 2011. The project will take two to four field
seasons to complete and will remove approximately 17,000 cubic yards of
contaminated soil and sediment at a cost of about $16 million.
Basis for Taking Action
The Supplemental RI/FSs for OU5 have not been completed, and no RODs have been
issued for OU5. As a result, EPA has not yet documented a basis for taking any final
remedial actions at this OU. The remedial status of OU5 is discussed below.
Remedial Status
On February 27, 2007, Georgia-Pacific Corporation and Millennium Holdings,
LLC signed an AOC with EPA to conduct a Supplemental RI/FS investigation for
the entire 80-mile stretch of the Kalamazoo River. OU 5 is divided into seven
areas each separated by a dam. Area 1 is the most upstream area from Morrow
Dam to the former Plainwell Dam. EPA approved the SRI Report for Area 1 on
June 27, 2012. The FS Report for Area 1 is scheduled to be submitted to EPA in
November 2012. The SRI for Area 2, which is the area of the Kalamazoo River
from the former Plainwell Dam to the Otsego City dam, began in December 2010
and is due to EPA in November 2012. The SRI for Area 3, which is the area of
the Kalamazoo River from the Otsego City dam to the Otsego dam, began in June
2012 and sampling is underway. Samples of river sediment and bank soil are
being collected at specific locations along the river (see Figure 10, OU5 Site
Map).
Since a ROD has not been issued for OU5, there is no remedial action to discuss or
evaluate; therefore, OU5 is not discussed further in this five-year review report.
B.6. Operable Unit 7
Physical Characteristics
The former Plainwell Paper Mill (OU7) is located in the City of Plainwell, Allegan
County, Michigan (see Figure 11, OU7 Location Map). The 34-acre mill property is
bordered by the Kalamazoo River to the north, the Plainwell central business district to
the east, residential property to the south, and commercial properties and the City of
Plainwell Wastewater Treatment Plant to the west.
Land and Resource Use
Operable Unit 7 was formerly zoned industrial. In 2006, the City of Plainwell purchased
the mill property and the mill property was rezoned as residential. Land use in the
36
-------
immediate vicinity of OU7 is characterized as industrial, commercial, and residential. A
restrictive covenant running with the land from the former owner of the property to
MDEQ (MDEQ Reference No: RC-RRD-201-05-00Ion USEPA Site No. 059B) is
already in place (see Attachment 7, Restrictive Covenant for OU7). EPA is a third-party
beneficiary of this restrictive covenant, which was recorded with the Allegan County
Registry of Deeds on March 25, 2005. The restrictive covenant provides, among other
things, that owners of the mill property must take reasonable steps to stop any continuing
release of hazardous substances, and may not use the property in a manner that causes
existing contamination to migrate beyond the property's boundaries. The restrictive
covenant further provides that as response activities are performed at this property,
MDEQ and EPA may require modifications to the covenant to assure the integrity and
effectiveness of any selected remedial action.
History of Contamination
Between 1910 and 1962, various owners of the Plainwell Paper Mill obtained pulp
through the de-inking and repulping of used paper. PCBs were introduced into the
residuals as a result of the use of carbonless copy paper, which between approximately
the 1950s and 1970s contained PCBs. Wastewater from the de-inking operations was
discharged directly to the Kalamazoo River until 1954. After 1954, a clarifier was
installed adjacent to the mill and wastewater was treated primarily by clarification. The
clarified effluent was discharged into the Kalamazoo River. The underflow from the
clarifier was dewatered in a series of on-site lagoons. The secondary treatment system
was updated in 1983 with the installation of a second clarifier.
Historically, twice a year each lagoon was excavated and the material was taken to the
12th Street Landfill, located near the Plainwell Dam. The waste lagoons were taken out
of service in 1983 when the second clarifier was installed. Four former waste lagoons are
presently covered with soil and are well vegetated. Other lagoons were filled with soil
after being cleaned out and are almost entirely located under the mill's present
wastewater treatment facilities.
Response Activities
Emergency Response Action: Plainwell Mill Southern Banks
In 2007, at the request of the City of Plainwell, Weyerhaeuser conducted an
emergency response action for the excavation of the southern banks of the
Kalamazoo River adjacent to OU7 to abate a potential release from the banks of
the mill property. The emergency action included only those activities made
necessary as a result of the Plainwell Dam removal. An Emergency Response
Action approach was authorized by EPA, on June 29, 2007, in accordance with
the emergency action provisions of the Operable Unit #4 and the Plainwell, Inc.
Mill Property of the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund
37
-------
Site Consent Decree, which became effective February 22, 2005. Weyerhaeuser
began work in November 2007 and completed the work in November 2008.
Excavation activities were conducted in four stages (Zone A through Zone D),
each stage addressing a separate section of the adjacent Plainwell Mill banks,
which were selected based on similar bank and/or river conditions. Removal
activities began with Zone A, a 600-foot length of river bank adjacent to the west
end of OU7, and then moved upstream to Zone B, a 700-foot length of river bank
east of Zone A, followed by Zone D, a 650-foot length of river bank adjacent to
the east end of OU7, and finally Zone C, a 650-foot length of river bank area
situated between Zones B and D. Excavation on shore was considered complete
when visible residuals were removed and PCB concentrations in composite
verification samples collected from underlying soils were less than 4 mg/kg.
Excavation of floodplain and near-shore sediments was considered complete
when the original river bottom was encountered or when residuals were no longer
visible in soil and sediment samples and PCB concentrations in verification
samples collected from the underlying material were less than 1 mg/kg. Areas
where PCB concentrations exceeding target levels remained in place were
covered with geotextile fabric and 6 inches of clean soil or stone. Excavated
areas were backfilled with clean fill material, graded, and stabilized with rip-rap.
Weyerhaeuser removed a total of approximately 3,500 cubic yards of sediment
and floodplain soil. Consistent with the federal Toxic Substances Control Act,
sediments containing PCB concentrations greater than 50 ppm were segregated
and disposed (59.67 tons) at Environmental Quality Co.'s Wayne Disposal
Landfill in Belleville, Michigan. Sediments with concentrations less than 50 ppm
(4,704 tons) were disposed at Waste Management Westside Landfill in Three
Rivers, Michigan.
Basis for Taking Action
OU7 is in the RI/FS stage of the Superfund process. The RI/FS has not been completed,
and a ROD has not been issued for OU7. As a result, EPA has not yet documented a
basis for taking action at OU7. The remedial status of OU7 is discussed below.
Remedial Status
In December 2004, Weyerhaeuser signed a Consent Decree which, among other
things, obligated the company to conduct the RI/FS and RD/RA for the Plainwell
Mill property. RI Phase I field sampling and analysis activities were conducted
between May and December 2008 and included a historical information review, a
geophysical survey, installation of test pits along the banks of the Kalamazoo
River to the north of the mill buildings, and an initial groundwater evaluation and
assessment ot the on-site coal tunnel. Phase 2 of the RI was conducted between
January and June 2010 and included PCB investigation activities near the mill
38
-------
buildings banks. A draft RI Report was submitted to EPA in June 2011, and EPA
provided comments on the draft report in February 2012.
As noted above, effective ICs are in place at OU7. The ICs were negotiated as
part of the bankruptcy settlement with Plainwell Inc., a former owner of the
property. The ICs will be reevaluated after the selection of a remedy for OU7.
Since a ROD has not been issued for OU7, there is no remedial action to discuss or
evaluate; therefore, OU7 is not discussed further in this five-year review report.
IV. Remedial Actions
Remedial actions were selected in RODs that were issued for OU2, OU3, and OU4. Therefore,
for each of these OUs, the following subsections describe the selected remedy (including ICs), its
implementation, and system operations, where applicable.
A. Operable Unit 2
Remedy Selection
Remedial action objectives (RAOs) for the Willow Boulevard/A-Site Landfill (OU2) were
developed based upon the findings of the November 2004 RI and the human health risk
evaluation in the RI. The RAOs for OU2 include:
• Eliminate exposure to PCB-contaminated material exceeding applicable land-use
and/or risk based cleanup criteria;
• Prevent PCB migration, via erosion or surface water runoff, into the Kalamazoo
River; and
• Mitigate, to the extent practicable, adverse effects to the environment due to
implementation of a remedial action.
The OU2 ROD was signed on September 27, 2006. The remedy selected in the ROD includes:
• Excavation of PCB-contaminated residuals, soil, and sediment from areas outside the
landfill and consolidation of excavated material into the A-Site Landfill portion of
OU2;
• Creating a clean buffer between the Kalamazoo River and the Willow Boulevard
Landfill portion of OU2;
• Implementation of bank stabilization and erosion control measures to protect against
bank and/or dike failure and migration of PCB-contaminated residuals into the
Kalamazoo River.
• On-site disposal of PCB-contaminated material in accordance with a 40 C.F.R. §
761.61 risk-based disposal approval;
• Installing a fence that encompasses the landfill to restrict access to the landfill;
39
-------
• Implementing deed restrictions limiting future land use to industrial and/or
commercial use; and
• Long-term groundwater monitoring.
Remedy Implementation
On May 18, 2009, EPA and Georgia-Pacific signed a Consent Decree for the implementation of
the remedy at OU2. Remedial design work began in 2010 with the Preliminary Design Report
being submitted in July 2010. The Final Remedial Design Report was submitted in May of 2011
and approved by EPA on April 27, 2011. The RA site work began in May 2011 with clearing
and grubbing of the Willow Boulevard Landfill. EPA anticipates that RA site work will be
completed in the spring of 2013. Current completed activities include consolidation of wastes
from the areas surrounding the Willow Boulevard and A-Site Landfills and capping, storm water
management, and initial turf establishment at the Willow Boulevard Landfill. Capping and
storm water management efforts at the A-Site Landfill are currently under construction. Major
RA construction activities are anticipated to conclude with installation of the long-term
monitoring network in late 2012 or the spring of 2013.
Institutional Controls
Since the last five-year review, the ICs at OU2 have been completed and recorded to prevent use
of site groundwater and inconsistent land use, and for the protection of the remedy currently
under construction (see Attachment 5). Table 2 summarizes the institutional controls for the
restricted areas at OU2.
Table 2: Institutional Controls Summary for OU2
Media, remedy components &
areas that do not support UU/UE
based on current conditions
Objectives of IC
Title of Institutional Control
Instrument Implemented
Groundwater - On Site
Prohibit groundwater
use
Declaration of Restrictive Covenants
and Environmental Protection
Easement, July 22, 2010
Other Remedial Action
Components
Prohibit Inconsistent
Uses and protect the
integrity of the remedy
components
Declaration of Restrictive Covenants
and Environmental Protection
Easement, July 22, 2010
As noted above, a restrictive covenant is in place to restrict future use of the landfill property.
The restrictive covenant prohibits any activity or use that would interfere with the landfill cap,
prohibits excavation, restricts property uses to those compatible with industrial use, and restricts
the use of site groundwater at this OU.
40
-------
Current Compliance
The remedy is currently under construction. Compliance will be evaluated after
completion of the remedial action.
Long-Term Stewardship
Compliance with effective ICs is required to assure long-term protectiveness. EPA will
ensure that long-term stewardship of OU2, as well as every other OU of the Site, includes
implementation and maintenance of each component of the selected remedy, including
any necessary ICs. Along with implementation of effective ICs, assurance plans (such as
the O&M Plan) must be developed to assure proper maintenance and monitoring of
effective ICs. The plan would include regular inspection of ICs at the Site and annual
certification to EPA that ICs are in place and effective.
B. Operable Unit 3
Remedy Selection
The RAOs for the King Highway Landfill (OU3) were developed based upon the findings of the
July 1994 RI and the human health risk evaluation in the RI. The RAOs identified in the
Septemberl994 Focused Feasibility Study include:
• Reduce the potential migration of PCBs to the Kalamazoo River that could result
from erosion of residuals from behind the dike that physically separates the residuals
from the river, or failure of the dike;
• Restrict the potential for PCB migration from leachate to groundwater;
• Restrict the potential transport of PCB-containing soil/residuals along the dike to the
river in surface runoff or by erosion of soils/residuals due to river flows; and
• Restrict the potential contact with PCB-containing soil/residuals and surface water by
workers and trespassers at the King Highway Landfill.
The ROD for OU3 and the Georgia-Pacific Five Former Lagoons was signed by MDEQ in
October 1997, and EPA concurred on the ROD in February 1998. The remedy selected in the
OU3 ROD includes:
• Excavation and consolidation of PCB-contaminated soils, sediments, and residuals
from the landfill berms, the KSSS floodplain, the Georgia-Pacific Mill Lagoons, and
the river sediment adjacent to the King Highway Landfill, and containment of the
excavated material into the King Highway Landfill;
• Construction of a State of Michigan Part 115 landfill-compliant cap over the landfill;
• Erosion protection on the berms of the landfill designed to protect against a 100-year
flood event;
41
-------
• Installation of new groundwater monitoring wells and abandonment of wells that are
no longer needed;
• Long-term groundwater and surface water monitoring for 30 years after capping;
• Landfill gas monitoring;
• Implementing deed restrictions limiting future land use;
• Implementing access restrictions by enclosing the entire King Highway Landfill and
the Mill Lagoons (only during remediation) with a fence; and
• Placing a permanent marker at the King Highway Landfill and posting warning signs
at the entry gates and on the fence every 200 feet.
The purpose of the selected remedy at the King Highway Landfill and the Mill Lagoons is to
prevent direct contact with PCB-contaminated residuals and eliminate or reduce the potential
migration of PCBs from the landfill and the Mill Lagoons into the Kalamazoo River. The
selected remedy addresses OU3 and the Mill Lagoons by reducing the current and potential
migration of PCBs into the Kalamazoo River.
Cleanup goals for soil at OU3 and the Mill Lagoons were based on the anticipated future land
use, which was expected to remain industrial. Both properties are zoned for industrial use,
therefore, the limited industrial cleanup criteria for soil established in Sections 20120(a) and
20121(b) of Part 201, Environmental Remediation, of the Natural Resources and Environmental
Protection Act, 1994 PA 451, as amended, MCL 324.20101(0) et seq. (NREPA), were used. At
the time the ROD was signed, the limited industrial cleanup criterion for PCBs in soil was 21
mg/kg, but this standard was later reduced to 16 mg/kg. The ROD required that all visible PCB-
contaminated residual, soil, and sediment from the KSSS floodplain and the river adjacent to the
landfill be excavated and consolidated back into the landfill. The ROD did not impose numerical
cleanup criteria for the KSSS floodplain and river adjacent to the landfill because these actions
were considered an interim response action. However, if the confirmatory sampling at the KSSS
floodplain showed that a residential cleanup criterion of 1 mg/kg PCB or lower had been
achieved, then the action at the KSSS floodplain would be accepted as a final RA.
Remedy Implementation
On February 8, 2000, a Consent Order was signed by Georgia-Pacific and the State of Michigan,
whereby Georgia-Pacific agreed to implement the remedy for OU3 and the Georgia-Pacific Five
Former Lagoons. The remedial design started on June 30, 1999, and was completed on
September 27, 2002. There were no difficulties or changes that occurred during the remedial
design. Georgia-Pacific voluntarily started construction of the remedial action in 1996, before
the ROD was issued and before the Consent Order was executed.
At the time the Consent Order was signed in February 2000, the landfill cap had already been
constructed. The next on-site mobilization that occurred was on October 21, 2002, when the
long-term groundwater monitoring well network was installed. This date of on-site construction
of the RA is the date that "triggered" the initial five-year review requirement.
42
-------
Georgia-Pacific submitted a Final Report for Completion of Construction for the King Highway
Landfill OU3 and the Mill Lagoons to the MDEQ in May 2004 and a post-closure O&M Plan in
June 2004. As of this five-year review, the MDEQ has not yet approved the Final Completion of
Construction Report or the Final O&M Plan. However, additional components of the remedy
were, and are, still needed to ensure long-term protectiveness, including the following: methane
gas mitigation efforts (trenches); resolution of property ownership issues for components of the
remedy constructed beyond property owned by Georgia-Pacific and residuals that were
discovered to be contiguous with the landfill extending onto adjacent properties; related
remediation efforts for those residuals; and implementation of appropriate ICs. Therefore, new
drafts of the Completion of Construction Report and O&M plan are necessary to reflect the
current status of the OU. The review of these draft documents is being conducted by MDEQ
concurrent with the remaining mitigation efforts.
Institutional Controls
At the King Highway Landfill, a locked chain-link fence and sheet pile enclose the landfill and
restrict public access to the landfill and potential for exposure to PCB-contaminated material.
Warning signs are posted along the fence every 200 feet, and permanent markers will be posted
on both ends of the landfill after deed restrictions on the site parcels are recorded with the
Kalamazoo County Register of Deeds. The Mill Lagoons property is also fenced to restrict
public access to the property.
Two draft restrictive covenants have been prepared for OU3 and final details are being worked
out between the State of Michigan and Georgia-Pacific LLC. The first restrictive covenant
covers the landfill property portion of OU3, and the second covers the Mill Lagoons property,
also part of OU3.
Restrictive Covenant for the Kins Highway Landfill Property
The King Highway Landfill restrictions as set forth in the draft restrictive covenant
include: prohibitions on any use of the property that would interfere with response
activities at the property; prohibitions on construction/use of wells for consumption,
irrigation or any use except those necessary for response activities; prohibitions on
construction of any new buildings or structures unless the structures are outside the
remedy area and are approved by MDEQ; prohibitions on excavation or other intrusive
activity that could affect the integrity of the landfill cap; and restrictions on uses other
than those necessary to implement the remedial action. An Access License Easement
under negotiation between the City of Kalamazoo and Georgia-Pacific provides the city
and its contractors access across the landfill property to access a city force main; the
access road covered by the easement is described on a survey that will be recorded with
the restrictive covenant.
The restrictions for the landfill property cover six parcels owned by Georgia-Pacific.
Georgia-Pacific owned three of the parcels (known as 1, 2, and 10) at the time of the
43
-------
previous five-year review, and acquired three of the parcels (known as Parcel A, B, and
the Triangle Parcel) from 2006-2008 after it was identified that parts of the OU3 remedy
were installed on land not owned by Georgia-Pacific, including land within the Michigan
Department of Transportation (MDOT) right-of-way along King Highway.1 In addition,
landfill gas monitoring results at the time revealed that methane gas was migrating
offsite.
To address these conditions, Georgia-Pacific purchased the Triangle parcel from MDOT,
and Parcels A and B from MDOT and the City of Kalamazoo, respectively, and these
parcels will be subject to the terms of the restrictive covenant. Georgia-Pacific also
implemented a series of contingency actions to address the methane gas, including
releasing potentially trapped gases, installing ventilators on passive gas riser vents,
installing four landfill gas cutoff trenches and other barriers at the sides of the landfill,
installing additional permanent gas monitoring probes, and increasing the frequency of
landfill gas monitoring. While investigating and addressing the issues regarding the
methane gas, additional residuals were discovered beyond the extent of the landfill and
within the MDOT right-of-way. Georgia-Pacific performed additional investigations in
the area, secured a permit to work on the MDOT property, and re-excavated in certain
areas, removing visible residuals. In addition, Georgia-Pacific took soil borings for
evaluation of the need for additional excavation, and a test pit was excavated for taking
confirmation samples. The investigation and remedial activities conducted in the MDOT
right-of-way are documented in reports submitted to MDEQ.
The portion of the King Highway right-of-way impacted by residuals was not available
for purchase from MDOT, and therefore an approach for addressing remaining
contamination was agreed upon as follows (in summary): Georgia-Pacific executed an
Environmental License Agreement with MDOT for property within the MDOT right-of-
way along King Highway, identified as "Parcel C" in documents submitted to MDEQ and
filed with the Kalamazoo County Register of Deeds. The Environmental License
Agreement delineates and provides notice of an area within the right-of-way where
residual contamination remains, and provides for a bond from Georgia-Pacific for the
purpose of covering additional costs that MDOT may incur due to the presence of the
contamination if future construction is necessary within the right-of-way. The
Environmental License was signed in March 2010. MDEQ approved the completed
remedial activities within the right-of-way on December 29, 2010. The remedial
activities included excavation of the top foot of soil and disposing the materials at a solid
waste landfill, placing an orange geotextile demarcation layer along the bottom of the
excavation, backfilling the area with a minimum of one foot of clean topsoil, and grading,
seeding and mulching the topsoil to promote proper drainage and revegetation.
1 At the time of the 2007 five-year review, it was not known that residuals contiguous with the landfill extended
onto adjacent properties.
44
-------
On January 28, 2011. Georgia-Pacific recorded a Notice of Environmental Conditions
with the Kalamazoo County Register of Deeds to place a notice in the chain of title
regarding the location and nature of the PCB contamination remaining within the MDOT
right-of-way, as well as the exposure barrier and clean fill placed over the residuals.
Permanent markers for the right-of-way were placed between May 11 and May 18, 2011.
Restrictive Covenant on the Mill Lagoons Property
No decision had been made regarding restrictions on the Mill Lagoons portion of OU3 at
the time the 2007 five-year review was completed. Georgia-Pacific, in consultation with
MDEQ and EPA, has agreed to record a restrictive covenant restricting the uses of the
Mill Lagoons property to substantially the same extent the King Highway Landfill is
restricted, including: prohibitions on any use of the property that would interfere with
response activities at the property; prohibitions on construction/use of wells for
consumption, irrigation or any use except those necessary for response activities;
prohibitions on construction of any new buildings or structures unless the structures are
outside the remedy area and are approved by MDEQ; and restrictions on uses other than
those necessary to implement the remedial action, with the exception of the following
limited allowed uses:
• A recreational trail crossing a portion of the Mill Lagoons property that is owned and
will be maintained by Kalamazoo County. An easement from Georgia-Pacific to
Kalamazoo County executed on May 15, 2012, allows access to the recreational non-
motorized path, prescribes allowed uses, requires maintenance, and describes the area
covered by the easement and on which recreational uses are allowed by the restrictive
covenant (the easement will be attached to the restrictive covenant and recorded with
it). The easement also acknowledges the Superfund status of the Mill Lagoons
property and commits the county to complying with all laws and rules that apply to
the Mill Lagoons property. The draft restrictive covenant creates an express
exception for recreational use for the easement area, fencing, and benches within the
fenced area. Kalamazoo County has also provided its consent to the terms of the draft
restrictive covenant, which will be recorded with the restrictive covenant. New
surveys depicting the trail location are being prepared for recording as well.
• An Access License Agreement allowing Kalamazoo County access to construct and
maintain the non-motorized path crossing a portion of the Mill Lagoons property, also
executed on May 15, 2012. The Access License grants a temporary construction
license for installation of the recreational trail, prohibits soil excavation or removal,
and acknowledges the Superfund status of the Mill Lagoons property and commits the
county to complying with all laws and rules that apply to the Mill Lagoons property.
The license expires on the earlier of completion of the trail or December 31, 2012.
• Portions of the City of Kalamazoo sanitary sewer line, as well as a force main and
pump station, are located on and under the Mill Lagoons property and are served by
45
-------
an access road for maintenance. The sewer lines are identified in existing easements
recorded at Liber 820, page 1483, and Liber 811, page 780. An Access License
Agreement for construction and maintenance of the force main, sewer line, and pump
station in areas covered by the restrictive covenants is under discussion between the
City of Kalamazoo and Georgia-Pacific to address the city's plans for sewer
improvements in the near future. The Access License Agreement, when executed,
will be recorded and will reference the Restrictive Covenant for the Mill Lagoons
Property and the Landfill Property as needed. The draft restrictive covenant language
addresses the city's plans by providing for an allowed use within the sewer easements
and forthcoming Access License Agreement for sewer installation or maintenance
work.
Table 3 summarizes the institutional controls for these restricted areas at OU3.
Table 3: Institutional Controls Summary for OU3
Media, remedy components
& areas that do not support
UU/UE based on current
conditions
Objectives of IC
Title of Institutional Control
Instrument Implemented
Landfill - Capped Area
Prohibit use except
maintenance and assure
integrity of the landfill cap
Institutional controls are being
evaluated
Groundwater - On Site
Prohibit groundwater use
Institutional controls are being
evaluated
Other Remedial Action
Components
Prohibit inconsistent uses
and protect the integrity of
the remedy components
Institutional controls are being
evaluated
Georgia-Pacific Mill Property
Use limited to industrial
use and a recreational bike
trail
Institutional controls are being
evaluated
System Operations and O&M Costs
GP has submitted a document that summarizes the previous five years of O&M costs for OU3, as
is required by the AOC. The "maintenance" category is not itemized, but the dollar amounts are
a significant percentage. Operation and maintenance costs were estimated in the ROD to be
$125,000 per year. The actual annual O&M cost is $250,000. These costs are mostly attributed
to activities performed pursuant to the Hydrogeologic Monitoring Plan and the Landfill Gas
Monitoring Plan, which were developed pursuant to the requirements of the AOC (and which
were developed years after the Focused Feasibility Study and ROD). Some of the activities
performed include water level measurements, ultra low-flow groundwater sampling, data
analysis and evaluation, design of various landfill gas control devices, and regulatory reporting -
none of which were contemplated as part of the development of the annual O&M cost estimate
presented in the 1994 Focused FS. Actual costs of physical cap maintenance and repair are less
46
-------
than those estimated in the 1994 Focused FS, as there have not been any significant repair
activities required thus far for the cap. A significant portion of the current annual O&M costs
associated with on-site maintenance activities have been associated with the installation of
several landfill gas control devices over the past several years.
C. Operable Unit 4
Remedy Selection
The RAOs for the 12th Street Landfill (OU4) were developed based upon the findings of the RI
and the human health risk evaluation in the RI. The RAOs identified in the July 1997 Focused
Feasibility Study Report include:
• Reduce the potential migration of PCBs to the Kalamazoo River that could result
from erosion of residuals;
• Reduce the potential migration of PCBs to the adjacent property and wetlands that
could result from erosion of residuals;
• Restrict the potential for PCB migration from leachate to groundwater; and
• Restrict the potential contact with PCB-containing soil/residuals by any workers or
trespassers, or any anglers along the river.
MDEQ signed the ROD for OU4 on September 28, 2001. EPA concurred on September 28,
2001. The OU4 ROD requires the cleanup of the 12th Street Landfill and four areas adjacent to
the landfill into which PCBs have migrated including: the woodland area, wetlands, adjacent
property, and the former powerhouse channel.
The remedy selected in the 12th Street Landfill OU 4 ROD includes:
• Excavation of PCB-contaminated residuals, soil, and sediment from areas adjacent to
the landfill and consolidation of the excavated material back into the landfill;
• Creating a hydraulic barrier between the east side of the landfill along the former
powerhouse discharge channel;
• Restoration of areas that are excavated, cleared and grubbed, or otherwise affected by
the remedial action;
• Construction of a side wall containment system around the outside of the landfill that
provides side slope stability, 500-year event flood protection, and erosion control;
• Construction of a cover (cap) over the landfill that consists of, from bottom up, a six-
inch-thick granular fill layer, 30-mil-thick geomembrane liner, 24-inch-thick general
fill layer, and a six-inch-thick vegetative layer;
• Installation of a groundwater monitoring network and abandonment of wells no
longer in use;
• Long-term groundwater monitoring and, during excavation activities, short-term
surface water monitoring;
47
-------
• Deed restrictions to restrict future land use; and
• Access restrictions including constructing a fence surrounding the landfill with
warning signs and permanent markers posted along the fence.
Remedy Implementation
The Consent Decree for RD/RA work addresses the 12th Street Landfill OU4 and also requires a
RI/FS investigation and RD/RA implementation at the former Plainwell Mill property (OU7).
The Consent Decree for RD/RA was agreed to by EPA and Weyerhaeuser in December 2004,
and entered by the U.S. District Court on February 15, 2005. However, at the request of EPA,
the start of the remedial design phase of the remedy was put on hold pending the outcome of
settlement negotiations for the Plainwell Dam removal action. Settlement negotiations ended on
February 27, 2007. In May 2007, EPA notified Weyerhaeuser to begin the design phase of the
12th Street Landfill remedy and to initiate the RI at the former Plainwell Mill Property OU7.
Weyerhaeuser completed an emergency response at OU4 in accordance with the Consent Decree
in anticipation of the future removal of the Plainwell Dam. The Plainwell Dam is located just
upstream and adjacent to the landfill. Weyerhaeuser completed removal of contaminated
sediments in the adjacent powerhouse channel and grading and armoring of the riverbanks along
the Kalamazoo River adjacent to the 12th Street Landfill. The work represented a portion of the
work associated with implementation of the remedial action that was selected in the ROD. The
remaining components of the selected remedy were designed during the remedial design phase of
work that started with the submittal of the Preliminary Design Report in October 2008. The final
Remedial Design Report was approved in March of 2010. RA field work began in April 2010
and included consolidation of waste, capping, storm water management, turf establishment, and
installation of a long-term groundwater monitoring network. Weyerhaeuser completed the RA
field work in November 2010. EPA granted the Certification of Completion of the RA on
October 1, 2012. Initial operation and maintenance efforts include repair of erosion during turf
establishment and placement of additional topsoil and seeding over the perimeter pore water
discharge trench to prevent undercutting of the rip-rap-filled shallow trench and surface erosion.
Quarterly groundwater monitoring began in October 2011. Two quarters of monitoring have
been completed so far. Low-level concentrations of arsenic and cyanide have been detected at
concentrations that exceed applicable State of Michigan generic criteria at one or more
monitoring locations. Evaluation of groundwater monitoring data will continue until sufficient
data is available to determine contaminant trends.
Institutional Controls
Access restrictions are currently inadequate at the 12th Street Landfill. A chain-link fence was
installed on the south side of the landfill and warning signs were posted. However, OU4 is not
fenced on the north, east, and west sides of the landfill, and the OU is easily accessible by the
public.
48
-------
Since the last five-year review, the ICs at 0U4 have been modified to prohibit the use of
groundwater. Table 4 summarizes the institutional controls for the restricted areas at OU4.
Table 4: Institutional Controls Summary for OU4
Media, remedy components
& areas that do not support
UU/UE based on current
conditions
Objectives of IC
Title of Institutional Con trol
Instrument Implemented
Groundwater - On Site
Prohibit groundwater use
Amendment to Declaration of
Restrictive Covenants and
Environmental Protection
Easement, July 19, 2012
Other Remedial Action
Components
Prohibit inconsistent uses
and protect the integrity of
the remedy components
Declaration of Restrictive
Covenants and Environmental
Protection Easement, March 22,
2005
As noted above, a restrictive covenant is already in place to restrict future use of the landfill
property. The restrictive covenant prohibits any excavation that would interfere with the landfill
cap and the amendment to the restrictive covenant prohibits of the use of on-site groundwater.
Current Compliance
The access restrictions are currently inadequate to prevent trespassing and/or remedy
vandalism at the landfill. A fence needs to be constructed to prevent access and possibly
other measures need to be employed to ensure long-term protectiveness. During the RD
phase, Weyerhaeuser requested permission to only install limited fencing so the use of
OU4 as an eco-park could be evaluated. EPA expects to discuss this potential use of
OU4 and long-term access controls with Weyerhaeuser by the end of 2012.
Low-Term Stewardship
Compliance with effective ICs is required to assure long-term protectiveness. EPA will
ensure that long-term stewardship of OU4, as well as every other operable unit of the
Site, includes implementation and maintenance of each component of the selected
remedy, including any necessary ICs. Along with implementation of effective ICs,
assurance plans (such as the O&M Plan) must be developed to assure proper maintenance
and monitoring of effective ICs. The plan would include regular inspection of ICs at the
site and annual certification to EPA that ICs are in place and effective.
V. Progress Since the Last Review
Protectiveness Statements from Prior Review
The prior five-year review contained the following protectiveness statements for OU3 and OU4.
49
-------
0U3 - King Highway Landfill: "The remedy at 0U3 currently protects human health and the
environment in the short-term. The landfill cap is in good condition and prevents PCB-
contaminated material in the landfill from migrating, via erosion or surface water runoff into
the Kalamazoo River. The cap is also an effective barrier that prevents exposure, via direct
contact, to the contaminated material by on-site workers, trespassers, and anglers. The cap also
minimizes infiltration of rainwater and reduces the potential for leachate generation and the
potential for PCBs in groundwater to migrate into the Kalamazoo River. Public access to the
landfill is restricted by a locked chain-link fence and sheet pile, where present, and prevents
people from being exposed to the contaminated material. Institutional controls are not yet in
place. However, in order for the remedy to be protective in the long-term, the following actions
will need to be taken: (I) submit a schedule or plan to U.S. EPA and MDEQfor resolving
ownership issues with respect to the MDOT and city of Kalamazoo properties and for
implementing ICs at the landfill and MDOT and city of Kalamazoo properties; and (2) submit a
landjill gas mitigation plan to MDEQ that will satisfy its concerns about the off-site migration of
methane gas at the south end of the landfill. Long-term protectiveness requires compliance with
effective ICs. U.S. EPA will ensure that long-term stewardship of 0U3, as well as every other
operable unit of the Site, includes implementation and maintenance of each component of the
selected remedy, including any necessary ICs. "
0U4 12th Street Landfill: "The remedy at the 12'h Street Landfill 0U4 is not protective because
the remedy has not yet been constructed and because access controls are inadequate to protect
trespassers from short-term risks associated with remedy construction. A chain-link fence is
installed along the west side of the landfill but not on the east, north, and south sides of the
landfill and trespassers can easily gain access to the landfill. A chain-link fence will need to be
installed on all sides of the landfill to prevent public access to the property and prevent
trespassers from being exposed to PCB-contaminated material during the on-going construction
activities. Long-term protectiveness requires compliance with existing ICs. Although ICs are in
place, an evaluation is necessary of whether groundwater use at the landfill needs to be
restricted and, if so, whether existing ICs appropriately restrict or prevent groundwater use at
the landfill property. This evaluation will be made during the remedial design phase of the
remedy. U.S. EPA will ensure that long-term stewardship of 0U4, as well as every other
operable unit of the Site, includes implementation and maintenance of each component of the
selected remedy, including any necessary ICs. "
Issues and Recommendations from Prior Review
During the first five-year review, several issues were identified at OU3 and OU4. The
information below provides information on the actions that have been taken to address those
issues.
50
-------
0U3 King Highway Landfill:
Table 5: Actions Taken at OU3 Since the Last Five-Year Review
Issues from Previous
Review
Recommendations/
Follow-up Actions
Party
Responsible
Milestone
Date
Action Taken and
Outcome
Date of
Action
Institutional controls are
not in place at the
landfill property,
including the land
currently owned by
MDOT and city of
Kalamazoo which is
located within the site
security fence. The
remedy is not
protective until effective
ICs are placed on both
properties and are
monitored and
maintained.
An IC Plan will be
prepared documenting
the IC evaluation
activities and
necessary corrective
measures. The IC
plan is necessary to
evaluate what ICs are
necessary and
develop a schedule for
their implementation.
The IC plan will also
evaluate how to
ensure long-term
stewardship of the OU
and long-term
protectiveness of the
remedy.
EPA
April 18,
2008
The IC plan was
completed on September
14, 2007. Two draft
restrictive covenants have
been prepared for OU3
and final details are being
worked out between the
State of Michigan and
Georgia-Pacific LLC. The
first restrictive covenant
covers the landfill
property portion of OU3,
and the second covers
the Mill Lagoons property,
also part of OU3.
Sept. 2007
(IC plan);
January
2011 (draft
restrictive
covenant);
Ongoing
MDEQ approval of the
Final Completion of
Construction Report
and the Final O&M
Plan is pending
resolution of the MDOT
and city of Kalamazoo
property ownership
issues.
Submit a schedule or
plan to U.S. EPA and
MDEQ for 1) resolving
issues associated with
the MDOT and city of
Kalamazoo properties
and 2) implementing
ICs at the landfill
property and the
MDOT and city of
Kalamazoo properties
PRP
November
15, 2007
Two draft restrictive
covenants have been
prepared for OU3 and
final details are being
worked out between the
State of Michigan and
Georgia-Pacific LLC. The
first restrictive covenant
covers the landfill
property portion of OU3,
and the second covers
the Mill Lagoons property,
also part of OU3.
January
2011 (draft
restrictive
covenant);
Ongoing
Methane gas has
migrated off-site in
concentrations that
exceed threshold
criteria and will need to
be mitigated.
Submit a landfill gas
mitigation plan to
MDEQ that will satisfy
its concerns about the
off-site mitigation of
methane gas at the
south end of the
landfill
PRP
November
2007
Georgia-Pacific
constructed gas collection
trenches and additional
monitoring locations to
evaluate the effectiveness
of the mitigation efforts.
2007-2012
Other actions that have been taken at OU3 since the last five-year review include the following:
• Acquisition of the Triangle Parcel at the southwest comer of the King Highway Landfill and
Parcels A and B along the southern boundary of the King Highway Landfill to ensure that all
structures and/or components of the remedy were located on property owned by Georgia-
Pacific.
51
-------
• Excavation and off-site disposal of some PCB-containing soils/residuals from the western
portion of the MDOT right-of-way located south of the site security fence. As part of this
remedial activity, a certain area of PCB-containing soils/residuals was left in place. This area,
referred to as Parcel C, was delineated through visual observation and analytical testing via
the advancement of soil borings and the excavation of test pits. The top one toot of material
in Parcel C was excavated and an orange non-woven geotextile was placed at the bottom of
the excavation. The area was then backfilled with a one-foot-thick layer of clean backfill
material, graded, seeded, and mulched to promote drainage and facilitate revegetation. A
Final Environmental License Agreement Associated with the MDOT R-O-W was executed
between MDOT and Georgia-Pacific; this was the mechanism by which MDOT allowed the
PCB-containing soils/residuals to remain within its property. In parallel with the Final
License Agreement, the Final Notice of Environmental Conditions Affecting Property
Controlled by the MDOT was developed in coordination with MDEQ and recorded with the
Kalamazoo County Register of Deeds on January 28, 2011, to notify any potential future
owners of the property that PCB-containing material remained below grade within this area.
• Installation of permanent markers in the MDOT right-of-way to notify the public of the
environmental conditions that exist - specifically, PCB-containing residuals present below
the demarcation layer installed one foot below grade within Parcel C.
OU4 12th Street Landfill:
Table 6: Actions Taken at OU4 Since the Last Five-Year Review
Issues from Previous
Review
Recommendations/
Follow-up Actions
Party
Responsible
Milestone
Date
Action Taken and
Outcome
Date of
Action
Access controls are
inadequate. A chain-link
fence is present along
the south side of the
landfill but there is no
fence on the north, east,
or west sides of the
landfill. Trespassers
and anglers can freely
enter the property and
use the river banks to
fish and may become
exposed to
contaminated material.
Install a chain-link
fence on the north,
east, and west sides
of landfill; post
warning signs every
200 feet along the
fence and on all entry
gates; and place
permanent markers
around the boundary
of the landfill
describing the
restricted area and
the nature of the
restrictions.
PRP
December
2007
Not yet completed; a
fence needs to be
constructed to prevent
access and possibly other
measures employed to
prevent exposures until
the remedy is fully
implemented. During the
RD phase, Weyerhaeuser
requested permission to
install limited fencing so
the use of OU4 as an
eco-park could be
evaluated. EPA expects
to discuss this potential
use of OU4 and long-term
access controls with
Weyerhaeuser by the end
of 2012.
Planned
for May
2013
52
-------
Issues from Previous
Review
Recommendations/
Follow-up Actions
Party
Responsible
Milestone
Date
Action Taken and
Outcome
Date of
Action
It is unclear whether
groundwater use at the
landfill needs to be
restricted and, if so,
whether existing ICs
appropriately restrict
groundwater use within
the landfill property.
Evaluate whether
groundwater use at
the landfill should be
restricted and, if so,
amend existing ICs
as necessary to
ensure that ICs
adequately restrict
groundwater use at
the landfilljDroperty.
PRP
April 2008
The use of groundwater
has been restricted
through the Amendment
to Declaration of
Restrictive Covenants
and Environmental
Protection Easement,
July 19, 2012.
July 19,
2012
Other actions that have been taken at OU4 since the last five-year review include the following:
• The final Remedial Design Report was approved in March 2010. RA field work began in
April 2010 and included consolidation of waste, capping, storm water management, turf
establishment, and installation of a long-term groundwater monitoring network.
Weyerhaeuser completed the RA field work in November 2010, and EPA granted the
Certification of Completion of the RA on October 1, 2012. Initial operation and maintenance
efforts include repair of erosion during turf establishment and placement of additional topsoil
and seeding over the perimeter pore water discharge trench to prevent undercutting of the rip-
rap-filled shallow trench and surface erosion.
• Quarterly groundwater monitoring began in October 2011. Two quarters of monitoring have
been completed. Low-level concentrations of arsenic and cyanide have been detected at
concentrations that exceed applicable State of Michigan criteria at one or more monitoring
locations. Evaluation of groundwater monitoring data will continue until sufficient data is
available to determine contaminant trends.
VI. Five-Year Review Process
Administrative Components of the Five-Year Review Process
The EPA Remedial Project Manager (RPM), James Saric, notified the MDEQ and Georgia-
Pacific of the start of the second five-year review in a letter dated February 23, 2012. The EPA
RPM headed the five-year review team and was assisted by co-RPMs Michael Berkoff and
Sheila Desai, and the MDEQ Project Managers, Paul Bucholtz, Keith Krawczyk, and Kristi
Zakrzewski.
The review schedule included the following components:
Community Notification
Document Review
Data Review
Site Inspection
Five-Year Review Report Development and Review
53
-------
Community Notification and Involvement
In September 2012, the EPA Office of Public Affairs placed an ad in the local newspapers
announcing that the five-year review was in progress and requesting that any interested parties
contact the EPA RPM or Community Involvement Coordinator for additional information.
Copies of the newspaper notices are included in Appendix A. Since the announcement notice
was issued, no member of the community has contacted EPA regarding the five-year review.
Document Review
The five-year review included a review of relevant documents, which are listed in Appendix B.
Data Review
The five-year review included a review of relevant data reports listed in Appendix C. The
findings of the data are discussed throughout this five-year review report. Since the last five-
year review, groundwater samples at OU3 have been collected quarterly through 2010 and then
biannually since 2011. PCBs have not been detected in the vast majority of those groundwater
samples. When detected, PCBs are significantly below the 0.2 (ig/L screening level. At OU4,
quarterly groundwater monitoring began in April 2011. PCBs have not been detected in the vast
majority of those samples. When detected, PCBs are significantly below the 0.2 jig/L screening
level. Monitoring wells have yet to be installed at OU2. The groundwater monitoring results for
OU3 and OU4 are included in Attachment 2.
Site Inspection
Willow Boulevard/A-Site Landfill OU2
The five-year review site inspection of OU2 was conducted on August 7, 2012, with Kristi
Zakrzewski from MDEQ, Garry Griffith from Georgia-Pacific, and Michael Berkoff from EPA
participating. The photographs and site inspection log are included in Attachments 3 and 4,
respectively.
During the inspection, EPA observed that the gas venting sand layer was being placed upon the
A-Site portion of OU2. Installation of the landfill cover was complete at the Willow portion of
OU2, but the groundwater monitoring system had not yet been installed.
King Highway Landfill OU3
The five-year review site inspection of OU3 was conducted on August 7, 2012, with Keith
Krawczyk from MDEQ, Garry Griffith from Georgia-Pacific, and Michael Berkoff from EPA
participating. The photographs and site inspection log are included in Attachments 3 and 4,
respectively.
54
-------
At the time of the inspection, weather conditions were sunny with an air temperature in the mid-
80s. The activities conducted during the inspection included a walk through the OU to assess the
physical integrity of the components of the remedy, including the landfill cap, groundwater
monitoring wells, gas vents, security fence, etc.
The landfill cap was in good condition. The vegetative cover had a few distressed areas. Most
of these areas appear to be due to the lack of precipitation. There was one distressed area at
which methane was detected on May 31, 2012 (see Figure 7, OU3 Site Map). The presence of
methane in the soil would indicate that methane is migrating up through some compromise to the
geosynthetic liner. On August 27, 2012, contractors for Georgia-Pacific excavated the area and
discovered a tear and several small holes in the geomembrane liner. The contractors then
replaced that section of the liner, tested its integrity and then backfilled the area. Georgia-
Pacific's contractors completed the work on August 29, 2012. Erosion was observed in the
southeast corner of the landfill with the toe of the liner visible in four locations. Erosion of the
soil cover, in the form of a gully, was also observed along the southern border of the landfill near
the sedimentation outlet. The second location is outside of the landfill cap. Georgia-Pacific
expressed its intent to address both of these areas. During the inspection, the inspection team
observed another distressed area on the eastern toe of the landfill, which was similar in
appearance to the distressed area at which methane had been detected. Georgia-Pacific agreed to
sample the soil in this area for methane. The inspection team observed some settling within the
drainage swale along the northern landfill cap access road. That settling prevents drainage as
designed. Georgia-Pacific agreed to regrade the area. Some gas vents appeared to be slightly
tipped but the surrounding cap did not appear to be compromised. Otherwise, the cap appeared
to be fairly well maintained with no other noticeable depressions, cracks, or odors. The areas in
need of repair will be addressed as a part of the regular O&M of the landfill.
Groundwater wells were in good condition and properly secured. Gas monitoring probes and
passive gas vents were also in good condition, properly secured, and functioning properly. A
locked, chain-link fence surrounds the landfill and effectively restricts public access to the
landfill. At the time of the inspection, warning signs were posted every 200 feet on the fence.
Permanent markers will be posted on each side of the property at the time the restrictive
covenant is recorded with the City of Kalamazoo Registry of Deeds.
Interviews were conducted with Keith Krawczyk, MDEQ project manager, and Garry Griffith,
Georgia-Pacific project manager, during the August 7, 2012, site inspection.
Though the MDEQ project manager is generally satisfied with the overall operation and
maintenance ol the OU3 remedy, he is dissatisfied with the O&M Manager's responsiveness in
addressing problems as they arise and the overall quality of the site inspections. The Georgia-
Pacific project manager addressed these concerns, stating that future inspections would be
conducted by different personnel and that they would be more prepared for the inspections, and
an appropriate response would be completed to address issues identified during the inspections.
55
-------
No interviews with the public were conducted or necessary during the five-year review period as
community interest regarding OU3 is minimal.
12,h Street Landfill OU4:
The five-year review site inspection of OU4 was conducted on August 7, 2012, with Kristi
Zakrzewski from MDEQ, Jodie Dembowske of Conestoga Rovers & Associates, and Michael
Berkoff from EPA participating. The photographs and site inspection log are included in
Attachments 3 and 4, respectively.
At the time of the inspection, weather conditions were sunny with an air temperature in the mid-
80s. The activities conducted during the inspection included a walk through the OU to assess the
physical integrity of the components of the remedy, including the landfill cap, groundwater
monitoring wells, gas vents, security fence, etc.
The landfill cap was in good condition. The vegetative cover had a few distressed areas, which
appear to be due to the lack of precipitation. At the toe of the landfill, on the northern, southern
and western sides, the site team observed a band of erosion. The area corresponds with the zone
at which water exits the cap drainage layer. Portions of the geotextile layer that make up the
drainage feature were exposed. This band of erosion had been observed at the landfill on
multiple previous site visits. The previous remedy for the problem was to add soil patches to the
eroded areas. The inspection team agreed that repairs are needed to prevent further erosion.
Otherwise, the cap appeared to be fairly well maintained with no noticeable depressions, cracks,
or odors.
Groundwater wells were in good condition and properly secured. Gas monitoring probes and
passive gas vents were also in good condition, properly secured, and functioning properly. As
previously discussed, access controls do not currently prevent trespass. At the time of the
inspection, warning signs were not posted every 200 feet on the fence and permanent markers
were not posted on each side of the property. EPA and MDEQ are evaluating Weyerhaeuser's
proposed signage, which will be installed once approved. The restrictive covenant is recorded
with the City of Kalamazoo Registry of Deeds.
VII. Technical Assessment
A. Operable Unit 2
Question A: Is the remedy functioning as intended by the decision documents?
No. Implementation of the remedy is not yet complete, as the landfill cover is not in place at the
A-Site Landfill. Groundwater monitoring wells are not in place at the Willow portion, so it is
not yet possible to determine if the remedy is operating as intended at that portion of the OU.
However, once completed it is anticipated that the remedy will function as designed. Site
controls implemented as a part of the RA mitigate the possibility for off-site transport and
exposure to contaminated materials.
56
-------
Question B: Are the exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels, and remedial action
objectives used at the time of remedy selection still valid?
Yes. The exposure assumptions, toxicity data, risk assessment methods, and RAOs at the time of
the ROD are still valid.
Question C: Has any other information come to light that could call into question the
protectiveness of the remedy?
No. No additional information has been identified that would call into question the
protectiveness of the remedy.
B. Operable Unit 3
Question A: Is the remedy functioning as intended by the decision documents'!
Yes. The landfill remedy (capping and containment) is operating and functioning as intended by
the ROD and the Consent Order. The landfill cap is generally in good condition and prevents
PCB-contaminated material in the landfill from migrating, via erosion or surface water runoff,
into the Kalamazoo River. The cap is also an effective barrier that prevents exposure, via direct
contact, to the contaminated material by on-site workers, trespassers, and anglers. The cap also
minimizes infiltration of rainwater and reduces the potential for leachate generation and,
consequently, the migration of PCBs in groundwater into the Kalamazoo River. PCBs were not
detected in groundwater above the performance standard.
Access restrictions are in place and prevent exposure to the contaminated material. The locked
chain-link fence and sheet piling restricts public access to the landfill via Route M-89 and via the
Kalamazoo River. Warning signs are posted every 200 feet along the perimeter fence notifying
the public that the area is hazardous due to the buried paper-making residuals. Although not
required at the time of this five-year review, permanent markers were installed along the MDOT
property to demarcate the extent of residuals left in place. Signs have been posted on all entry
gates and every 200 feet along the chain link fence.
As previously discussed, not all institutional controls are in place. However, the objectives of
the ICs are being met since the public is not directly exposed to PCB-contaminated residuals or
to PCBs via groundwater. The landfill property is zoned industrial and will remain industrial in
the future via local zoning ordinances and the anticipated deed restrictions. Groundwater at the
landfill property is not used for any purpose; therefore, there are no exposure pathways to on-site
workers or the public from groundwater. All immediate threats have been addressed and no
additional actions, other than the recommended actions identified in Section VIII of this five-
year review, are anticipated.
Methane gas has migrated off-site in concentrations that exceed threshold criteria. However,
Georgia-Pacific has constructed gas collection trenches to address this issue and additional
57
-------
monitoring locations have been established to evaluate the effectiveness of the mitigation efforts.
Question B: Are the exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels, and remedial action
objectives used at the time of remedy selection still valid?
Yes, except that since the date of the Consent Order implementing the ROD, the Michigan
cleanup standard for PCBs in soil has become less stringent. The exposure assumptions, toxicity
data, risk assessment methods, and RAOs at the time of the ROD are still valid. However, when
the ROD was issued, the State of Michigan Part 201 limited industrial cleanup criterion for PCBs
in soil was 21 mg/kg and when the Consent Order for RD/RA was signed, the industrial cleanup
criterion for direct contact with PCBs in soil was 9.9 mg/kg. Today, the PCB industrial land use
criteria is 16 mg/kg for PCBs in soil. The landfill and the Mill Lagoons were remediated to
achieve the industrial land use criterion of 9.9 mg/kg as specified in the Consent Order. Because
the landfill and Mill Lagoons were remediated to a level that is below today's standards, the
change in cleanup levels has no effect on the protectiveness of the OU3 remedy. The remedy is
progressing as expected and is achieving the RAOs.
Question C: Has any other information come to light that could call into question the
protectiveness of the remedy?
No. Methane migration could be an issue as it is occasionally detected outside of the capture
zone of the gas collection trenches outside of the Georgia-Pacific property, and always detected
at those gas wells within the perimeter fence above the lower explosive limit. It is possible that
this issue is now very localized to GW-13. Additional gas collection trenches have been
installed along with new monitoring locations, though more may be required. Continued
monitoring is necessary and will be conducted to determine if this is an issue in the future.
B. Operable Unit 4
Question A: Is the remedy functioning as intended by the decision documents?
No. The major activities involved in construction of the landfill are complete, and EPA
approved the Certification of Remedial Action Completion in early October 2012. Although ICs
are in place, engineered access restrictions are inadequate to protect trespassers from damaging
the components of the remedy, and the lack of access controls could potentially result in future
exposure to PCB-contaminated material. Except for the lack of access controls, it appears that
the rest of the remedy is operating as intended. EPA has agreed to let Weyerhaeuser evaluate
access controls as a part of its evaluation of the landfill as a wildlife viewing area. This
evaluation should be complete by the end of 2012.
Question B: Are the exposure assumptions, toxicity data, cleanup levels, and remedial action
objectives used at the time of remedy selection still valid?
Yes. The exposure assumptions and RAOs used at the time of the remedy selection are still
valid. The OU4 ROD did not specify cleanup numbers for industrial soils. Instead, the ROD
58
-------
established visual criteria as the primary method by which PCB-contaminated material would be
identified. Post-excavation sampling was then compared to Michigan Part 201 criteria;
specifically, confirmation samples at OU4 were compared to the residential/commercial criterion
of 4 mg/kg PCB.
Question C: Has any other information come to light that could call into question the
protectiveness of the remedy?
No. No additional information has been identified that would call into question the
protectiveness of the remedy.
VIII. Issues
The tables in this section highlight the issues identified for OU2, OU3 and OU4 during the five-
year review, based upon document reviews and discussions with the MDEQ project manager(s).
Willow Boulevard/A-Site Landfill OU2
No issues were identified at OU2.
King Highway Landfill OU3
MDEQ has not yet approved the Construction Completion Report and it may require further
revision and augmentation before approval. Monitoring and maintenance of the landfill needs
improvement.
Some of the landfill remedy components were built on properties that are not owned by Georgia-
Pacific. These properties are located within the security fence at OU3, but are owned by MDOT
and the City of Kalamazoo. Georgia-Pacific needs to continue to work toward resolution of this
issue and implement the necessary ICs.
59
-------
The following table summarizes the issues at OU3 that affect the protectiveness of the remedy.
Table 7: Issues Identified at OU3
Issues
Affects Current
Protectiveness
Affects Future
Protectiveness
Effective ICs are needed on all site properties and need to be
monitored and maintained. Institutional controls are needed for the
landfill property and the land located within the site security fence
that is currently owned by MDOT and the City of Kalamazoo.
Additionally, MDEQ will not approve the Final Completion of
Construction Report and the Final O&M Plan until the MDOT and
City of Kalamazoo property ownership issues are resolved. Until
these reports are approved, MDEQ cannot issue a Certification of
Completion of Construction for the landfill and without this
certification, under the terms of the agreement between MDEQ and
Georgia-Pacific, the appropriate restrictive covenants cannot be
recorded with the Kalamazoo County Register of Deeds.
No
Yes
Methane gas has migrated off-site in concentrations that exceed
threshold criteria and will need to be mitigated.
No
Yes
12th Street Landfill OU4
The following table summarizes the issues at OU4 that affect the protectiveness of the remedy.
Table 8: Issues Identified at OU4
Issues
Affects Current
Protectiveness
Affects Future
Protectivenes
s
Access controls are inadequate. A chain-link fence is present
along the south side of the landfill but there is no fence on the
north, east, or west sides of the landfill. Trespassers and anglers
can freely enter the property and use the river banks to fish and
have access to the landfill cap and associated gas vents.
Additionally, the fence on the southern side of the landfill does not
restrict foot traffic. The current access configuration does not
prevent vandals from damaging the remedy.
No
Yes
Ongoing erosion at the toe of the landfill over the pore water
collection discharge area.
No
Yes
60
-------
IX. Recommendations and Follow-Up Actions
The recommended follow-up actions to address the issues identified in Section VIII of this report
for OU3 and OU4 are presented in Table 9 and Table 10, respectively.
Table 9: Recommendations and Follow-Up Actions for OU3
Issue
Recommendations
and
Follow-up Actions
Party
Responsible
Oversight
Agency
Milestone
Date
Affects
Protectiveness
Current
Future
Effective ICs are needed on all
site properties and need to be
monitored and maintained.
Institutional controls are
needed for the landfill property
and the land located within the
site security fence that is
currently owned by MDOT and
the City of Kalamazoo.
Additionally, MDEQ will not
approve the Final Completion
of Construction Report and the
Final O&M Plan until the
MDOT and City of Kalamazoo
property ownership issues are
resolved. Until these reports
are approved, MDEQ cannot
issue a Certification of
Completion of Construction for
the landfill and without this
certification, under the terms of
the agreement between MDEQ
and Georgia-Pacific, the
appropriate restrictive
covenants cannot be recorded
with the Kalamazoo County
Register of Deeds.
Submit a plan to
MDEQ and EPA
for 1) resolving
property ownership
issues with respect
to the MDOT and
City of Kalamazoo
properties, 2)
finalizing the Final
Completion of
Construction
Report and the
Final O&M Plan,
and 3)
implementing all
required ICs.
PRP
EPA and
MDEQ
October
2013
No
Yes
Methane gas has migrated off-
site in concentrations that
exceed threshold criteria and
will need to be mitigated.
Submit an updated
landfill gas
mitigation plan to
MDEQ that will
satisfy its concerns
about the off-site
mitigation of
methane gas at the
south end of the
landfill.
PRP
EPA and
MDEQ
October
2013
No
Yes
61
-------
Table 10: Recommendations and Follow-Up Actions for OU4
Issue
Recommendations and
Follow-up Actions
Party
Responsible
Oversight
Agency
Milestone
Date
Affects
Protectiveness
Current
Future
Access controls are
inadequate. A chain-link
fence is present along
the south side of the
landfill but there is no
fence on the north, east,
or west sides of the
landfill. Trespassers
and anglers can freely
enter the property and
use the river banks to
fish and have access to
the landfill cap and
associated gas vents.
Additionally, the fence
on the southern side of
the landfill does not
restrict foot traffic. The
current access
configuration does not
prevent vandals from
damaging the remedy.
Complete evaluation of
access controls along
with evaluation of
potential use of OU4 as
an eco-park (i.e., wildlife
viewing area) so that final
decisions about long-term
access controls can be
made.
PRP
EPA and
MDEQ
December
2012
No
Yes
Ongoing erosion at the
toe of the landfill over
the pore water collection
discharge area.
Repair or reconstruct
drainage feature at toe of
landfill.
PRP
EPA and
MDEQ
October
2013
No
Yes
X. Protectiveness Statements
The remedy at OU2 is expected to be protective of human health and the environment upon
completion ot the remedy, and in the interim, exposure pathways that could result in
unacceptable risks are being controlled. The RA for OU2 began in April 2011 and is expected to
be completed in 2013. During 2011, the waste at the Willow Boulevard Landfill portion of OU2
was consolidated and covered with an impermeable cap. The vegetated soil cover for this
portion ol OU2 was installed in 2012. EPA expects the installation of the impermeable cover at
the A-Site portion ot OU2 to be completed in 2012 and the installation of the OU2-wide
groundwater monitoring system to be completed in 2013. Institutional controls restricting the
use of site groundwater, site use, and for protection of the remedy were recorded and filed in
2010. Once the RA is completed EPA expects the remedy at OU2 to be protective of human
62
-------
health and the environment. EPA will make that determination by inspecting the landfill cover
and evaluating groundwater and methane monitoring data. In addition, there is a restrictive
covenant in place that restricts certain use of the property including use that interferes with
measures necessary to assure the effectiveness and integrity of the remedial action and use of site
groundwater.
The remedy at OU3 currently protects human health and the environment in the short term. The
landfill cap is generally in good condition and prevents PCB-contaminated material in the
landfill from migrating, via erosion or surface water runoff, into the Kalamazoo River. The cap
is also an effective barrier that prevents exposure, via direct contact, to the contaminated material
by on-site workers, trespassers, and anglers. The cap also minimizes infiltration of rainwater and
reduces the potential for leachate generation and the potential for PCBs in groundwater to
migrate into the Kalamazoo River. Public access to the landfill is restricted by a locked chain-
link fence and sheet pile, which prevents people from being exposed to the contaminated
material. Methane generated within the landfill is passively managed and mitigated by gas
collection trenches installed outside of the landfill. These trenches are largely effective with
methane only occasionally detected at off-site probes beyond the lateral extent of the trenches.
Additional trenching (or some alternative) may need to be installed to extend the lateral capture
of methane migration at the OU3 boundary. Some ICs are in place at OU3, but require revision,
while other ICs are not yet in place. In order for the remedy to be protective in the long term, the
following actions will need to be taken: (1) implement revised and new ICs; (2) mitigate any
off-site migration of methane gas, and (3) properly maintain the landfill. Long-term
protectiveness requires compliance with effective ICs. EPA will ensure that long-term
stewardship of OU3, as well as every other operable unit of the Site, includes implementation
and maintenance of each component of the selected remedy, including any necessary ICs, and
proper maintenance of the landfill.
The remedy at OU4 currently protects human health and the environment in the short term. The
remedy has been constructed, and exposure pathways that could result in unacceptable risks are
being controlled. The following issues need to be addressed as part of O&M at OU4: 1) erosion
is occurring at the toe of the landfill where water exits the soil cover drainage feature, and 2) the
current access controls do not prevent trespass. Weyerhaeuser, a PRP for OU4, will evaluate
additional access controls. Evaluation of groundwater monitoring data will continue until
sufficient data is available to determine contaminant trends. Long-term protectiveness requires
compliance with existing ICs. Since the last five-year review, the ICs at OU4 have been
modified to include a groundwater use prohibition. EPA will ensure that long-term stewardship
of OU4, as well as every other operable unit of the Site, includes implementation and
maintenance of each component of the selected remedy, including any necessary ICs.
XI. Next Review
The next five-year review for the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Site is
required within five years from the signature date of this review.
63
-------
Attachments
Attachment 1
Attachment 2
Attachment 3
Attachment 4
Attachment 5
Attachment 6
Attachment 7
Site Maps (Figures 1-11)
Post-Closure Monitoring Groundwater Sample Results 2007-2012
Photos Documenting Site Conditions
Site Inspection Report
Restrictive Covenant for OU2
Restrictive Covenant for OU4
Restrictive Covenant for OU7
Appendices
Appendix A: Newspaper Public Notices
Appendix B: List of Documents Reviewed for the Five-Year Review
Appendix C: List of Data Reviewed for the Five-Year Review
64
-------
ATTACHMENTS
-------
Attachment 1
Site Maps (Figures 1-11)
-------
ALLEGAN COUNTv
' <¦
Allied Paper/
Portage Creek/
Kalamazoo River
Superfund Site
FIGURE 1 - Site Location Map
-------
MICHIGAN
NOT TO SCALE
LAKE SUPERIOR
LAKE HURON
LAKE MICHIGAN
ALLEGAN COUNTY—
KALAMAZOO COUNTY
CALHOUN
LAKE ERIE
X; (NONE)
Li ON= • on- REf
P: PAGESET/PLT-BL
1S/1S/03 SYR-ii-RLP PGL RCA
64560007/RIREPWT/64551SW1.DWG
ALHOUN
Bounty
5 MILES
10 MILES
GRAPHIC SCALE
KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUP
ALLIED PAPER. INC. / PORTAGE CREEK /
KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
ALLIED PAPER, INC. OU
FIGURE 2.- OU1 Location Map
ALLIED PAPER, INC. OU
DRAFT
FOR STATE REVIEW
NOTE:
ALLEGAN, KALAMAZOO AND CALHOUN COUNTY MAPPING
OBTAINED FROM MICHIGAN RESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEM.
-------
- OU1 Site Plan
-------
A H t
KALAMAZOO COUNTY
LAKE SUPERIOR
LAKE MICHIGAN
KALAMAZOO COUNTY
LAKE HURON
I
LAKE ERIE
MICHIGAN
NOT TO SCALE
5 MILES
SCALE
i
10 MILES
NOTE:
KALAMAZOO COUNTY MAPPING OBTAINED FROM
MICHIGAN RESOURCE INFORMATION SYSTEM.
KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUP
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FOCUSED FEASIBILITY STUDY
WILLOW BOULEVARD/A-SITE OU
FIGURE 4 - OU2 Location Map
P: DJA-C3-4
2/22/01 SYR—54-DJO JER GMS
64581640/64581 G03.0WG
-------
X 64581X03
P-tnG-2^"'REF*' *BL«. >N-«. ON-WBL-SPL
2/23/01 SYR—54-RLP DJP CMS
64581640/64581 G08.DW3
I
CREEK
LEGEND
ELEVATION CONTOUR
(NGVD 1929)
EDGE OF WATER OR
DRAJNAGE CHANNEL
UNPAVED ROAD/TRAIL
APPROXIMATE A-SITE BOUNDARY
GEORGIA-PACIFIC PROPERTY
BOUNDARY OUTSIDE OF A-SITE
FORMER LAGOON AREA
EXISTING SHEETPILE WALL
NOTES:
1. UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED ALL SAMPLE
LOCATIONS SURVEYED BY WADE-TRIM INC.
OCTOBER 1993 THROUGH AUGUST 1996.
SAMPLES ARN-1 THROUGH ARN-5 AND
WRN-1 THROUGH WRN-5 WERE SURVEYED
BY BBL JULY 1993.
2. TOPOGRAPHIC MAPPING PRODUCED USING
PHOTOGRAMMETRIC METHODS BY LOCKWOOD,
INC. FROM AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY FLOWN APRIL
1991. KALAMAZOO RIVER SOUTH BANK. EAST OF
DAVIS CREEK REVISED PER CURRENT CONDITIONS.
ADDITIONAL TOPOGRAPHIC CHANGES AFTER APRIL
1991 ARE NOT SHOWN.
3. ALL LOCATIONS ARE APPROXIMATE.
150'
KALAMAZOO RIVER STUDY GROUP
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
REMEDIAL INVESTIGATION/FOCUSED FEASIBILITY STUDY
WILLOW BOU LEVARD/A—SITE OU
FIGURE S -OU2 Site Plan
-------
rel
t^i r t Mi
IlTCE' ~
=§¦ ~" "uT"dvt TTarri son
.. ¦. ai ¦£;. :W-
-- V-^raHNr- ^ '
-+-.-.S- ^ 15/ ? 1 y
at.on BM 7£l i * PoAerpianC
&
===;==. Br onsor
PlaylnSf (tf
o;-
£
T
-1.
* "= M 'Pv . **k
I t\' i
I Seh
.
U'
J? St Marj* Sell
\ ii rn ill t ¦
^ i ..>.,¦ Oza&bofn '• ^ ...1 u*w£r !;' ^11 *
WT KALAMAZOO
j :¦ I a 2. [ _4ye
j ;s < k ? 5 " ;••¦
- S" ';• 5_- I i !: q
13
Harking "vf. -,
Arbo:/^
c\ P
1 __ S«ll 'V \ CHAOLfS • J. 12^= w-A,£-_
ViT^ ?&1 SITE LOCATION
* Vvl
. l,f
fr8i
r
r
;/
/.
_J "-• •>' Ra L2 •: -Vj
"3 ; v .' -x* v>\v
N/.0
p.!
.]
V : ').:> --" Grave-
*rU„ J£- irt^C-5 . P'*S
/.. \ ..y. v~]
•'- ( s*»»# '< " •
Ss*agf iuispssa' Ponds
Park
\
Pa'kt»»6
v-'lf',*
.4.. -;•
i.. _
I
i'rf't1 ^ -M,
• | ^ \ .:>• I -ygv-
A I, A M A ZOu /
v i,V
\ 1 \ \ ^ • •• •:¦ ' p£NN
••> \ F V \ •;•... • •
' .\.. r ; k ?o.-. ¦:,
8 jywt M
: Ii
4
Ik
ijilamaftrn
OO
rvSthmgch ;: ,r/ Iv-|/ S
" '-fes y
JACKSON
T--= :'i \M
j slStt
SJSS1'
JlL
'Mi
1 / LJL=<«^
/ r
r
/ S rpC k fi RfDGE
*5 CGSLTfijOAy
CL/ni%)a;
^ Weed
I J5 . _ Paft. /
¦ Ff a® - i
Wasle Cispc .6
_ Pords
iMl?
24
.[(i-seph SchJ' \
fe'C S ,r^S\ -i k' ' •'
• l Ive ' tA. ....! ¦ •. .
\ *1
.5 ii 1 .' ¦
Lakewo
a =
<1 " • • ,;
~ .«. •
L \V- •-
¦^Ipounty ratrgrourd • ^ _
I
—¦*' a -. . :¦. a:
-EO r Ii AVE : _ -r,fcV\ :\ ¦ .-.
".vTlu i« x '
fy • , -aj- ° -"a JL —i xWasle B«p"
^*y|WMhinptonSt^ J -j.?: • ,-\ Piy'ai
-il' -• f
Sit.trsW'e" ii
palme* Piaagroijnd i^vf o
v
' »• - ";1
? ' •; ; :
BrmptPonk T*\
AlrP-i S3
&OSELAHD
TV/LLC# S3 S
!-s- ;avt
HOMCCRES T AVE.
Jlii - ^ - l , 2 5 p ¦
r...
.}-f#
\
I . ...
lb cams ridge 4
O
Waste D-scosal
Ponds
? / S,.|, ' i.:.^
¦!* *""". ' £ i.' Sri, '
SHE*:OAS! . ; ;gs.: .
I Milwood ^
S " —
• v 'a
^ .-Grdyei Pit
Q
i^. ::'5
-z
^ ,o
¦ ^ / ,;«
r • I 'I Refinfry
. ' *
* t. • •
• 4 • • •
REFERENCE: Base Map Source: USGS 7.5 Min. Topo. Quad., Kalamazoo, Ml (1967, Photorevised 1973).
0 2000'
2000'
¥ a-
i ff
m o
CO Z
Q CO
a: S
>- -^r
r~> 00
R to
AREA LOCATION
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK
KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
EPA 5-YEAR REVIEW REPORT
KHL-OU AND MILL LAGOONS
FIGURE 6 - OU3 Location Map
-------
388
= 33
LEGEND:
APPROXIMATE PROPERTY BOUNDARY
— DITCH LINE
ABANDONED RAILROAD
SHEETPILE WALL
] ACCESS ROAD
RIPRAP
CULVERT PIPE
FINAL AS-BUILT INDEX CONTOUR
FINAL AS-BUILT INTERMEDIATE CONTOUR
SECURITY FENCE
PORE-WATER COLLECTION PIPE
PORE WATER DRAIN
APPROXIMATE WATER EDGE
A
V-1-2A
MW-14
RG-3 ©-
GW-2 A
BH-2 •
SV-B
SV-A
NOTES:
1.
GAS VENTS (ORIGINAL 23; ONLY
FOUR WERE GIVEN IDs)
CUTOFF TRENCH GAS VENTS
LANDFILL GAS CUTOFF TRENCH
FLOW DIRECTION
MONITORING WELL
RIVER GAUGE STATION
LOCATION OF GAS MONITORING PROBES
TEMPORARY BOREHOLE LOCATION
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF STRESSED
VEGETATION AREA REPAIRED DURING WEEK
OF AUGUST 27, 2012
APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF GEOMEMBRANE
LINER PATCHED WITH NEW 40 MIL LLDPE TO
REPAIR BREACH ON AUGUST 28. 2012
I
BASE MAP INFORMATION OBTAINED FROM CADD DRAWING FILE DEVELOPED BY RMT.
INC., ANN ARBOR, MICHIGAN (CADD FILE: L1630SU01.DWG AS-BUILT SURVEY;
8/21/00).
FINAL AS-BUILT CONTOUR ELEVATIONS ARE SHOWN AND ARE BASED ON A FIELD
SURVEY BY ATWELL-HICKS, INC., DATED 9/27/00 WITH REVISIONS DATED 10/23/00.
12/21/01. 12/10/02, AND 7/24/03.
FINAL AS-BUILT CONTOUR ELEVATIONS OF SEDIMENTATION BASIN ARE BASED ON A
FIELD SURVEY BY PREIN it NEWHOF. DATED 2/3/04.
PROPERTY BOUNDARY, AND FINAL AS-BUILT CONTOUR ELEVATIONS OF PARCEL C AND
SURROUNDING AREAS BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY BY PREIN & NEWHOF. DATED
11/19/2010.
ELEVATIONS ARE BASED ON NGVD OF 1929 (MSL).
PROPERTY SURVEY PERFORMED BY WILKINS & WHEATON ENGINEERING CO., INC.. ON
7/1/96.
TOPOGRAPHIC CONTOUR INTERVAL IS 1 FOOT.
8. LOCATIONS OF GW-5, GW-6. GW-7. GW-8. GW-9. AND GW-10 ARE BASED ON A
FIELD SURVEY BY TERRA CONTRACTING LLC. DATED 9/23/05.
9. LOCATION OF GW-11 IS BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY BY TERRA CONTRACTING LLC.
DATED 1/11/06.
10. LOCATIONS OF RG-6, V-4-4, V-4-5, AND V-4-6 ARE BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY
BY TERRA CONTRACTING LLC, DATED 6/7/06.
11. LOCATIONS OF V-1-2 THROUGH V-1-6, V-2-3, V-2-10, AND V-2-18 ARE BASED
ON MULTIPLE FIELD SURVEYS CONDUCTED BY TERRA CONTRACTING. LLC. IN APRIL
2008. GAS VENTS V-2-4 THROUGH V-2-9, AND V-2-11 THROUGH V-2-17 ARE
NOT SHOWN FOR CLARITY PURPOSES (THESE VENTS ARE LOCATED ALONG TRENCH C).
12. LOCATION OF GW-12 IS APPROXIMATE.
13. LOCATIONS OF GW-13 THROUGH GW-17 BASED ON FIELD SURVEY CONDUCTED BY
PREIN & NEWHOF ON 11/1/11.
LOCATION OF SHEETPILE WALL AND A PORTION OF THE MONITORING WELLS ARE
BASED ON A FIELD SURVEY BY ATWELL—HICKS, INC. DATED 9/27/00.
15. PARCELS 1. 2. 10. A, B, AND THE TRIANGLE PARCEL ARE OWNED BY
GEORGIA—PACIFIC.
16. GEORGIA-PACIFIC PURCHASED THE "TRIANGLE PARCEL" FROM THE MICHIGAN
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (MDOT) IN EARLY 2006.
17. GEORGIA—PACIFIC PURCHASED PARCELS A (PREVIOUSLY OWNED BY MDOT) AND B
(PREVIOUSLY OWNED BY THE CITY OF KALAMAZOO) IN JUNE 2008, WHICH ARE
LOCATED IN THE PORTION OF THE KING HIGHWAY (M-96) RIGHT-OF-WAY THAT IS
ENCLOSED BY THE KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL SITE BOUNDARY FENCE.
18. STRESSED VEGETATION AREAS SV-C. AND SV-E THROUGH SV-G ORIGIN ALLY
IDENTIFIED IN THE JUNE 27, 2012 STRESSED VEGETATION SAMPLING RESULTS AND
WORK PLAN WERE NOT REPAIRED DURING THE WEEK OF AUGUST 27, 2012 AS THE
GRASS GROWTH IN THESE AREAS HAD IMPROVED SINCE THEIR ORIGINAL DISCOVERY
DUE TO RECENT RAINFALL AND DID NOT REQUIRE TOPSOIL APPLICATION
Photo No. 4
GRAPHIC SCALE
Photo No. 2
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/
KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
STRESSED VEGETATION AND GEOMEMBRANE
LINER REPAIR ACTIVITIES
CURRENT STATUS OF COMPLETED
STRESSED VEGETATION AND
GEOMEMBRANE LINER REPAIR
G ARCADIS
FIGURE
FIGURED -OU3 Site Plan
-------
SIT
REMEDIAL INVEST
12th stre FIGURE 8 - 0U4 Location Map
ALLIED PAP r
KALAMAZQ
-------
FIGURE 9 -0U4 Site Plan
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
CERTIFICATION OF COMPLETION OF OU-4 RA REPORT
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL.
LANDFILL GAS PROBE/VENT LOCATIONS
1,
X )
1
fl
\\
il
k
J
¦ fx
•l
J
\
-------
The Seven Areas of Operable Unit 5
(The Kalamazoo River and Portage Creek)
City of
Way land
Eitypf
Fgnrn/illp
rCitV'Qf Allegan,
inwell dam
Rtchterd
City of
GoWes
take KttUgpu
River Reach/ Area
Average .
Length Water I®"®6
(miles) Depth width (ft)
Area
(acres) v
Area 1 - Morrow Dam to
Plainwell Dam
21.9
3.4
181
487
Area 1 - Portage Creek
2.0
2.3
32
8
Area 2 - Plainwell to Otsego
City Dam
1.7
2.5
450
96
Area 3 - Otsego City to
Otsego Dam
3.4
3.8
200
83
Area 4 - Otsego to
Trowbridge Dam
4.7
5.0
248
131
Area 5 - Trowbridge to
Allegan City Dam
9.1
4.3
292
317
Area 6 - Lake Allegan
9.8
6.7
1,500
1,650
Area 7 - Allegan Dam to
Lake Michigan
26
5.5
212
670
\City of Kalamazoc*'
)oty of Portage"
FIGURE 10 -OU5
-------
Figure 11 -
OU7 Location Map
D:\05130\03\51300301.mxd 8/29/2007 15:00:31
-------
Attachment 2
Post-Closure Monitoring Groundwater Sample Results
2007-2012
-------
Attachment 2A
0U3 Results
-------
TABLE 1
DRAFT
POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ALLIED PAPER, INCJPORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT
Sample ID:
Well ID:
Date Collected:
Generic
GSI
Values
Site
Specific
WQBEL
Units
H85378
MW-7
02705/07
H85379
MW-1AR
02/06/07
H85380
MW-2R
02/06/07
H85381
MW-16A
02/06/07
H86382
MW-11RR
02/06/07
H8S383
Equip. Blank
[MW-11RR]
02/06/07
H86384
MW-12B
02/07/07
H86385
MW-16B
02/07/07
H86386
MW-12AR
02/07/07
H86387
MW-13B
02/07/07
H85388
MW-8AR
02/08/07
H86389
DUP [MW-16AR]
02/08/07
VOCs
Acetone I 1,700 | - | pg/L | ND[5 0] | ND [5.0] | ND [5.0] | ND[5 0] | ND [5.0] | ND [5.0] | ND [5.0] | ND [5.0] | ND [5.0] | ND [5.0] | ND [5.0] | ND [5.0]
SVOCs
4-Methylphenol
71
-
h¥l
ND [9.71
ND [9.71
ND [9.4]
ND [9.6]
ND [9.71
ND [9.91
ND [101
ND [9.61
ND [9.51
ND [9.71
ND f9.41
ND f9.4]
Naphthalene
13
_
fjq/L
ND [9.71
ND [9.71
ND [9.4]
ND [9.61
ND [9.71
ND [9.9]
ND f10]
ND [9.61
ND [9.5]
ND [9.71
ND [9 41
ND [9.41
Phenol
210
-
mil
ND [9.7]
ND [9.7]
ND [9.4]
ND [9.6]
ND [9.7]
ND [9.9]
ND [10]
ND [9.6]
ND [9.5]
ND [9.7]
ND [9.4]
ND [9.4]
PCBs
Aroclor 1016
-
-
W'L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.053]
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0481
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
Aroclor 1221
-
-
fjq/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0481
ND [0.048]
ND f0.0531
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
Aroclor 1232
_
-
Hq/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND fO 053]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
Aroclor 1242
-
-
(jq/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0 048]
ND 10.0531
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0 048]
Aroclor 1248
-
-
fjq/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0 0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0531
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
Aroclor 1254
-
_
(jq/L
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND fO.0531
ND [0.0471
ND fO 0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0 0481
Aroclor 1260
-
_
WL
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND fO.0531
ND [0.0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
Total PCBs
0.2
-
H9«-
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0 047]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.053]
ND [0.047]
ND [0 048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0 048]
ND [0.0481
Metals
Barium
_
2,300
H9,l
78.2 B
413
214
442
424
ND [9 81
283
519
668
225
499
501
Calcium
-
-
Hf1
172,000
221.000
157,000
168.000
151,000
476 B
134,000
152,000
210,000
144.000
196.000
197.000
Chromium6
11
_
|jq/L
ND [101
ND [10]
ND [101
ND [101
ND [101
1.3 B
ND [101
ND [10]
ND [10]
ND [101
ND [101
ND [101
Iron
-
pq/L
4.370
83.500
9.650
10.200
4.550
49.7 B
4,890
7,590
39,600
8,330
35,500
35.800
Sodium
-
-
ucj/L
61,700
4,090 B
98.500
72,400
79,800
777 B
91,000
80,600
51.300
95.400
43,500
43,400
Thallium
-
160
uq/L
ND [6.91
15.5 B
ND [6.91
ND [6 91
ND [6.91
ND [6 91
ND [6.91
ND [6.91
ND [6.91
ND [6.91
ND [6.91
8.5 B
Zinc
-
1,200
H9/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
12
-
ffl"-
ND [2.7]
ND [2.7]
ND [2.7]
ND [2.7]
ND [2.7]
ND [2.7]
ND [2.7]
ND [2.7]
ND [2.7]
ND [2.7]
ND [2.7]
ND [2.7]
Miscellaneous
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
430
740
460
510
450
1.8 B
370
480
810
390
620
630
Carbonate Alkalinity
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chemical Oxyqen Demand
-
-
mg/L
ND [20]
24.3
ND [201
ND [20]
ND [20]
ND [201
ND [201
ND [201
36.7
ND [201
34.6
30.5
Hydroxide Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitroqen
-
-
ma/L
0.032 B
ND [011
0.085 B
NDf0.1l
NDfO.1l
ND [0.11
0.037 B
NDf0.1l
NDf0.1l
NDf0.1l
0.039 B
ND [0.11
Sulfate
-
-
mq/L
140
2.4
34
51
62
ND [0.21
76
42
32
69
15
14
Total Alkalinity
-
-
ma/L
430
740
460
510
450
1.8 B
370
480
810
390
620
630
Total Organic Carbon
-
-
mq/L
3.8
6.4
41
7.7
5
ND Ml
1.9
7.6
14 8
3.2
7.2
7.1
Total Suspended Solids
-
~
mq/L
39.2
51.3
12.8
17.4
12.6
ND [0.51
10.6
16.9
23.2
9.2
20.1
20.1
See Notes on Page 27.
8/21/2012
O:\Cliente\GP KHU06 Notes and Data\GW Sampling Results Since Last 5-Yr Reviewjdw
Page 1 of 27
-------
TABLE 1
DRAFT
POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT
Sample ID:
Well ID:
Date Collected:
Generic
GSI
Values
Site
Specific
WQBEL
Units
H86390
MW-13AR
02/08/07
H86391
MW-8BR
02/08/07
H8S392
MW-14AR
02/09/07
H86393
MW-16AR
02/09/07
H86394
DUP [MW-15AR]
02/09/07
H85396
MW-3AR
02/09/07
H86396
MW-7
06/07/07
H85397
MW-2R
05/08/07
H86398
MW-1AR
05/08/07
H85399
MW-11RR
05/08/07
H86400
MW-16A
05/08/07
H85401
Equip. Blank
[MW-11RR]
05/08/07
VOCs _
Acetone I 1.700 | - | pg/L | ND [5 0] | ND [5.0] | ND [5.0] | ND [5.0] | ND [5.0] | ND [5.0] ] NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA
SVOCs
4-Methylphenol
71
_
mq/l
ND [9.4]
ND [9.4]
ND [9.51
ND [9.6]
ND f9 8]
ND [9.71
ND [9.7]
ND [9.41
ND [9.71
ND f9.7l
ND [9 41
ND [9.51
Naphthalene
13
-
HR/l
ND [9.41
ND [9.41
ND [9.5]
ND [9.6]
ND r9.8]
ND [9.71
ND [9.71
ND [9.41
ND f9 7]
ND [9.7]
ND f9.4]
ND r9.51
Phenol
210
»
H9'L
ND [9.4]
ND [9.4]
ND [9.5]
ND [9.6]
ND [9.8]
ND [9.7]
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PCBs
Aroclor 1016
_
-
H9'l
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND f0.048l
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1221
_
-
uq/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0,048]
ND [0 0481
ND r0.048l
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0481
ND rO 0471
Aroclor 1232
_
-
uq/L
ND [0 048]
ND [0.048]
ND P 0471
ND fO 048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0 0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0 0481
ND fO.048]
ND [0 047]
ND [0.0481
ND r0.0471
Aroclor 1242
_
-
M3/L
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0 0481
ND [0 0481
ND r0.048]
ND [0 047]
ND [0.0481
ND fO.0471
Aroclor 1248
_
-
uq/L
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.047]
ND [0 048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0,0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1254
-
-
MP/L
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0 048]
ND [0 048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND TO 0471
Aroclor 1260
-
~
H9/l
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND f0.0471
Total PCBs
0.2
-
HS'L
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0 048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0 048]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
Metals
Barium
-
2.300
m"-
655
266
246
270
268
428
54.5 B
160 B
421
401
431
ND [11.51
Calcium
-
-
H9'L
266,000
152,000
143,000
153,000
152,000
197.000
161.000
154,000
237,000
156,000
173,000
157 B
Chromium6
11
-
jig/L
ND [10]
ND [10]
ND [10]
ND [101
ND [101
ND [101
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Iron
-
-
HS"-
66,100
9,620
8,780
9,800
9,720
61.100
3,790
8,490
97,300
4,350
10,900
ND [15.81
Sodium
-
-
Hg/L
13,900
103,200 E,J
116,100 E,J
141,500 E,J
140,200 E.J
72.200
52,400
64,200
3,920 B
82,200
71,300
351 B
Thallium
-
160
P9'L
ND [6 91
ND [6.91
ND [6.91
ND [6.91
ND [6.91
7.7 B
ND [1.11
ND [1.11
NDri.1l
ND[1.11
NDf1.1l
ND [1.11
Zinc
-
1.200
ng/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
12
-
PS'L
ND [2.7]
ND [2.7]
ND [2.7]
ND [2.7]
ND [2.7]
ND [2.7]
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Miscellaneous
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
840
480
430
430
430
560
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chemical Oxyqen Demand
-
-
mq/U
34.6
24 3 J
ND [20]
ND 120]
ND [201
ND [20]
22.9
ND [20]
29.3
27.1
20.8
22.9
Hydroxide Alkalinity
-
-
mfl/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitroqen
-
-
mq/L
NDf0.1l
NDr0.1l
NDr0.1l
NDr0.1l
ND [0.11
0.9904
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Sulfate
-
-
mq/L
3.9
43
65
73
74
30
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
840
480
430
430
430
560
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Orqanic Carbon
-
-
mq/L
7.5
4.3
3.2
3.5
3.8
4.4
5.5
3.7
5.7
5.4
8.2
ND f1l
Total Suspended Solids
-
mq/L
22.9
8.8
19.5
21.3
19.7
54
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
See Notes on Page 27.
8/21/2012
G:\Cllents\GP KHL\06 Notes and Data\GW Sampling Results Since Last 5-Yr Review.xlsx
Page 2 of 27
-------
TABLE 1
DRAFT
POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ALLIED PAPER, INCJPORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT
Sample ID:
Well ID:
Date Collected:
Generic
GSI
Values
Site
Specific
WQBEL
Units
H86402
MW-12B
05/09/07
H86403
MW-16B
06/09/07
H86404
MW-12AR
06/09/07
H86405
MW-13B
06/09/07
H66406
MW-13AR
06/09/07
H86407
MW-8AR
06/10/07
H86408
DUP [MW-8AR]
06/10/07
H86409
MW-8BR
06/10/07
H86410
MW-16AR
06/10/07
H85411
DUP [MW-16AR]
06/10/07
H85412
MW-14AR
06/10/07
H85413
MW-3AR
06/11/07
VOCs
Acetone I 1,700 J - | pg/L | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA
SVOCs
4-Methylphenol
71
pg/L
ND [9.6]
ND [9.4]
3.9 J
ND f9.6l
ND [9.41
ND [10]
ND [9.81
ND [9.4]
ND [9.4]
ND [9.4]
ND [9.9]
ND [9.41
Naphthalene
13
—
Hfl/L
ND [9.61
ND [9.4]
ND [9.5]
ND [9.61
ND [9 41
ND [10]
ND [9 8]
ND [9.4]
ND [9.41
ND [9.4]
ND [9.91
ND [9.41
Phenol
210
-
M9'L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PCBs
Aroclor 1016
_
_
nq/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.0471
ND [0,0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1221
_
-
[jq/L
ND r0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0.047]
ND [0 047]
Aroclor 1232
_
-
Hfl'L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND f0 047]
ND [0.048]
ND [0 048] UJ
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0471
ND [0.04"71
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1242
_
nq/i
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1248
_
_
fjq/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
Aroclor 1254
-
_
pq/L
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048] UJ
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0471
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1260
-
_
ua/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048] UJ
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0471
Total PCBs
0.2
--
H9/l
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0 047]
ND [0.048]
ND [0 048] UJ
ND [0.047]
ND [0 047]
ND [0.047]
ND [0 047]
ND [0.047]
ND [0 047]
ND [0.047]
Metals
Barium
-
2,300
HS'L
260
494
629
203
705
482
479
262
273
249
226
244
Calcium
-
-
uq/L
132.000
154,000
211.000
144.000
308.000
197.000
192,000
153,000
158,000
154,000
147,000
168,000
Chromium6
11
~
ffl"-
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Iron
-
-
H9'l
4,690
8.160
51.200
7.400
87,300
35,000
33,900
10,600
10,200
9,940
9.340
33.900
Sodium
--
-
H3'l
89.500
81,400
41.300
96.000
9,040
52,700
51,200
99,600
154,000
150,000
118,000
104,000
Thallium
-
160
hs/l
ND [1.11
ND [1.11
ND [1.11
ND f1.1l
ND [1.11
NDM.11
NDM.11
NDM.11
NDM.11
NDM.11
NDM.11
NDM.11
Zinc
-
1.200
uq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
12
-
Mfl/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Miscellaneous
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chemical Oxygen Demand
-
-
mg/L
31.4
33.5
37.7
ND [201
29.3
25
27.1
22.9
27.1
ND [201
ND [201
31.4
Hydroxide Alkalinity
-
-
mgA.
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitrogen
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Sulfate
-
-
mq/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Organic Carbon
-
-
mg/L
8.2
7.3
12.2
2.9
6.5
9
9.4
4.4
4.9
4.7
5
4.7
Total Suspended Solids
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
See Notes on Page 27.
8/21/2012
G:\Clients\GP KHL\06 Notes and Dsta\GW Sampling Results Since Last 5-Yr Review.xlsx
Page 3 of 27
-------
TABLE 1
DRAFT
POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT
Sample ID:
H85414
H8641S
H85416
H86417
H85418
H85419
H86420
H85421
H8S422
H85423
H86424
H85425
Well ID:
Generic
Site
MW-7
MW-2R
MW-11RR
Equip. Blank
MW-1AR
MW-16B
MW-16A
MW-12B
MW-13B
MW-12AR
MW-13AR
MW-8AR
GSI
Specific
[MW-11RR]
Date Collected:
Values
WQBEL
Units
08/06/07
08/06/07
08/08/07
08/08/07
08/08/07
08/08/07
08/08/07
08/08/07
08/08/07
08/09/07
08/09/07
08/09/07
VOCs
Acetone
1,700
-
pg/L | NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SVOCs
4-Methylphenol5
71
_
H9/l
ND [9.81
ND [9.61
ND [9.4]
ND [9.9]
NDI101
ND [101
ND [10]
ND [10]
ND r9.4l
ND [9.41
ND [9.5]
ND [101
Naphthalene
13
-
H9/L
ND [9.81
ND [9.6]
ND [9.41
ND [9.81
ND [101
ND [101
ND [101
ND [101
ND [9.41
ND [9.4]
ND [9.51
ND [101
Phenol
210
~
H9/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PCBs
Aroclor 1016
_
_
ffi"-
ND rO 049]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.051
ND [0.051]
ND [0 0491
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0511
ND [0.048]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0531
Aroclor 1221
-
-
pq/L
ND fO.049]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.049]
ND [0.051
ND [0.0511
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0511
ND [0.0481
ND rO.047]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0531
Aroclor 1232
-
-
yq/L
ND fO 0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND rO 051
ND [0.0511
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0511
ND [0 048]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0531
Aroclor 1242
_
_
pq/L
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.051
ND [0.0511
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.051]
ND [0 0481
ND [0 0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0 0531
Aroclor 1248
_
-
H1/l
ND [0 049]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.051
ND [0.0511
ND rO 0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0511
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471 UJ
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0531
Aroclor 1254
_
-
(jq/L
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
ND [0 0491
ND [0.051
ND [0 0511
ND [0.0491
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0511
ND [0.048]
ND [0.047] UJ
ND [0 048]
ND [0.0531
Aroclor 1260
-
-
pq/L
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.051
ND [0.0511
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.051]
ND [0.0481
ND [0 0471 UJ
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0531
Total PCBs
0.2
~
Mfl'L
ND [0.049]
ND [0 049]
ND [0 049]
ND [0 05]
ND [0.051]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.051]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.047] UJ
ND [0 048]
ND [0 0531
Metals
Barium
-
2,300
hr'l
68.8 B
157 B
417
ND [11.11
410
407
476
272
198 B
613
558
475
Calcium
-
-
Hf)'L
168,000
154,000
160,000
ND [8841
233,000
169,000
153,000
140,000
146,000
216,000
243,000
202,000
Chromium6
11
-
(jg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Iron
-
-
ug/L
4,650
10,100
5,850
ND [18.61
98,400
11,300
7,940
5,590
6,960
51,400
62,400
27.700
Sodium
-
-
pg'L
64,800
100,000
86,400
ND [1,230]
2,530 B
76,000
83,000
94,300
100,000
60,800
43,200
86,300
Thallium
-
160
H9'l
ND [61 UJ
ND [6] UJ
ND [61 UJ
ND [6] UJ
ND [61 UJ
ND [6] UJ
ND [6] UJ
ND [6] UJ
ND [61 UJ
ND [61 UJ
ND [6] UJ
ND [61 UJ
Zinc
-
1,200
HS'L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
12
-
H9"-
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Miscellaneous
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chemical Oxygen Demand
-
-
mg/L
ND [201
25.2
ND [20]
ND [201
ND [201
ND [20]
ND [20]
ND [201
ND [201
35.8
23
37.9
Hydroxide Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitroqen
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Sulfate
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Orqanic Carbon
--
--
mg/L
4.1
4
5.7
ND [11
5.6
7.5
6.9
2.3
3.1
13.3
8.7
14.3
Total Suspended Solids
"
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
See Notes on Page 27.
8/21/2012
G:\Clients\GP KHL\06 Notes and Data\GW Sampling Results Since Last 5-Yr Review xlsx
Page 4 of 27
-------
TABLE 1
DRAFT
POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ALLIED PAPER, INCJPORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT
Sample ID:
Well ID:
Date Collected:
Generic
GSI
Values
Site
Specific
WQBEL
Units
H85426
DUP [MW-8AR]
08/09/07
H86427
MW-8BR
08/09/07
H85428
MW-15AR
08/10/07
H85429
DUP [MW-15AR]
08/10/07
H85430
MW-14AR
08/10/07
H86431
MW-3AR
08/10/07
H86432
MW-7
10/29/07
H8S433
MW-1AR
10/30/07
H85434
MW-2R
10/30/07
H86436
MW-11RR
10/30/07
H85437
MW-16A
10/30/07
H85438
MW-12B
10/30/07
Acetone I 1,700 | - | pg/L | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA I NA | NA | NA | NA
SVOCs
4-Methylphenor
71
_
(jq/L
ND [10]
ND [9.5]
ND [101
ND [101
ND [9.71
ND [9.41
ND [9.6]
ND [9.41
ND [9.41
ND [9.6]
ND [101
ND [101
Naphthalene
13
_
pq/L
ND [101
ND [9.5]
ND [101
ND [101
ND [9.71
ND [9 41
ND [9.61
ND [9.4]
ND [9.4]
ND [9.6]
ND [10]
ND [101
Phenol
210
-
W«-
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PCBs
Aroclor 1016
_
—
|jq/L
ND [0.0511
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0511 UJ
ND [0.051 UJ
ND [0.05]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1221
_
_
H9'l
ND [0.0511
ND [0.048]
ND [0.051] UJ
ND [0.051 UJ
ND [0.051
ND [0.0481
ND [0 0481 UJ
ND [0.0471 UJ
ND [0 047] UJ
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.0471 UJ
ND [0.0471 UJ
Aroclor 1232
_
-
fjq/L
ND [0.051]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.051] UJ
ND [0.051 UJ
ND [0.051
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0471
Aroclor 1242
-
_
yp/L
ND [0.0511
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0511 UJ
ND [0.051 UJ
ND [0.051
ND [0.0481
ND TO 0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1248
-
_
F9'L
ND [0.0511
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0511 UJ
ND [0 051 UJ
ND [0.051
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0471
Aroclor 1254
_
-
Ff1
ND [0.0511
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0511 UJ
ND [0.051 UJ
ND [0.05]
ND [0.0481
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0471
Aroclor 1260
_
-
ffl'L
ND [0.0511
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0511 UJ
ND [0.051 UJ
ND [0.051
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND r0.0471
ND [0.0471
Total PCBs
0.2
-
M#L
ND [0.051]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.051] UJ
ND [0.05] UJ
ND [0.05]
ND [0.048] ND [0.048] UJ
ND [0.047] UJ
ND [0.047] UJ
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0 047] UJ
ND [0 047] UJ
Metals
Barium
-
2,300
H9/l
483
300
255 J
252 J
253 J
202 J
70 9 B
314
236
434
410
268
Calcium
-
-
fjq/L
207,000
179,000
158,000 J
156,000 J
160,000 J
159.000 J
156,000
193,000
185,000
153,000
165,000
139,000
Chromium6
11
_
H9'L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Iron
-
-
|jq/L
28,600
14,600
10,100 J
10,100 J
11.100J
14,500 J
2,510
65,400
14,900
5,110
9,690
5.110
Sodium
-
-
H9"-
88,200
103.000
153,000 J
152,000 J
112.000 J
157,000 J
73,000
4,420 B
69,500
84,300
76,700
94,600
Thallium
-
160
HR/L
ND [61 UJ
ND [61 UJ
ND [61 UJ
ND [6] UJ
ND [6] UJ
ND [61 UJ
ND [0 91
ND [0.91
ND [0.9]
ND [0.91
ND [0.9]
ND [0.91
Zinc
-
1,200
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
12
-
ug/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Miscellaneous
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chemical Oxyqen Demand
-
-
mgyi
33.7
ND [201
ND [201 UJ
ND [201 UJ
ND [20] UJ
ND [201 UJ
ND [201 UJ
30.2 J
ND [20] UJ
ND [201 UJ
22 J
ND [201 UJ
Hydroxide Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitrogen
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Sulfate
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Organic Carbon
—
-
mq/L
14.4
5.7
4.4 J
4.1 J
4.5 J
4 J
3.2
7
4.5
6.1
7.5
2.3
Total Suspended Solids
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
See Notes on Page 27.
8/21/2012
G:\Gllents\GP KHL\06 Notes and Data\GW Sampling Results Since Last 5-Yr Review.xlsx
Page 5 of 27
-------
TABLE 1
DRAFT
POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT
Sample ID:
Well ID:
Date Collected:
Generic
GSI
Values
Site
Specific
WQBEL
Units
H85439
MW-16B
10/30/07
H85440
MW-13B
10/31/07
H85441
MW-12AR
10/31/07
H85442
MW-13AR
10/31/07
H85443
MW8BR
10/31/07
H86444
MW-8AR
10/31/07
H86445
DUP [MW-8AR]
10/31/07
H85446
MW-14AR
11/01/07
H86447
DUP [MW-14AR]
11/01/07
H85448
MW-3AR
11/02/07
H85449
MW-15AR
11/02/07
H85450
MW-2R
02/11/08
VOCs
Acetone I 1,700 I - I MQ/L I NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA ] NA | NA
ND [5]
SVOCs
4-Methylphenol
71
_
fjq/L
ND [9.71
ND [9.41
ND [9.6]
ND [9.41
ND [9.4]
ND [9 6]
ND [9.8]
ND [9.4]
ND [9.4]
ND r9 7]
ND [9.81
ND [9.51
Naphthalene
13
_
HP/l
ND [9.71
ND [9.4]
ND [9.61
ND [9.4]
ND [9.4]
ND [9.6]
ND [9.81
ND [9 41
ND [9.4]
ND [9.71
ND [9.4]
ND [9.51
Phenol
210
-
HBfl-
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND [9.5]
PCBs
Aroclor 1016
_
-
fjq/L
ND [0.0491
ND [0.047]
ND [0.047]
ND [0 047]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.046]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0 049]
ND [0.049]
Aroclor 1221
_
(jq/L
ND [0.0471 UJ
ND [0.0471 UJ
ND [0.0471 UJ
ND [0.047] UJ
ND [0.047] UJ
ND [0 047] UJ
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.046] UJ
ND [0 049] UJ
ND [0.049] UJ
ND [0.049] UJ
ND [0.049]
Aroclor 1232
-
-
|jq/L
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0 0481
ND [0.046]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
Aroclor 1242
-
-
fjq/i-
ND [0.049]
ND [0 0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.046]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.049]
Aroclor 1248
_
-
W/L
ND [0,0491
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0 0461
ND [0.0491
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.049]
Aroclor 1254
_
_
fjq/L
ND [0 0491
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.046]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
Aroclor 1260
-
-
H9"-
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.046]
ND [0 0491
ND [0 0491
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
Total PCBs
02
-
H9'L
ND [0.047] UJ
ND [0.047] UJ
ND [0 047] UJ
ND [0.047] UJ
ND [0.047] UJ
ND [0.047] UJ
ND [0.048] UJ
ND [0.046] UJ
ND [0.049] UJ
ND [0.049] UJ
ND [0.049] UJ
ND [0.0491
Metals
Barium
-
2.300
uq/L
477
211
638
685
286
550
559
250
256
649
253
223
Calcium
-
-
uq/l
150.000
151.000
220,000
286,000
166,000
235,000
239,000
158,000
160,000
239,000
154,000
151.000
Chromium8
11
_
pq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND [101
Iron
-
-
|jq/L
7.390
7,840
50,800
69,500
12.500
33,800
34,000
11.000
11.200
51.500
9,600
14,400
Sodium
-
-
(jq/L
84,400
101,000
72,700
28,600
114,000
40.300
39,400
113,000
115.000
78,300
142,000
64.100
Thallium
-
160
H9'L
ND [0.91
ND [0.91
ND [0.9]
ND [0.91
ND [0 9]
ND [0.91
ND [0.9]
ND [0.9]
ND [0.9]
ND [0.9]
ND [0.91
ND [0.671
Zinc
-
1.200
H9/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
12
-
yg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
2.1 B
Miscellaneous
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
-
—
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbonate Alkalinity
~
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chemical Oxygen Demand
-
-
mg/l
26.1 J
261 J
48.6 J
40.5 J
ND [20] UJ
26.1 J
24.1 J
ND [201 UJ
ND [201 UJ
24.1
26.1 J
ND [201
Hydroxide Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitroqen
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND [1001
Sulfate
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
19
Total Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
460
Total Orqanic Carbon
-
-
mg/L
6
3
13.6
9.2
5
9
7.9
4.7
4.7
6.5
5.6
4
Total Suspended Solids
~
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
23.7
See Notes on Page 27.
8/21/2012
G:\Clients\GP KHL\06 Note9 and DataVGW Sampling Results Since Last 5-Yr Review.xlsx
Page 6 of 27
-------
TABLE 1
DRAFT
POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT
Sample ID:
Well ID:
Date Collected:
Generic
GSI
Values
Site
Specific
WQBEL
Units
H85461
MW-17
02/11/08
H85452
MW-1AR
02/12/08
H85453
MW-11RR
02/12/08
H85456
MW-16A
02/12/08
H854S6
MW-16AB
02/13/08
H86457
MW-12AR
02/13/08
H85458
MW-12B
02/13/08
H85459
MW-8BR
02/14/08
H86460
MW-13B
02/14/08
H85461
MW*13AR
02/14/08
H86462
MW-8AR
02/14/08
H85463
DUP [MW-8AR]
02/14/08
VOCs
Acetone I 1.700 | - I MQ/LI ND [5]
ND [5] | ND [5] | ND [5] | ND [5] | ND [5] | ND [5] | ND [5] | ND [5] | ND [5] | ND [5] | ND [51
SVOCs
4-Methylphenor
71
_
(jq/L
ND [9.81
ND [9.9]
ND [9.5]
ND r9,81
ND [9.41
ND [9.41
ND [9.41
ND [9.4]
ND [9 41
ND [9.4]
ND [9.4]
ND [9.4]
Naphthalene
13
_
|jq/l
ND [9.8]
ND [9.91
ND [9.51
ND [9.8]
ND [9.4]
ND [9.4]
ND [9.4]
ND [9.4]
ND [9.4]
ND [9.41
ND [9.4]
ND [9.4]
Phenol
210
_
M9'L
ND [9 8]
ND [9.9]
ND [9.5]
ND [9.8]
ND [9.4]
ND [9 4]
ND [9.4]
ND [9.4]
ND [9.4]
ND [9 4]
ND [9.4]
ND [9.4]
PCBs
Aroclor 1016
..
~
(jq/l.
ND [0.05]
ND [0.05]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0 05]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.05]
ND [0.052]
ND [0.052]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.05]
ND [0.05]
Aroclor 1221
_
H9/l
ND [0.05]
ND [0.05]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.05]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.05]
ND [0 0521
ND [0.0521
ND [0.0481
ND [0.051
ND [0.051
Aroclor 1232
-
_
nq/L
ND [0.05]
ND [0.05]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.051
ND [0.0471
ND [0.05]
ND [0.0521
ND [0.052]
ND [0.048]
ND [0 05]
ND [0 051
Aroclor 1242
_
_
pq/L
ND [0.051
ND [0.05]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.051
ND [0.047]
ND [0.051
ND [0.0521
ND [0.052]
0.066
ND [0 05]
ND [0.05]
Aroclor 1248
_
_
uq/L
ND [0.051
ND [0.05]
ND [0 049]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.05]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.05]
ND [0.052]
ND [0.0521
ND [0.0481
ND [0.05]
ND [0.05]
Aroclor 1254
_
-
WL
ND [0.051
ND [0.05]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.05]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.05]
ND [0.0521
ND [0.052]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.05]
ND [0.051
Aroclor 1260
-
H9'L
ND [0.05]
ND [0.05]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.05]
ND [0 0471
ND [0.051
ND [0.0521
ND [0.052]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.05]
ND [0.05]
Total PCBs
0.2
~
HQ'L
ND [0.05]
ND [0.05]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.05]
ND [0 047]
ND [0.05]
ND [0.052]
ND [0.052]
0.066
ND [0.05]
ND [0.05]
Metals
Barium
-
2,300
WL
67.5 B
305
423
397
516
567
286
252
200 B
891
354
353
Calcium
-
-
ffl'L
159,000
206,000
156,000
169,000
163,000
195,000
147,000
154.000
145,000
307,000
199,000
198,000
Chromium6
11
-
pq/L
ND [0.141
ND [0.141
ND [10]
ND [10]
ND [10]
ND [10]
ND [101
ND [101
ND [101
ND [101
ND [0.141
ND [101
Iron
-
-
H9/l
3,120
70,600
4,180
8,590
8.310
47,200
5.370
10,300
7,200
95,100
34,700
34,500
Sodium
-
-
hi'l
71,500
4,480 B
87.900
76,600
88,800
71,500
98,700
109,000
102,000
3.940 B
14,700
19.200
Thallium
-
160
uq/L
ND [0.67]
ND [0.67]
ND [0.671
ND [0.671
ND [0.67]
ND [0.67]
ND [0.671
ND [0.671
ND [0.671
ND [0.67]
ND [0.671
ND [0.671
Zinc
-
1.200
uq/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
12
-
Mfl/L
0.97 B
1.5 B
2 B
1.7 B
1.5 B
2 B
1.2 B
0.83 B
0.89 B
1.2 B
1.3 B
1.1 B
Miscellaneous
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chemical Oxygen Demand
-
~
mg/L
ND [201
28.2
ND [201
24.1
24.1
52.7 J
ND [201
ND [20]
ND [201
22
ND [20]
ND [20]
Hydroxide Alkalinity
~
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitroqen
-
-
mq/L
ND [100]
ND [1001
ND [100]
ND [1001
NDf100l
ND [1001
ND [1001
ND [100]
ND [1001
ND [1001
ND [100]
ND [1001
Sulfate
-
—
mg/L
110
0.53
53
50
35
0.75
77
38
61
10
8.5
94
Total Alkalinity
-
-
ma/L
420
580
460
520
480
680
380
440
400
910
530
530
Total Orqanic Carbon
-
-
mg/L
3.4
7.1
9
8.1
69
12.2
2.2
3.5
2.8
7.1
4.1
4.6
Total Suspended Solids
-
~
mg/L
32.9
62.2
11.6
20.8
20.6
648
11.4
21.9
15.2
894
42.9
44.4
See Notes on Page 27.
8/21/2012
G:\ClientslGP KHLV06 Notes and Data\GW Sampling Results Since Last 5-Yr ReviewJdsx
Page 7 of 27
-------
TABLE 1
DRAFT
POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT
Sample ID;
Well ID:
Date Collected:
Generic
GSI
Values
Site
Specific
WQBEL
Units
HB5464
MW-14AR
02/14/08
H85466
DUP [MW-14ARJ
02/14/08
H85466
MW-16AR
02/15/08
H86467
MW-3AR
02/16/08
H85468
MW-7
05/12/08
H85469
MW-1AR
05/13/08
H86470
MW-2R
05/13/08
H86471
MW-11RR
05/13/08
H86473
MW-1SA
05/14/08
H85474
MW-16B
05/14/08
H85475
MW-12AR
05/14/08
H85476
MW-12B
06/14/08
VOCs
Acetone I 1,700 I - | Mfl/U ND [5] | ND [5] | ND [51 I ND [5] | NA | NA | NA | NA
2
>
2
>
2
>
NA
SVOCs
4-Methylphenol
71
-
Hq/L
ND [9.41
ND [9.4]
ND [9.5]
ND [9.51
ND [9.41
ND [9.41
ND [9 4]
ND [9.4]
ND [9.51
ND [11]
ND [10]
ND [9 71
Naphthalene
13
UQ/L
ND [9 41
ND [9 41
ND [9.51
ND T9 51
ND [9 41
ND [9.41
ND [9.41
ND [9.41
ND [9.51
ND [111
ND [101
ND [9 71
Phenol
210
-
Hflrt-
ND [9.4]
ND [9.4]
ND [9.5]
ND [9.51
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PCBs
Aroclor 1016
_
_
fjq/L
ND [0.051
ND [0.0521
ND [0.0471
ND 10.0481
ND [0.0621
ND [0.0691
ND [0.0491
ND [0.051
ND [0.0561 UJ
ND [0.0531
ND [0 0531
ND [0.047]
Aroclor 1221
-
_
pq'i
ND [0.05]
ND [0.052]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0621
ND [0.0691
ND [0.0491
ND [0.05]
ND [0.0561 UJ
ND [0.053]
ND [0.0531
ND [0.047]
Aroclor 1232
_
H9'l
ND [0.051
ND [0.0521
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0621
ND [0.0691
ND [0 0491
ND [0.05]
ND [0 056] UJ
ND [0.0531
ND [0.053]
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1242
_
-
pq/L
ND [0.05]
ND [0.0521
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.062]
ND [0.0691
ND [0.0491
ND [0.051
ND [0.0561 UJ
ND [0.0531
ND [0.0531
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1248
-
-
H1'l
ND [0.051
ND [0.0521
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0621
ND [0.0691
ND [0.0491
ND [0.051
ND [0.0561 UJ
ND [0.0531
ND [0.053]
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1254
-
Ufl/L
ND [0.051
ND [0.052]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.062]
ND [0.0691
ND [0 0491
ND [0.051
ND [0.0561 UJ
ND [0.053]
ND [0.0531
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1260
-
-
HFI/l
ND [0.051
ND [0.0521
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0621
ND [0.0691
ND [0.0491
ND [0.051
ND [0.0561 UJ
ND [0.0531
ND [0.0531
ND [0.0471
Total PCBs
0.2
-
H9"-
ND [0 05]
ND [0.052]
ND [0.047]
ND [0 048]
ND [0.062]
ND [0.069]
ND [0.049]
ND [0 05]
ND [0.056] UJ
ND [0.053]
ND [0.053]
ND [0.047]
Metals
Barium
-
2,300
H9/l
233
228
254
432
65 B
286
216
405
450
532
598
271
Calcium
-
-
nq/i
153,000
150,000
155,000
176,000
166,000
193,000
186,000
166,000
198,000
178,000
225,000
150,000
Chromium6
11
_
H3'l
ND [101
ND [101
ND [101
ND [101
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Iron
-
-
ra'L
9,770
9,600
9,950
55,700
39,100
64,600
17,200
4.270
11,600
9,180
56,300
5,360
Sodium
-
~
HF)/l
119,000
117,000
140,000
14,400
60,200
5,130
82,600
86,800
76,200
92,000
56,600
101,000
Thallium
-
160
H3'L
ND [0.67]
ND [0.671
ND [0 671
ND [0.671
ND [0.61
ND [0.61
ND [0 6]
ND ro.61
ND [0.6]
ND [0.61
ND [0.61
ND [0.61
Zinc
-
1,200
H9/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
12
-
ug/L
1.5 B
0.78 B
2.6 B
1.3 B
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Miscellaneous
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chemical Oxygen Demand
-
-
mq/L
ND [20]
ND [201
ND [201
ND [201
22
466
ND [201
ND [201
364
28.2
36.4
ND [201
Hydroxide Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitroqen
-
-
ma/L
ND [1001
ND [1001
110
ND [1001
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Sulfate
-
-
mg/L
57
58
52
3.1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
420
430
430
510
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Organic Carbon
-
-
ma/L
8.4 J
48 J
5.2
6.1
3.4
9.7
7.7
6.3
9.3
10.1
11.1 J
2.1
Total Suspended Solids
-
mg/L
19.6
188
20.9
72.2
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
See Notes on Page 27.
8/21/2012
G:\Clients\GP KHL\06 Notes and Data\GW Sampling Results Since Last 5-Yr Review.xlsx
Page 8 of 27
-------
TABLE 1
DRAFT
POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT
Sample ID:
H85477
H85478
H86479
H86480
H86481
H85482
H86483
H86484
H8548S
H86486
H86487
H86488
Well ID;
Generic
GSI
Values
Site
Specific
WQBEL
MW-13AR
MW-13B
MW-8AR
DUP [MW-8AR]
MW-8BR
MW-14AR
DUP [MW-14AR1
MW-16AR
MW-3AR
MW-7
MW-2R
MW-1AR
Date Collected:
Units
06/16/08
06/15/08
06/16/08
06/16/08
06/16/08
06/16/08
06/16/08
06/16/08
06/16/08
08/06/08
08/06/08
08/06/08
VOCs
Acetone
1,700
-
MQ/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SVOCs
4-Methylphenol5
71
_
H9/l
ND f111
ND [101
ND [111
ND [111
ND [9.8]
ND [9.9]
ND [101
ND [9.81
ND [10]
ND T9.51
ND [9.5]
ND [9.51
Naphthalene
13
-
H9/L
ND M11
ND [101
ND [111
ND [111
ND [9.81
ND [9 91
ND [101
ND [9.81
ND [101
ND [9.51
ND [9.51
ND [9.51
Phenol
210
-
MQ'L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PCBs
Aroclor 1016
-
_
H9/l
ND [0.0531
ND [0 049]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0541
ND [0 0491
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0531
ND r0.0541
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0 0491 UJ
Aroclor 1221
-
-
H9/l
ND [0.0531
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0541
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND rO.053]
ND [0.0541
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0491 UJ
Aroclor 1232
_
H9/l
ND [0.0531
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0 0541
ND [0.0491
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0531
ND [0.0541
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.049] UJ
Aroclor 1242
_
H9/l
0.036 J
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0541
ND [0 049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0531
ND [0.0541
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0491 UJ
Aroclor 1248
_
_
H9/l
ND [0.0531
ND rO 0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0541
ND [0.049]
ND r0.049l
ND [0.0531
ND [0.0541
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0491 UJ
Aroclor 1254
-
-
ug/L
ND [0.0531
ND [0.0491
ND [0 0491
ND [0.0541
ND [0.049]
ND [0,0491
ND [0.0531
ND [0.054]
ND [0.0471
ND r0.0481
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0491 UJ
Aroclor 1260
-
-
H9/l
ND [0.0531
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0541
ND [0 049]
ND [0 0491
ND [0.0531
ND [0.0541
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0491 UJ
Total PCBs
0.2
-
po/l
0.036 J
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.054]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0531
ND [0.054]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0491 UJ
Metals
Barium
--
2.300
Hfl/L
845
196 B
436
438
268
255
260
311
215
67.7 B
178 B
387
Calcium
-
~
H9/L
316,000
149,000
211.000
212.000
175.000
176.000
176,000
185.000
172,000
166.000
156.000
226,000
Chromium8
11
-
H9/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Iron
-
-
pg/L
93,900
7.200
33,900
34.100
13,500
11.000
11,000
14.600
28,400
55,700
11,600
82,600
Sodium
-
-
pg/L
9,560
107.000
58,900
59.200
108.000
131.000
131.000
175.000
113.000
50,500
80.400
23,500
Thallium
-
160
HS^1-
ND [0.61
ND [0.61
ND [0.6]
ND [0.61
ND [0.61
ND [0.6]
ND [0.61
ND [0.61
ND [0.61
ND [25]
ND [0.921
ND [251
Zinc
-
1.200
ug/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
12
-
H9'L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Miscellaneous
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
~
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chemical Oxvaen Demand
-
-
mg/L
30.2
ND [20]
26 1
22
ND [201
ND [20]
22
ND [201
ND [201
26.1
ND [201
34.3
Hydroxide Alkalinity
-
-
mo/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitroaen
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Sulfate
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Alkalinity
-
-
rno/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Organic Carbon
-
-
ma/L
7.4
3
6.7
8.3
7
5.1
5.5 J
4.9
4.2
4.2
4.6
6,9
Total Suspended Solids
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
See Notes on Page 27.
8/21/2012
G:\Clients\GP KHL\06 Notes and Data\GW Sampling Results Since Last 5-Yr Review.xlsx
Page 9 of 27
-------
TABLE 1
DRAFT
POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ALLIED PAPER, INCJPORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT
Sample ID:
Well ID:
Date Collected:
Generic
GSI
Values
Site
Specific
WQBEL
Units
H86489
MW-11RR
08/06/08
H86490
MW-16A
08/06/08
H85492
MW-16B
08/06/08
H8&493
MW-12B
08/06/08
H86494
MW-12AR
08/07/08
H85496
MW-13B
08/07/08
H86496
MW-13AR
08/07/08
H86497
MW-8BR
08/07/08
H86498
MW-8AR
08/07/08
H85499
DUP [MW-8AR]
08/07/08
H85500
MW-16AR
08/08/08
H86601
MW-14AR
08/08/08
VOCs
Acetone I 1,700 | - | Mg/L I NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA
NA | NA
SVOCs
4-Methylphenol5
71
..
ND [9.41
ND [101
ND [9.51
ND [9.9]
ND [9.91
ND [9 4]
ND [101
ND [9.61
ND noi
ND [101
ND [9.91
ND [9.6]
Naphthalene
13
-
wi/l
ND [9 41
ND [101
ND [9.51
ND [9.9]
ND [9.91
ND [9 41
ND [10]
ND [9.61
ND [101
ND [10]
ND [9 9]
ND [9.6]
Phenol
210
-
uq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PCBs
Aroclor 1016
_
(jq/L
ND rO 0471
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0 0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.049]
ND [0 047] UJ
ND [0.0471
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1221
_
_
H9/l
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0481
ND [0 048]
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0491
ND [0.047] UJ
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0491
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1232
_
-
|jq/L
ND [0.0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0 048]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0471 UJ
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0491
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1242
_
-
nq'L
ND f0.0471
ND rO.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0,0491
ND [0 0471 UJ
ND [0 0471
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1248
-
-
UQ/L
ND [0.0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0471 UJ
ND [0.0471
ND [0 049]
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1254
-
~
H9/l
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0 048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0471 UJ
ND [0.0471
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1260
~
-
fjq/L
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0 047]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0471 UJ
ND [0 0471
ND [0 049]
ND [0.0471
Total PCBs
0.2
-
M9'l
ND [0 047]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0 048]
ND [0.047]
ND [0 047]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0471 UJ
ND [0.047]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.047]
Metals
Barium
-
2,300
H9/l
448
420
505
262
598
193 B
744
273
444
467
257
233
Calcium
-
-
yq/L
162,000
174,000
166,000
141,000
217,000
142,000
291,000
172,000
202,000
215,000
156,000
150,000
Chromium6
11
_
M9"-
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Iron
~
-
Mf)/L
5,930
10,700
8,240
5,030
53,100
6,910
65,000
14,000
29,100
30,800
9,550
8,980
Sodium
--
-
H9/L
89,100
77,100
88,400
95,100
58,600
99,900
23,000
80,300
59,400
63,200
156,000
120,000
Thallium
-
160
Hfl'L
ND [0.92]
ND [0.92]
ND [0.921
1.1 B
3.3 B
ND [0.921
ND [0 921
ND [0.921
ND [0.921
ND [0 921
ND [0.921
ND [0.921
Zinc
-
1.200
H9/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
12
-
P9'L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Miscellaneous
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chemical Oxygen Demand
-
-
mg/L
ND [201
24.1
ND [201
ND [201
38.4 J
ND [201
32 3
ND [201
40.5
38.4
ND [201
ND [201
Hydroxide Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitroqen
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Sulfate
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Orqanic Carbon
-
-
mq/L
7.8
8.5
7.8
2.7
12.7
4.1
8.7
9.5
14,5
13.7
5.3
5.2
Total Suspended Solids
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
See Notes on Page 27.
8/21/2012
G:\Clients\GP KHL\06 Notes and Data\GW Sampling Results Since Last 5-Yr Review.xlsx
Page 10 of 27
-------
TABLE 1
DRAFT
POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT
Sample ID:
Well ID:
Date Collected:
Generic
GSI
Values
Site
Specific
WQBEL
Units
H85502
DUP [MW-14AR]
08/08/08
H85503
MW-3AR
08/08/08
H85504
MW-7
11/03/08
H85505
MW-2R
11/03/08
H85506
MW-1AR
11/04/08
H85507
MW-16A
11/04/08
H85508
MW-11RR
11/04/08
H85510
MW-16B
11/06/08
H85511
MW-12B
11/05/08
H86512
MW-12AR
11/06/08
H85513
MW-13B
11/05/08
H85514
MW-8BR
11/06/08
VOCs
Acetone I 1,700 | - | pg/L | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA
SVOCs
4-Methylphenol5
71
_
ug/L
ND [101
ND [101
ND [9.51
ND [101
ND [9.51 UJ
ND [9.71 UJ
ND [9.51 UJ
ND [9.51
ND [9.41
ND [9.51
ND [9.71
ND [9.51
Naphthalene
13
_
H9/l
ND [101
ND [101
ND [9.51
ND [101
ND [9.51 UJ
ND [9.71 UJ
ND [9.51 UJ
ND [9.51
ND [9 4]
ND [9 5]
ND [9.7]
ND [9 51
Phenol
210
-
pg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PCBs
Aroclor 1016
_
H9/l
ND r0.0481 UJ
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1221
-
-
H9/L
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.047]
ND r0.048l
ND [0 0471
Aroclor 1232
-
-
ug/L
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND rO.0481
ND [0.0471
ND rO 048]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1242
-
_
fjq/L
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
0.027 J
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.047]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1248
..
ug/L
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1254
-
-
ug/L
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.047]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1260
_
_
H9/l
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.047]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
Total PCBs
0.2
-
Mg/L
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0 047]
0.027 J
ND [0.048]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.048]
ND [0 047]
Metals
Barium
-
2.300
|jq/L
236
250
66.6 B
183 B
267
441
449
491
257
621
192 B
236
Calcium
-
-
H9"-
149.000
168.000
153.000
141.000
166.000
179,000
158,000
162,000
142,000
228,000
143,000
157,000
Chromium6
11
-
pq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Iron
-
-
ffl/L
8.970
16,000
24,600
15.100
53,200
11.700
4,380
8.190
5,160
65,300
7,240
12,400
Sodium
-
-
un/L
120.000
165,000
54,300
51,000
13,000
80,200
92,700
88,700
99,100
51,900
98,200
90,700
Thallium
-
160
nq/i
ND [0.921
ND [0.921
ND [251 UB
ND [0.771
ND [251 UB
ND [251 UB
ND [0.771
ND [25] UB
ND [251 UB
ND [251 UB
ND [0.771
ND [251 UB
Zinc
-
1.200
HfC1-
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
12
-
PS/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Miscellaneous
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbonate Alkalinity
-
-
ma/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chemical Oxygen Demand
-
-
mq/L
ND [201
ND r201
ND [201
28.2
22
48.6
ND [201
28.2
ND [201
28.2 J
ND [201
ND [20]
Hydroxide Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitrooen
-
-
ma/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Sulfate
-
-
ma/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Orqanic Carbon
-
ma/L
5.3
5.1
3.7
5.2
7.3
10.3
6.9
7
22
12.5
4
4,4
Total Suspended Solids
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
See Notes on Page 27.
8/21/2012
G:\Cllents\GP KHL\06 Notes and DataVGW Sampling Results Since Last 5-Yr Review.xlsx
Page 11 of 27
-------
TABLE 1
DRAFT
POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT
Sample ID:
H86615
H85616
H85517
H85618
H86519
H8S520
H86621
H86622
H86523
H86524
H86526
H85626
Well ID:
Generic
GSI
Site
Specific
WQBEL
MW-13AR
MW-14AR
DUP [MW-14AR]
MW-8AR
DUP [MW-8AR]
MW-16AR
MW-3AR
MW-7
MW-1AR
MW-2R
MW-11RR
MW-16A
Date Collected:
Values
Units
11/06/08
11/06/08
11/06/08
11/06/08
11/06/08
11/07/08
11/07/08
02/02/09
02/03/09
02/03/09
02/03/09
02/03/09
VOCs
Acetone
1,700
-
ug/L | NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND [5] UJ
ND [2.51 UB,J
ND [5] UJ
ND [2.3] UB,J
ND [5] UJ
SVOCs
4-Methylphenot
71
_
fjq/L
ND [9.51
ND [9.4]
ND [9.6]
ND [9 51
ND [9.5]
ND [9 5]
ND [9.61
ND [101
ND [101
ND [10]
ND [9.5]
ND [9.7]
Naphthalene
13
_
pq/l
ND [9.51
ND [9.41
ND [9.61
ND [9.5]
ND [9.51
ND [9.5]
ND [9 61
ND [10]
ND [101
ND [101
ND [9.51
ND [9.7]
Phenol
210
-
Cfl/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND [10]
ND [10]
ND [10]
ND [9.5]
ND [9.7]
PCBs
Aroclor 1016
_
HQ/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0491
Aroclor 1221
-
_
(jq/L
ND [0 048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0 0491
Aroclor 1232
-
HP/L
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0491
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0491
Aroclor 1242
_
-
|jq/L
0.073
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0491
Aroclor 1248
-
_
fjq/L
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0491
Aroclor 1254
-
-
H9"-
ND f0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0491
Aroclor 1260
-
-
H9/l
ND fO.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND rO 0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0 0491
Total PCBs
0.2
-
H9'l
0.073
ND [0.048]
ND [0 0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0 048]
ND [0 047]
ND [0 049]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.049]
Metals
Barium
-
2.300
735
247
247
465
466
212
176 B
62 B
266
174 B
437
414
Calcium
-
~
H9"-
256,000
165,000
166,000
216,000
214,000
138,000
116,000
165,000
184,000
163,000
155,000
173,000
Chromium6
11
-
H9/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND [0.14]
ND [0.14]
ND [0.141
0.38 B
0.46 B
Iron
~
-
(jq/L
52,800
10,700
10,800
36.600
36,600
8,700
10,100
4,470
56,200
9,930
3,930
10,700
Sodium
-
-
uq/L
42,300
131.000
133,000
44.500
44.500
141.000
120,000
50,600
16,600
110,000
90,700
80,300
Thallium
-
160
Hfl"-
ND f25] UB
ND [25] UB
ND [0.771
ND [0 771
ND [251 UB
ND [25] UB
ND [25] UB
ND [251 UB
ND [25] UB
ND [251 UB
ND [25] UB
ND [251 UB
Zinc
-
1.200
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
12
-
ug/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
ND [0.5]
ND [0.5]
ND [50] UB
ND [50] UB
ND [50] UB
Miscellaneous
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
370
530
460
450
500
Carbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chemical Oxygen Demand
-
-
mg/L
40.5
ND [201
ND [201
42.5
42.5
ND [20]
ND [20]
31.5
27.2
75
ND [20]
20.6
Hydroxide Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitroqen
-
--
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.033 J
ND [0.11
NDf0.1l
nd ro.ii
NDf0.1l
Sulfate
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
180
0.38
56
45
36
Total Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Orqanic Carbon
-
-
mq/L
10.1
4
4.4
13
12.9
4.5
5.5
4.5
7.8
4.5
5.7
9.1
Total Suspended Solids
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
15.4
70
19.4
11 6
25.3
See Notes on Page 27.
8/21/2012
G:\Cllente\GP KHL\06 Notes and Data\GW Sampling Results Since Last 5-Yr Review.xlsx
Page 12 of 27
-------
TABLE 1
DRAFT
POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT
Sample ID:
Well ID:
Date Collected:
Generic
GSI
Values
Site
Specific
WQBEL
Units
H86628
MW-16B
02/04/09
H85629
MW-12B
02/04/09
H86530
MW-13B
02/04/09
H85531
MW-12AR
02/04/09
H85532
MW-13AR
02/06/09
H8S633
MW-8BR
02/0 6/09
H86634
DUP [MW-8BR]
02/05/09
H85535
MW-8AR
02/05/09
H85536
MW-14AR
02/05/09
H85537
MW-15AR
02/06/09
H86538
DUP [MW-15AR]
02/06/09
H85539
MW-3AR
02/06/09
Acetone I 1 700 | ~ | MQ/L I ND (5] UJ I ND [5] UJ | ND [5] UJ | ND [51UJ | ND [5] UJ | ND [5] UJ | ND [5] UJ | ND [5] UJ | ND [5] UJ | ND [5] UJ | ND [51UJ I ND [51UJ
SVOCs
4-Methylphenol5
71
_
fjq/L
ND [101
ND [101
ND [101
ND [9.81
ND [10]
ND [9.91
ND [9.71
ND [9.81
ND [9.8]
ND [9.51
ND [9.4]
ND [101
Naphthalene
13
_
jjq/L
ND [101
ND [101
ND [10]
ND [9 81
ND [101
ND [9.9]
ND [9.71
ND [9 81
ND [9.8]
ND [9.51
ND [9.4]
ND [101
Phenol
210
-
ug/L
ND [101
ND [10]
ND [10]
ND [9.8]
ND [10]
ND [9 9]
ND [9.7]
ND [9.8]
ND [9.8]
ND [9 5]
ND [9.4]
ND [10]
PCBs
Aroclor 1016
_
_
H9/l
ND r0.0471
ND [0.0491
ND [0 049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.051]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.049]
ND [0 0491
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
Aroclor 1221
-
_
pg/L
ND TO 0471
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0511
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
0.041 J
ND [0.0491
Aroclor 1232
_
_
ug/L
ND [0.0471
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0511
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
ND ro.049]
Aroclor 1242
_
_
pq/L
ND [0.0471
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0511
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.049]
Aroclor 1248
_
-
ug/L
ND [0.0471
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0511
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0 049]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
Aroclor 1254
_
_
H9/L
ND [0.0471
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0511
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
Aroclor 1260
_
_
Hfl/L
ND [0.0471
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0511
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0 0491
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
Total PCBs
0.2
-
ug/L
ND [0.047]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.051]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0 049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
0.041 J
ND [0.049]
Metals
Barium
-
2.300
M9/L
473
243
187 B
583
729
245
235
427
264
256
258
261
Calcium
fjq/L
155,000
128.000
139,000
208,000
246,000
157,000
152,000
195,000
174.000
165,000
163,000
164,000
Chromium6
11
_
nq/L
0.32 B
ND [0.141
ND [0 141
0 82 B
0.53 B
ND [0.14]
0.25 B
ND [0.141
ND [0.14]
0.31 B
ND [0.141
ND [0.14]
Iron
-
-
H9/L
7.140
4.590
6,500
63,000
56,800
11,800
11.400
31,000
10,400
9,640
9.560
20,800
Sodium
-
-
HR/l
86,900
90,800
96,600
58,600
38,400
99,800
96,800
71,400
152,000
168,000
171,000
118,000
Thallium
-
160
M9/l
ND [251 UB
ND [25] UB
ND [251 UB
ND [251 UB
2.6 B
2.3 B
2.1 B
3.6 B
1.2 B
3 B
2.5 B
3.2 B
Zinc
-
1.200
ng/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
12
-
uo/L
ND [50] UB
ND [0.5]
ND [50] UB
ND [50] UB
ND [0 5]
ND [0.5]
ND [50] UB
ND [50] UB
ND [0.5]
ND [50] UB
ND [50] UB
ND [50] UB
Miscellaneous
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
470
350
390
680
680
450
450
640
450
410
410
470
Carbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chemical Oxygen Demand
-
-
mg/L
29.3
ND [20]
20.6
72.8 J
53.3
20.6
25
53.3
42.4
29.3
ND [20]
48.9
Hydroxide Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitroqen
-
-
mg/L
ND [0.11
ND[0.11
ND [0 11
ND [0.1]
ND [0 11
0.1 J
ND [0.11
NDr0.1l
ND [0.1]
0.033 J
0.033 J
ND[0.11
Sulfate
-
-
mq/L
34
71
58
0.8
0.14 J
37
38
2.9
59
84
80
42
Total Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Organic Carbon
-
-
mg/L
8.6
2.7
3.4
17.3
9.4
4
3.8
14.2
4.1
4.4
4.3
5.3
Total Suspended Solids
-
-
mg/L
18.9
11.2
13.8
848
71.7
24.9
23.6
50.2
23.2
19.4
21.2
36.1
See Notes on Page 27.
8/21/2012
G:\Clients\GP KHL\06 Notes and Data\GW Sampling Results Since Last 5-Yr Review.xlsx
Page 13 of 27
-------
TABLE 1
DRAFT
POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT
Sample ID:
H85540
H85541
H86542
H85543
H85644
H85546
H85547
H85548
H85551
H85562
H85553
H85554
Well ID:
Generic
GSI
Site
Specific
WQBEL
MW-7
MW-1AR
MW-2R
MW-11RR
MW-16A
DUP [MW-16A]
MW-16B
MW-12B
MW-13B
MW-12AR
MW-13AR
DUP [MW-13ARJ
Date Collected:
Values
Units
06/18/09
05/19/09
05/19/09
05/19/09
05/19/09
05/19/09
05/20/09
05/20/09
05/20/09
05/20/09
05/21/09
05/21/09
VOCs
Acetone
1,700
-
pg/L | NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SVOCs
4-Methylphenol
71
_
pq/L
NDT9.81
ND [9.9]
ND [9.71
ND [9.9]
ND [9.8]
ND [9.91
ND [9.81
ND [9.8]
ND [9.7]
ND [9.71
ND [9.81
ND [9.71
Naphthalene
13
-
pq/L
ND [9.8]
ND [9.91
ND [9.71
ND [9.9]
ND [9.81
ND [9.9]
ND [9.8]
ND [9.8]
ND [9.71
ND [9 71
ND [9.81
ND [9.71
Phenol
210
-
wg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PCBs
Aroclor 1016
-
-
H9/l
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.049]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0491
ND [0 0491
ND [0.0491
Aroclor 1221
_
-
H9/L
ND [0 049]
ND TO 0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.049]
ND [0.048]
ND r0.048l
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
Aroclor 1232
-
-
HR/l
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.049]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
Aroclor 1242
-
-
H9/L
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0 048]
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.049]
0.05
0.039 J
Aroclor 1248
-
~
pq/l
ND [0 0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0 048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0 0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
Aroclor 1254
_
pg/L
ND [0 049]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0 0491
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0,048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.049]
Aroclor 1260
-
_
pg/L
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0 048]
ND [0 048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0491
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0491
Total PCBs
0.2
-
M9/l
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0 049]
ND [0.048]
ND [0 048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0 049]
0.05
0.039 J
Metals
Barium
-
2,300
HR/l
84.1 B
398
179 B
434
440
444
474
265
191 B
550
1,090
1,090
Calcium
-
-
HR/l
175.000
246,000
164.000
152.000
166,000
168,000
151.000
133.000
139,000
190,000
292,000
293,000
Chromium8
11
_
pg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Iron
-
-
ug/L
5.700
86,800
10.800
4,120
14,600
14,500
7.320
4.330
6,540
62,700
86,800
86,800
Sodium
-
-
pg/L
63,300
19,800
119.000
85,900
76.200
78,200
80,400
88,900
89,900
51,400
11,800
11.800
Thallium
--
160
H9/L
ND [251 UB
ND [25] UB
ND [25] UB
ND [251 UB
ND [0.691
ND [0.691
ND [25] UB
ND [251 UB
ND [25] UB
ND [25] UB
ND [25] UB
ND [251 UB
Zinc
-
1.200
pg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
12
-
pq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Miscellaneous
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbonate Alkalinity
~
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chemical Oxyqen Demand
-
-
mq/L
22.8
31.5
29.3
25
33.7
35.9 J
ND [20]
ND [201
ND [201
38
35.9
38
Hydroxide Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitrogen
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Sulfate
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Orqanic Carbon
-
-
mg/L
4
8.6
4.6
5.5
8.7
8.1
7
2.1
2.5
12.7
7.1
7.7
Total Suspended Solids
~
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
See Notes on Page 27.
8/21/2012
G:\Cllents\GP KHL\06 Notes and DataVGW Sampling Results Since Last 5-Yr Review.xlsx
Page 14 of 27
-------
TABLE 1
DRAFT
POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT
Sample ID:
Well ID:
Date Collected:
Generic
GSI
Values
Site
Specific
WQBEL
Units
H8665S
MW-14AR
06/21/09
H86656
MW-8BR
05/21/09
H85567
MW-8AR
05/21/09
H86568
MW-16AR
05/22/09
H86559
MW-3AR
06/22/09
H85660
MW-7
08/17/09
H85561
MW-1AR
08/18/09
H85562
MW-2R
08/18/09
H86663
MW-11RR
08/18/09
H855&4
MW-16A
08/19/09
H85566
MW-16B
08/18/09
H86567
MW-12B
08/18/09
VOCs
Acetone I 1,700 I - I ng/L I NA | NA I NA I NA | NA | NA I NA I NA I NA I NA I NA I NA
SVOCs
""
71
_
Hfl/L
ND [9.81
ND [9 71
ND [9.8]
ND [9 8]
ND [9.6]
ND [9.9]
ND [10]
ND [9.6]
ND [9.6]
ND [9.5]
ND [9.51
ND [9 71
Naphthalene
13
_
H9/l
ND [9.81
ND [9.71
ND [9.8]
ND [9.81
ND [9.6]
ND [9.9]
ND [101
ND [9.61
ND [9.6]
ND [9 5]
ND [9.5]
ND [9.7]
Phenol
210
-
ug/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PCB, I
Aroclor 1016
_
_
HC|/L
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.0481
ND fO.047]
Aroclor 1221
-
-
(iq/l
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0491
0.024 J
ND [0.0481
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.0481
ND f0.047l
Aroclor 1232
-
-
H9'l
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0 049]
ND [0 048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0491
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0 048]
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.0481
ND fO.047]
Aroclor 1242
-
_
(jq/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0 048]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0 0491
ND [0 048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0 0481 UJ
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1248
-
-
Mfl"-
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.049]
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0 0481
ND [0.047]
Aroclor 1254
_
-
Hq/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0481
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0 0481 UJ
ND [0.048]
ND [0 047]
Aroclor 1260
-
-
Hq/L
ND [0 048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.049]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0 048]
ND [0.047]
Total PCBs
0.2
-
uo/L
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.049]
0 024 J
ND [0.048]
ND [0.049]
ND [0 048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0 048]
ND [0.047]
Metals
Barium
-
2,300
H9'L
252
261
420
256
212
71 8 B
371
145 B
444
422
479
242
Calcium
-
_
Hq/l
147.000
164,000
233.000
148.000
167,000
169,000
230,000
133,000
155,000
170.000
158.000
130.000
Chromium6
11
-
UO/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Iron
-
-
9.580
13.000
42.900
10.100
29,900
5.380
80.900
11.100
5,060
12.300
8.020
4,990
Sodium
-
-
193.000
109,000
10,300
149,000
23,100
56.600
20,000
96,400
84,900
77,000
84,900
91,700
Thallium
-
160
ND [0.691
ND [251 UB
ND [0.691
ND [251 UB
ND [25] UB
2.3 B
3.3 B
ND[1.11
NDf1.1l
ND [1.11
ND [1.11
ND [1.51
Zinc
-
1.200
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
12
-
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
(Miscellaneous
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mqyi
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbonate Alkalinity
-
-
ma/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chemical Oxygen Demand
-
--
ma/L
33.7
ND [201
ND [20]
ND [201
ND [20]
ND [201
33.7
ND [201
ND [20]
20.6
ND [20]
ND [201
Hydroxide Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitrogen
-
-
ma/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Sulfate
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Alkalinity
-
_
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Orqanic Carbon
-
-
mq/L
4.4
4.1
4.9
3.9
3.7
3.9
6.4
4
6.3
8.8
6.1
1.8
Total Suspended Solids
-
- i
ma/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
See Notes on Page 27.
8/21/2012
G:\Clients\GP KHLV06 Notes and Data\GW Sampling Results Since Last 5-Yr Review.xlsx
Page 15 of 27
-------
TABLE 1
DRAFT
POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT
Sample ID:
Well ID:
Date Collected:
Generic
GSI
Values
Site
Specific
WQBEL
Units
H85668
MW-12AR
08/19/09
H85569
MW-13B
08/19/09
H85570
MW-13AR
08/19/09
H85571
DUP [MW-13AR]
08/19/09
H86672
MW-8BR
08/19/09
H86673
MW-8AR
08/19/09
H86574
MW-14AR
08/20/09
H85575
DUP [MW-14AR]
08/20/09
H85576
MW-16AR
08/20/09
H85577
MW-3AR
08/21/09
H85578
MW-11RR
11/10/09
H85579
MW-1AR
11/10/09
VOCs
Acetone I 1,700 I - I ng/L | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA
SVOCs
4-Methylphenol
71
_
H9/l
ND [9.5]
ND [9.6]
ND [9.51
ND [9.51
ND [9.51
ND [9 51
ND [9.5]
ND [9.71
ND [9.51
ND [9.7]
ND [9.51
ND [9.6]
Naphthalene
13
-
H9/l
ND [9.51
ND [9.61
ND [9.51
ND [9.5]
ND [9.51
ND [9.51
ND [9.5]
ND [9,71
ND [9.5]
ND [9.7]
ND [9.51
ND [9.61
Phenol
210
-
uo/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PCBs
Aroclor 1016
_
F9/l
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.051
ND [0.051
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
Aroclor 1221
-
-
pq/L
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
0.048 J
ND [0.051
ND [0.05]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
Aroclor 1232
-
-
ug/L
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0 048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.051
ND [0.051
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
Aroclor 1242
_
_
H9/l
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0471
0.064
0.05
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.051
ND [0.051
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
Aroclor 1248
_
_
pq/L
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.05]
ND [0.051
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
Aroclor 1254
-
-
HR/L
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.051
ND [0.05]
ND [0.048]
ND r0 048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0 0481
Aroclor 1260
-
_
M9/l
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.051
ND [0 051
ND [0 048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
Total PCBs
0.2
-
mq/l
ND [0.047]
ND [0.047]
0.064
0.05
ND [0.048]
0.048 J
ND [0.05]
ND [0.05]
ND [0 048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0 048]
Metals
Barium
-
2,300
uq/L
546
193 B
841
827
249
436
281
277
228
218
476
283
Calcium
-
-
H9/l
195,000
147,000
263,000
258,000
171,000
205,000
171,000
169,000
152.000
136,000
157,000
166,000
Chromium6
11
-
ng/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Iron
-
-
WL
58.100
7,360
71,200
69,700
14.900
40,700
10,900
10,700
8,970
16,700
5,670
57.200
Sodium
-
-
ng/L
67,200
96,600
33,600
33,000
89,900
34,700
175.000
174,000
109,000
86,800
89,600
13.700
Thallium
-
160
ug/L
nd rill
nd ri.ii
2.2 B
1.7 B
ND [1.11
NDf1.1l
ND [1.11
ND [1.11
ND [1.11
ND [1,11
ND [251 UB
ND [0.51
Zinc
-
1,200
pg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
12
-
ua/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Miscellaneous
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chemical Oxygen Demand
-
-
mg/L
46.7
ND [20]
20.6
206
ND [201
31.5
ND [20]
ND [201
ND [201
ND [20]
33.7
ND [201
Hydroxide Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitroqen
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Sulfate
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Organic Carbon
-
-
mg/L
11.8 J
2.6
84
8.1
4.8
8.8
4.2
4.4
4.2
3.9
6.8
7.6
Total Suspended Solids
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
See Notes on Page 27.
8/21/2012
G:\Clients\GP KHl\06 Notes and DataVGW Sampling Results Since Last 5-Yr Review.xlsx
Page 16 of 27
-------
TABLE 1
DRAFT
POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT
Sample ID:
H85580
H85682
H85683
H86584
H86585
H85686
H85587
H86688
H85589
H8S690
H86591
H85592
Well ID:
Generic
GSI
Values
Site
Specific
WQBEL
MW-18A
MW-16B
MW-12B
MW-12AR
MW-13B
MW-13AR
DUP [MW-13AR]
MW-8BR
MW-8AR
MW-14AR
DUP [MW-14AR]
MW-15AR
Date Collected:
Units
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/10/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/11/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
11/12/09
VOCs
Acetone
1,700
-
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SVOCs
4-Methylphenol
71
H9/L
ND [9.51
ND [9.51
ND [9.5]
ND [9.61
ND [9.51
ND [9.51
ND [9.51
ND [9.51
ND [9.71
ND [9.61
ND [9.61
ND [9.71
Naphthalene
13
-
ug/L
ND [9.51
ND [9.5]
ND [9.51
ND [9.61
ND [9.51
ND [9.51
ND [9.51
ND [9.51
ND [9.71
ND [9.6]
ND [9.6]
ND [9.71
Phenol
210
-
ua/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PCBs
Aroclor 1016
-
-
H9/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0481
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0 0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0 048]
ND [0 048]
Aroclor 1221
-
-
ug/L
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
0.053
Aroclor 1232
-
_
jjq/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0 0481
Aroclor 1242
-
-
pq/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
0.079
0.055
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
Aroclor 1248
-
_
ug/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0 0481
ND [0.048]
Aroclor 1254
_
_
H9/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0 048]
ND [0.048]
Aroclor 1260
-
-
ug/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
Total PCBs
0.2
-
ug/L
ND [0.048]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.047]
0.079
0.055
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
0.053
Metals
Barium
-
2,300
H9/l
431
516
248
536
203
850
842
241
407
268
258
284
Calcium
-
-
pq/L
162,000
158,000
132,000
189,000
142,000
265,000
263,000
153,000
215,000
164,000
158,000
172,000
Chromium6
11
-
pg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Iron
-
-
pq/L
12,200
8,450
5,150
52,900
7,670
72,800
72,200
13,900
32,900
11,100
10,800
10,800
Sodium
-
-
pg/L
81,800
89,600
96,200
67,900
93,700
19,200
18,800
93,000
23,000
364,000
360,000
326,000
Thallium
-
160
pg/i
ND [0.51
ND [0.51
0.6 B
ND [0.51
ND [0.51
ND [0.51
ND [251 UB
ND [0 51
ND [0.5]
ND [0 51
ND [0.5]
ND [0.51
Zinc
-
1,200
H9/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
12
-
P9/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Miscellaneous
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chemical Oxygen Demand
~
-
mg/L
35.9
44.6
ND [201
42.4
ND [201
424
33.7
ND [201
25.5
22
22
23.8
Hydroxide Alkalinity
—
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitrogen
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Sulfate
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Alkalinity
-
-
ma/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Organic Carbon
-
-
mg/L
8.4
6.6
2
12
2.9
8.3
8.8
4.4
6.9
4.8
4.9
5.5
Total Suspended Solids
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
See Notes on Page 27.
8/21/2012
G:\Cllents\GP KHL\06 Notes and Data\GW Sampling Results Since Last 5-Yr Review.xlsx
Page 17 of 27
-------
TABLE 1
DRAFT
POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT
Sample ID:
Well ID:
Date Collected:
Generic
GSI
Values
Site
Specific
WQBEL
Units
H86683
MW-3AR
11/12/09
H85694
MW-2R
11/13/09
H85595
MW-7
11/09/09
H85596
MW-2R
02/15/10
H86697
MW-7
02/15/10
H85598
MW-11RR
02/16/10
H85599
DUP [MW-11RR]
02/16/10
H85600
MW-1AR
02/16/10
H85602
MW-16A
02/16/10
H85603
MW-16B
02/16/10
H85604
MW-12B
02/17/10
H85605
MW-12AR
02/17/10
VOCs
Acetone I 1.700 I - I pq/L | NA I NA | NA I ND [5.01 1 ND [5.01 1 ND [5.01 1 ND [5.01 1 1.3 J I ND [5.0] I ND [5.0] I ND [5.0] | ND [5.0]
SVOCs
4-Methylphenol5
71
-
nq/L
ND [9.5]
ND [9 5]
ND [9.51
ND [9.71
ND [9.6]
ND [9.4]
ND [9.51
ND [9.6]
ND [9.7]
ND [101
ND [9.71
ND [9.4]
Naphthalene
13
_
F1'l
ND [9 51
ND [9.5]
ND [9.51
ND [9.71
ND [9.61
ND [9.4]
ND [9.51
ND
9.61
ND [9.7]
ND [101
ND [9.7]
ND [9.41
Phenol
210
-
NA
NA
NA
ND [9.7]
ND [9.6]
ND [9.4]
ND [9.5]
ND
96]
ND [9.7]
ND [10]
ND [9.7]
ND [9.4]
PCBs
Aroclor 1016
_
-
W'L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.0481
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1221
_
_
Hl'L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.0481
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0 048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1232
_
\IQll
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.0481
ND [0.049]
ND I0.0491
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1242
_
-
pq/L
0.025 J
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.0481
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.049]
ND [0.047]
Aroclor 1248
-
-
hq/l
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.0481
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0 048]
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1254
_
-
Mfl/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0 048]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0 048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1260
-
-
pq/L
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0491
ND [0.049]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0471
Total PCBs
0.2
-
H9/l
0.025 J
ND [0.047]
ND [0.048] UJ
ND [0.048]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0471
Metals
Barium
_
2.300
fjq/L
346
160 B
118 B
142 BJ
87.1 BJ
421 J
411 J
255 J
396 J
489 J
239 J
532 J
Calcium
-
-
ffl/L
204.000
133,000
214,000
145,000
195.000
146,000
149,000
179,000
158,000
156,000
130.000
195.000
Chromium6
11
-
Hfl"-
NA
NA
NA
ND [0.111
NDf0.11]
ND [10] UB
ND [0.111
ND [0.11]
ND [0.111
ND [101 UB
ND [101 UB
NO M01 UB
Iron
-
-
Ma'L
35.300
15.100
12.400
10.700
5,070
4,190
5.310
57.300
10.900
7,500
4,720
48,900
Sodium
-
-
H9'L
86,800
449,000
59.400
69.200 J
51.900 J
91.100 J
92.100 J
9.470 J
87.800 J
90,400 J
106,000 J
71.100 J
Thallium
-
160
ND [0.5]
NDfO.51
ND [0.51
ND [0.631
ND [0.631
ND [0.63]
ND [0.631
ND [0.63]
ND [0.63]
ND [0.631
ND [0.631
ND [0.631
Zinc
-
1.200
H9"-
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
12
-
ug/L
NA
NA
NA
ND [0.36]
ND [0.36]
ND [0.36]
ND [0.361
ND [50] UB
ND [0.36]
ND [0 36]
ND [0.36]
ND [0.36]
Miscellaneous
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
390
320
450
440
520
520
480
360
710
Carbonate Alkalinity
-
-
ma'L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chemical Oxyqen Demand
-
-
mo/L
ND [201
ND [201
25
ND [201
ND [20]
27.3
ND [20]
20.3
27.3
20.3
23.8
43
Hydroxide Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitrogen
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
0.027 J
0.11
0.018 J
ND[0.11
0.03 J
0.037 J
NA
0.04 J
NA
Sulfate
-
-
ma/L
NA
NA
NA
62
320
33
39
0.58
23
29
69
1
Total Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Orqantc Carbon
-
-
ma/L
6
4.1
5.9
4.8
4.9
5.6
5.5
6.3
9.6
8.1
2.4
14.7
Total Suspended Solids
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
18.4
278
11.1
13.3
55.1
26.8
18.5
9.3
63.9
See Notes on Page 27.
8/21/2012
G:\Clients\GP KHL\06 Notes and Data\GW Sampling Results Since Last 5-Yr Review.xisx
Page 18 of 27
-------
TABLE 1
DRAFT
POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT
Sample ID:
Well ID:
Date Collected:
Generic
GSI
Values
Site
Specific
WQBEL
Units
H85606
MW-13B
02/17/10
H85607
DUP [MW-13B]
02/17/10
H85608
MW-13AR
02/17/10
H85609
MW-8BR
02/18/10
H85610
MW-8AR
02/18/10
H85611
MW-14AR
02/18/10
H86612
MW-3AR
02/18/10
H85613
MW-16AR
02/18/10
H85614
MW-7
05/24/10
H8S616
MW-2R
05/24/10
H86616
MW-1AR
05/24/10
H85617
MW-11RR
05/24/10
i i - i 1 i 1
Acetone 1 1.700 | - | pg/L | ND[5.0] | ND [5.0] | ND [5.0] | ND [5.0] | ND [5.0] I ND [5.0] | ND [5.0] | ND [5.0] | NA | NA | NA | NA
SVOCs
4-Metnylphenol"
71
_
H9/L
ND [9.4]
ND [9.4]
ND [9.81
ND [9.4]
ND [9.41
ND [9.51
ND [9.5]
ND [9.5]
ND [9.4]
ND [9.4]
ND [9.41
ND [10]
Naphthalene
13
_
(jq/L
ND [9.41
ND [9.41
ND [9.8]
ND
9.4]
ND [9.41
ND [9.51
ND [9.5]
ND [9.5]
ND [9.41
ND [9.41
ND [9.4]
ND [10]
Phenol
210
-
m/L
ND [9 4]
ND [9.4]
ND [9 8]
ND
9 41
ND [9 4]
ND [9.5]
ND [9.5]
ND [9.5]
NA
NA
NA
NA
PCBs
Aroclor 1016
-
MQ/L
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0 0491
ND [0 0491
ND [0.0471
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1221
-
-
fjq/L
ND [0.047]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0471
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0481
ND r0.048l
ND [0.049]
ND [0 0471
ND r0.047l
ND [0.047]
Aroclor 1232
_
_
fjq/L
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.049]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1242
-
-
ffl'L
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.049]
0.057
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1248
-
-
H9'l
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.049]
ND [0,0491
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0 0491
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1254
-
-
|jq/L
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.049]
ND [0 0491
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1260
-
-
H9'l
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0471
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
Total PCBs
0.2
-
H9'L
ND [0.047]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.049]
0.057
ND [0.047]
ND [0 049]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.047]
Metals
Barium
-
2,300
H9'L
169 BJ
174 J
744 J
217 J
417 J
226 J
277 J
291 J
62.3 B
155 B
246
364
Calcium
-
-
Hq/L
134,000
130,000
251,000
150,000
232,000
147,000
182,000
178,000
163,000
132,000
186,000
136.000
Chromium8
11
_
yq/L
ND [10] UB
ND [10] UB
ND [101 UB
ND [0.111
ND [0.111
ND [101 UB
ND [0.111
ND [101 UB
NA
NA
NA
NA
Iron
-
-
ug/L
5,920
5,900
70,000
13,300
41,000
9,700
18,100
11,400
4.350
15.400
62,700
3,980
Sodium
-
-
pq/l
98,500 J
95,700 J
20,200 J
93.800 J
31,200 J
164.000 J
240,000 J
252,000 J
44,800
49,600
8,070
78.900
Thallium
-
160
H3'l
ND [0.63]
ND [0.63]
ND [0.631
ND [0 631
ND [0.631
ND [0.631
ND [0.631
ND [0 63]
ND [3.61
ND [3.6]
ND [3.61
ND [3.61
Zinc
-
1,200
H3'L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
12
-
H9'L
ND [0.36]
ND [0 36]
ND [50] UB
ND [0.36]
ND [0 36]
ND [0.36]
ND [0.36]
ND [0.36]
NA
NA
NA
NA
Miscellaneous
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
380
380
810
440
710
430
440
450
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chemical Oxyqen Demand
-
-
mq/L
ND [20]
23.8
27,3
23.8
37.8
43
30.8
41.3 J
ND [201
ND [20]
46.5
ND [201
Hydroxide Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitrogen
-
-
mq/L
0.021 J
0.076 J
0.12
0.024 J
0.035 J
0.28
NA
0.037 J
NA
NA
NA
NA
Sulfate
-
-
mq/L
53
57
0.26
35
1.2
63
120
90
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Alkalinity
-
-
mo/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Orqanic Carbon
-
-
mg/L
3.4
36
11.1
6.2
8.3
6.2
7.2
6.3
3.2
3.4
5.5
5
Total Suspended Solids
-
-
mg/L
10.8
12
38
26.5
61.1
17.8
37.5
23.6
NA
NA
NA
NA
See Notes on Page 27.
8/21/2012
G:\Cllents\GP KHL\06 Notes and Data\GW Sampling Results Since Last 5-Yr Review.xlsx
Page 19 of 27
-------
TABLE 1
DRAFT
POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT
Sample ID:
H86619
H85620
H85621
H85622
H86623
H86624
H85625
H85626
H85627
H85628
H86629
H85630
Well ID:
Generic
GSI
Values
Site
Specific
WQBEL
MW-16B
MW-16A
MW-12B
DUP [MW-12B]
MW-12AR
MW-13B
MW-13AR
MW-8AR
MW-8BR
MW-14AR
MW-15AR
DUP [MW-16AR]
Date Collected:
Units
05/25/10
06/25/10
06/25/10
05/26/10
06/25/10
05/26/10
05/26/10
06/26/10
06/26/10
06/26/10
06/27/10
05/27/10
VOCs
Acetone
1,700
-
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SVOCs
4-Methylphenol
71
_
H9/L
ND [9 5]
ND [101
ND [9.51
ND [9.51
ND [9.41
ND [9.41
ND [9.51
ND [9.5]
ND [9.61
ND [9.5]
ND [9.61
ND [9.61
Naphthalene
13
-
nq/L
ND [9.51
ND [10]
ND [9.51
ND [9.51
ND [9.41
ND [9.41
ND [9.5]
ND [9.51
ND [9.61
ND [9 5]
ND [9.61
ND [9.6]
Phenol
210
~
ug/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PCBs
Aroclor 1016
-
nq/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
NDr0.051lUJ
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1221
_
_
H9/l
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0511 UJ
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1232
-
_
ng/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0511 UJ
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1242
~
-
H9/l
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0511 UJ
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1248
-
-
ug/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND r0.0471
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0511 UJ
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1254
-
_
pg/L
ND r0 0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.051] UJ
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0471 UJ
ND [0 0471
ND [0.0471
ND TO 0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1260
-
-
Hf?/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0511 UJ
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
Total PCBs
0.2
-
M9/l
ND [0.048]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0511 UJ
ND [0.047]
ND [0.047] UJ
ND [0.047]
ND [0.047]
ND [0 0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0,0471
Metals
Barium
-
2,300
UQll
485
379
228
226
488
160 B
816
271
190 B
222
279
272
Calcium
-
-
pg/L
161,000
156,000
127,000
128,000
185.000
125.000
268,000
199.000
141.000
151.000
170,000
167,000
Chromium6
11
-
pg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Iron
-
-
pg/L
7.740
12,000
3,800
3.810
43.600
5,970
86,200
26,000
12.000
10,300
11,000
10,900
Sodium
-
-
pg/L
84,700
75,900
90,600
91,600
71,300
87.700
12,700
1,060 B
87,200
154.000
224,000
222,000
Thallium
-
160
pg/L
ND [3 61
ND r3.61
ND [3.61
ND [3.61
ND [3.6]
ND [3.61
ND f3.6]
ND r3.6l
ND [3.61
ND [3.61
ND [3.6]
ND [3.61
Zinc
-
1,200
Hg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
12
--
pq/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Miscellaneous
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbonate Alkalinity
~
--
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chemical Oxyqen Demand
-
-
mg/L
20.3
27.3
ND [201
20.3
36
ND [20]
27.3 J
23.8
ND [20]
ND [201
ND [201
273
Hydroxide Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitrogen
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Sulfate
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Organic Carbon
-
-
mg/L
7.9
8.3
1.9
1.9
11.9
2.8
6
3.8
3.5
38
5.2
5.3
Total Suspended Solids
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
See Notes on Page 27.
8/21/2012
G:\Clients\GP KHLA06 Notes and Data\GW Sampling Results Since Last 5-Yr Review.xJsx
Page 20 of 27
-------
TABLE 1
DRAFT
POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT
Sample ID:
H85631
H86632
H85633
H85634
H8563S
H8S636
H85637
H85638
H85639
H8S640
H85641
H86642
Well ID;
Generic
GSI
Site
Specific
WQBEL
MW-3AR
MW-7
MW-2R
DUP [MW-2R]
MW-11RR
MW-1AR
Rinse Blank
[MW11RR]
MW-16A
MW-16B
MW-12AR
MW-12B
MW-13AR
Date Collected:
Values
Units
06/27/10
08/23/10
08/23/10
08/23/10
08/24/10
08/24/10
08/24/10
08/24/10
08/24/10
08/24/10
08/26/10
08/26/10
VOCs
Acetone
1,700
- I pg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SVOCs
4-Methylphenol
71
_
H9/l
ND [10]
ND [9.6]
ND [101
ND [9.4]
ND [9.41
ND [9.41
ND [9.61
ND [9.51
ND [9.41
ND [10]
ND [9.61
ND [9.41
Naphthalene
13
_
fjq/L
NDM01
ND [9.6]
ND [101
ND [9.4]
ND [9.41
ND [9 41
ND [9.6]
ND [9.51
ND [9.41
ND [101
ND [9.61
ND [9.41
Phenol
210
-
H9«-
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PCBs
Aroclor 1016
_
_
uq/L
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1221
_
-
W"-
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1232
_
-
(jq/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.047]
ND [0 0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0 048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.049]
ND [0 0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.047]
Aroclor 1242
-
_
|jq/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0 048]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
0.044 J
Aroclor 1248
-
_
(jq/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0 047]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.047]
Aroclor 1254
-
-
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0491
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1260
_
-
uq/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0 0471
Total PCBs
0.2
-
Mq/L
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.047]
ND [0 048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.049]
ND [0 048]
ND [0.048]
0 044 J
Metals
Barium
-
2,300
(jq/L
267
75.1 J
135 J
147 J
478
328
ND [200]
428
500
487
252
742
Calcium
-
_
W/L
171,000
155,000
129,000
137,000
153,000
220,000
318 J
165,000
162,000
188,000
135,000
243,000
Chromium6
11
_
H9'L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Iron
-
-
pq/L
23,100
12,500
10,700
11,200
5,880
73,300
33.7 J
12,100
7,650
39.700
5,130
70,200
Sodium
-
-
pq/L
150,000
57.900
70,600
76,800
94,400
12.100
1.100J
82,800
88,200
82,500
99,000
31.500
Thallium
-
160
H9"-
ND [3.61
ND [251
ND [25]
ND [25]
ND [25]
ND [251
ND [25]
ND [25]
ND [251
ND [25]
ND [251
ND [25]
Zinc
-
1,200
(jq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
12
-
uq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Miscellaneous
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbonate Alkalinity
-
--
mR/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chemical Oxygen Demand
-
-
ma/L
ND [201
ND [201
ND [201
ND [20]
25.2
33.4
ND r20]
25.2
334
45.6
ND [20]
33.4
Hydroxide Alkalinity
-
-
ma/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitrogen
-
-
ma/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Sulfate
-
-
ma/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Alkalinity
-
-
mfl/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Organic Carbon
-
-
mg/L
5.1
3.3
4.4
4.4
6.9
6.8
ND [11
89
7.8
12.5
2
6.7
Total Suspended Solids
~
-
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
See Notes on Page 27.
8/21/2012
G:\ClienteVGP KHL\06 Notes and Data\GW Sampling Results Since Last 5-Yr Revlew.xlsx
Page 21 of 27
-------
TABLE 1
DRAFT
POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT
Sample ID:
Well ID:
Date Collected:
Generic
GSI
Values
Site
Specific
WQBEL
Units
H86643
MW-13B
08/26/10
H86644
DUP [MW-13B]
08/25/10
H86645
MW-8BR
08/25/10
H85646
MW-8AR
08/26/10
H85647
MW-14AR
06/26/10
H86648
MW-15AR
08/27/10
H85649
MW-3AR
08/27/10
H85650
MW-7
11/15/10
H86651
MW-1AR
11/16/10
H86662
MW-2R
11/16/10
H86653
MW-11RR
11/16/10
H85654
Rinse Blank
[MW-11RR]
11/16/10
VOCs
Acetone I 1.700 I - I yg/L I NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA I NA I NA | NA I NA
SVOCs
4-Methylphenol
71
_
yq/L
ND [9.4]
ND [9 41
ND [9.6]
ND [9.6]
ND [9.61
ND [9,6]
ND [9.5]
ND [9.6]
ND [9.5]
ND [9.6]
ND [9.6]
ND [9 6]
Naphthalene
13
_
H9/L
ND [9.4]
ND [9.41
ND [9.61
ND [9.61
ND [9.61
ND [9.61
ND [9.51
ND [9.61
ND [9.5]
ND [9.61
ND [9.6]
ND [9.6]
Phenol
210
-
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PCBs
Aroclor 1016
_
-
uq/L
ND f0 0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.049]
ND [0 0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
Aroclor 1221
_
_
mq/l
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.049]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
Aroclor 1232
-
-
(jq/L
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.047]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0491
ND [0 0481
ND [0.048]
Aroclor 1242
-
(jq/L
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0 047]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.047]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0,0491
ND [0 0481
ND [0.048]
Aroclor 1248
_
_
(jq/L
ND F0.0471
ND [0 0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.049]
ND [0 047]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
Aroclor 1254
-
~
(jq/L
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0 049]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
Aroclor 1260
-
-
H9/l
ND [0.0471
ND ro.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0491
ND [0.047]
ND [0 0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0491
ND [0 0481
ND [0.048]
Total PCBs
0.2
-
Mfl'L
ND [0,047]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048] UJ
ND [0.049]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
Metals
Barium
-
2.300
m'L
177 J
170 J
213
380
260
304
245
71.6 J
320
151 J
452
ND [200]
Calcium
-
-
Wfl/L
130.000
125,000
146,000
206,000
169.000
178.000
153,000
166,000
214,000
151.000
155.000
114 J
Chromium6
11
-
(jq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Iron
-
-
uq/L
6.660
6.400
12.400
33,800
11.000
11.500
12.300
4,430
77.200
10.700
6.160
ND [2001
Sodium
-
-
Hfl«-
93.200
89,700
91.400
32.200
185,000
248.000
195,000
51,900
9,160
77.600
96,600
163 J
Thallium
-
160
Hf)'L
ND [251
ND [251
ND [251
ND [251
ND [25]
ND [251
ND r25l
ND [251
ND [251
ND [251
ND [251
ND [251 UB
Zinc
-
1.200
H9'L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
12
-
ug/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Miscellaneous
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
-
~
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chemical Oxygen Demand
-
-
mq/L
ND [201
23.2
ND [201
29.3
ND [201
27.2
ND [201
ND r201
21.1
ND r20l
ND [201
ND [201
Hydroxide Alkalinity
—
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitrogen
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Sulfate
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Organic Carbon
-
-
mq/L
3
2.5
4.3
11
5.1
5.7
5.6
3.9
6.4
4
5.7
ND [11
Total Suspended Solids
-
~
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
See Notes on Page 27.
8/21/2012
G:\Clients\GP KHL\06 Notes and Data\GW Sampling Results Since Last 5-Yr Review.xlsx
Page 22 of 27
-------
TABLE 1
DRAFT
POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT
Sample ID:
Well ID:
Date Collected:
Generic
GSI
Values
Site
Specific
WQBEL
Units
H856S5
MW-16A
11/16/10
H85666
MW-16B
11/16/10
H86657
MW-12B
11/17/10
H85658
MW-13B
11/17/10
H85659
MW-12AR
11/17/10
H86660
DUP [MW-12AR1
11/17/10
H85661
MW-8BR
11/18/10
H85662
MW-13AR
11/18/10
H86663
MW-8AR
11/18/10
H85664
MW-14AR
11/18/10
H85665
MW-3AR
11/19/10
H85666
MW-16AR
11/19/10
VOCs
Acetone I 1,700 | - I wg/L | NA I NA I NA I NA I NA I NA I NA I NA I NA I NA I NA I NA
SVOCs
4-Methylphenol
71
uq/l
ND [9.6]
ND [9.5]
ND [9.7]
ND [9.6]
ND [9.6]
ND [9.4]
ND [9.5]
ND [9.5]
ND [9.5]
ND [9.5]
ND [9.51
ND [9.4]
Naphthalene
13
_
H9/l
ND [9.61
ND [9.51
ND [9.71
ND r9.61
ND [9.61
ND [9.4]
ND [9.51
ND [9.5]
ND [9.51 UJ
ND [9.5]
ND [9.5]
ND [9 41
Phenol
210
-
uo/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PCBs
Aroclor 1016
..
_
H9/l
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0481
ND [0 048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0 0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1221
-
-
H971-
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0 048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1232
-
-
pq/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0 0481
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.047]
Aroclor 1242
-
-
H9/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0 0481
ND [0.047]
Aroclor 1248
-
-
H9/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND 10.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0,0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1254
-
-
H9/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
Aroclor 1260
-
-
H9/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND 10.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0471
ND r0.048l
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
Total PCBs
0.2
-
ug/L
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND fO.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
Metals
Barium
-
2.300
H9/l
386
496
250
178 J
580
561
215
667
393
226
242
268
Calcium
-
nq/L
158,000
164,000
136,000
131,000
218,000
214,000
150,000
241,000
187,000
151.000
152.000
157.000
Chromium6
11
-
H9/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Iron
-
-
ug/L
10,700
7.760
4,960
6,390
42,700
41,800
13,500
64,800
27.900
10.100
10.500
10.100
Sodium
-
-
H9/l
90,700
96,900
101,000
95,800
89,500
87,300
99,800
37,700
81,500
137.000
193,000
222.000
Thallium
-
160
ug/L
ND [251
ND [251
ND [251
ND [251
ND [251
ND [25]
ND [251
ND [251
ND [251
ND [25]
ND [251
ND [251
Zinc
-
1,200
ug/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
12
-
pg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Miscellaneous
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbonate Alkalinity
--
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chemical Oxyqen Demand
-
-
mg/L
ND [201
ND [201
ND [20]
ND [201
374
25.2
ND [201
ND [201
23.2
31.3
ND [201
ND [201
Hydroxide Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitroqen
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Sulfate
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Alkalinity
-
~
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Orqanic Carbon
-
-
mq/L
7.2
6.9
2.5
2.6
15.3 D
14.9
3.8
8.4
14.4
4.4
5.2
5.1
Total Suspended Solids
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
See Notes on Page 27.
8/21/2012
G:\Clients\GP KHL\06 Notes and Data\GW Sampling Results Since Last 5-Yr Review.xlsx
Page 23 of 27
-------
TABLE 1
DRAFT
POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT
Sample ID:
H85667
H85668
H85669
H86670
H85671
H86672
H86873
H86674
H85675
H86676
H86677
H86678
Well ID:
Generic
GSI
Site
Specific
WQBEL
DUP [MW-16AR]
MW-7
MW-2R
MW-1AR
MW-16A
MW-11RR
RINSE BLANK
[MW-11RR]
MW-16B
DUP [MW-16B]
MW-12B
MW-12AR
MW-13B
Date Collected:
Values
Units
11/19/10
05/09/11
06/09/11
06/09/11
06/10/11
06/10/11
06/10/11
06/10/11
06/10/11
06/10/11
06/11/11
06/11/11
VOCs
Acetone
1,700
-
pg/L | NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SVOCs
4-Methylphenor
71
-
HR/l
ND [9.5]
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Naphthalene
13
_
H9/l
ND [9.51
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Phenol
210
-
pg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PCBs
Aroclor 1016
_
_
H9/L
ND [0.0471
ND [0 048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0 0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.050] UJ
Aroclor 1221
-
_
H9/l
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.050] UJ
Aroclor 1232
_
_
pq/L
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND r0 048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.050] UJ
Aroclor 1242
-
-
H9/l
ND [0.047]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0,048]
ND [0.048] UJ
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.050] UJ
Aroclor 1248
-
-
P9/l
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND r0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048] UJ
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.050] UJ
Aroclor 1254
_
_
H9/l
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048] UJ
ND [0.048]
ND [0 048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0 0481
ND [0 048]
ND [0 048]
ND [0.050] UJ
Aroclor 1260
-
-
H9/L
ND fO 0471
ND [0 048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0 048]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0 048]
ND [0.0501 UJ
Total PCBs
0.2
-
F9/l
ND r0.0471
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048] UJ
ND [0 048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.050] UJ
Metals
Barium
-
2.300
pg/L
265
265
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Calcium
-
-
pg/L
156,000
156,000
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chromium6
11
_
pg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Iron
-
-
H9/l
9.900
9.900
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Sodium
~
-
H9/l
219,000
219,000
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Thallium
-
160
H3/l
ND [251
ND [25]
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Zinc
-
1,200
pg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
12
-
ug/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Miscellaneous
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbonate Alkalinity
—
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chemical Oxygen Demand
-
-
mg/L
ND [201
ND [201
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Hydroxide Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitroqen
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Sulfate
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Orqanic Carbon
-
-
mg/L
51
6.1
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Suspended Solids
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
See Notes on Page 27.
8/21/2012
G:\Clients\GP KHL\06 Notes and Data\GW Sampling Results Since Last 5-Yr Review.xlsx
Page 24 of 27
-------
TABLE 1
DRAFT
POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT
Sample ID:
H85679
H85680
H85681
H85682
H85683
H85684
H85685
H85686
H85687
H8S688
H86689
H85690
Well ID:
Generic
GSI
Site
DUP [MW-13B]
MW-13AR
MW-8BR
MW-8AR
MW-14AR
MW-15AR
MW-3AR
MW-2R
MW-1AR
MW-16A
MW-11RR
Rinse Blank
[MW-11RR]
Date Collected:
Values
WQBEL
Units
05/11/11
05/11/11
05/11/11
06/11/11
05/11/11
05/11/11
05/11/11
06/04/12
06/04/12
06/04/12
06/04/12
06/04/12
VOCs
Acetone
1,700
-
pg/L | NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SVOCs
4-Methylphenol
71
_
H9/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Naphthalene
13
-
H9/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Phenol
210
-
pq/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PCBs
Aroclor 1016
_
_
H9/l
ND [0.0501 UJ
ND [0.048] UJ
ND [0.049] UJ
ND [0.048] UJ
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0 0481 UJ
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.0521
ND [0.049]
ND [0.054]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0501
Aroclor 1221
-
-
ug/L
ND [0.0501 UJ
ND [0.048] UJ
ND [0.0491 UJ
ND [0.048] UJ
ND [0.048] UJ
0.052 J
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.052]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.054]
ND [0.0481
ND [0 0501
Aroclor 1232
_
H9/l
ND [0.050] UJ
ND [0.048] UJ
ND [0.0491 UJ
ND [0.048] UJ
ND [0.048] UJ
ND [0.048] UJ
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0 0521
ND [0.049]
ND [0.054]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0501
Aroclor 1242
_
-
H9/L
ND [0.050] UJ
ND [0.048] UJ
ND rO 0491 UJ
ND [0 0481 UJ
ND [0.048] UJ
ND [0 0481 UJ
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.052]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.054]
ND [0.0481
ND [0 050]
Aroclor 1248
_
_
H9/l
ND [0.0501 UJ
ND [0.048] UJ
ND [0.0491 UJ
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.048] UJ
ND [0.048] UJ
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.0521
ND [0.049]
ND [0.054]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0501
Aroclor 1254
-
-
H9/l
ND [0.0501 UJ
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.0491 UJ
ND [0 0481 UJ
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.048] UJ
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.0521
ND [0.0491
ND [0.054]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0501
Aroclor 1260
_
-
H9/l
ND [0.0501 UJ
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.0491 UJ
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.048] UJ
ND [0 0481 UJ
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.0521
ND [0.049]
ND [0.054]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0501
Total PCBs
0.2
-
ND [0.050] UJ
ND [0.048] UJ
ND [0.049] UJ
ND [0.048] UJ
ND [0.048] UJ
0 052 J
ND [0.0481 UJ
ND [0.052]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0541
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0501
Metals
Barium
-
2,300
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Calcium
-
-
pg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chromium®
11
-
pg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Iron
-
-
pq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Sodium
-
-
M9/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Thallium
-
160
H9/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Zinc
-
1,200
H9/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
12
-
pcfL
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Miscellaneous
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbonate Alkalinity
-
-
ma/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chemical Oxygen Demand
-
-
ma/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Hydroxide Alkalinity
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitroqen
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Sulfate
—
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Organic Carbon
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Suspended Solids
~
"
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
See Notes on Page 27.
8/21/2012
G:\Clients\GP KHLA06 Notes and Data\GW Sampling Results Since Last 5-Yr Revlew.xlsx
Page 25 of 27
-------
TABLE 1
DRAFT
POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ALLIED PAPER, INCJPORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT
Sample ID:
Well ID:
Date Collected:
Generic
GSI
Values
Site
Specific
WQBEL
Units
H86691
MW-16B
08/05/12
H85892
MW-12AR
06/05/12
H85693
DUP
[MW-12AR]
06/05/12
H86694
MW-13B
06/05/12
H85695
MW-12B
08/05/12
H85696
MW-13AR
06/05/12
H85697
MW-3AR
06/05/12
H85698
MW-15AR
06/05/12
H85699
Rinse Blank
[MW-16AR]
06/06/12
H85700
Rinse Blank
[MW-14AR]
06/06/12
H85701
MW-14AR
06/06/12
H85702
DUP
[MW-14ARJ
06/06/12
VOCs
Acetone
1,700
-
pg/L I NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
SVOCs
4-Methylphenol
71
_
pq/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Naphthalene
13
-
pq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Phenol
210
-
pg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
PCBs
Aroclor 1016
_
_
pq/L
ND [0.049]
ND [0 0541
ND [0.0481
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0531
ND [0 048]
ND [0.047]
ND [0.055]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
Aroclor 1221
-
_
pq/L
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0541
ND [0.048]
ND [0.049]
ND [0.053]
ND [0 0481
ND [0.047]
ND [0 0551
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0491
ND [0.0491
Aroclor 1232
-
pq/L
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0541
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0491
ND [0.053]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0551
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
Aroclor 1242
-
_
HR/l
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0541
ND f0.048l
ND [0.0491
ND [0.053]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0551
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
Aroclor 1248
-
-
H9/l
ND [0.049]
ND [0.054]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0491
ND r0.053]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0551
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
Aroclor 1254
-
-
H9/l
ND [0.049]
ND [0.054]
ND [0.0481
ND [0.049]
ND [0.053]
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
ND [0 0551
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0491
ND [0.0491
Aroclor 1260
-
-
H9/l
ND [0.049]
ND [0.0541
ND rO 0481
ND [0.0491
ND ro.053]
ND [0 0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0551
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0491
ND [0 0491
Total PCBs
0.2
~
pg/L
ND rO.049]
ND [0.0541
ND [0.0481
ND r0.0491
ND [0.0531
ND [0.048]
ND [0.0471
ND [0.0551
ND [0.0481
ND [0.0471
ND fO.0491
ND [0.0491
Metals
Banum
-
2.300
P9/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Calcium
-
-
H9/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chromium8
11
_
H9/l
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Iron
-
-
pg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Sodium
-
-
H9/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Thallium
-
160
pg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Zinc
-
1,200
pg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
12
-
uall
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Miscellaneous
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Carbonate Alkalinity
~
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Chemical Oxygen Demand
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Hydroxide Alkalinity
-
-
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitrogen
-
-
ma/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Sulfate
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Alkalinity
-
-
ma/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Orqanic Carbon
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
Total Suspended Solids
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
See Notes on Page 27.
8/21/2012
G:\Clients\GP KHLA06 Notes and Data\GW Sampling Results Since Last 5-Yr Review xisx
Page 26 of 27
-------
TABLE 1
DRAFT
POST-REMEDIATION GROUNDWATER SAMPLING ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
KING HIGHWAY LANDFILL OPERABLE UNIT
Well ID:
Date Collected:
Generic
GSI
Values
Site
Specific
WQBEL
Units
H85703
MW-8BR
06/06/12
H85704
MW-8AR
06/06/12
H86705
MW-7
06/06/12
VOCs
Acetone
1,700
-
ug/L
NA
NA
NA
SVOCs
4-Methylphenol
71
_
H1/l
NA
NA
NA
Naphthalene
13
-
Ffl/L
NA
NA
NA
Phenol
210
-
pg/L
NA
NA
NA
PCBs
Aroclor 1016
_
_
pq/L.
ND [0.0551
ND [0.053]
ND [0.048]
Aroclor 1221
-
-
(jq/L
ND [0.0551
ND [0.053]
ND [0.048]
Aroclor 1232
-
-
Hfl"-
ND [0.055]
ND [0.053]
ND [0.0481
Aroclor 1242
-
-
(jq/L
ND [0.055]
ND [0.053]
ND [0.048]
Aroclor 1248
-
-
H9'l
ND [0.055]
ND [0.0531
ND [0.0481
Aroclor 1254
-
_
H9'l
ND [0.055]
ND [0.0531
ND [0.0481
Aroclor 1260
_
-
ffl"-
ND [0.0551
ND [0.053]
ND [0.048]
Total PCBs
0.2
-
ug/L
ND [0.055]
ND [0.0531
ND [0.048]
Metals
Barium
-
2,300
|jq/L
NA
NA
NA
Calcium
-
_
uq/L
NA
NA
NA
Chromium6
11
pq/L
NA
NA
NA
Iron
-
-
fjq/L
NA
NA
NA
Sodium
-
~
pq/L
NA
NA
NA
Thallium
-
160
NA
NA
NA
Zinc
-
1,200
H9'l
NA
NA
NA
Vanadium
12
-
ug/L
NA
NA
NA
Miscellaneous
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
-
~
ma/L
NA
NA
NA
Carbonate Alkalinitv
-
_
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
Chemical Oxygen Demand
-
_
ma/L
NA
NA
NA
Hydroxide Alkalinity
-
-
ma/L
NA
NA
NA
Nitrate/Nitrite Nitroaen
_
-
ma/L
NA
NA
NA
Sulfate
-
-
ma/L
NA
NA
NA
Total Alkalinitv
_
_
ma/L
NA
NA
NA
Total Organic Carbon
_
mq/L
NA
NA
NA
Total Suspended Solids
-
-
mg/L
NA
NA
NA
Notes:
1. ND - Not detected. Practical quantitation limits are shown in brackets.
2. NA - Not analyzed.
3. pg/L - Micrograms per liter.
4. mg/L - Milligrams per liter.
5. GSI Value is for methylphenols.
6. Total Chromium is being analyzed, but the GSI Value refers to Chromium (VI) oxidation state.
7. The Generic GSI Values are obtained from the KHL-OU Hydrogeologic Monitoring Plan (September 2002).
8. The WQBEL values are per the MDEQ Surface Water Quality Division, as recommended in a January 22,1998 interoffice communication.
9. Sample IDs H85549 and H85550 correspond to Matrix Spike/Matrix Spike Duplicate samples associated with Sample ID H85548, and were therefore not included hereon.
Definitions of Data Qualifiers-
B - The reported value was obtained from a reading less than the contract required detection limit (CRDL) but greater than or equal to the instrument detection limit (IDL).
J - The compound/analyte was positively identified; however, the associated numerical value is an estimated concentration only.
Hi" comP°und/ana|yte was not detected above the reported sample quantitation/detection limit. However, the reported limit is approximate and may or may not represent the actual limit of quantitation/detection
UB - The compound/analyte was considered non-detect at the listed value due to associated blank contamination.
8/21/2012
G:\Clients\GP KHL\06 Notes and Data\GW Sampling Results Since Last 5-Yr Review.xlsx
Page 27 of 27
-------
Attachment 2B
0U4 Results
-------
TABLE 2
Page I of 10
SUMMARY OF
APRIL 2010 FOLLOW-UP GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
Sample Locution
Sample Identification
Sample Date
Sample Elevation (feet AMSL)
Screen Depth (feet hgs)
MW-101S
GW-56393-0406U-EV-002
4/t/2011
702.35 - 663.35
32-39
Groundwater Cleanup Criteria
MW-101S
GW-56393-0406U-EV-003
WOU
702.35 - 663.35
32-39
Duplicate
MW-101D
GW-56393-040611-EV-001
4/6/1011
664.33 - 589.33
70-75
MW-102S
GW-56393-040S11-EV-017
4/fyZOU
701.18 - 691.18
3-10
MW-1Q2D
GW-56393-040811-EV-015
4/8/2011
664.43 - 619.43
40-45
MW-102D
GW-56393-0408U-EV-016
4/8/2011
664.43 - 619.43
40-45
Duplicate
Units
<1
b
r
Metals
Aluminum
Mg/L
50
50
87
9.6
| 185'"
| 65.6'h
| 43.1
| 67.2*1" |
Antimony
Mg/L
6
6
130
0.05 U
0.02|
0.11
0.05 U
0.05 U
0.05 U
Arsenic
I'g/L
10
10
10
019 J
0 25 1
1.10
0 44 J
0.18J
0.44 |
Banum
Mg/L
2000
2000
1400
73.1
72 7
78.9
81 8
68.8
83 4
Beryllium
Mg/L
4
4
41
0.004 |
0.020 U
0.022
0.005 1
0.004 J
0 004 J
Cadmium
Mg/L
5
5
5.1
0.005}
0.005 j
0.021
0.023
0.00b J
0.025
Chromium
Mg/L
100
100
11
0.41
0 49
1.11
0 34 U
0.26 U
0 31 U
Cobalt
Mg/L
40
100
100
0.124
0.128
1.040
0.515
0 153 J
0.506 J
¦Copper
Mg/L
1000
1000
23
0.77
0.79
2.94
0.93
0.78
0.94
Iron
Mg/L
300
300
80.8
68.5
| 1510'1'
| 426 J"1
| 171J
| 430 J'h |
Lead
Mg/L
4
4
34
0.041
0.048
1.200
0.207
0.183
0.208
Magnesium
Mg/L
4C0000
1100000
25300
24900
24300
29000
24200
28900
Manganese
Mg/L
50
50
5200
2 94
2.90
| 65.8"*
| 573*"
| 8.35 J
1 S77 r I
Mercurv
Mg/L
2
2
0.0013
0.20 U
0.20 U
0 20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
Nickel
Mg/L
100
100
130
1.03
1.07
241
2.15
0.92
2.1 L
Selenium
Mg/L
50
50
5
0.3 J
0.4 I
1.0 U
1.0 U
1 0 LI
1.0 U
Silver
Mg/L
34
98
02
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.0:0 U
0.020 U
0 020 U
Sodium
Mg/ L
120000
350000
23400
23000
24900
20000
20900
19900
Thallium
Mg/L
2
2
3.7
0.003 j
0.003 I
0.020 !
0.051
0.020 U
0.051
Vanadium
Mg/L
4.5
f)2
12
0.17J
0 1 b J
1.08
0 36
0.26
0 34
Zinc
Mg/L
2400
5000
310
0.78
1.21
52.4
1.27
1.46
1.43
rcBs
Aroclor-10lf> (PCB-1016)
Mg/L
0 021 UJ
0.020 UJ
0.020 UJ
G.020 UI
0.020 UJ
0.020 UI
Aroclor-1221 (PCB-1221)
Mg/L
0.041 UJ
0 040 UJ
0.040 UJ
0 040 UJ
0.040 UJ
0.040 UJ
Aroclor-1232 (PCB-1232)
Mg/L
0.021 UJ
0.020 UJ
0.020 UJ
0.020 UJ
0.020 UJ
0.020 UJ
Arodor-1242 (PCB-1242)
Mg/L
0.021 UJ
0 020 UJ
0.020 UJ
0 020 UJ
0.020 UJ
0.020 UJ
Aroclor-1 248 (PCB-1248)
Mg/L
0.021 Uj
0.020 Ul
0 020 UJ
0.020 UJ
0 020 Ui
0 020 UJ
Aroclo{'-I25H (PCB-IZ541
Mg/L
0.021 U|
0.020 UJ
0.020 UJ
0.020 u)
0.020 UJ
0,020 UJ
A rodor-12oti (fCS-l 2g0)
Mg/L
0.021 Uj
0 020 U|
0.020 UJ
0.020 UJ
0.020 U|
0.020 U|
Tolal PCB5
Mg/L
0.5
0.5
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
-------
Page 2 of in
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF
APRIL 2010 FOLLOW-UP GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
Sample Location
Sample liientification
Sample Date
Sample Elevation (feet AAtSL)
Screen Depth (feet bgs)
Sample Tyfje
Groundwater Cleanup Criteria '
MW-tQIS
G W-56393-040611 -£ V-002
¦Won
702.35 - 663.35
32-39
MVV-1015
GW-56393-0406U-EV-003
4/t/201\
702.35 - 663.35
32-39
Duplicate
MW-101D
GW-5b393*Q40t>U-EV-001
W2011
664.33 - 589.33
70-75
SfW-102S
GW'5b393-040Sll-EV-017
4/S/20U
701.18-691.18
3-10
MW-102D
GW-5b393-040811-EV~015
4/8/20U
664.43 - 619.43
40-45
MW-102D
GW-56393-040SU-EV-01b
4/8/2011
664.43 - 619.43
40-45
Duplicate
Units
Volatile Organic Compounds
.Acelone
Mg/L
730
2100
1700
R
R
R
R
R
R
Ben/ene
Mg/L
5
5
200
0.50 UJ
0 50 Uj
0.50 Ui
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
Brornobenzene
Mg/L
18
50
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 Ul
2.0 Ul
Bromodichlororwthane
Mg/L
80
80
ID
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0.58
0.50 Ul
0.50 Ul
0.50 UJ
fJromoform
Mg/L
80
80
ID
0.50 UJ
0.50 Ul
0.50 Ul
0.50 UJ
0.50 Uf
0 50 Uj
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
Mg/L
10
29
35
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 Ul
2-Bntanone (Methyl ethyl ketone) (MEK)
Mg/L
13000
38000
2200
R
R
R
R
R
R
N-Butvlbenzene
Mg/L
80
230
ID
2.0 U[
2.0 Ul
2.0 U|
2.0 UJ
2.0 U|
2 0 UJ
Carlx">n disulfide
Mg/L
800
2300
ID
0 50 U)
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 Uj
0 50 UJ
Carbon tetrachloride
Mg/L
5
5
45
0.50 UJ
0 50 UI
0 50 Ul
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
Chlorobenzene
l'g/L
100
100
25
0.50 U!
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
Chlorobromomelhane
Mg/L
0.50 UJ
0.50 U|
0.50 U|
0 50 UJ
0.50 UI
0.50 UJ
Chlnroethane
Mg/L
430
r-oo
1100
0 50 U|
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 Uj
0.50 UJ
0.50 U|
Chloroform (Trifhloromethane)
Mg/L
80
so
350
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
1.1
0 50 UJ |
0 0901
0.50 Uj
Chloromflhane (Melhyl chloride)
Mg/L
260
1100
ID
0.50 U|
0.50 U|
0 50 UJ
0.080 J
o.m j
0 080 1
2-Chlorotoluene
Mg/L
150
420
ID
2.0 U|
2.0 Ul
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 U|
2.0 UJ
4-ChJorotoluene
Mg/L
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 U|
2.0 Uf
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
Cyinene (p-lsopropvi toluene)
Mg/L
2.0 III
2.0 UJ
2 0 UJ
2 0 UJ
2.0 U|
2.0 UJ
'J,2-Djbromo-3-chloroprofVne (DOCP)
Mg/L
0.2
1)2
R
R
R
2.0 Uj
2 0 Uf
2.0 Uj
Oibromochloromethdne
Mg/L
80
80
ID
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 24 [
0.50 UJ
0.50 Ui
0.50 U|
J,2-Dibromoelh<*ne (Ethylenedibromide)
Mg/L
0.05
0.05
5.7
2.0 U|
2.0 U,T
2.0 UJ
2 0 Uf
2 0 Ul
2.0 uj
Dibrornomethane
Mg/L
80
230
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0.50 UI
C.50 Ul
l,2-Dii"h!orobenzene
Mg/L
600
O00
13
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 u'j
C 50 UJ
1,3-Dich lorobenzene
Mg/L
6.6
19
28
0.50 UJ
0.50 Ul
0 50 UI
0 50 Uf
0.50 UJ
0.50 Uj
1,4-Djchlorobenzene
Mg/L
75
75
17
0.50 i'l
0 50 Uj
0.50 Ui
0.50 U|
0.50 Uj
0 50 Uj
Dichlorodifluoromelhane (CFC-12)
Mg/L
1700
-1800
ID
0.50 UJ
0.50 Ul
0 50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 Ul
0.50 U[
1,1 -Dichloroefhane
Mg/L
880
2500
7-30
0 50 UJ
0.50 Ul
0 50 Ul
Q 50 VI
0 50 UJ
0.50 Uj
1,2-Dichloroethane
Mg/L
5
5
360
0.50 UI
0.50 Ul
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
U-Djchloroelhefie
Mg/L
7
7
130
0.50 Uf
0 50 Ul
0.50 Uj
0.50 Ul
0.50 Ul
0.50 Ui
ci*-l,2-Dirhloroethene
Mg/L
71)
70
620
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 Ul
0 50 U]
0.50 U|
0 50 Ul
fM.'is-l,2-DichJoroefhene
Mg/L
700
100
1500
0 50 UJ
0.50 Ul
0 50 UJ
0 50 U|
0 50 UI
0.50 UJ
1,3-Dichloropropane
Mg/L
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 U]
0.50 UJ
0.50 U|
0.50 UJ
1.2-Pichloropropane
Mg/L
5
5
230
0.50 UJ
0.50 U l
0.50 UI
0.50 Ul
0 50 l'J
0.50 L 1
2,2-Dichloropropane
Mg/L
0.50 UJ
0.50 Ul
0.50 UJ
0,50 UJ
0.50 Ul
0 50 Ul
1,1-Dic'hloropropene
Mg/L
0.50 U|
0.50 Uj
0 50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0 50 UJ
'V50 Ul
cis-l,3-Dichloi-opropene
Mg/L
0.50 UJ
0.50 Ul
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
1 50 L.J
-------
Piige 3 of 10
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF
APRIL 2010 FOLLOW-UP GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
Sample Locution
Sample Identification
Sample Date
Sample Elevation (feet AMSL)
Screen Depth (feet bgs)
Sample Ty/>e
Gronndjrater Cleanup Criteria
Units a b c
MW-101S
GW-5t393-0406U-EV-002
4/6/2011
702.35 - 663.35
32-39
MW-101S
GW-56393-040611-EV-003
4/t/2011
702.35 - 663.35
32-39
Duplicate
MW-101D
GW-56393-040611-EV-001
4/0/2011
664.33 - 589.33
70-75
MW-102S
GW-56393-040S11-EV-017
4/8/2011
701.18-691.18
3-10
MW-W2D
G W-56393-Q40811 -E V-Oi 5
4/S/20U
664.43 - 619.43
40-45
MW-102D
GW-5b393-040Sll-EV-016
4/S/2011
664.43 - 619.43
40-45
Duplicate
trans-1.3-Dichloropropene
Mg/L
-
0 50 UI
0 50 U|
0.50 UJ
0.50 Ul
0.50 U l
0.50 Ul
Elhylbe rizene
Mg/L
74
74
18
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0.50 Uj
0.50 Uj
Hexachlorobuladiene
Mg/L
15
42
0.053
2.0 U |
2.0 UJ
2.0 Uj
2.0 Uj
2.0 UI
2 0 U|
2-He\afvotto
I'g/L
1000
2900
ID
R
R
R
20 Uj
20 U|
20 UJ
Isopropvl benzene
Mg/L
800
2300
28
2 0UJ
2.0 UJ
20 Ui
2.0 Uj
2.0 Uj
2.0 UI
4-Methvl-2-penlanone(,MlBK.)
ms/l
1800
5200
ID
R
R
R
R
R
R
Methylene chloride
Mg/L
5
5
1500
2.0 U[
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2 0 UJ
2.0 UJ
Naphthalene
Mg/L
520
1500
11
2 0UJ
2.0 U)
2.0 UJ
2.0 U|
2.0 UJ
2.0 U|
N-Propvlbenzene
I'g/L
80
230
ID
2.0 Uj
2.0 Ul
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 Ul
2.0 UJ
2-rhenylbutane (see-But vlbenzene)
l'g/'L
80
230
ID
20UJ
2 0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 Ul
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
Stvrene
ms/l
100
100
80
0.50 U!
0.50 UJ
0 50 Ul
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
lerl-Buh Ibenzene
Mg/L
80
230
ID
2.0 UJ
2 0 UJ
2.0 Ul
2 0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
I,l,2,2-~ietrachloroethane
Mg/L
S.5
35
78
0.50 U!
0 50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 Uj
1,1,1,2-Tetrachloroelhane
Mg/L
77
320
ID
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 UI
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
Tetrachbroelhene
Mg/L
5
5
60
0.50 Ul
0 50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UI
0.50 UJ
Toluene
Mg/L
790
790
270
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 Uj
0.50 UI
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
l,2,4-Tri':hloruheniene
Mg/L
70
70
99
2.0 uj
2.0 UJ
2 0 UJ
2 0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 Uj
1,2,3-Tnchlorobenzene
Mg/L
2.0 UJ
2 0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 Uj
2 0 UJ
1,1,1-Tnchloroethane
Mg/L
200
200
89
0.50 UJ
0.50 Ul
0 50 UJ
0.50 Uj
0 50 Uj
0.50 uj
1,1,2-Truhloroelhane
Mg/L
5
5
330
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
Tnchloroethene
Mg/L
5
5
200
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 U!
0.50 Ul
0 50 UJ
Trichloroiluoromethane (CFC-I I)
Mg/L
2600
7300
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0.50 Ul
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0.50 UJ
1,2,3-Triehloropropane
Mg/L
42
120
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
11.50 UJ
0.50 Uj
0.50 UI
0.50 UJ
1,2,4-Trimelhv 1benzene
Mg/L
63
63
17
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 Ul
2 0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 U|
1,3,5-Trnnethvllvnzene
Mg/L
72
72
45
2.0 U!
2 0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 UI
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
Vinvl chloride
Mg/L
2
2
13
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
050 U|
0.50 UJ
0.50 Uj
0.50 Uj
o-Xylene
Mg/L
280
280
41
0.50 UI
0.50 Uj
0.50 UJ
0.50 UI
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
in&p-Xvlenes
Mg/L
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 Uj
0 50 UI
field Parameters
Conductivity, hold
Dissolved owgen (DO), field
Oxidation reduction potential (OPPi, held
pH, held
Temperature, field
Turbiditv field
niS/cm
0.67
0 6"
0,676
0.699
0.595
0 595
mg/L.
4.07
4.07
3 82
0.58
0.7b
0.76
millivolts
84
84
91
154
139
139
s.ii. 6.5-8.5 6.5-8.5
8.21
821
8.21
85
S.34
8.34
DegC
7.96
7.96
9.25
6.6
8.27
8 27
NTU
6.33
6.33
5o.9
46.9
14.4
14.4
-------
Page 4 of 10
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF
APRIL 2010 FOLLOW-UP GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
Sample Location
MW-103D
MW-1G4S
MW-W4D
MW-1055
MW-105D
Sample Identification
GW-56393-040711-EV-014
GIV-563W- 040711- E V-012
G\\'-jt393-0407n-EV.(}13
G W-56393-040711 -EV-010
G W-56393-0407J1 -E V-OU
Sample Date
4/7/2.01!
4/7/1011
4/7/2011
4/7/2011
4/7/2011
Sample Elevation (feet AMSL)
074.37-639.37
684.86 - 658.S6
663.4S - 618.4S
699.S9-6S7.S9
662.79 - 615.79
Screen Depth (feet bgs)
30-35
20-25
40-45
5-12
42-47
Sample Type
Groundwater Cleanup Criteria
U nit a
a
c
Metals
Aluminum
Mg/L
50
50
10.5
| 97.4*"
] IS 4
331
7.6
Antimonv
Mg/L
6
6
130
0.05 U
0 05 U
0 07 U
0 05 U
0 05 U
Arsenic
Mg/L
10
10
10
0.50 U
0 43)
0.28 I
0.25 J
0 50 U
Barium
Mg/L
2000
2000
1400
o7.3
73 4
79.1
146
74 4
Beryllium
Mg/L
4
4
41
0 020 U
0.005)
0.020 U
0.020 U
0 020 U
Cadmium
Mg/L
5
5
5.1
0.011 J
0.010 J
0.017]
0 013 J
0.005 1
Chromium
Mg/L
100
100
11
0.29 (j
0 35 I'
0.60
0.24 U
0.22 U
Cobalt
Mg/L
40
100
100
0 117
0.302
0.293
0.608
0.12o
Copper
Mg/'L
1000
1000
23
0 62
0.92
0 76
0 76
0.92
Iron
Mg/ L
300
?00
19.bJ
| 474 Jih
| 34 4 1
| 419 y
| 16.8 J
Lead
Mg/L
4
4
34
0.032
0.323
0.080
0111
0 070
Magnesium
Mg/L
400000
1100000
25300
25500
25600
31800
26000
Manganese
Mg/L
50
50
5200
5.05
135
| 83.7'"
j 208'"
I 212
Mercurv
Mg/L
2
2
0.0013
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
Nickel
Mg/L
100
100
130
1.15
1 24
1 43
1.92
0.98
Selenium
Mg/L
50
50
5
1.0 U
1.0 U
1.0 U
1.0 u
1.0 U
Silver
Mg/L
34
98
02
0 020 U
0.020 U
0 020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
Sodium
Mg/L
120000
350000
22400
24R00
24900
25000
21900
Thallium
Mg/L
2
2
3.7
0 020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
Vanadium
Mg/L
4.5
62
12
0.18 J
0.48
0.25
0181
0.14 j
Zinc
Mg/L
2400
5000
310
1.52
1 50
2.48
0 92
1.23
PCBs
Aroclor-1016 (PCB-1016)
Mg/L
0.020 UJ
0.020 Ul
0 020 UJ
0.020 UJ
0.020 UJ
Aroclor-1221 (PCB-1221)
Mg/L
0.040 UJ
0.040 U|
0.040 U)
0 040 UJ
0.040 UJ
Aroclor-1232 (PCB-1232)
Mg/L
0.020 U|
0.020 U!
0.020 UJ
0.020 Ul
0.020 Ul
Aruclor-1242 (PCB-1242)
Mg/L
0.020 Uj
0.020 UJ
0.020 UJ
0.020 UJ
0.020 UJ
Aroclor-1248 (PCB-1248)
Mg/L
0.020 UJ
0.020 Ul
0.020 UJ
0 020 UJ
0.020 UJ
Aroclor-1254 (PCB-1254)
Mg/L
0.020 UJ
0.020 Ul
0.020 UJ
0 020 UJ
0.020 Ul
Ari'cIor-1260 (PCB-12bO)
Mg/L
0 020 U]
0 020 Ul
0 020 U|
0.020 UJ
0.020 UJ
Total PCBs
Mg/L
0.5
0.5
0.2
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
MW-I06S
G W-56393-040711 -LV-00H
1/7/1011
701.89 - 692.89
2-9
27.8
0.11 U
15.3
538
0 003 I
0.009 J
0.40
0 760
(.68
20800 J"
0.330
37000
48.V"
0.20 U
1 87
1.0 U
0 020 U
21500
0.020 U
0.29
4.82
0 020
U|
0 040
Uf
0.020
UJ
0.020
UJ
0.020
Ul
0 020
UJ
0,020
UJ
ND
-------
Page 5 of 10
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF
APRIL 2010 FOLLOW-UP GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
Sample Location
Sample Identification
Sample Dale
Sample Elevation (feet AMSL)
Screen Depth (feet bgs)
Sample Type
Groundwater Cleanup Criteria
Units a b <
MW-103D
G W-56393-040711 -EV-014
4/7/2011
674.37- 639.37
30-35
MW-104S
GW-56393-0407U-EV-012
4/7/2011
684.86 - 658.86
20-25
MW-104D
GW-5t>393-0407U-EV-013
4/7/2011
663.4S-61S.4S
40-45
MW-105S
GW-56393-040711-EV-010
4/7/2011
699.S9 - 687.89
5-12
MW-105D
GW-56393-040711-EV-011
4/7/2011
662.79 - 615.79
42-47
MW-lObS
C, W-5c393-04071 1 -E V-00S
4/7/2011
70l.S9 - 692.S9
2-9
Volatile Organic Compounds
Acetone
Mg/L
730
2100
1700
Is
R
R
R
R
R
Benzene
l'g/L
5
5
200
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Bromolvnzene
Mg/L
18
50
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2 0 UJ
2 0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
Bromodichiorornelhane
Mg/L
80
80
ID
0 50UJ
0.50 UI
0.45]
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
Bromoform
Mg/L
80
80
ID
0.50 UJ
0.50 U|
0 50 UI
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
Bromomethane (Methvl bromide)
Mg/L
10
29
35
0 50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
2-Bufanone (Methyl ethyl ketone) (MEK)
Mg/L
13000
38000
2200
R
R
R
R
R
R
N-Butyllx?nzene
Mg/L
80
230
ID
2 0 UJ
2.0 U|
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 UI
Carbon disuihde
Mg/L
800
2300
ID
0.50 U)
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
Carbon tetrachloride
Mg/L
5
5
45
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 UI
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
Chlorolvnzene
Mg/L
100
100
25
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0.50 Uj
0.50 UJ
Chlorobromomelhane
Mg/L
0.50 UJ
0.50 UI
0 50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
Chloroethane
Mg/L
430
1700
1100
0.50 UJ
0.50 U|
0.50 UI
0 50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0.50 UJ
Chloroform (Trichloromelhane)
ii.;/ L
80
80
350
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 58
0.50 UJ
0.090 J
0.50 UJ
Chloromethane (Methvl chloride)
Mg/L
260
1100
ID
0.12 |
0.50 UJ
0.29 J
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0.50 UJ
2-Chiorotoluene
Mg/L
150
420
ID
2.0 UJ
2 0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
4-Chlorotoluene
Mg/L
2.0 UI
2.0 U]
2.0 UI
2.0 UJ
2.0 U|
2.0 UI
Cvmene (p-lsopropvltoluene)
Mg/L
2.0 Ui
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2 0 UJ
2.0 UI
2.0 UJ
1,2-D;brc nio-3-chloropropane (DBCP)
Mg/L
0.2
0.2
2.0 U)
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
Dibromochloromethane
Mg / L
80
80
ID
0 50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.38 J
0.50 UI
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
1,2-Dibromoelhane (Ethylene dibronnde)
Mg/L
0.05
0.05
5.7
2 0 UJ
2 0 UJ
20 UI
2 0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
Pibromornethane
Mg/L
80
230
0.50 UJ
0.50 UI
0.50 UJ
0.50 UI
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Mg/L
600
600
13
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
1,3-DichJorobenzene
Mg/L
b.b
19
28
0 50 U1
0 50 U]
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 U|
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Mg/L
75
75
17
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
050 U!
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
Dichlorodifluoromethane (Cf:C-12)
Mg/L
1700
4800
ID
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
1.1-Dichloroethane
Mg/L
880
2500
740
0 50 UI
0 50 U|
0 50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 U!
0.50 UJ
1.2-Dichloroefhane
Mg/L
5
5
360
0.50 UJ
0.50 U|
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 Uj
J ,1-Didiloroethene
Mg/L
7
7
130
0.50 UJ
0.50 UI
0 50 UJ
0.50 UI
0 50 UJ
0.50 Uj
cis-1,2-Dichloroelhene
Mg/L
70
70
620
0 50 UI
0 50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0.50 UJ
trans-1,2-f >ic hloroft hene
Mg/L
TOO
100
1500
0 50 UI
0 50 U!
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UI
1,3-Pichloropropdiie
Mg/ L
0.50 UI
0.50 UJ
0.50 Uj
0.50 UJ
0.50 UI
0.50 U|
1.2-Dichloropropane
Mg/L
5
5
230
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0 50 UJ
2,2-Dichloropropane
Mg/ L
0.50 Ui
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
1 rl - Dichloropropene
Mg/L
0 50 U|
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
cis-l^-Duhloropropene
Mg/L
0.50 U]
0 50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
-------
Page 6 of 10
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF
APRIL 2010 FOLLOW-UP GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
Sample Location
S imple Identification
Sample Date
Sample Elevation (feet AMSL)
Snei'ii Depth (feet bgs)
Sample Type
Groundwater Cleanup Criteria '
Units a !> (
MW-103D
C W-5*393-04071 1 -EV-0]4
4/7/1011
674.37- 639.37
30-35
MW-104S
7,W-56393-0407ll-EV-0l2
4/7/1011
6S4.86 - 658.S6
20-25
MIV-104D
GW-56393-040 711-EV-013
4/7/1011
663.4S - 618.4S
40-45
MW-105S
GW-56393-0407U-EV-010
4/7/1011
699.89 -6S7.89
5-12
MW-205D
GW-56393-Q40711-EV-011
4/7/1011
662.79- 615.79
42-47
MW-106S
GW-56393-040711-EV-0OS
4/7/2011
701.89 - 692.89
2-9
tran>-l,?-Du"hJoropropene
F.thyllvnzene
Hexachlorohutadiene
2-Hiixanone
Isopropvl benzene
4-Meth\ l-2-pentanone(\11BK)
Methylene chloride
Naphlh.ilene
N-PropWlvnzene
2-Plw?nvlbutane i.sec-Butvlbenzene)
Jjtyrene
tert-Butylbenzene
'i,1,2,2-7etrtKhloroe{hane
1,1,1,2-Tetrachioroethanc
TelrachJoroelhene
To I Jent'
1,2,4-Tnchlorobenzern!
),2,3-Trichlarabenzene
1.1.1-Tnch]prc>elhane
1.1.2-TnchJoroethane
Trit'hlorofthene
Tnchlorofliioromethant' (CFC-11)
1.2.3-Trichloropropane
1.2.4-Tn met h v I benzene
1.3.5-Tnmethvlbenzene
Vinvl chloride
o-Aylern?
m&p-Xvlenes
Field Parameters
Conductivity, field
Dissolved oxvgen (DO), field
Oxidation reduction potential (ORP), held
ph, field
Temperature, field
TurbidiU, field
Mg/L
0 50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0.50 11
0.50 UJ
0.50 Ul
0 50 Ul
Mg/L
74
74
18
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 ul
0 50 Uj
0 50 U|
0.50 UJ
Mg/L
15
42
0.053
2.0 UJ
2.0 Ul
2.0 Ul
2.0 U|
2.0 Ul
2.0 U|
Mg/L
1000
2900
ID
20 UJ
20 UJ
20 U|
20 UJ
20 Ul
20 UJ
Mg/L
800
2*100
28
2.0 UJ
2.0 U|
2.0 Ul
2 0 U|
2.0 Ui
2.0 uj
Mg/L
1800
5200
ID
R
R
R
R
R
R
Mg/L
5
5
1500
2.0 UJ
2.0 U|
2.0 UJ
2 0 UJ
2.0 UJ
o uj
Mg/L
520
1500
11
2.0 UJ
2.0 Ul
2.0 Uj
2.0 U|
2.0 Ul
2.0 U|
Mg/L
80
230
ID
2.0 UJ
2.0 U|
2.0 UJ
20 Ul
2 0 Ul
2.0 UJ
Mg/L
80
230
ID
20 U|
2 0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2 0 UJ
2.0 UJ
Mg/L
100
100
80
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0 50 Ul
0.50 l'J
0 50 Ul
Mg/ L
80
230
ID
20 U|
20 Ul
2.0 UJ
2.0 U|
2.0 UJ
2.0 Uj
Mg/'L
8.5
35
78
0.50 U|
0.50 UJ
0 50 U!
0 50 Ul
0.50 UJ
C.50 Ul
Mg/L
77
320
ID
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0.50 Ul
0.50 UJ
0 50 U|
C 50 Ul
Mg/L
5
5
60
0.50 UJ
0.50 U|
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
Mg/'L
790
790
270
0.50 U!
OOftO |
0 OhO |
050 U|
0 50 Lj 1
0 090 1
Mg/L
70
70
99
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 Ul
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
Mg/L
2 0 UJ
2.0 Uj
2 0 UJ
2.0 U|
2 0 UJ
2 0 UJ
Mg/L
200
200
89
0.50 UJ
0.50 U|
0.5C U|
0.50 Ul
0.50 Uj
0.50 UJ
Mg/L
5
5
330
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
Mg/L
5
5
200
0 50 Uj
0 50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 U]
0.50 UJ
Mg/L
2600
7300
-
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 Ul
0 50 Uj
0.50 Uj
0.50 UJ
Mg/L
42
120
0.50 U[
0 50 Ul
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 U|
Mg/L
63
63
17
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
20 Ul
2 0 U|
2.0 UJ
Mg/L
72
72
45
2.0 UJ
2 0 Uj
2 0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 Uj
2 0 Ul
Mg/L
2
2
13
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0.50 Ul
0.50 U|
0.50 UJ
0.50 Uj
Mg/L
280
280
41
0.50 Ul
0.50 Uf
0 50 Ul
0.50 UJ
0 50 UI
0 50 UJ
Mg/L
0 50 U[
0.50 Ul
0 50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
mS/cm
0.b26
0.b4
0.o4S
0 813
0 656
1.171
mg./L
1.33
1 17
0.96
0 23
2.32
0 2
IlllllVOltS
40
13
40
-12
9
0.84
s u.
6.5 - 8.5
6.5-8.5
8.22
8.17
8.18
7 94
8.14
7 75
PegC
10 68
10.88
10.39
9 75
H.34
8.25
NTU
2.94
5
20.5
7.99
4.16
15.6
-------
TABLE 2
Page 7 of 10
SUMMARY OF
APRIL 2010 FOLLOW-UP GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
Simple Locution
MW-106D
MW-107S
MW-108S
MW-108D
MW-109D
Sample Identification
G W-56393-040711 -E V-009
GW-56393-040711-EV-007
GW-56393-040711-EV-005
GW-56393-040711-EV-006
GW-56393-040611-
Sample Date
4/7/2011
4/7/2011
4/7/2011
4/7/2011
W10U
Sample Elevation (feet AMSLi
664.66 - 620.66
695.76 - 682.76
701.32 - 692.32
663.39 - 61S.39
6S9.41 ¦ 666.-
Screen (feet
40-45
8-13
2-9
40-45
22-27
Sample T
Groundwater Cleanup Critciia
Units
(/
I;
c
Metals
A lu milium
Mg/L
50
50
6.3
52
| 74.0'h
| 28.8
10.7
Antimony
Mg/L
6
6
130
0.18
0.06 u
0.07 U
0.08 U
0.03 J
Arsenic
ms/l
10
10
10
0.09 J
0 48 J
0.30 J
0.52
0.16 |
Barium
Mg/L
2000
2000
1400
95.9
86 1
78.7
331
74.8
Beryllium
Mg/L
4
4
41
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.008 J
0.004 J
0.020 U
Cadmium
Mg/L
5
5
5.1
0.012 I
0.111
0.010J
0.018 J
0 008 [
Chromium
Mg/ L
100
100
11
0 50
0.22 U
0.4c
0.20 U
0.43
Cobalt
Mg/ L
40
100
100
0.138
0 344
0.23S
0.553
0.13b
Copper
Mf,/ l
1000
1000
23
0.95
1.37
1.0(1
1.59
1.33
lion
Mg/L
300
300
14.9 J
| 830 J'"
| 275]
240]
31.7
Lead
Mg/L
4
4
34
0.059
0.058
0.263
0.275
0.079
Magnesium
Mg/L
400000
1100000
24700
30700
23300
31 °00
24300
Manganese
Mg/L
50
50
5200
36.4
| 268Jr
| 24.3
| 2orh
| 2.16
Mercury
Mg/L
2
2
0.0013
0 20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
Nickel
Mg/L
100
100
130
1.40
3.91
1 33
2.13
1.17
Selenium
Mg/L
50
50
5
1.0 u
1.0 U
1.0 U
1.0 U
0.4 |
Silver
Mg/L
34
98
0.2
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
Sodium
Mg/L
120000
350000
30000
21900
20600
54300
21300
Thallium
Mg/L
2
2
3.7
0.026
0213
0.020 U
0 098
0.006 !
Vanadium
Mg/L
4.5
62
12
0.13.1
0.09 J
0.30
0.19 J
0.15 I
Zmc
Mg'L
2400
5000
310
1.62
4.20
2 90
3.28
1.56
I'CBs
Aaxlor-lOlti (fXrB-1016)
Mg/L
0 020 UJ
0.020 U|
0 020 UJ
0.020 UJ
0.020 UJ
Aroclor-1221 (PCB-1221)
Mg/L
0.040 U|
0.040 UJ
0.040 UJ
0.040 UJ
0.040 UJ
Aroclor-I 232 (PCB-1232)
Mg/L
0.020 U!
0 020 UJ
0.020 UJ
0.020 UJ
0.020 UJ
Aroclor-1242 (PCB-1242)
Mg/'L
0.020 UJ
0.020 U|
0.020 UJ
0.020 UJ
0.020 U|
Aroclor-1.248 (PCB-1248)
Mg/L
0 020 UJ
0.020 UJ
0 020 UJ
0 020 UJ
0.020 UJ
Aroclor-1254 (PCB-1254)
Mg/L
0 0083 J
0.020 U|
0.0056 !
0 020 UJ
0.020 U|
Aroclor-12t)0 (PCB-1260)
M6/L
0 020 UJ
0 020 UJ
0.020 UJ
0.020 UJ
0.020 UJ
Total PCBj
Mg/ L
0.5
0.5
0.2
0.0083 J
ND
0.0056 J
ND
ND
- A I! ¦
-------
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF
APRIL 2010 FOLLOW-UP GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
SiitnpJe Locution
Sample Identification
Sample Date
Sample Elevation (feet AMSL)
Screen Depth (feet bgs)
Sample Type
Groundwater Cleanup Criteria '
Units a b i
MW-lObD
GW-56393-04Q7U'EV-0t)9
4/7/2011
664.66 - 620.66
40-45
MW-107S
C,W-56393-040711-EV'Q07
V7/2011
695.76 - 6S2.76
8-13
MW-108S
GW-56393-0407U-EV-005
4/7/2011
701.32 - 692.32
2-9
MW-10SD
GW-56393-04Q7U-EV-Q06
4/7/2011
663.39 - 618.39
40-45
MW-109D
GW-56393-0406U'EV-004
4A/2011
6S9.41 - 666.41
22-27
Volatile Organic Compounds
Acetone
^S/ L
730
2100
1700
R
R
R
F.
R
Benzene
Mg/L
5
5
200
0 50 U
0 50 U
0.50 U
0.50 L1
0.50 L'J
Bromolvnzene
Mg/L
18
50
2.0 U|
2 0 U1
2 0 UJ
2 0 UJ
2.0 UJ
Bromodichloromethane
Mg/L
ao
HO
ID
0.50 UJ
0.50 U|
0 50 LI 1
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
Eiroinoform
Mg/L
80
80
ID
0.50 U]
0 50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 U|
[Jromomethaiv? (Methyl bromide)
Mg/L
10
29
35
0 50 U|
0.50 U1
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
l'-]3utanone (Methyl elhy) ketone) (MEK)
Mg/L
1.1000
38000
2200
R
R
K
R
N-Butylbenzene
Mg/L
80
230
ID
2.0 U|
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
Carbon disulfide
Mg/L
800
2 W0
[D
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0.50 UI
Carbon tetrachloride
I'g/L
5
5
45
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 U|
0.50 U|
0.50 U|
Chlorobenzene
Mg/L
100
100
25
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0 50 L1
0.50 UJ
0 50 U!
Chbrobromoniethane
Mg/I-
0.50 Li J
0.50 UJ
0.50 L'J
0.50 UJ
0.50 L'J
Chloroethane
Mg/L
430
1700
1100
0.50 UJ
0.50 Ut
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
Chloroform O'nchloromefhane)
Mg/L
80
30
350
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 U|
0.50 UJ
Chloromethane (Methvl chloride)
Mg/L
260
1100
ID
0.10J
0 50 U]
0 50 UI
0 50 UJ
0.50 UJ
2-Chtorololuene
Mg/L
150
420
ID
2.0 l'J
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2 0 U|
4-C hlorotoluene
ug/L
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2 0 UJ
2 n uj
2.0 U!
Cvmem? (p-lsopropylto,uene)
Mg/L
2.0 U|
2.0 UJ
2 0 UJ
2.0 UJ
2.0 UJ
i,2-Dibromo-3?nzene
Mg/L
600
600
13
0.50 UJ
0 50 I; J
0.50 UI
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
l,3Pichloroh»?nzene
Mg/L
6.b
19
28
0 50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0.50 UJ
1,4'Dichlorolvnzene
Mg/L
75
75
17
0.50 UJ
0.50 UI
0 50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
Dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC-12)
Mg/L
1700
4800
ID
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0.50 UI
0.50 UI
0.50 UI
1,1-Dichloroethane
Mg/L
880
2500
740
0 50 l'J
0.50 UJ
0.50 UI
O.U 1
0.50 L'l
1,2-Dichloroethane
Mg/L
5
5
360
0.50 UJ
0.50 U]
0 50 U|
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
"U-Dictiloroethene
Mg/L
"
7
130
0.50 UJ
0 50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
cis-l,2-Dichloroethene
Mg/L
70
70
620
0 50 UJ
0 50 u;
0.50 UI
0.50 UJ
0.50 UJ
trans-1,2-Dichloroetheii
-------
i'
-------
Page 10 of 10
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF
APRIL 2010 FOLLOW-UP GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
Sample Location
Sample Identification
Sample Date
Sample Elevation e
MW-101S
GW-56393-040611-EV-002
4A/20U
702.35 - 663.35
32-39
MW-101S
G W-56393-04%ll-EV-003
M*2011
702.35 - 663.35
32-39
Duplicate
MW-W1D
GW'56393-040611-EV-001
•Vt/20n
664.33 - 5S9.33
70-75
Groundwater Cleanup Criteria
Units a b c
Notes:
Michigan Act 451, Part 231 Cleanup Criteria and Part 213 Risk-based Screening Levels: Residential and Nnn-Residential L>eneric Cleanup Cnter a lJ'
(1) Cleanup criteria identified In MDEQ RRD C>p Memo No 1, updated 3/25/2011, pursuant to 1^94 PA 451 as amended.
a - Residential drinking water criteria.
b- Non-Residential drinking water criteria.
c - Groundwater surface water interface
L' - Not present at or above the associated value.
J - Estimated concentration.
Uj - Estimated reporting limit.
R - Rejected.
feet AMSL - feet above mean sea level
feet bgs - feet below ground surface
-------
TABLE 2
I'age I of o
SUMMARY OF OCTOBER 2011 GROUNDWATER ANALY TIGVL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
Sample Location:
MW-101S
MW'IOW
MW-102S
MW-102i
Santfjle Identification:
WG-56393-102511-J V-019
WG'56393-102511-J V-01S
WG-56393-102511-JV-020
WG-56393-10251
Sample Date:
1(^25/2011
10/25/2011
10/15/2011
10/25/201,
Sample Type:
Groundwater
Cleanuv Criteria
Duplicate
Units
A
b
c
Volatile Organic Compounds
Acetone
Mg/L
730
2100
1700
R
R
R
R
Benzene
Mg/L
5
5
200
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Bromodichlorome thane
Mg/L
80
80
ID
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Bromoform
Mg/L
80
80
ID
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
Mg/L
10
29
35
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
2-Butanone (Methyl ethyl ketone) (MEK)
Mg/L
13000
38000
2200
R
R
R
R
Carbon disulfide
Mg/L
800
2300
ID
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Carbon tetrachloride
Mg/L
5
5
45
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Chlorobenzene
Mg/L
100
100
25
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Chloroethane
Mg/L
430
1700
1100
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Chloroform (Trichloromethane)
Mg/L
80
80
350
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 L"
Chloromethane (Methyl chloride)
Mg/L
260
1100
ID
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
l,2-Dibromo-3-chIoropropane (DBCF)
Mg/L
0.2
0.2
-
R
R
R
R
Dibromnchlorome thane
Mg/L
80
80
ID
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,2-Dibromoethane (Ethylene dibromide)
Mg/L
0.05
0.05
5.7
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 V
2.0 U
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Mg/L
600
600
13
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
Mg/L
6.6
19
28
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,4-Dichloro benzene
Mg/L
75
75
17
0.50 U
0.50 L'
0.50 U
0.50 U
Dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC-12)
Mg/L
1700
4800
ID
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,1-Dkhlovoethane
Mg/L
880
2500
740
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 L'
1,2-Dichloroethane
Mg/L
5
5
360
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,1-Dichloroethene
Mg/L
7
7
130
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
cis-l,2-Dichloroethene
Mg/L
70
70
620
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene
Mg/L
100
100
1500
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,2-Dich loropropane
Mg/L
5
5
230
0.50 L'
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene
Mg/L
0.50 L'
0.50 U
0.50 I'
0.50 U
Ethvlbenzene
Mg/L
74
74
18
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
2-Hexanone
Mg/L
1000
2900
ID
R
R
R
R
Isopropvl benzene
Mg/L
800
2300
28
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
Methyl tert butyl ether (MTBE)
Mg/L
40
40
7100
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
4-Methvl-2-pentanone (Methvl isobutvl ketone) (MIBK)
Mg/L
1800
5200
ID
R
R
R
R
Methylene chloride
Mg/L
5
5
1500
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
Styrene
Mg/L
100
100
80
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Mg/L
8.5
35
78
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Tetrachloroethene
Mg/L
5
5
60
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Toluene
Mg/L
790
790
270
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 i:
0.50 U
1,2,4-Trichloro benzene
Mg/L
70
70
99
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
I. IJ-Trichloroethane
Mg/L
200
200
89
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
I, l,2-Trichloroethane
Mg/L
5
5
330
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 V
0.50 U
Trichloroethene
Mg/L
5
5
200
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0,50 U
KA < i=v. \cj)- J 2 TI^K
-------
TABLE 2
Page 2 ot 6
SUMMARY OF OCTOHER 2011 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
Sample Location:
Sample Identification:
Sample Date:
Sample Type:
Trichlorofluoromethane (CFC-11)
Vinyl chloride
c-Xvlene
m&p-Xv lenes
I'Clis
Arocloi-1016 (PCB-1016)
Amclor-1221 (rCB-1221)
Arudor-1232 (PCB-T232)
Arcdor-1242 (PCB-1242)
Aroclor-1248 (PCB-1248)
Arcclor-1254 (PCB-1254)
Arotlor-1260 (PCB-1260)
Total PCBs
A/W-lOiS
WG-56393-102511>)V-019
l(\/25/2011
Units
ME/L
hr/l
nf:/L
MB/L
Mg/L
mi;/l
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
M.s/L
Mg/I-
Hg/L
Gro»mf»>fifer Cleanup Criteria
a l>
2600
2
280
7300 - 0.50 U
2 13 0.50 U
280 41 0.50 U
0.50 U
0.020 U
0.040 U
0.020 U'
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.5 0.2 ND
MW-10W
WG-56393-102511-JV-01S
1005/1011
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.020 U
0 040 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 LJ
0.020 l:
\'D
MW-102S
WG-5f>393-10251l'JV-Q20
10/15/2011
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.020 U
0.040 U
0.020 L"
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 LT
0.020 U
ND
A/W-J02S
WG-56393-102511-IV-021
1QO5/2011
Duplicate
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.020 LT
0.040 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
ND
Metals
Magnesium
Mercury
Sodium
Hg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
400000
2
120000
1100000
350000
24200
0.001 U
23800
23300
0.00113 U
23400
22800
0.0012 U
19200
23100
0.00119 U
20200
General Chemistry
Cvanide (total)
Field Parameters
Conductivity, Held
Dissolved oxygen (DO), field
Oxidation reduction potential (ORP), field
pH, Held
Temperature, field
Turbidity, field
Pg/L
mS/cm
mg/L
millivolts
s.u.
DegC
NTU
200
200
6.5-8.5 6.5-8.5
.6%
3.58
-29.7
7.01
16.19
10 U
0.670
6.15
-32.4
7.36
13.25
21.1
5 J
0.670
0.16
-45.0
7.16
18.11
31.9
0.670
0.16
-45.0
7.16
18.11
31.9
Notes:
Michigan Act 451, Part 201 Cleanup Criteria and Part 213 Risk-based Screening Levels: Residential and
Non-Residential Generic Cleanup Critei ia
- Non-residential drinking water crite ia.
c - Groundwater surface water interface.
U - Not present at or above the associated value.
J - Laboratory qualifiers - estimated concentration.
-------
TABLE 2
Tiiyi' 3 of o
SUMMARY OF OCTOBER 2011 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL. RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
Sample Location: MW-102D MW-103P MW-104S MW-W4D MW-105S MW-105D
Sample Identification: WG-56393-1025U-JV-022 WG-56393-102611-fV-023 WG-56393-W2611-JV-025 WG-56393-102611-JV-024 WG-56393-102611-JV-027 WG-56393-1026U-/V-020
Sample Date: 10/25/20U 1Q/26/20U MyiCVZOU ltyl&lQU ItyltflQU 1W2G/2011
Sample Type:
Units
Volatile Organic Compounds
Acetone
Mg/L
R
R
R
R
R
R
Benzene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 L"
0.50 U
Bromodichlorome thane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 L:
0.50 U
0.50 U
Bromor'orm
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
Mg/L
0.50 UJ
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
2-Butanone (Methyl ethyl ketone) (MEK)
Mg/L
R
R
R
R
R
R
Carbon disulfide
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Carbon tetrachloride
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Chlorobenzene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Chloroethane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Chloroiorm (Trichloromethane)
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Chloromethane (Methyl chloride)
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropiine (DBCP)
Mg/L
R
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
Dibromochloromethane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,2-Dibromoethane (Ethylene dibromide)
Mg/L
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
Mg/L
0.50 li
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.4-Diehlorobenzene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Dichlo rod ifluoromethane (CFC-12)
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 V
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,1-Dichloroethane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,2-Dichloroethane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 L'
0.50 L1
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,1 -Dicl'iloroethene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
cis-l,2-Dichloroethene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U'
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
trans-1,2-Pichloroethene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,2-Dichloropropane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
cis-l,3-Dichioropropene
Mg/L
0.50 L1
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
lrans-1,3-Pichloropropene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 i;
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Ethvlbenzene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
2-Hexanone
Mg/L
R
R
R
R
R
R
Isopropyl benzene
Mg/L
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 L1
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
Methyl terl butyl ether (MTBE)
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 L:
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
4-Meth\ l-2-pentanone (Methyl isobutyl ketone) (MIBK)
Mg/L
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
Methylene chloride
Mg/L
2.0 U
2.0 L1
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
Sty rene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
letrachluroethene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
loluene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.2,-J-Trichloro benzene
Mg/L
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 D
2.0 V
2.0 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 L"
0.50 U
0.12 J
1,1,2-Trichlovoethane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Trichloroethene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
-------
TABLE 2
Page 4 ot 6
SUMMARY OF OCTOBER 2011 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
Sample Location:
MW-102D
MW-103D
MW-1D4S
MW-104D
MW-105S
MW-105D
Sample Identification;
WG-56393-102511-JV-022
WG-56393-102611-JV-0.13
WG-56393-10261 l-JV-025
WG-56393-102611-JV-024
WG-56393-W26U-JV-Q27
WG-56393-1026U-
Sample Date:
10/25/2011
10/26/1011
10/16/2011
10/26/2011
10/26/2011
10/2^/2.011
Sample Type:
U/ff'fS
Trichlorolluoromethane (CFC-11)
[1.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Vinvi chloride
(i g/L
0.50 0"
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U"
0.50 U
0.50 U
c-Xvlene
t'C./L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
mfcp-Xylenes
ng/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 Li
0.50 U
PCiis
Aroclor-1016 (PCB-1016)
ck/l
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 Lr
0.020 LI
0.020 U
0.020 U
Aroclor-1221 (PCB-1221)
ug/L
0.040 U
0.039 LI
0.040 U
0.040 U
0.040 U
0.040 U
Aroclor-1232 (PCB-1232)
»&/L
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 L'
0.020 U
0.020 V
Aroclor-1242 (PCB-1242)
l'g/L
0.020 U
0.020 L'
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.02:0 U
Aroclor-1248 (PCB-1248)
I'S/L
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 L"
0.020 U
0.020 U
Aroclor-1254 (PCB-1254)
Hg/L
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 LI
0.020 U
0.020 U
Aroclor-1260 (PCB-1260)
Mg/L
0.0201;
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 L"
0.020 U
0.020 U
Total PC:Bs
I'g/L
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Meta Is
Magnesium
Mg/I-
22700
20500
21700
22200
26700
23200
Merc u r\
Pg/L
0,001 u
0.001 U
0.001 L'
0.001 U
0.001 U
0.001 L'
Sod in m
t'g/L
19600
18400
20200
28000
22800
20500
General Chemistry
Cy-jnide (total)
I'g/L
9 r
9JC
10 U
10 L:
10 U
-1J
Field Parameters
Conductivity, field
mS/cm
0.607
0.549
0.610
0.621
0.732
0.629
Dissolved oxygen (DO), field
mg/L
1.88
0.25
1.27
1.29
0.27
1.41
Oxidation reduction potential (ORP), field
millivolts
-34.4
17 1
-32.9
-26.1
-65.1
51.7
pH, field
s.u.
7.30
6.98
7.25
7.25
7.10
7.32
Temperature, field
DegC
15.84
11.65
12.81
12.28
13.25
11.65
Turbid/tv, field
i\TU
3.02
9.82
1.29
2.01
3.12
Notes:
Michigan Act 451, Part 201 Cleanup Criteria and Pari 213 Risk-based Sere'
Nun-Residential Generic Cleanup Criteria*'1.
''' Cleanup criteria identified by MDEQ RRD Op Memo No. 1, updated 3/
451 as amended,
a - Residential drinking water c riteria,
b - Non-residential drinking water criteria,
c - Groundwater surface water interface.
U • Not present at or above the associated value.
J - Laboratory qualifiers - estimated concentration.
i 'R A OV Vj v\i|.nn--l J.TI'ls
-------
TABLE 2
I\ip,e 5 Ot h
SUMMARY OF OCTOBER 2011 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
Sample Location: MW-106S MW-106D MW-107S MW-108S MW-1081) MW-109D
Sample Identification: WG-56393-102611-JV-029 WG-56393-102611-JV-028 WG-56393-102711-/V-030 WG-56393-1027U-JV-032 WG-56393-10Z711-JV-Q31 WG-56393-IQ27U-JV-Q33
Sample Date: 10/2V2011 10/2^/2011 10/27/2011 10/27/2011 10/27/1011 10/27/2011
Sample Type:
Volatile Organic Compounds
Acetone
Mg/L
R
R
R
R
R
20 U
Benzene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Bromodichloromethane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Bromolorm
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 L"
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
2-Butanone (Methyl ethyl ketone) (MEK)
Mg/L
R
R
R
R
R
20 U
Carbon disulfide
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Carbon tetrachloride
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Chlorobenzene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 V
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Chloroethane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 \J
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Chlorolorm (Trichlorom ethane)
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Chloromethane (Methyl chloride)
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
l,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP)
Mg/L
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 V
2.0 U
2.0 U
Dibromochloroniethane
Mg/L
0.50 L'
0.50 15
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 II
0.50 U
1,2-Dibi'omoelhane (Ethylene dibromide)
Mg/L
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
1,2-Dichloro benzene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,3-Dichlorobenzene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 l:
0.50 U
0.50 U
Dichlorodilluoromethane (CFC-12)
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 L1
1,1-Dichloroethane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.14 f
0.50 U
1,2-Dichloroethane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 L'
1,1-Dichloroethene
Mg/ L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
cis-l,2-Pichloroethene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,2-Dichloropropane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
f is-1,3- r> ic h 1 o ro p ro pen e
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
trans- 1,3-Dichloropropene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 LT
0.50 U
lithylbenzene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
2-Hexanone
Mg/L
R
R
R
R
R
20 U
Isopropvl benzene
Mg/L
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 V
Methyl lert butyl ether (MTBE)
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 L'
0.50 U
0.50 U
4-Methyl-2-pentanone (Methyl isobutvl ketone) (MIBK)
Mg/L
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
Methylene chloride
Mg/L
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
Styrene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethanr
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50
0.50 U
"1 etrachloroethone
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Toluene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 I!
1,2,4-Trk hlorobenzene
Mg/L
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
1,1,1-Trk hloroethane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,1,2-Trii hloroethane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 V
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Trichlorcethene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
-------
TABLE 2
Tage 6 of 6
SUMMARY OF OCTOBER 2011 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
Sample Location:
Sample Identification:
Sample Date:
Sample Type:
MW-106S
WG-56393-1026U-JV-029
10/26/1011
MW-106D
WG-56393-102611-JV-028
10/2(/2011
MW-tU/S
WG-56393-102711-JV-030
10/27/1011
MW-IQ8S
WG-56393-102711 -J V-032
10/17/2011
MW-10SD
WG'56393-102711'JV-031
10/27/1011
MW-109D
WG-56393-102711-JV-033
10/17/1011
Trie hlorofluoromethane (CFC-11)
Vim') chloride
o-Xylene
m&p-Xylenes
J'CBs
Arocior-1016 (PCB-lOib)
Aroclor-1221 (PCB-1221)
Aroclor-1232 (PCB-I232)
Aroclor-1242 (PCB-1242)
Aroclor-1248 (PCB-1248)
Aruclor-1254 (PCB-1254)
Aroclor-1260 (PCB-1260)
Total PCBs
Me tals
Magnesium
\1ercur\
Sodium
liin'fs
hb/l
mjj/L
Mg/L
I'g/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 V
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.020 U
0.040 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
ND
42300
0.0203c
20800
0,50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.020 U
0.040 U
0.020 Li
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.010 I
0.020 U
0.01 f
23500
0.001 L"
24400
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.020 U
0.040 U
0.020 U"
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
ND
27300
0.001 U
26700
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 L"
0.020 Lf
0.040 LT
0.020 U
0.020 L"
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
ND
23900
0.00112 U
19500
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 L[
0.50 U
0.020 U
0.040 U
0.020 l[
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
ND
26900
0.001 U
46100
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.020 (J
0.040 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.0201:
ND
24400
0.00022 J
22300
General Chemistry
Cyanide (total)
Field Parameters
Conductivity, field
Dissolved oxygen (DO), field
Oxidation reduction potential (ORP), field
pll, field
Temperature, field
Turbiditv, field
l'g/L
mS/cm
mg/L
millivolts
s.u.
DegC
NTU
6 r
1.243
0.27
190.0
6.78
13.83
4.01
0.662
2.37
-42.5
7.34
11.74
1.95
0.784
0.27
-21.2
6.83
12.23
5.21
10 I'
0.73b
1,33
-63.2
7.00
12.59
8.74
0.817
0.17
-81.1
7.28
11.82
3.82
H) U
0.696
2.28
-68.9
Notes:
Michigan Act 451, Part 201 Cleanup Criteria and Part 213 Risk-based Scre«
Non-Residential Generic Cleanup Critei ia
Cleanup criteria identified by MDEQ RRD Op Memo No. 1, updated 3/
45i as amended.
a - Residential drinking water criteria,
h - Non-residential drinking water c riteria,
c - Groundwater surlace water interface
- Not present at or above the associated value.
I - Laboratory qualifiers - estimated concentration.
l.kA *-Mt»mivi;.THs
-------
I ABLE 2
SUMMARY OF FEBRUARY 2012 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
Sample Location:
Afi'c/ng/iH /4cf 451, Part 201 Cleanup Criteria and Part 213 Risk-
AfW-20IS
MW-101D
AfW-302S
WW-102D
MW'103L
Sample Identification:
based Screening Levels: Rj'sirfrnfmf mid Non-RfSnJeiifiuI
WG-56393-020612-JV-038 WG-56393-020612-
•JV-037 WG-56393-020612.
-JV-040 WG-56393-020612-
¦JV-039 WG-56393-0207T
Sample Date:
Generic Cleanup Criteria
2/(y?0l2
2/6/2012
W2012
2/6/2012
2/7/2012
Siwiph' Type:
Groundwater
Residential
Non-Residential
Surface Water
Units
Drinking Wfifi
i'r Drinking Wiifcr
Interface
Volatile Organic Compounds
Acetone
i'g/L
730
2100
1700
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
Benzene
iig/L
5
5
200
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Bromodichloromethane
Mg/L
80
80
ID
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Bromolorm
Mg/L
80
80
ID
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Bromomethane (Methyl bromide)
Mg/L
10
29
35
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
2-Butanone (Methvl ethyl ketone) (MEK)
Mg/L
13000
38000
2200
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
Carbon disulfide
Mg/L
800
2300
ID
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Carbon tetrachloride
Mg/L
5
5
45
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Chlorobenzene
Mg/L
100
100
25
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Chloroethane
I'g/L
430
1700
1100
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 L"
0.50 U
Chloroform (Trichloromethane)
Mg/L
80
80
350
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.13 J
0.14 J
Chloromethane (Methvl chloride)
Mg/L
260
1100
ID
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
l,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP)
Mg/L
0.2
0.2
-
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
Dibromochloromethane
f'g/L
80
80
ID
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,2-Dibromoethane (Ethylene di bromide)
Mg/L
0.05
0.05
5.7
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
1,2-Dicblorobenzene
Mg/L
600
600
13
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,3-Dichloro benzene
Mg/L
6.6
19
28
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,4-Dicliloro benzene
n/L
75
75
17
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC-12)
Mg/L
1700
4800
ID
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,1-Dichloroelhane
Mg/L
880
2500
740
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,2-DiYMoroethane
Mg/L
5
5
360
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,1-Dichloroethene
Mg/L
7
7
130
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
cis-1.2-Pichloroelhene
Mg/L
70
70
620
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
trans-l,2-Dichloroethene
Mg/L
100
100
1500
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 L"
1,2-0 ic h 1 o 10 p ro pane
Mg/L
5
5
230
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
cis-l,3-Dicliloropropene
Mg/L
-
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
trans-l,"-Dichloropropene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Ethylbenzene
Mg/L
74
74
18
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
2-Hexanone
Mg/L
1000
2900
ID
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
Isopropyl benzene
Mg/L
800
2300
28
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
Methvl lert butvl ether (MTBE)
Mg/L
40
40
7100
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
4-Methvl-2-pentanone 121
Mg/L
1800
5200
ID
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
Methvieae chloride
Mg/L
5
5
1500
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
Styrene
Mg/L
100
100
80
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Mg/L
8.5
35
78
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 V
0.50 U
0.50 U
Tetrachloroethene
Mg/L
5
5
60
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Toluene
Mg/L
790
790
270
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.060)
0.070 ]
0.50 U
1,2,4-Trk hlorobenzene
Mg/L
70
70
99
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
1,1,1-Trichloroethane
Mg/L
200
200
89
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,1,2-Trichloroe thane
Mg/L
5
5
330
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Tnchloroethene
Mg/L
5
5
200
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
TrichlorofUioromethane (CFC-11)
Mg/L
2600
7300
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Vinyl chloride
Mg/L
2
2
13
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
o-Xylene
Mg/L
280
280
41
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
m&p-Xvlenes
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
-------
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF FEBRUARY 2012 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
Sample Location:
Michigan Act 451, Part 201 Cleanup Criteria and Part 21.3 R/s/c-
AfW-lOlS
MW-10W
MW-W2S
MW-102D
MW-1031
Sample Identification:
Iwsfd SoffVMMg Levels: Residential and Non-Residential
WG-56393-020bl2-JV-03S WC.-56393-020612-
{V-037 WG-5b393-020bU-
¦JV-040 WG-56393-020612-f\;
¦039 WG-56393-0207T.
Sample Date:
Generic Cleanup Criteria
2/(^2012
2/\V2012
2/6/2012
2/^2012
2/7/2012
Sample Type:
Units
Residential
Drinking Water
Non-Residential
Drinking Water
Groundwater
Surface Water
Interface
Semi-Volatile Organic Compounds
Acenaplithene
"g/L
1300
3800
38
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
Acenaphthylene
"g/L
52
150
ID
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 L"
0.20 U
Anthracene
"g/L
43
43
ID
0.20 L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
Benzo(a)anthiacene
"g/L
2.1
8.5
ID
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
Benzo(a)pyrene
"g/L
5
5
ID
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
Benzo(l')f)uoranthene
"g/L
1.5
1.5
ID
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 V
Benzo(£,h,i)pervlene
"g/L
1
1
0.20 L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
Benzo(L)fluoran{hene
"g/L
I
1
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
Butyl benzylphthalate (BBP)
"g/L
1200
2700
67
0.20 U
0.061 J
0.026 J
0.024 J
0.026 J
Carbazole
"g/L
85
350
10
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 LI
0.20 U
4-C'iloro-3-niPthylphenol
" g/L
150
420
7.4
0.49 U
0.48 Ij
0.48 U
0.48 l:
0.50 U
his(2-Ch loroethy l)ether
"g/L
->
8.3
1
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
2-Chlorophenol
"g/L
45
130
18
0.49 U
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.50 U
Chrvsene
"g/L
1.6
1.6
ID
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
Dibenz(a,h)anthracene
"g/L
2
2
ID
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 L:
0.20 V
0.20 U
Dibenzofuran
"g/L
ID
ID
4
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
3,3'-Pichlorol>enz.]dine
ug/L
1.1
4.3
0.3
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2,4-Dichlorophenol
11 g/L
73
210
11
0.49 U
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.48 L'
0.50 U
Dielhvl phtlwlate
"g/L
5500
16000
110
0.019 J
0.033 ]
0.022 J
0.019 J
0.018 J
Dimethyl phthalate
ug/L
73000
210000
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
2,4-Dimethylphenol
"g/L
370
1000
380
3.9 U
3.9 U
3.9 U
3.9 U
4.0 U
Di-n-butylphthalate (DBP)
"g/L
880
2500
9.7
0.024 J
0.033 .1
0.031 J
0.033 1
0.031 J
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
"g/L
20
20
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
"g/L
7.7
32
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
Di-n-oitvl plithalate (DnOP)
"g/L
130
380
ID
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
bis< 2-Eth\ l hexs l)pli lhalate (DEHP)
"g/L
6
6
25
0.98 U
0.96 U
0.96 L
0.96 U
1.0 U
Fluoranthene
"g/L
210
210
1.6
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
F'luorene
"g/L
880
2000
12
0.20 U
0.20 V
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
Hetachlorob^nzene
"g/L
1
1
0.2
0.20 Li
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
HexachlorobuUdiene
"g/L
J5
42
0.053
0.20 L"
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 Lf
0.20 U
Heiachlorocyclopentadiene
"g/L
50
50
ID
0.98 L'
0.96 U
0.96 U
0.96 U
1.0 U
HexacMoroethane
"g/L
7.3
21
6.7
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
Indeno(l,2,3-cd)pyrene
"g/L
2
2
ID
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
fsophorone
"g/L
770
3100
1300
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
2-Methylnaphthalene
"g/L
260
750
19
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
2-Meth\iphenol
"g/L
370
1000
30
0.49 V
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.50 V
4-Methvlphenol
"g/L
370
1000
30
0.49 U
0.48 U
0.48 V
0.48 U
0.50 V
Naphthalene
"g/L
520
1500
11
0.20 i;
0.20 U
0 040 J
0.030 I
0.075 J
Nitrobenzene
"g/L
3.4
9.6
180
0.20 I'
0.2C L1
0.20 U
0.20 L
0.20 L
2-Nitrophenol
"g/L
20
58
ID
0.49 U
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.50 U
N-Nitrosodi-n-propvlamine
"g/L
5
5
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 Lf
0.20 U
0.20 U
N-Nitrosodiphenylamine
"g/L
270
1100
0.20 U
0.20 V
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
Pentach/orophenoJ
"g/L
1
I
G,X
0.98 U
0.96 U
0.96 U
0.96 U
1.0 U
Phenanthrene
"g/L
52
150
2
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
Phenol
"g/L
4400
13000
450
0.49 IJ
0.067 ]
0.48 U
0.48 L
0.50 U
Pyrene
"g/L
140
140
ID
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
2,4.5-Truhlorophenol
"g/L
730
2100
0.49 U
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.50 U
2,4,6-Trichlorophenol
"g/L
120
470
5
0.49 LT
0.4S U
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.50 U
-------
TABLE 2
Sample Locution:
Suwfifi' MenfiyiVufion:
Sample Date:
Sample Type:
PCBs
Aroclor-1016 (PCB-1016)
Aroclor-1221 (PCB-1221)
A roc lo i -1232 (PC B-1232)
Aroclor-1242 (PCB-1242)
Arocloi-1248 (PCB-1248)
Aroclor-1254 (PCB-1254)
Aroclot-1260 (PCB-1260)
Total PCBs
Dioxins
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-OcUchlorodibenzofurAn (OCDF)
1,2,3.4,6,7,8,9-Odachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (OCDD)
L2,3,4,6,7,S-Heplachlorodibenzofuran (HpCDF)
1.2.3.4.6.7.8-Heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (HpCDD
1.2.3.4.7.8.9-Heptadilorodibenzofuran (HpCDF)
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexaihlorodibenzofuran (HxCDF)
1,2,3,4.7,8-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (HxCDD)
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran (HxCDF)
1.2.3.6.7.8-HexachIorodibenzo-p-dioxin (HxCDD)
1.2.3.7.8.9-Hexachlorodibenzofuran (HxCDF)
1,2,3,7,8.9-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (HxCDD)
1,2,3,7,8-PeutAdilorodibenzofuran (PeCDF)
1,2,3,7,8-IVntdchlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (PeCDD)
2,3,4,0,7 8-HyxAchlorodibenzofuran (HxCDF)
2,3,4,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzofuran (PeCDF)
2,3,7,8-Telradilorodibenzofuran (TCDF)
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibeiizo-p-dioxin (TCDD)
Total heptadilorodibenzofuran (HpCDF)
Total hepLidilorodibenzo-p-dioxin (HpCDD)
Total hetai hlorodibenzofuran (HxCDF)
Total he*achlorodibenzo-p-dio.\in (HxCDD)
Total pentadilorodibenzofuran (PeCDF)
Total pentachlorodiberuo-p-dioxin (PeCDP)
Total tetrachloiodibenzoturan (TCDF)
Total tetiachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)
SUMMARY OF FEBRUARY 2012 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
Michigan Act 451, Part 201 Cleanup Criteria attti Part 213 Risk-
based Screening Levels: Residential and Non-Residential
Generic Cleanup Criteria
Residential
Drinking Water
Non-Residential
Drinking Water
Groundwater
Surface Water
Interface
MW'IOIS MW-101D MW-102S MW-102D MW-103D
WG-56393-020612-JV-03S WG-56393-020612-JV-037 WG-56393-020612-JV-040 WG-56393-02Q612-JV-039 WG-56393-020712-f\
2/6/2012
2/6/2012
2/6/2012
2/6/2012
2/7/2012
Mg/L
Ug/L
Ug/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Ug/L
I'g/L
Hg/L
0.5
0.2
0.021 U
0.041 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
N'D
0.021 U
0.041 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
ND
0.021 U
0.041 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
ND
0.020 U
0.040 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
ND
0.021 U
0.041 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
ND
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
"g/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
0.00001
0.000049 U
0.00000667 J
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000098 V
0.0000098 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000098 U
0.0000098 U
0.0000521 U
0.00000698 J
0.000026 U
0.000026 U
0.000026 U
0.000026 U
0.000026 U
0.000026 U
0.000026 U
0.000026 U
0.000026 U
0.000026 U
0.000026 U
0.00002b U
0.000026 U
0.0000104 U
0.0000104 U
0.000026 U
0.00000186 J
0.000026 U
0.000026 U
0.000026 U
0.000026 U
0.0000104 U
0.0000104 U
0.000049 U
0.00000626 JK
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000098 U
0.0000098 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000098 U
0.0000098 U
0.0000481 U
0.000005 1
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.00000962 U
0.00000962 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.00000962 U
0.00000962 U
0.00005 U
0.0000068 J
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 L"
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.00001 U
0.00001 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.00001 U
0.00001 u
-------
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF FEBRUARY 2012 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSr.GO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
Sum/j/t' Locatwn:
Michigan Act 451, Part
201 Cleanup Criteria ami Part 21.3 Risk-
MW-101S
\tW-101D
MW-102S
MW-102D
MW-W3D
Sample Identification:
based Screening Lez>els: Residential ami Non-Residential
WG-56393-020612-JV-038 WG-56393-020612-JV-037
WG-56393'020bl2-J\;-040 WC-5t>393-020bl2
f\'-039 WG-56393-020712
Sample Date:
Generic Cleanup Criteria
2/f/2012
2/t/2012
2/t/2012
2/6/2012
2/7/2012
Siimple Type:
Groundwater
Residential
Non-Residential
Surface Water
Units
Drinking Water
Drinking Water
Interface
Metals
Aluminum
"g/L
50
50
-
7.0
15.6
3.8
3.5
4.5
Antimony
ug/L
6
6
130
0.019 J
0.024 J
0.040 J
0.026 1
0.019 J
Arsenic
ug/L
10
10
10
0.15 J
0.19 1
0.16.1
0.21 I
0.17)
Barium
ug/L
2000
2000
1400
77.0
80.1
79.2
70.5
64.6
Beryllium
ug/L
4
4
41
0.020 L1
0.020 U
0 020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
Cadmium
"S./L
5
5
5.1
0.020 U
0.011 J
0.012 1
0.008 1
0.020 U
Chromium (total)
ug/L
100
100
11
0.14 J
0.26
0.05]
0.14 J
0.17 J
Chromium VI (hevavalent)
"g/L
100
100
11
2.0 U,.\
2.0 U,.\
2.0 U„\
2.0 V,\
2.0 V,X
Cobalt
ug/L
40
100
100
0.034
0.079
0.176
0.029
0.047
Copper
"g/L
1000
1000
23
0.40
1.37
0.39
0.33
0.31
Iron
ug/L
300
300
54.4
84.0
52.9
7.7 1
9.9 J
Lead
"g/L
4
4
34
0.060
0.221
0.020
0.048
0.023
Magnesium
"g/L
400000
1100000
24800
24300
26200
23800
23200
Manganese
"g/L
50
50
5200
2.26
3.91
162lh
0.40
0.57
Mercurv
"g/L
2
2
0.0013
| 0.00327c |
0.00157c
o.oom
0.00096 1
0.00076 J
Nickel
ug/L
100
100
130
0.24
0.57
0.49
0.19 J
0.26
Selenium
ug/L
50
50
5
0.4 J
1.0 U
1.0 u
0.2 J
0.2 J
Silver
"g/L
34
98
0.2
0.020 i;
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
Sod i u m
"g/L
120000
350000
-
23500
25300
20300
21800
22400
Thallium
"g/L
2
2
3.7
0.0019 I
0.0019 J
0.0191 J
0.00251
0.0031 ]
Vanadiu m
ug/L
4.5
62
12
0.088 J
0.211
0.074 J
0.107 1
0.097 J
£mc
ug/L
2400
5000
310
0.94
5.12
0.32 J
0.67
0.52
General Chemistry
Cyanide (amenable)
"g/L
200
200
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10U
Cyanide (total)
I'g/L
200
200
5.2
10 (J
10 t;
10 U
10 U
10 U
field Parameters
Cond uctivity
mS/cm
0.544
0.559
0.587
0.511
0.503
Dissolved oxygen (DO)1 1
m g/L
Oxidation reduction potential (ORP)
millivolts
202
189
77
(28
173
PH
s.u.
6.5 - 8.5
6.5-8.5
7.23
7.25
7.02
7.21
7.37
Temperature
Deg C
9.2
10.8
7
9
9.7
Turbidity
NTU
<3.69
<3.35
4.34
<2.98
<2.68
Notes:
Cleanup criteria identified by M DEQ KRD Op
Memo No. 1, updated 3/25/2011, pursuant to 1994
PA 451 as amended.
'2lAlso known as Metlivl iso butyl ketone (MIBK)
lVPO results were nol obtained at MW-101S, NHV-
tOlD, MW-1-2S, MVV-I02D, MW-I03D, MW-104S.
MW-104D, MW-5S, MVV-105D, and MW- 06Sdue
to DO meter failure
U - Not present at or above the associated value.
J - Laboratory qualifiers - estimated concentration.
-------
IABLL 2
SUMMARY OF FEBRUARY 2012 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RtSUL'IS
12lh STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
Sample Locution:
Sample Identification:
Sample Date:
Sample Type:
MW-103D MW-104S MW-104D MW-105S MW-105D MW-106S MW-W6D
WG-56393-020712'JV'044 WG-56393-020712-]V-046 WG-56393-020712-f\'-045 \VG-5t>393-020712-f\'*048 WG*56393-020712'f\'-047 WG-56393-020712-JV-050 WG-r*393-020712-IV-04V
2/7/2012
Duplicate
2/7/2012
2/7/2012
2/7/2012
2/7/2012
2/7/2012
2/7/2012
Volatile Organic Compounds
Acetone
Mg/L
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
Benzene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Bromodichloromethane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Bromoform
Mg/T.
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 V
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Bromoniethane (Methyl bromide)
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
2-Butanone (Methyl ethyl ketone) (MEK)
Mg/L
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 Li
20 U
20 U
20 U
Carbon disulfide
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Carbon tetrachloride
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 L"
Chlorobenzene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Chloroethane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 L"
0.50 U
Chlorolorm (Trichloromethane)
Mg/L
0.16)
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.080 1
0.50 U
0.50 U
Chloromethane (Methyl chloride)
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 V
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
i,2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP)
Mg/L
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
Pi hromochlorome thane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.2-Dibromoethane (Ethylene dibromide)
Mg/L
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
1,2-Pichlorobenzene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 L'
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
i,3-Dichlorobenzene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 V
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Oichlorodifluoromethane (CFC-12)
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,1-Dichloroethane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 V
0.50 U
1,2-Dichioroethane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 V
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,1-Dichloroethene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 V
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
c is-],2-Pich]orot1lhi?ne
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 L'
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 L"
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,2-Dichlorupropane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 V
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
trans-l,3-Dichloropropene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Hhvlbenzene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
2-Hexanone
Mg/L
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
Isopropvl beuzene
Mg/L
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
Methyl tert butvl ether (MTBE)
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
4-Methyl-2-pentanone
Mg/L
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 L1
Methylene chloride
Mg/L
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
Styrene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Tetrachloroelhene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Toluene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.070 J
1 2,4-Trichlorobenzene
Mg/L
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
1.1,1-Trichloroethane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.12 J
0.090 J
0.50 U
0.10 I
1, l,2-Trichloroe thane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Tnchloroethene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Trichlorolluoromethane (CFC-11)
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
\'inyl chloride
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
o-X\ lene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 L'
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
ni
-------
tabu: 2
SUMMARY OF FEBRUARY 2012 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
]2th STREET LANDFJLL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
Sample Locution: MW-W3D MW-104S MW-10-ID MW-10SS MW-105D MW-W6S MW-W6D
Sample Identification: WG-56393-020722-/V-044 WG-5tt393-020712-/V-04e WG-5(i393-020722-/V-0.!5 WG-56393-020712-/V-04S WG-56393-020712-/V-047 WC-5M93-020712-/V-050 WG-5(>393-02O712-/V-049
Sample Pate: 2/7/2012 V7/20J2 2^/2012 V7/2012 2A/20V- V7/2012 V7/2012
Sample Tt/pe: Duplicate
Si'ifii-Vohitile Organic Con/poi/mis
Acenaphthene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 V
o.2o l;
0.20 u
0.20 U
0.20 L:
AcenaplUhylene
"g/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
o.2o t;
0.20 (j
0.20 U
0.20 Li
0.20 U
Anthracene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
Ben/.o(a)anth racene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 I."
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
Ben^o(d)pyrene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 V
0.20 L'
0.20 U
0.20 V
0.20 U
Ben;:o(b)nuoranthene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
Beii£o(g,h,i)perylene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 L'
0.20 L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 LT
0.20 U
Butvl bonzvlphthalate (BBP)
ug/L
0.20 U
0.023 J
0.018 ]
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.033 I
Cdfbazole
ug/L
0.20 LT
0.20 (j'
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 L:
0.20 U
0.20 U
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
ug/L
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.48 J
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
bis(2-Chloroethyl)ether
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 J
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
2-Chlorophenol
ug/L
0 48 U
0.48 V
0.48 u
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Chrysene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
Dili-?nz(A,h)antlirdcene
ug/'L
0.20 0"
0.20 L"
0.20 L"
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
Pib?nzofuran
L'g/ L.
0.20 U
0.20 L
0.20 L'
0.20 L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
3,3'-Dichlorol>enzidine
ug/L
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2,4-Dichlorophenol
ug/ L
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.48 L"
0.4S U
0.48 V
0.50 Li
0.50 L"
Diethyl phlhalate
ug/L
0.015 I
0.022 J
0.03t 1
0.017 J
0.031 J
0.032 J
0.023 J
Dimethyl phthdldte
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 LI
0.02(> 1
0.20 U
0.031 J
0.031 I
0.20 U
2,4-Dimethvlphenol
ug/L
3.9 U
3.9 U
3.9 U
3.9 U
3.9 U
4.0 U
4.0 U
Di-n-buty Iphthalate (DBP)
ug/L
0.20 U
0.029 I
0.03=.]
0.024 J
0.040 I
0.20 U
0.037 J
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
ug/L
2.0 LT
2.0 U
2.0 lj
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2,4-Djnitrotoluene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 L
0.20 U
Di-n-octyl phthdldle (DnOP)
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
bisi2-Ethylhe\yl)phthrtldte (DEHP)
ug/L
0.96 U
0.96 L'
0.96 L'
0.96 LJ
0.96 U
t.o u
i.o a
Fluoranthene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 L"
Fluorene
i'g /L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 L"
Hexachlorobenzene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
Hexachlorobutadiene
ug/L
0.20 Li
0.20 L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 L!
He\achlorocvclopent«?diene
ug/L
0.96 U
0.96 U
0.96 U
0.96 L'
0.96 U
1.0 U
1.0 U
He ^chloroethane
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 Li
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
lndeno(l,2,3-cd)py rene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
Isophorone
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 L'
0.20 V
0.20 U
0,20 L?
0.20 Li
0.20 U
2-Methylnaphthalene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
2-Methylphenol
ug/'L
0.48 0"
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.48 U
0,48 U
1.2
0.50 L
1-Methvlphenol
ug/L
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.48 L'
0.30 U
0 50 V
Naphthalene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 L
0.20 L
0.027 J
0.033 .1
Nitrobenzene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 Lj
0.20 L'
0.20 V
0.20 U
2-Nitrophenol
ug/L
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.48 V
0.48 U
0.48 L
0.50 U
0.50 Li
N'-N'itrosodi-n-propylamine
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 L
0.20 L
0.20 U
0.20 V
N-Nitrosodiphenylannne
ug/L
0.20 U
0.2(1 U
0.20 Li
0.20 L"
0.20 L"
0.20 I'
0.20 L
Pentachlorophenol
ug/L
0.% u
0.96 U
0.96 U
0.96 U
0.96 L"
1.0 U
1.0 L
Phenanthrene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 L'
0.20 U
0.20 Li
0.20 L"
0.20 U
0.20 Li
Phenol
ug/L-
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.48 L
0.74
0 51) i;
Pyiene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 L"
0.20 L
0.20 U
0.020 J
2,4 5-Trichlorophenol
ug/L
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.48 L"
0.50 U
0 30 I.'
2,4 6-Trichlorophenol
ug/L
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.48 i;
0.48 U
0.48 U
0.30 U
0.30 V
-------
TABLE 2
Sample Locution:
Sample IiU'ntificiition:
Sample Date:
Sample Type:
PCBs
Arodor-1016 (PCB-1016)
Aroclor-1221 (PCB-1221)
Aroclor-1232 (PCB-1232)
Arodor-1242 (PCB-1242)
Aroclor-1248 (PCB-1248)
Arodor-1254 (PCB-1254)
Aroclor-1260 (PCB-1260)
Total PCBs
DllWHIS
1.2,3,4,6,7,8,9-Octachlorod ibenzofuran (OCDF)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-Octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (OCDD)
1,2,3,4.6,7,8-Heptachlorodibenzofuran (HpCDF)
1.2.3.4.6.7.8-Heptachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (HpCDD'
1.2.3.4.7.8.9-Heptachlorod ibenzofu ran (HpCDF)
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorod ibenzofu ran (HxCDF)
1,2,3,4,7,8-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (HxCDD)
1,2,3,6,7,8-Hexachlorod ibenzofu ran (HxCDF)
1.2.3.6.7.8-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (HxCDD)
1,2,3,7,8.,9-Hexachlorod ibenzofu ran (HxCDF)
1.2.3.7.8.9-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (HxCDD)
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenz.ofuran (PeCDF)
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (PeCDD)
2,3,4,6,7.8-Hexachlorod ibenzofu ran (HxCDF)
2,3,4,7,8-PentachIorodibenzofuran (PeCDF)
2,3,7,8-Tetrachlorodibenzofuran (TCDF)
2,3,7,8-TetrAchlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)
Total heptachlorodibenzofuran (HpCDF)
Total hepUchlorodibenzo-p-dio\in (HpCDD)
Total hexachlorodibenzofuran (HxCDF)
Total hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (HxCDD)
Total pentachlorodtbenzofuran (PeCDF)
Total penlachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (PeCDD)
Total tetrachlorodibenzofuran (TCDF)
Total letrachlorodibenzo-p-diovin (TCDD)
SUMMARY OF FEBRUARY 2012 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
MW-103D MW-104S MW-104D MW-105S MW-105D MW-2065 MVV-lObD
WG-5b393-020712-JV-044 WG-56393-020712-JV-046 WG-56393-020712-[V-045 WG-56393-020712-p/-048 WG-56393-020712-JV-047 WG-56393-020712-JV-050 WG-56393-020712-JV-049
2/7/2012 2/7/1012 2/7/2012 2/7/2012 2/7/2012 2/7/2012 2/7/2012
Duplicate
Units
I'g/L
I'g/L
Ug/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
l'g/L
Mg/L
Hg/L
0.020 U
0.040 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
ND
0.021 U
0.041 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
ND
0.021 U
0.041 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
ND
0.020 U
0.040 U
0.020 U
0.020 V
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
ND
0.021 U
0.041 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
ND
0.020 U,
0.040 U,
0.020 U,
0.020 U,
0.020 U,
0.020 U
0.020 U
ND
0.020 L'
0.040 U
0.020 LT
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
ND
ug/L
0.000049 U
0.0000481 U
0.0000481 U
0.000049 U
0.0000532 U
0.000051 U
0.00000254 I
ug/L
0.00000705 ]
0.00000542]
0.00000541 J
0.00000879)
0.00000973 J
0.00000779 1
0.0000292 1
ug/L
0.0000245 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000266 U
0.0000255 U
0.0000255 U
ug/L
0.0000245 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000266 U
0.0000255 U
0.0000255 U
ug/L
0.0000245 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000266 U
0.0000255 U
0.0000255 L"
ug/L
0.0000245 U
0.000024 LT
0.000024 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000266 U
0.0000255 U
0.0000255 U
ug/L
0.0000245 V
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000266 U
0.0000255 U
0.0000255 U
ug/L
0.0000245 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000266 L"
0.0000255 U
0.0000255 U
ug/L
0.0000245 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000266 U
0.0000255 U
0.0000255 U
ug/L
0.0000245 U
0.000024 L'
0.000024 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000266 U
0.0000255 U
0.0000255 U
ug/L
0.0000245 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000266 U
0.0000255 U
0.0000255 U
ug/L
0.0000245 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000266 U
0.0000255 U
0.0000255 U
ug/L
0.0000245 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000266 U
0.0000255 U
0.0000255 U
ug/L
0.0000245 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.01)00245 U
0.0000266 U
0.0000255 U
0.0000255 U
ug/L
0.0000245 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000266 U
0.0000255 U
0.0000235 U
ug/L
0.0000098 U
0.00000962 U
0.00000962 U
0.0000098 U
0.0000106 U
0.0000102 U
0.0000102 U
ug/L
0.0000098 U
0.00000962 U
0.00000962 U
0.0000098 U
0.0000106 U
0.0000102 U
0.0000102 U
ug/L
0.0000245 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.0000245 U
0.000026O U
0.0000255 U
0.0000255 U
ug/L
0.0000245 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000266 L"
0.0000255 U
0.0000255 U
ug/L
0.0000245 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000266 U
0.0000255 U
0.0000255 U
ug/L
0.0000245 U
0.000024 V
0.000024 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000266 U
0.0000255 U
0.0000255 U
ug/L
0.0000245 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000266 U
0.0000255 U
0.0000255 U
ug/L
0.0000245 U
0.000024 U
0.000024 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000266 U
0.0000255 U
0.0000255 U
ug/L
0.0000098 U
0.00000962 U
0.00000962 U
0.0000098 U
0.0000106 U
0.0000102 U
0.0000102 U
ug/L
0.0000098 U
0.00000962 U
0.00000962 U
0.0000098 U
0,0000106 U
0.0000102 U
0.0000102 U
-------
TAB1.L 2
SUMMARY OF FLBRUARV 2012 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
Sample Location:
Sample Identification:
Sample Date:
Sample fype:
MW-103D MW-1Q4S MW-104D Af W-105S MW-105D MW-lObS AfW-106D
WG-5b393-020712-JV-044 WG-5b393-020712-fV-04b WG-56393-Q20712-JV-045 WG-5b393'020712-JV-048 WG-56393-020712-JV-047 WG-5t>3M-020712-/V-050 WG-56393-020712-JV-049
2/7/2012
Duplicate
2/7/2012
2/7/2012
2/7/2012
2/7/2012
2/7/2012
2/7/2012
Metals
Aluminum
Antimony
Arsenic
Barium
Beryllium
Cadmium
Chromium (total)
Chromium V] (hexavalent)
Cobalt
Copper
Iron
Lead
Magnesium
Manganese
Mercury
Nickel
Selenium
Silver
Sodium
Thallium
Vanadium
Zinc
ug/L
US/L
"g/L
Ug/L
I'g/L
Ug/L
ug/L
"g/L
ug/'L
"g/L
Ug/L
ug/L
ug/l-
"g/L
I'g/L
Ug/L
»g/L
ug/1-
ug/L
l'g/L
"g/I'
4.0
0.012 f
0.17}
63.7
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.18 J
2.0 UX
0.050
0.28
10.0]
0.014]
23400
0.45
0.00054 J
0.28
0.2 J
0.020 U
19800
0.0034 I
0.120 J
0.36 J
8.0
0.016 J
0.21 I
74.2
0.020 Li
0.07/
0.23
2.0 I",A
0.038
0.43
38.3
0.042
24100
1.62
0.00087 J
0.45
0.2 J
0.020 U
22300
0.0009 1
0.160 I
0.45]
4.7
0.021 |
0.23 I
66.9
0.020 U
0.008 j
0.31
2.0 U,X
0.034
0.27
13.7 J
0.027
22800
0.73
0.00053 f
0.2
0.2 I
0.020 U
21900
0.0033 1
0.145]
0.63
0.021 J
0.14 J
1 14
0.020 l.
0.010 J
0.25
2.0 U,X
0.179
0.3?
48.5
0.032
30800
98.1J
0.00058]
0.44
0.2 J
0.020 U
25800
0.0043 I
0.057 f
1.40
7.0
0.02J J
0.21 I
80.6
0.020 V
0.020 V
0.30
2.0 U,X
0.037
0.38
36.7
0.067
25200
1.48
0.00053 J
0.23
1.0 U
0.020 I
22000
0.0200 U
0.088 J
0.97
2.4
0.J 46
5.77
443
0.020 U
0.029
0.23
2.0 U,\
0.578
0.50
8220'
0.016]
40500
0.00447c
2.47
0.3 I
0.020 U
17000
0.0009]
0.135]
40.0
0.085
0.24 1
81.4
0.020 Li
0.00S f
0.36
2.0 V.X
0.019]
0.34
9.9 J
0.020 J
24200
0.41
0.00053 J
0.23
0.3]
0.020 U
24400
0.0065]
0.116 J
0.92
General Chetutslry
Cyanide (amenable)
Cyanide (total)
ug/L
Mg/L
10 U
10 U
10 Li
10 U
10 U
10 IJ
JO U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
10 U
Field Parameters
Conductivity
Dissolved oxygen (DO)'
Ox.dation reduction potential (OKP)
pH
Tempera to re
Turbidity
mg/L
millivolts
s.u.
DegC
NTU
0.503
173
7.37
9.7
<2.68
0.519
7.32
9.2
<3.14
188
7.35
10.1
<2.73
0.847
14
7.01
8.4
212
7.07
10.8
<1.23
¦ 119
6.77
6.8
<0.95
0.724
2.07
-31
7.25
10.8
<1.52
Notes:
11 Cleanup criteria identified by MDEQ Ri
-------
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF FEBRUARY 2012 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREUT LANDFILL
OTSFGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
Sample Location: MW-107S MW-108S MW-108D MW-109D
Sample Identification:
W G-56393-020812-
¦JV-051 WG-56393-020S12-/V-053 WG-56393-020S12-JV-052
WG-5o393-020M.
Sample Date:
2/8/2012
2/8/2012
2/8/2012
2/b/2012
Sample Ti/pc:
Units
Volatile Organic Compounds
Acetone
Mg/L
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
Benzene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Bromodichloro methane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Bromoform
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Bromoruelhane (Methyl bromide)
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
2-Butanone (Methyl ethyl ketone) (MEK)
Mg/L
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
Carbon disulfide
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Carbon tetrachloride
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Chlorobenzene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 L"
0.50 U
0.50 U
Chloroethane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Chloroform (Trichloromethane)
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Chloromethane (Methyl chloride)
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP)
Mg/L
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
Dibrom ochloromethane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,2-Dibromoethane (Ethylene dibrom ide)
Mg/L
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
1,2-Dichlorobenzene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,3-Dichloro benzene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,4-Dichlorobenzene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Dichloi'oditluoromethane (CFC-12)
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1.1-Dichloroethane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.15 J
0.50 U
1,2-Dichloroethane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
1,1-Dichloroethene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
cis-l,2-Dichloroothene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
trans-1,2-Dichloroethene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 (J
0.50 U
0.50 L)
1,2-Dichloropropane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
Hg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
trans-I.3-Dichloropropene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
I'thylbenzene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
2-Hexanone
Mg/L
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 L1
Isopropyl benzene
Mg/L
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
Methyl t?rt butyl elher (MTBE)
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
4-MethyJ-2-pentanone u>
Mg/L
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
Methylene chloride
Mg/L
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
Stv rene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 L'
1,1.2,2-Totrachloroe thane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Tetrachloroethene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Toluene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
l,2,4-Trichlorol>enzene
Mg/L
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
1,1,1-Trichlorot'lhane
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.12 J
0.50 U
1.1.2-Trichloroc thane
Mg/L
0.50 V
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Trichloroethene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Trichlorolluoromethane (CFC-11)
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
Vinyl chloride
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
o-Xylene
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
m&p-Xvl-mes
Mg/L
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
-------
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF FEBRUARY 2012 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSHGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
Sample location: MW-W7S MW-W85 MW-108B MW-109D
Sample Identification: WG-56393-020812-JV-051 WG-56393-020812-JV-053 WG-56393-020812-fV-052 WG-56393-020til2-JV'041
Sample Date: 2/8/2012 2/8/2012 2/8/2012 2/tV2012
Sample Type:
Units
Semi-Vohittle Organic Compounds
Acenaphthene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
Acenaphthvlene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
AnUuatene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
Ben/.o(a)anthrai«?ne
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.023 I
0.20 U
Ben,:o(a)pt'rene
»g/L
0.20 U
0.20 V
0.20 i;
0.20 U
Ben:io(b)fluoranthene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
Benzo(g,h,i)pervlene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
o.2o i;
0.20 U
Benzo(k)fluoranthene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 V
Buh l benzylphthalate (BBP)
ug/L
0.021 J
0.20 U
0.027 1
0.024 J
Carbazole
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
4-Chloro-3-methylphenol
ug/L
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.50 J
0.48 U
bis(.2-Cli loroethy 1 )etht»r
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
2-ChJoropbenoJ
"g/L
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.50 L"
0.48 U
Chrysene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
Dib?nzia,h)anthracene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 L"
0.20 U
Dibenzofuran
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.2ft U
0.20 U
3,3'-Dichloro benzidine
ug/L
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 i;
2.0 U
2,4-Dichlorophenol
"g/L
0.50 U
0.48 U
0.50 U
0.48 U
Diethyl phthalate
ug/L
0.025 J
0.021 J
0.028 i
0.021 j
Dimethyl phthalate
ug/L
0.022 J
0.20 U
0.02^ J
0.20 U
2,4-Diniethylphenol
ug/L
4.0 U
3.9 U
4.0 1J
3.9 U
Oi-n-but\ lphthalate (DBP)
ug/L
0.032 1
0.20 L'
0.03-i J
0.025 J
4,6-Dinitro-2-methylphenol
ug/X
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2.0 U
2,4-Dinitrotoluene
ug/ L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.201;
0.20 U
Di-n-ottvl phthalate (DnOP)
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.019 J
0.20 U
bi.sf2-Ethvihe.\vJ)ph tin late (DEHP)
ug/L
1.0 U
0.96 U
1.0 J
0.96 V
Fluoranthene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.020 1
0.20 U
Fhiorene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 V
0.20 U
Hexachlorobenzene
ug/L
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
0.20 U
He
-------
TABLE 2
Multiple Location:
Sample Identification:
Sample Date:
Sample Type:
PCBs
Aroclor-1016 (PCB-1016)
Aroclor-1221 (PCB-122I)
Aroilor-1232 (PCB-1232)
Arodor-1242 (PCB-1242)
Arodor-1248 (PCB-1248)
Artu'lor-1254 (PCB-1254)
Arodor-1260 (TCB- I2b0)
Total PCBs
Dumns
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-Octadilorodibenzofuran (OCDF)
1,2,3,4,6,7,8,9-Octachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (OCDD)
1,2,3,4,6.7,8-Heptadilorodibenzofu ran (HpCDF)
1.2.3.4.6.7.8-Heptadilorodibenzo-p-dioxin {HpCDD
1.2.3.4.7.8.9-Heptadilorodibenzofuran (HpCDF)
1-2,3,4,7.8-Hexaclilorodibenzofuran (HxCDF)
t,2,3,4,7.8-He\adUorodibenzo-p-dioxin (HxCDD)
1,2,3,6,7.8-Hexachlorodibenzofuran (HxCDF)
1.2.3.6.7.8-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (HxCDD)
1.2.3.7.8.9-Hexachlorodibenzofuran (HxCDF)
1,2,3,7,8,9-Hexachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (HxCDD)
1.2,3,7,8-Pentadilorodibenzofuran (PeCDF)
1,2,3,7,8-Pentachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (PeCDD)
2,3,4,6,7,8-1 lexaihlorodibenzofuran (HxCDF)
2,3,4,7,8-Pentadilorodibenzofuran (PeCDF)
2,3,7,8-T?trachlorodibonzofuran (TCDF)
2,3,7,8-T'?trachlcrodilx,nzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)
Totai heptaciilorodibenzofuran (HpCDF)
Total heptadilorodibenzo-p-dioxin (HpCDD)
Total hevachlorodibenzofuran (HxCDF)
Total hexadilorodibenzo-p-dioxin (HxCDD)
Total pentadilorodibenzofuran (PeCDF)
Total peritachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (PeCDD)
Total tetradilorodibenzofuran (TCDF)
Total tetraihlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD)
SUMMARY OF FEBRUARY 2012 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
MW-107S MW-108S MW-108D MW-W9D
WG-56393-020812-JV-051 WG-56393-020812-1V-053 WG-56393-020812-/V-05: WG-563M-020H12-/V-043
2/8/2012 2/8/2012 2/8/2012 2/(-/2012
Units
Mg/L
Mg/L
Ug/L
Cg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Hg/L
Mg./L
0.021 U
0.041 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
ND
0.020 V
0.040 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 U
ND
0.021 U
0.041 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
ND
0.021 U
0.041 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
0.021 U
ND
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
ug/L
0.000049 U
0.00000719 J
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U"
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 II
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000098 U
0.0000098 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000245 U
0.0000098 U
0.0000098 U
0.00005 U
0.00000941 1
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.00001 U
0.00001 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.00001 U
0.00001 U
0.00005 U
0.0000103]
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.00001 U
0.00001 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.00001 U
0.00001 U
0.00005 U
0.0000066 J
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.00001 U
0.00001 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.000025 U
0.00001 U
0.00001 U
-------
TABLE. 2
SUMMARY OF FEBRUARY 2012 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
Ol SECO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
Sample Location:
Sample Identification:
Sample Date:
Santftle Type:
MW-107S MW-10SS MW-I08D MW-109D
WG-5b393-020812-JV-051 WG-56393'020S12'JV-053 WG-56393-020812-JV-052 WG-5b393-0206l2-J\'-041
2/8/2012
2/8/2012
2/8/2012
2/(^012
Units
Metals
Aluminum
ug/L
1.3 J
3.4
2.9
1.1 1
Antimony
"g/L
0,023 J
0.035 J
0.038.)
0.02 J
Arsenic
"g/L
1.81
0.53
1.31
0.13 J
Bari jm
"g/L
103
99.7
303
81.4
Ber) Ilium
"g/L
0.020 U
0.020 U
0.020 I'
0.020 U
Cadmium
"g/'L
0.004
0.017 J
0.008 J
0.020 U
Chromium (total)
"g/L
0.047 J
0.09 J
0.15 I
0.11 J
Chromium VI (hexavalcnt)
"g/L
2.0 U
2.0 U,\
2.0 U,\
2.0 U,\
Cobalt
11 g/ L
0.648
0.369
0.418
0.037
Copper
"g/L
0.50
0.47
0.20
0.37
Iron
"g/L
3290ib
122
398'*
11.4 J
Lead
"g/L
0.010 J
0.035
0.018 j
0.009 J
Magnesium
11 g/L
28300
24700
27200
24100
Manganese
"g/L
709ih
448'"
283'P
0.17
Meicury
"g/L
0.00057 1
0.00085]
0.0007J
0.00081
Nickel
"g/L
2.76
0.99
0.84
0.18)
Seleniu rn
"g/L
1.0 U
1.0 u
1.0 U
0.2 j
Silver
"S/L
0.020 V
0.020 V
0.020 U
0.020 L1
Sodium
"g/L
22300
22100
45700
23100
Thallium
"g/L
0.119
0.0101 I
0.0564
0.0032 1
Vanadium
"g/L
0.035 J
0.079 J
0.055 I
0.075 J
Zin.
"g/L
2.16
4.53
0.74
0.36 J
General Chemistry
Cyanide (amenable)
"g/L
10 U
io i;
4 I
10 U
Cyanide (total)
I'g/L
10 U
10 u
4 J
10 U
fit'M Parameters
Conductivity
mS/cm
0.875
0.796
0.851
0.552
Dissolved oxvgen (DO)^'
m g/L
0.1
1.03
0
Ovdation reduction potential (ORP)
millivolts
-98
7
-88
206
pH
s.u.
6.83
7.02
7 27
7.13
Temperature
DegC
9.3
9.1
9.4
11.1
Turbidity
MTU
<2.69
<4.12
<3.81
<2.01
Notes:
Cleanup criteria identified bv MDEQ RRD Op
Memo No. 1, updated 3/25/2011, pursuant to 1994
FA 451 as amended.
"'Also known as Methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK)
" DO results were not obtaihed at MW-IOIS. MVV-
I0ID, MW-I-2S, MW-102D, MW-I03D, MW-104S,
MW-I04D, MW-5S, MW-lOijD, and MW-ObSdue
to DO meter failure
I - Not present at or above the associated value.
J - Laboratory qualifiers - estimated ainct ntration.
-------
TABLE 2
Page 1 nl 6
Snwi;Wf» Location:
Sample Identification;
Sample Date:
Sample Type:
Volatile Organic Compounds
Acetone
Beiizene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromolorm
Bromomethane (Methvl bromide)
2-Butanone (Methvl ethvl ketone) (MEK)
Carbon disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform (Trichloromethane)
Chloromethane (Methvl chloride)
],2-Dibromo-3-chloropropane (DBCP)
Dibromochlorovnethane
1,2-Dibronioethane (Ethvlene dibromide)
1.2-Dichlorobenzene
1.3-Dk'hloro benzene
1.4-Dichlorobenzene
Dichlorodifluoromethane (CFC-12)
1.1-Dichloroethane
1.2-Dichloroethane
1.1-Dichloroethene
cis>-l,2-Dichloroethene
trans-1.2-Dicliloroethene
1.2- D ic h loro p ropane
cis-l,3-Dichloropropene
tians-ly3-Dichloropropene
Ethvlbenzene
21 lexanone
Isopropvl benzene
Methvl tert butyl ether (MTBE)
4-Meth\ 1-2-pentanone IJ1
Methylene chloride
Slvrene
1,1,2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetraiiiloroethene
Toluene
1,2,4-TrichIorobenzene
1,.1.1-TrniiiciroPthane
1,1,2-Trichloroethane
Trichloroethene
TnchloTofluoromethavie (CFC-ll)
Vinvl chloride
o-X\ lenc
m&p-Xvlenes
SUMMARY OF APRIL 2012 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
Michigan Art 451, Part 201 Cleanup Criteria and Part 213 Risk- MW-101S MW-101D MW-1Q25 MW-IQ2D
based Screening Levels: Residential and Non-Residential Generic WG-56393-020612-JV-03S WG-56393-020612-JV-037 WG-56393-020612-IV-040 WG-5t393-020612-fV-039
Cleanup Criteria 4/27/1012 4/27/2012 4/25/2012 4/25/2012
Residential Drinking Non-Residential Groundwater Surface
Water '1 Drinking Waterh Water Interface'
Mg/L
730
2100
1700
20 U
20 U
20 U
20 U
Mg/L
5
5
200
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0.50 U
Mg/L
80
80
ID
0.50 U
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 L1
Mg/L
80
80
ID
0 50 U
0.50 U
0.50 L'
0.50 U
Hg/ L
10
29
35
0.50 U
0 50 L
0 50 U
0 50 U
Mg/L
13000
38000
2200
20 LI
20 L1
20 L1
20 U
Mg/L
800
2300
ID
0.50 U
0 50 V
0.50 U
0.50 U
Mg/L
5
5
45
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
Mg/L
100
100
25
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
Mg/L
430
1700
110D
0.50 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
0.50 U
Mg/L
80
80
350
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0.11 J
Mg/L
260
1100
ID
0.50 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 50 L
Mg/L
0.2
0.2
-
20 U
2 0 U
2 0 L
2.0 Li
Mg/L
80
80
ID
0.50 L1
0.50 U
0 50 V
0 50 U
Mg/L
0.05
0.05
5.7
20 U
2 0 U
20 U
2.0 V
USS/L
600
600
13
0.50 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 50 Li
Mg/L
6.6
19
28
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 L:
Mg/L
75
75
17
0.50 U
0.50 L1
0 50 U
0 50 V
Mg/ L
1700
4800
ID
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
Mg/L
880
2500
740
0.50 I1
0.50 L'
0.50 U
0 50 U
me/l
5
5
360
0 50 Li
0 50 U
0.50 U
0.50 L
Mg/L
7
7
130
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 L'
Mg/L
70
70
620
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
Mg/L
100
100
1500
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
Mg/L
5
5
230
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 50 V
Mg/L
-
-
-
0.50 U
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 l:
Mg/L
-
-
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
Mg/L
74
74
18
0.50 U
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
Mg/L
1000
2900
ID
20 I'
20 U
20 Li
20 u
Mg/L
800
2300
28
20 U
20 U
2 0 U
20 U
Mg/L
40
40
7100
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0.50 V
Mg/L
1800
5200
ID
20 U
20 L:
20 Li
20 U
Mg/L
5
5
1500
2 0 U
2 0 U
2.0 U
2.0 L-
Mg/L
100
100
80
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
Mg/L
8.5
35
78
0 50 U
0.50 V
0.50 U
0 50 U
Mg/L
5
5
60
0 50 U
0 50 L
0 50 U
0 50 U
Mg/L
790
790
270
0.11 J
0.1 o ]
o.5o u
Oil ]
Mg/L
70
70
99
2.0 U
2 0 U
2 0 LT
2 0 U
Mg/L
200
200
89
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0.50 U
Mg/L
5
5
330
0 50 U
0.50 V
0 50 U
0 50 U
Mg/L
5
5
200
0 50 I1
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
Mg/L
2600
7300
-
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 L'
0.50 L'
Mg/L
"1
•>
13
0 50 V
0 50 U
0 50 L:
0 50 Li
Mg/L
280
280
41
0 50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0 50 L
Mg/ L
0.50 U
0 50 L1
0 50 U
0 50 L1
-------
TABLE 2
Page 2 of 6
Sample Location:
Sample Identification:
Sample Date:
Sample Type:
Volatile Organic Compounds
Mttals
SUMMARY OF APRIL 2012 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
Michigan Act 451, Part 201 Cleanup Criteria ami Part 213 Risk- MW-1Q1S
based Screening Levels: Residential and Non-Residential Generic WG-56393-020612-/V-03S
Cleanup Criteria 4/27/2012
Residential Drinking Non-Residential Groundwater Surface
Waler'1 Drinking W aferb Water interface'
MW-101D
WG-56393-020612-JV-037
4/21/2012
MW-102S
\VG-56393-02Q612-}V-040
4/25/2012
MW-102D
WG-56393-020612-/V-039
4/25/2012
Cyanide /amenable)
Cv anide (total)
Magnesium
Mercuiy
Sodium
ug/L
»b/l
"&/'-
l'g/L
ug/L
200
200
400000
2
120000
200
200
1100000
5.2
0 0013
10 U
10 U
25-400
0 00129
24800
10 U
10 U
24300
0,00147
10 u
10 u
26800
0 00074 J
23600
10 U
10 u
22800
0 00084 ]
21200
PCBs
Aroclor-1016 (PCB-1016)
Arodor-1221 (PCB-1221)
Arodoi-1232 (PCB-1232)
Aroclor-1242 (PCB-1242)
Aroclor-1248 (PCB-1248)
Arodor-1254 (PCB-1254)
Arodor-1260 (PCB-12601
ToM) PCBs
ug/L
ug/L
ug./'L
ug/L
ug./L
^;/L-
«k/l
"fl/L
0 020 L!
0 040 L'
0 020 U
0.020 U
0 020 L!
0.020 Li
0 020 U
0 020 U
0 040 L
0 020 U
0.020 L!
0 020 Li
0 020 U
0 020 U
NP
0 020 l1
0.040 U
0 020 U
0.020 U
0.020 Li
0 020 Li
0 020 U
i\'P
0 020 V
0.040 U
o 020 u
0 020 Li
0 020 U
0.020 U
0 020 U
ND
Field Parameters
Conductivity
Dissolved oxvgen (DO)
Oxidation reduction potential (ORP)
PH
Temperature
Turbidity
mS/cm
mg/L
millivolts
s.u.
DegC
NTU
6.5-8.5
b.5 - 8.5
0.779
5.21
230
7.23
9.3
<0 80
0.774
4.36
227
7.18
10.8
<0.98
0.836
1.92
81
6.71
10 9
0.785
2.53
209
6 88
11 9
<0.63
Notes.
Cleanup criteria identified bv MDEQ RRD Op Memo
111 No. 1, updated 3/25/2011, pursuant to 1994 PA 451 as
amended,
a Residential Drinking Water
b Non-Residential Drinking Water
c Groundwater Surface Water Interface
111 Also known as Methvl isobutvl ketone (MIBK).
U Not present at or abov e the associated value.
J Laboratory" qualifiers - estimated concentration.
-------
TABLE 2
r.ige 3 ol h
Sample Location:
Sample Identification:
Sample Date:
Sample Type:
Volatile Organic Compounds
Acetone
Benzene
Bromodichloromethane
Bromoform
Broniomethane (Methvl bromide)
2-Butanone (Methyl ethvl ketone) (MHK)
Carbon disulfide
Carbon tetrachloride
Chlorobenzene
Chloroethane
Chloroform (Trichloromethane)
Chloromethane (Methyl chloride)
l,2-Dibromo-3-chIoropropane (DBCP)
Dibromochlorome thane
1,2-Dibromoethane (Ethvlene dibromide)
1.2-Dichlorobenzene
1.3-Dichlorobenzene
1.4- Dichloro benzene
Pichlorodifluoromethane (CFC-12)
1.1- D ichloroe thane
1.2-Dichloroethane
1.1-Pichloroethene
cis-l,2-Dichloroethene
t ra ns -1,2- D ic h lo roe the ne
1.2-Dichloropropane
cis-L,3-Dichloropropene
trans-1,3-Dichloropropene
Ethvlbenzene
2-Hexanone
Is.opropyl benzene
Methyl tert butvl ether (MTBE)
4-Methvl-2-pentanone l2'
Methylene chloride
Styrene
1,1.2,2-Tetrachloroethane
Tetrachloroethene
Toluene
1,2,4-Trichlorohenzpne
1,1,1 -Trichloroe thane
1.1,2-Trichloroe thane
Trichloroethene
Trichlorofluoromethane (CFC-U)
Vim i chloride
o-Xvlene
nufcp-Xvlenes
SUMMARY OF APRIL 2012 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
MW-103D MW-104S MW-104D MW-104D MW-105S MW-105D
WG-56393-020712-JV-043 WG-56393-020712-JV-044 WG-56393-020712-fV-046 WG-56393-020712-JV-045 WG-56393-020712-JV-04S WG-56393-0207l2-fV-047
4/25/2012 4/25/2012 4/25/2012 4/25/2012 4/25/2012 4/25/2012
Duplica te
Units
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/'L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/1-
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/ L
20 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
20 V
0 50 U
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 13 J
0 50 U
20 U
0.50 U
2 0 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 50 V
0.50 U
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
0.50 L1
0 50 U
0.50 U
20 U
20 U
0.50 U
20 U
2 0 U
0 50 L;
0.50 U
0 50 L[
0 50 U
2 0 1'
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 L1
0.50 L.'
0 50 L)
0 50 L1
0 50 L1
20 U
0 50 U
0 50 L!
0 50 U
0.50 U
20 U
0 50 L1
0 50 U
0 50 L'
0 50 U
0 50 U
0.10 1
2.0 L'
0 50 U
2.0 U
0 50 U
0.50 I'
0 50 U
0 50 LI
0 50 U
0 50 U
0.50 L1
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0.50 L1
0 50 L1
20 U
20 U
0 50 U
20 U
20 U
0 50 U
0 50 Li
0.50 l;
0 060 J
20 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 50 L1
0 50 U
0.50 U
o 50 l;
0.50 L)
20 t
0 50 V
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
20 U
0 50 U
0.50 L'1
0 50 U
0.50 L)
0 50 U
0 50 L1
2 0 b
0 50 U
2 0 Li
0 50 U
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 L'
0.50 U
0 50 U
0.5C U
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 L1
0.50 u
0.50 U
0 50 Li
20 U
2 0 Li
0 50 U
20 L'
2 0 U
0 50 U
0 50 V
0.50 U
0.50 LJ
21) L'
0.50 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 L1
20 Li
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
0.50 L'
20 U
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 50 L1
0.50 U
0.50 U
2.0 U
0 50 U
20 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0.50 L!
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0.50 u
0.50 U
0 50 U
20 Li
2 0 L1
0 50 U
20 L;
2 0 L
0 50 U
0,50 L'
0 50 U
0 17 j
2.0 L.1
0 50 U
0 50 U
0.50 L1
0.50 U
0 50 L'
0 50 L:
0.50 L'
20 L'
0 50 L!
0 50 U
0 50 U
0.50 U
20 U
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 L'
0.50 U
0 50 U
0.50 U
20 L'
0.50 U
2 0 L[
0.50 U
0 50 U
0.50 L1
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50
0.50
0.50 U
0 50 V
0.50 U
0 50 U
20 U
2.0 U
0 50 L:
20 b
2 0 U
0 50 U
0 50 H
0 50 U
0.060)
20 U
0 080 J
0 50 L!
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0.50 U
20 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
20 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 50 L1
0.50 U
0 50 U
0.50 U
2 0 U
0 50 U
20 U
0.50 L!
0 50 L1
0.50 U
0 50 L1
0 50 U
0 50 U
0.50 u
0 50 U
0 50 Li
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
20 L:
20 U
0 50 L'
20 L;
2.0 U
0 50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0 18 J
20 U
0 fJ^O J
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 L1
0.50 L:
0.50 U
0 50 U
-------
TABLE 2
Page 4 of 6
Sample Location:
Sample Identification:
Sample Date:
Sample Type:
SUMMARY OF APRIL 2012 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
MW-103D MW-104S MW-104D MW-104D
WG-56393-02D712-JV-043 WG-56393-D20712-IV-044 WG-56393-020712-JV-Q46 WG-56393-020712-JV-045
4/25/2012
4/25/2012
4/25/2012
Duplica te
4/25/2012
MW-105S
WG-56393-020712-JV-04S
4/25/2012
MW-105D
WG-56393-020712-JV-047
4/25/2012
Volatile Organic Compounds
Metals
Units
Cvamde (amenable)
ug/L
10U
Cvamde (total)
l'g/L
10 U
Magnesium
ug/L
23200
Mercury
ug/L
0 00075 j
Sodium
"g/L
21700
pcbs
Aroclor-1016 (PCB-1036)
ug/L
0.020 L'
Aroclor-1221 (PC'B-1221)
ug/L
0 040 Li
Arodor-1232 (PC'B-1232)
"g/L
0.020 U
Arorlor-1242 (PCB-J242)
"g/L
0 020 I1
Aroclor-1248 (PCB-1248)
ug/L
0.020 U
Aroclor-1254 (PCB-1254)
"g/L
0 020 U
A roc) or-1260 (PC B- ] 260)
"fi/L
0 020 V
Total PCBs
ug/L
ND
Field Parameters
Conductivity
mS/cm
0.612
Dissolved oxvgen (DO)
mg/L
1.95
Oxidation reduction potential (OKI')
millivolts
230
PH
s.u.
5.76
Temperature
DegC
13 35
Turbiditv
NTU
<2.00
4J
4 I
23200
0.00073 ]
22100
0 020 L
0 040 U
0 020 U
0 020 L<
0 020 U
0 020 V
0 020 U
ND
0.739
2.67
229
7.07
13.3
<1.0
10 U
10 L1
22600
0 00061 I
21000
0 020
0.040 L
0 020 L
0 H20 L
0 020 U
0.U20 l_
0 020 V
ND
0.734
2.74
233
7.06
13.1
10 V
10 U
23)00
0 00064 ]
21900
0.G20 V
0 040 U
0 020 U
0 020 U
0.020 U
D 020 U
0 020 I'
ND
0.734
2.74
233
7.0t>
131
<2.77
10 U
10 u
28600
0 00047 j
25600
0 020 f
0 040 U
0 020 L1
0.020 V
0 020 L1
0 020 l!
0 020 I1
ND
0 928
.93
81
6.75
12.8
<0.64
10 1_:
10 U
25100
0.30088 J
23600
r 020 u
0 040 U
0 020 U
0 020
0 020 U
0.020 I'
0 020 U
ND
0.881
1.S0
96
6.77
13.2
<4.58
Notes
Cleanup criteria identified hv MDEQ RRD Op Memo
l" No 1, updated 3/25/2011, pursuant to 1994 PA 451 as
amended.
a Residential Drinking Water
b Non-Residential Drinking Water
c Groundwater Surface Water Interface
121 Also known as Methvl isobutvl kotone (MIBK).
L' Nof present at or above the associated value.
J Laboratory qualifiers - estimated concentration.
-------
w-iu y
3-0206:
'26/201
20 L!
0.50 U
0.50 U
0 50 Li
0 50 U
20 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 L.
0 50 I'
0.50 U
0 50 Li
2.0 U
0.50 U
2.0 L
0 50 U
0 50 D
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
CI 50 I1
0 50 L:
0.50 L'
0 50 L'
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 L:
0 50 U
20 U
20 U
0 50 U
20 L.
2 0 Li
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
2.0 U
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0.50 L1
0 50 U
0 50 U
TABLE 2
SUMMARY OF APRIL 2012 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNSHIP, MICHIGAN
MW-106S MW-106D MW-107S MW-108S MW-10SD
WG-56393-020712-JV-050 WG-56393-020712-JV-049 WG-56393-020812-JV-051 WG-56393-020812-JV-053 WG-56393-020S12-JV-052
4/26/2012 4/26/2012 4/26/2012 4/26/2012 4/26/2012
Units
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg / L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/ L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/'L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
Mg/L
20 I!
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
20 U
0.50 V
0.50 V
0 50 L'
0.50 U
0 50 L1
0 50 U
2.0 U
0.50 U
2.0 u
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 50 Li
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 L'
0 50 L!
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
20 U
2.0 U
0 50 U
20 U
2.0 V
0 50 U
0.50 L!
0.50 U
0.14 |
2.0 U
0 50 u
0 50 U
0.50 U
0.50 V
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
20 U
0 50 U
0.50 V
0 50 V
0.50 U
20 Ll
0 50 I'
0 50 U
0 50 L1
0 50 U
0 50 U
0.50 U
20 U
0 50 L!
2 0 L'1
0 50 U
0 50 V
0.50 U
0 50 L'
0 50 L1
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 L'
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 L'
0 50 Li
0 50 U
20 V
20 U
0 50 U
20 U
20 U
0 50 U
0.50 V
0 50 U
0 13 J
20 U
0 50 li
0 50 V
0 50 U
0 50 L!
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 Li
20 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
20 Li
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
2 0 U
0 50 L'
2 0 L'
0.50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 50 L1
0.30 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 LI
0 50 U
20 L1
20 L
0 50 U
20 U
2.0 U
0 50 L!
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 1?]
2.0 Li
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 Li
0 50 U
0 50 L'
0 50 U
0.50 U
20 U
0 50 U
0.50 L
0.50 U
0 50 U
20 U
0 50 V
0 50 L
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 Li
2.0 U
0 50 U
2 0 L1
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 Li
0 50 L1
0 50 U
0 50 U
0.50 Li
0.50 U
0 50 L1
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 50 L1
20 L.'
2 0 Li
0 50 U
20 L:
2 0 Li
0 50 U
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 23 J
2.0 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
20 L'
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 L1
20 U
0 50 L1
0 50 U
0.50 U
0 50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
20 b
0.50 U
20 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0.50 L1
0.50 U
on j
0 50 U
0.50 L:
0 50 L'
0 50 U
0.50 U
0.50 U
0 50 Li
0.50 L1
20 U
2 0 U
0 50 L1
20 U
2.0 U
0 50 V
0 50 U
0 50 L1
021 J
2 0 Li
0.14 I
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0 50 U
0.50 L'
0 50 U
-------
TABLE 2
Tape 6 of 6
SUMMARY OF APRIL 2012 GROUNDWATER ANALYTICAL RESULTS
12th STREET LANDFILL
OTSEGO TOWNS HIP, MICHIGAN
Sample Location: MW-106S MW-106D MW-107S MW-10SS MW-108D MW-109D
Sample Identification:
WG-56393-020712-JV-050
WG-56393-020712-JV-049
WG-56393-020S12-JV-051
WG-56393-020S12-JV-053
WG-56393-020S12-JV-052
WG-56393-02061
Sample Date:
4/26/2 012
4/26/2012
4/26/2012
4/26/2012
4/26/2012
4/16/20V.
Sample Type:
Units
Volatile Organic Compounds
Mt'lals
Cyanule (amenable)
uf./L
10 U
10 L:
10 u
10 u
10 Li
10 u
Cyanide (total)
uf./'L
10 u
10 L'
10 u
10 u
10 u
10 u
Magnesium
33400
24600
28200
24300
25900
24700
Mercury
"S/L
000119
0.00)2
0 00065 ]
| 0.001411
1 0 00079 j
0 00085 1
Sodium
uK/L
25000
26300
22100
23300
44400
22900
f'CBs
Aroclor-1016 (PCB-
1016)
Uf;/L
0.020 U
0 020 U
0 020 11
0 020 U
0 020 U
0 020 Li
Arodor-1221 (PCB-
1221)
uk/l
0 040 U
0 040 U
0 040 U
0 040 U
0.040 U
0 040 I
Arodor-1232 (PCB-
1232)
uj'/'L
0 020 U
0 020 U
0 020 U
0 020 U
0 020 I)
D 020 L:
Arodor-1242 (PCB-
1242)
ui;/L
0 020 U
0 020 U
0 020 U
0 020 U
0 020 U
0 020 U
Arodor-1248 (PCB-
1248)
UR/L
0.020 U
0 020 U
0 020 L1
0 020 U
0.020 v
0 020 L
Arodcr-1254 (PCB-
1254)
"t!/L
0.020 U
0 0098 J
0 020 U
0.020 U
0 020 U
0 020 L'
Arodor-1260 (PCB-
1260)
ui;/L
0.020 Ll
0 020 U
0 020 U
0 020 U
0.020 U
0 020 U
Tot«il PCRs.
U[i/L
ND
11 DD^S J
ND
ND
ND
ND
Field Parameters
Conductivitv
mS/cm
1 04
0.781
0.933
0 651
0.884
0.764
Dissolved oxvgen (DO)
mg/L
.98
3.42
6.38
2.72
1.68
4.12
Oxidation reduction potential (ORr)
millivolts
-59
91
-24
-12
-33
193
PH
s.u.
6.63
7.17
6.84
7.05
7.18
7.17
Temperature
DegC
11.3
125
11.9
11.9
12.3
11.7
Turbidity
NTU
<1.02
<2.98
<0 24
<0.5
<0.41
<0.35
Notps
Cleanup criteria identified bv MPEQ RRD Op Memo
No. 1, updated 3/25/2011, pursuant to 1994 PA 451 as
amended,
a Residential Drinking Water
b Non-Residential Drinking Water
c Groundwater Surface Water Interface
121 Also known as Methyl isobutyl ketone (MIBK).
U Not present at or above the associated value.
I Laboratorv qualifiers - estimated concentration.
-------
(IVo^oS
Attachment 3
Photos Documenting Site Conditions
-------
Attachment 3 a
Inspection Photos from King Highway Landfill - OU3
Date Taken: August 7, 2012 by Michael Berkoff
l
-------
Photo: 1
Gas collection Trench area
2
-------
Photo: 2
Gas monitoring probes near gas collection trench area
3
-------
Photo: 3
Permanent marker for extent of OU3 residuals
4
-------
Photo: 4
Distressed area with methane detection
5
-------
Photo: 5
Sunken and blocked drainage swale
6
-------
Photo: 6
Distressed area not yet tested for Methane
7
-------
Photo: 7
Small burrow holes outside of landfill cover
8
-------
Photo: 8
Landfill gas vent
9
-------
Photo: 9
OU3 retention pond area
10
-------
Photo: 10
Sheet piling at OU3
11
-------
Attachment 3 b
Inspection Photos from Willow Boulevard/A-Site Landfill - OU2
Date Taken: August 7, 2012 by Michael Berkoff
12
-------
Photo: 11
Sand layer being placed on Residuals at A-Site portion
13
-------
Photo: 12
Sand layer being placed on Residuals at A-Site portion
14
-------
Attachment 3 c
Inspection Photos from 12th Street Landfill - OU4
Date Taken: August 7, 2012 by Kristi Zakrzewski, MDEQ
15
-------
Photo: 13
Typical gas monitoring probe
16
-------
Photo: 14
Typical gas vent through landfill cap
-------
Photo: 15
Stressed vegetation and erosion in southwest surface water swale
18
-------
Photo: 16
Stressed vegetation and erosion in southwest surface water swale
-------
Photo: 17
Erosion and exposed geotextile liner at southwest surface water swale
20
-------
Photo: 18
Southern surface water swale
fmm
KSteSlaE
21
-------
Photo: 19
Southeastern surface water swale with exposed geotextile and erosion
22
-------
Photo: 20
Current vegetation
23
-------
Photo: 21
Current vegetation
24
-------
Photo: 22
Typical monitoring well
25
-------
Photo: 23
Southern surface water discharge into Kalamazoo River
26
-------
Photo: 24
Evidence of pedestrian site access for recreational use
27
-------
Photo: 25
Stressed vegetation and erosion in the northern surface water swale
-------
-------
Photo: 27
Surface water discharge point to wetlands with erosion and sedimentation
-------
31
-------
Photo: 29 Repair of erosion at drainage net discharge point at western storm water discharge
swale
32
-------
Photo: 30
Current vegetation on slope near asphalt plant
33
-------
Attachment 4
Site Inspection Report
-------
Site Inspection Checklist
I. SITE INFORMATION
Site name:
Date of inspection: l/Wv
Location and Region:
Agency, office, or company leading the five-year
review: eM
Weather/temperature:
Remedy Includes: (Check all that apply)
OMQindfill cover/containment
(Access controls
institutional controls
G Groundwater pump and treatment
G Surface water collection and treatment
G Other
G Monitored natural attenuation
G Groundwater containment
G Vertical barrier walls
Attachments: G Inspection team roster attached
G Site map attached
II. INTERVIEWS (Check all that apply)
Date
1. O&M site manager
G-riffflU.
Name
Interviewed G'at site G at office G by phone Phone no.
Problems, suggestions; G Report attached
Title
2. O&M staff
Name Title
Interviewed G at site G at office G by phone Phone no.
Problems, suggestions; G Report attached
Date
I
-------
Local regulatory authorities and response agencies (i.e., State and Tribal offices, emergency response
office, police department, office of public health or environmental health, zoning office, recorder of
deeds, or other city and county offices, etc.) Fill in all that apply.
Agency
Contact
Name
Problems; suggestions; G Report attached
0
vJritle J
ilfi^
Date Phone no.
Agency
Contact
Name
Problems; suggestions; G Report attached
Title
Date Phone no.
Agency
Contact
Name
Problems; suggestions; G Report attached
Title
Date Phone no.
Agency
Contact
Name
Problems; suggestions; G Report attached
Title
Date Phone no.
4.
Other interviews (optional) G Report attached.
tfOl- -
-------
III. ON-SITE DOCUMENTS & RECORDS VERIFIED (Check all that apply)
O&M Documents
G O&M manual G Readily available G Up to date £WA
G As-built drawings G Readily available G Up to date GN/A
G Maintenance logs G Readily available G Up to date G N/A
Remarks
~2. Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan ij^Readily available ~lrfjp to date G N/A
® Contingency plan/emergency response plan gtleadily available £fTJp to date G N/A
Remarks
3. O&M and OSHA Training Records GiCeadily available CTUjTtodate GN/A
Remarks
Permits and Service Agreements
G Air discharge permit G Readily available G Up to date Gf?7/A
G Effluent discharge G Readily available G Up to date S"ft/A
G Waste disposal. POTW G Readily available G Up to date Pffttk
G Other permits G Readily available G Up to date Otf/A
Remarks
5. Gas Generation Records G Readily available G Up to date 0"f5/A
Remarks
6. Settlement Monument Records G Readily available G Up to date G N/A
Remarks
7. Groundwater Monitoring Records G Readily available G Up to date Q^/A
Remarks
8. Leachate Extraction Records G Readily available G Up to date
Remarks
9. Discharge Compliance Records
G Air G Readily available G Up to date 0^J/A
G Water (effluent) G Readily available G Up to date M^/A
Remarks
10. Daily Access/Security Logs G Readily available G Up to date Oitf/A
Remarks
DU-U -
-------
IV. O&M COSTS
]. O&M Organization
G State in-house G Contractor for State
G PRJP in-house G Contractor for PRP
G Federal Facility in-house G Contractor for FederaLFacility , ,
gother Srn Lks OyM
yUV Z
2. O&M Cost Records Njh
G Readily available G Up to date
G Funding mechanism/agreement in place
Original O&M cost estimate G Breakdown attached
Total annual cost by year for review period if available
From
To
G Breakdown attached
From
Date
To
Date
Total cost
G Breakdown attached
From
Date
To
Date
Total cost
G Breakdown attached
From
Date
To
Date
Total cost
G Breakdown attached
From
Date
To
Date
Total cost
G Breakdown attached
Date
Date
Total cost
3. Unanticipated or Unusually High O&M Costs During Review Period
Describe costs and reasons: . , . a
AJJA
V. ACCESS AND INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS (^Applicable G N/A
A. Fencing
1. Fencing damaged G Location shown on sitemap Grates secured G N/A
Remarks
B. Other Access Restrictions
1. Signs and other security measures G Location shown on site map G N/A
Remarks cA~
0O-L - y.4-
-------
C. Institutional Controls (ICs)
1. Implementation and enforcement
Site conditions imply ICs not properly implemented
Site conditions imply ICs not being fully enforced
Type of monitoring (e.g., self-reporting, drive by)
Frequency
GYes GNo cTN/A
G Yes G No
Responsible party/agency
Contact
Name Title
Date Phone no.
Reporting is up-to-date
G
Yes
G No
GN/A
Reports are verified by the lead agency
G
Yes
GNo
GN/A
Specific requirements in deed or decision documents have been met
G
Yes
GNo
GN/A
Violations have been reported
G
Yes
GNo
GN/A
Other problems or suggestions: G Report attached
2. Adequacy
ffl^Tare adequate
G ICs are inadequate
GN/A
Remarks
D. General
S^cTv;
1. Vandalism/trespassing G Location shown on site map
Remarks
vandalism evident
2. Land use changes on site i a!A
Remarks
3. Land use changes off site G N/A
Remarks F
VI. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS
A. Roads G Applicable
/A
1. Roads damaged
Remarks
G Location shown on site map G Roads adequateG N/A
-------
B. Other Site Conditions
Remarks
VII. LANDFILL COVERS € Applicable G N/A
A. Landfill Surface
1. Settlement (Low spots)
Areal extent
Remarks
G Location shown on site map G Settlement not evident
Depth
2. Cracks
Lengths_
Remarks
G Location shown on site map G Cracking not evident
Widths Depths
Erosion
Areal extent_
Remarks
G Location shown on site map
Depth
G Erosion not evident
4.
Holes
Areal extent
Remarks
G Location shown on site map
Depth
G Holes not evident
Vegetative Cover G Grass G Cover properly established
G Trees/Shrubs (indicate size and locations on a diagram)
Remarks
G No signs of stress
Alternative Cover (armored rock, concrete, etc.) G N/A
Remarks
7. Bulges
Areal extent_
Remarks
G Location shown on site map G Bulges not evident
Height
- (>-£>
-------
8.
Wet AreasAVater Damage
G Wet areas
G Ponding
G Seeps
G Soft subgrade
Remarks
G Wet areas/water damage not evident
G Location shown on site map Areal extent
G Location shown on site map Areal extent
G Location shown on site map Areal extent
G Location shown on site map Areal extent
9.
Slope Instability G Slides
Areal extent
Remarks
G Location shown on site map G No evidence of slope instability
B.
Benches G Applicable fi^/A
(Horizontally constructed mounds of earth placed across a steep landfill side slope to interrupt the slope
in order to slow down the velocity of surface runoff and intercept and convey the runoff to a lined
channel.)
1.
Flows Bypass Bench
Remarks
G Location shown on site map G N/A or okay
2.
Bench Breached
Remarks
G Location shown on site map G N/A or okay
3.
Bench Overtopped
Remarks
G Location shown on site map G N/A or okay
C.
Letdown Channels G Applicable SWA
(Channel lined with erosion control mats, riprap, grout bags, or gabions that descend down the steep side
slope of the cover and will allow the runoff water collected by the benches to move off of the landfill
cover without creating erosion gullies.)
1.
Settlement G Location shown on site map G No evidence of settlement
Areal extent Depth
Remarks
2.
Material Degradation G Location shown on site map G No evidence of degradation
Material type Areal extent
Remarks
->
Erosion G Location shown on site map G No evidence of erosion
Areal extent Depth
Remarks
- (.1
-------
Undercutting
Areal extent
Remarks
G Location shown on site map
Depth
G No evidence of undercutting
Obstructions Type
G Location shown on site map
Size
Remarks
G No obstructions
Areal extent
6.
Type
Excessive Vegetative Growth
G No evidence of excessive growth
G Vegetation in channels does not obstruct flow
G Location shown on site map
Remarks
Areal extent
D. Cover Penetrations ^Applicable
^Apnlic
GN/A
1.
Gas Vents G Active G Passive
G Properly secured/locked G Functioning G Routinely sampled G Good condition
G Evidence of leakage at penetration G Needs Maintenance
GN/A
Remarks
Gas Monitoring Probes
G Properly secured/locked G Functioning
G Evidence of leakage at penetration
Remarks
G Routinely sampled G Good condition
GNeeds Maintenance GN/A
Monitoring Wells (within surface area of landfill)
G Properly secured/locked G Functioning G Routinely sampled G Good condition
G Evidence of leakage at penetration G Needs Maintenance G N/A
Remarks
Leachate Extraction Wells
G Properly secured/locked G Functioning
G Evidence of leakage at penetration
Remarks
G Routinely sampled G Good condition
G Needs Maintenance G N/A
Settlement Monuments
Remarks
G Located
G Routinely surveyed G N/A
~ j.g
-------
E. Gas Collection and Treatment
g^ppH
pplicable G N/A
Gas Treatment Facilities
G Flaring G Thermal destruction
G Good condition G Needs Maintenance
Remarks
G Collection for reuse
tllk.
2.
Gas Collection Wells, Manifolds and Piping
G Good conditionG Needs Maintenance
Remarks
Gas Monitoring Facilities (e.g., gas monitoring ofadjacent homes or buildings)
G Good condition G Needs Maintenance Grwk
Remarks
-------
H. Retaining Walls G Applicable G N/A
1.
Deformations G Location shown on site map G Deformation not evident
Horizontal displacement Vertical displacement
Rotational displacement
Remarks
2.
Degradation G Location shown on site map G Degradation not evident
Remarks
I. Perimeter Ditches/Off-Site Discharge G Applicable G N/A
1.
Siltation G Location shown on site map G Siltation not evident
Areal extent Depth
Remarks
2.
Vegetative Growth G Location shown on site map G N/A
G Vegetation does not impede flow
Areal extent Type
Remarks
3.
Erosion G Location shown on site map G Erosion not evident
Areal extent Depth
Remarks
4.
Discharge Structure G Functioning G N/A
Remarks
VIII. VERTICAL BARRIER WALLS G Applicable G N/A
1.
Settlement G Location shown on site map G Settlement not evident
Areal extent Depth
Remarks
2.
Performance MonitoringType of monitoring
G Performance not monitored
Frequency G Evidence of breaching
Head differential
Remarks
OUT- - |T . iO
-------
OSWER No. 9355.7-03B-P
IX. GROUNDWATERySURFACE WATER REMEDIES G Applicable ^pN/A
A. Groundwater Extraction Wells, Pumps, and Pipelines G Applicable JsN/A
1. Pumps, Wellhead Plumbing, and Electrical
G Good condition G All required wells properly operating G Needs Maintenance G N/A
Remarks
2. Extraction System Pipelines, Valves, Valve Boxes, and Other Appurtenances
G Good condition G Needs Maintenance
Remarks
3. Spare Parts and Equipment
G Readily available G Good condition G Requires upgrade G Needs to be provided
Remarks
B. Surface Water Collection Structures, Pumps, and Pipelines G Applicable
/A
1. Collection Structures, Pumps, and Electrical
G Good condition G Needs Maintenance
Remarks
2. Surface Water Collection System Pipelines, Valves, Valve Boxes, and Other Appurtenances
G Good condition G Needs Maintenance
Remarks ¦
3. Spare Parts and Equipment c
G Readily available G Good condition G Requires upgrade G Needs to be provided
Remarks
OVJT "ji.il
-------
C. Treatment System
G Applicable prn/A
1. Treatment Train (Check components that apply)
G Metals removal G Oil/water separation G Bioremediation
G Air stripping G Carbon adsorbers
G Filters
G Additive (e.g., chelation agent, flocculent)
G Others
G Good condition G Needs Maintenance
G Sampling ports properly marked and functional
G Sampling/maintenance log displayed and up to date
G Equipment properly identified
G Quantity of groundwater treated annually
G Quantity of surface water treated annually
Remarks
2. Electrical Enclosures and Panels (properly rated and functional)
G N/A G Good condition G Needs Maintenance
Remarks
3. Tanks, Vaults, Storage Vessels
G N/A G Good condition G Proper secondary containment G Needs Maintenance
Remarks
4. Discharge Structure and Appurtenances
G N/A G Good condition G Needs Maintenance
Remarks
5. Treatment Building(s)
G N/A G Good condition (esp. roof and doorways) G Needs repair
G Chemicals and equipment properly stored
Remarks
6. Monitoring Wells (pump and treatment remedy)
G Properly secured/locked G Functioning G Routinely sampled G Good condition
G All required wells located G Needs Maintenance G N/A
Remarks
D. Monitoring Data
JKi
1. Monitoring Data
G Is routinely submitted on time
G Is of acceptable quality
2. Monitoring data suggests:
G Groundwater plume is effectively contained
G Contaminant concentrations are declining
00V "
-------
D. Monitored Natural Attenuation
1. Monitoring Wells (natural attenuation remedy)
G Properly secured/locked G Functioning G Routinely sampled G GoofJ-condition
G All required wells located G Needs Maintenance (JX/A
Remarks
X. OTHER REMEDIES
If there are remedies applied at the site which are not covered above, attach an inspection sheet describing
the physical nature and condition of any facility associated with the remedy. An example would be soil
vapor extraction.
XI. OVERALL OBSERVATIONS
A. Implementation of the Remedy
Describe issues and observations relating to whether the remedy is effective and functioning as designed.
Begin with a brief statement of what the remedy is to accomplish (i.e., to contain contaminant plume,
minimize infiltration and gas emission, etc.). .
uiiiiLianuii anu ^iiusaiyn, ci\,.j. » (JIT**.
/Upw-&/ki ,3 rj^AAjeyu • TU-
"5'*^ j a.
t r / /w *Sy k* > /J+T UJZ/K-
-fjra - c&> A.t/~ LJilfoh) Uy rftfit,if d
B. Adequacy of O&M
Describe issues and observations related to the implementation and scope of O&M procedures. In
particular, discuss their relationship to the current and long-term protectiveness of the remedy.
nfotlki vU-kJ
601. - ji.li
-------
C. Early Indicators of Potential Remedy Problems
Describe issues and observations such as unexpected changes in the cost or scope of O&M or a high
frequency of unscheduled repairs, that suggest that the protectiveness of the remedy may be
compromised in.the futun
731 e^yLj I fa
-------
Site Inspection Checklist
I. SITE INFORMATION
Site name:
y Qui
»0_
0Uj
Date of inspection: */?/ M7-
Location and Region: ! M(0Od-rtQC'
Agency, office, or company leading the five-year
review: FlA
Weather/temperature:
P's
Remedy Includes: (Check all that apply)
.andfill cover/containment
'Access controls
^Institutional controls
G Groundwater pump and treatment
G Surface water collection and treatment
G Other
G Monitored natural attenuation
G Groundwater containment
G Vertical barrier walls
Attachments: G Inspection team roster attached
£^Site map attached
II. INTERVIEWS (Check all that apply)
1. O&M site manager
fpt A
3 Title o
Name ° Title
Interviewed^plt site G at office G by phone Phone no.
Problems, suggestions; G Report attached
#7/ft
Date
2. O&M staff
Name Title
Interviewed G at site G at office G by phone Phone no.
Problems, suggestions; G Report attached
Date
t>^2> - f-i
-------
Local regulatory authorities and response agencies (i.e., State and Tribal offices, emergency response
office, police department, office of public health or environmental health, zoning office, recorder of
deeds, or other city and county offices, etc.) Fill in all that apply.
Agency /i/vpga
Contact (Cm C£ /C
Name
Problems; suggestions; G Report attached
y- 1(>$
Title 0 Date Phone no.
Agency
Contact
Name
Problems; suggestions; G Report attached
Title
Date Phone no.
Agency
Contact
Name
Problems; suggestions; G Report attached
Title
Date Phone no.
Agency
Contact
Name
Problems; suggestions; G Report attached
Title
Date Phone no.
4. Other interviews (optional) G Report attached.
-------
III. ON-SITE DOCUMENTS & RECORDS VERIFIED (Check all that apply)
O&M Documents
£pO&M manual G Readily available G Up to date G N/A
As-built drawings G Readily available G Up to date GN/A
©Maintenance logs G Readily available G Up to date G N/A
Remarks 5'tc.
Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan G Readily available d>tjp to date
(^Contingency plan/emergency response plan G Readily available C?Up to date
Remarks aW J- s.u ¦
GN/A
GN/A
O&M and OSHA Training Records
Remarks -g 'ti
G Readily available ^T)Up to date
GN/A
Permits and Service Agreements
G Air discharge permit G Readily available G Up to date (gJ^/A
G Effluent discharge G Readily available G Up to date ^?N/A
G Waste disposal, POTW G Readily available G Up to date ^)N/A
G Other permits G Readily available G Up to date G N/A
Remarks
5. Gas Generation Records G Readily available S^Jp to date G N/A
Remarks f 1 ^^.(jdrds. 1rU
6. Settlement Monument Records G Readily available G Up to date CG-N/A
Remarks
7. Groundwater Monitoring Records G Readily available ^jpUp to date G N/A
Remarks fJyj-
Leachate Extraction Records
Remarks
G Readily available
G Up to date £_gJ*J/A
9. Discharge Compliance Records
G Air
G Water (effluent)
Remarks
G Readily available
G Readily available
G Up to date (OMlA
G Up to date ^^J/A
10. Daily Access/Security Logs
Remarks_
G Readily available
G Up to date G N/A
DOS - (1.3
-------
IV. O&M COSTS
O&M Organization
G State in-house
G PRP in-house
G Federal Facility in-house
G Other
G Contractor for State
^P^ontractor for PRP
G Contractor for Federal Facility
O<fi Cost Records
K Readily available StJp to date
G Funding mechanism/agreement in place
Original O&M cost estimate
G Breakdown attached
Total annual cost by year for review period if available
From
To
G Breakdown attached
From
Date
To
Date
Total cost
G Breakdown attached
From
Date
To
Date
Total cost
G Breakdown attached
From
Date
To
Date
Total cost
G Breakdown attached
From
Date
To
Date
Total cost
G Breakdown attached
Date
Date
Total cost
Unanticipated or Unusually High O&M Costs During Review Period ,
Describe costs and reasons: fW fly ^S*y
V. ACCESS AND INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS G Applicable G N/A
A. Fencing
1. Fencing damaged
Remarks
evocation shown on site map (^Gates secured G N/A
B. Other Access Restrictions
1. Signs and other security measures
G Location shown on site map G N/A
Remarks^
\ . Ar
-------
C. Institutional Controls (ICs)
1. Implementation and enforcement
Site conditions imply ICs not properly implemented GYes G No £N/A
Site conditions imply ICs not being fully enforced GYes G No 6"f5/A
Type of monitoring (e.g., self-reporting, drive by)
Frequency
Responsible party /agency
Contact
Name Title Date Phone no.
Reporting is up-to-date GYes G No G N/A
Reports are verified by the lead agency GYes G No GN/A
Specific requirements in deed or decision documents have been met GYes GNo GN/A
Violations have been reported GYes GNo GN/A
Other problems or suggestions: G Report attached
Jc< JoA-
Adequacy G ICs are adequate G ICs are inadequate «*N/A
Remarks
D. General
1. Vandalism/trespassing G Location shown on site map Offo'vandalism evident
Remarks
?
Land use changes on site G N/A
Remarks_
J.
Land use changes off siteG N/A
Remarks
VI. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS
e^ppiic
A. Roads S'Applicable G N/A
1. Roads damaged G Location shown on site map g^oads adequateG N/A
Remarks
-
-------
B. Other Site Conditions
Remarks
VII. LANDFILL COVERS Applicable G N/A
Jg^pplicable
A. Landfill Surface
1. Settlement (Low spots) G Location shown on site map G Settlement not evident
Areal extent (Depth jifay ^.J/lou
Remarks
I bc+A \UUl
J$Tl I
^'4rj /uAjk-l^ •
~~2. Cracks G Location shown on site map C?t5racking not evident
Lengths Widths Depths
Remarks
~3. Erosion G Location shown on site map g^rosion not evident
Areal extent Depth^
Remarks
:ni i^epin r
4. Holes G Location shown on site map tholes not evident
Areal extent Depth
Remarks
5. Vegetative Cover -gft^rass 8"t5over properly established G No signs of stress
G Trees/Shrubs (indicate size and locations on a diagram) N
Remarks A e /J ¦
6. Alternative Cover (armored rock, concrete, etc.) 6^/A
Remarks
7. Bulges G Location shown on site map a^ulges not evident
Areal extent Height
Remarks
-------
Wet Areas/Water Damage
G Wet areas
G Ponding
G Seeps
G Soft subgrade
Remarks
g^et areas/water damage not evident
G Location shown on site map Areal extent_
G Location shown on site map Areal extent_
G Location shown on site map Areal extent_
G Location shown on site map Areal extent_
9.
Slope Instability
Areal extent
Remarks
G Slides G Location shown on site map
evidence of slope instability
B. Benches G Applicable 0^J/A
(Horizontally constructed mounds of earth placed across a steep landfill side slope to interrupt the slope
in order to slow down the velocity of surface runoff and intercept and convey the runoff to a lined
channel.)
g"Nh
1. Flows Bypass Bench
Remarks
G Location shown on site map
N/A or okay
2. Bench Breached
G Location shown on site map or okay
Remarks
3. Bench Overtopped
G Location shown on site map okay
Remarks
>
C. Letdown Channels G Applicable
e^j/A
(Channel lined with erosion control mats, riprap, grout bags, or gabions that descend down the steep side
slope of the cover and will allow the runoff water collected by the benches to move off of the landfdl
cover without creating erosion
gullies.)
1. Settlement G Location shown on site map G No evidence of settlement
Areal extent Depth
Remarks
2. Material Degradation G Location shown on site map G No evidence of degradation
Material type Areal extent
Remarks
3. Erosion G Location shown on site map G No evidence of erosion
Areal extent Depth
Remarks
Ouj - (.i
-------
4.
Undercutting G Location shown on site map (/No evidence of undercutting
Areal extent Depth
Remarks
5.
Obstructions Type obstructions
G Location shown on site map Areal extent
Size
Remarks
6.
Excessive Veeetative Growth TvDe
(?No evidence of excessive growth
G V-<--iation in channels does not obstruct flow
G vocation shown on site map _ Areal extent
Remarks i/~^ •/"»
D.
Cover Penetrations ^^pplicable G N/A
1.
Gaj^Vents G ActiveG Passive
3Troperly secured/locked (^functioning (^Routinely sampled 8ijood condition
G Evidence of leakage at penetration G Needs Maintenance
GN/A
Remarks A+^X. g Lj>uJ-L tf )>*/ ^
2.
1 V
Gasjyionitoring Probes —
g'Properly secured/locked (Mnmctioning G-Routinely sampled S'tjood condition
G Evidence of leakage at penetration G Needs Maintenance GN/A
Remarks
3.
Monitoring Wells (within surface area of landfill)
e^roperly secured/locked ^functioning G-RtxtTtiiieiy sampled /^Good condition
G Evidence of leakage at penetration G Needs Maintenance GN/A
Remarks
4.
Leachate Extraction Wells
G Properly secured/locked G Functioning G Routinely sampled G Good condition
G Evidence of leakage at penetration G Needs Maintenance ^N/A
Remarks
5.
Settlement Monuments G Located G Routinely surveyed
Remarks
0°3> - f
-------
E. Gas Collection and Treatment inapplicable-u'N/A
1. Gas Treatment Facilities
G Flaring G Thermal destruction G Collection for reuse
G Good condition G Needs Maintenance hi*
Remarks //t
2. (^"Collection Wells, Manifolds and Piping
G Good condition G Needs Maintenance
Remarks
iood condition G Needs Maintenance . « * t
narks a/(( ^ n iW t^«A a*-" JIaA*-
Xi /] ji(/f (~rv^'V-f • y
man
Gas Monitoring Facilities (e.g., gas monitorins^afadjacent homes or buildings)
G Good condition G Needs Maintenance Qfri/A
Remarks
F. Cover Drainage Layer O^pplicable G N/A
1. Outlet Pipes Inspected functioning G N/A . .
Remarks ^«wjl jf /¦/
— — y (J
1. Outlet Rock Inspected cf unctioning G N/A
Remarks
G. Detention/Sedimentation Ponds (^Applicable G N/A
1. Silteiion Areal extent Depth G N/A
•g'Siltation not evident
Remarks
2. Erosiptr Areal extent Depth_
©-¦Erosion not evident
Remarks
~3. Outlet Works g^^unctioning . G N/A / /
Remarks .
4. Dam functioning G N/A
Remarks
-------
H. Retaining Walls
(fApplicable G N/A ^
1.
Deformations
Horizontal displacement
G Location shown on site map jJfiDeformation not evident
Vertical displacement
Rotational displacement
Remarks
2.
Degradation
Remarks
G Location shown on site map ^degradation not evident
I. Perimeter Ditches/Off-Site Discharge G Applicable 8^/A
1.
Siitation G Location shown on site map G Siltation not evident
Areal extent Depth
Remarks
2.
Vegetative Growth G Location shown on site map G N/A
G Vegetation does not impede flow
Areal extent Type
Remarks
3.
Erosion
Areal extent
Remarks
G Location shown on site map G Erosion not evident
Depth
4.
Discharge Structure
Remarks
G Functioning G N/A
VIII. VERTICAL BARRIER WALLS applicable «^/A
1.
Settlement
Areal extent
Remarks
G Location shown on site map Settlement not evident
Depth
2.
Performance MonitoringType of monitoring
G Performance not monitored
Frequency G Evidence of breaching
Head differential
Remarks
fro*, - fuia
-------
OSWER No. 9355.7-03B-P
IX. GROUNDWATER/SURFACE WATER REMEDIES G Applicable G
-------
C. Treatment System
G Applicable #WA
1. Treatment Train (Check components that apply)
G Metals removal G Oil/water separation G Bioremediation
G Air stripping G Carbon adsorbers
G Filters
G Additive (e.g., chelation agent, flocculent)
G Others
G Good condition G Needs Maintenance
G Sampling ports properly marked and functional
G Sampling/maintenance log displayed and up to date
G Equipment properly identified
G Quantity of groundwater treated annually
G Quantity of surface water treated annually
Remarks
2. Electrical Enclosures and Panels (properly rated and functional)
G N/A G Good condition G Needs Maintenance
Remarks
3. Tanks, Vaults, Storage Vessels
G N/A G Good condition G Proper secondary containment G Needs Maintenance
Remarks
4. Discharge Structure and Appurtenances
G N/A G Good condition G Needs Maintenance
Remarks
5. Treatment Building(s)
G N/A G Good condition (esp. roof and doorways) G Needs repair
G Chemicals and equipment properly stored
Remarks
6. Monitoring Wells (pump and treatment remedy)
G Properly secured/locked G Functioning G Routinely sampled G Good condition
G All required wells located G Needs Maintenance G N/A
Remarks
D. Monitoring Data
1. Monitoring Data
P^routinely submitted on time
OfTof acceptable quality
2. Monitoring data suggests:
fJ* ft**.*.
G Groundwater plume is effectively contained
G Contaminant concentrations are declining
~ fl.
-------
D. Monitored Natural Attenuation
Monitoring Wells (natural attenuation remedy)
G Properly secured/locked G Functioning G Routinely sampled
G All required wells located G Needs Maintenance
Remarks
G Gopd condition
imk
X. OTHER REMEDIES
If there are remedies applied at the site which are not covered above, attach an inspection sheet describing
the physical nature and condition of any facility associated with the remedy. An example would be soil
vapor extraction.
XI. OVERALL OBSERVATIONS
A.
Implementation of the Remedy
Describe issues and observations relating to whether the remedy is effective and functioning as designed.
Begin with a brief statement of what the remedy is to accomplish (i.e., to contain contaminant plume,
minimize infiltration and gas emission, etc.).
1 - ^
/M A
B. Adequacy of O&M
Describe issues and observations related to the implementation and scope of O&M procedures. In
particular, discuss their relationship to the current and long-term protectiveness of the remedy.
irtic-ular, discuss their relationship to the curre
A.V
jU,
(J
rh^K~ (J *7
— .
7eUt_ (j iW/VcW
-m /Kg
- |.l}>
-------
c.
Early Indicators of Potential Remedy Problems
Describe issues and observations such as unexpected changes in the cost or scope of O&M or a high
frequency of unscheduled repairs, that suggest that the protectiveness of the remedy may be
compromised in the future.
it ^
L*J<~ IpUy (g//
• r AM>K t£lfA.
D.
Opportunities for Optimization
Describe possible opportunities for optimization in monitoring tasks or the operation oflhe remedy.
_ jk* C^Jdl U . crm '"fy-A b pJA
A-jHAjs lu j /m jp cA. . 6 o
c>o3 - f.(4r
-------
Site Inspection Checklist
I. SITE INFORMATION
Site name
Date of inspection: */?//¦
Location and Region:
EPAm-.f\fooO(,Ot>7-?o(.
Agency, office, or company leading the five-year
MA
review:
Weather/temperature:
jo'S
Remedy Includes: (Check all that apply)
siTandfill cover/contaiiument
4^ cess controls
(^Institutional controls
G Groundwater pump and treatment
G Surface water collection and treatment
G Other
G Monitored natural attenuation
G Groundwater containment
G Vertical barrier walls
Attachments: G Inspection team roster attached
G Site map attached
II. INTERVIEWS (Check all that apply)
1. O&M site manager
Name
Interviewed G at site G at office G by phone Phone no.
Problems, suggestions; G Report attached
Title
Date
2. O&M staff
Name
. 6"aTsite
Title
Interviewed 6"at site G at office G by phone Phone no.
Problems, suggestions; G Report attached
Date
O O* -J.l
-------
3.
Local regulatory authorities and response agencies (i.e., State and Tribal offices, emergency response
office, police department, office of public health or environmental health, zoning office, recorder of
deeds, or other city and county offices, etc.) Fill in all that apply.
Agency - .
Contact b 1 rftj&cr
Name Title (J
Problems; suggestions; G Report attached
Date Phone no.
Agency
Contact
Name Title
Problems; suggestions; G Report attached
Date Phone no.
Agency
Contact
Name Title
Problems; suggestions; G Report attached
Date Phone no.
Agency
Contact
Name Title
Problems; suggestions; G Report attached
Date Phone no.
4.
Other interviews (optional) G Report attached.
D04-
-------
III. ON-SITE DOCUMENTS & RECORDS VERIFIED (Check all that apply)
1. O&M Documents
G O&M manual G Readily available G Up to date
)le G Up to (
; logs . .G.Readily^railat'
G As-built drawings G Readily available G Up to date G N/A
G Maintenance logs f ^Readil^av^ijable G Up to date G N/A
Remarks
2.
Site-Specific Health and Safety Plan -^"Readily available
Srt^ontingency plan/emergency resnonse »lan (Readily available
Remarks t\i IOC^(
G Up to date
G Up to date
GN/A
GN/A
->
J
O&M and OSHA Training Records S-f(eadily available
Remarks ¦ffiCuA -
G Up to date
GN/A
4. Permits and Service Agreements
G Air discharge permit G Readily available G Up to date &N/A
G Effluent discharge G Readily available G Up to date cfN/A
G Waste disposal, POTW G Readily available G Up to date G N/A .
G Other permits G Readily available G Up to date S"N/A
Remarks
5. Gas Generation Records G Readily available G Up to date G N/A
Remarks
6. Settlement Monument Records G Readily available G Up to date ct5j/a
Remarks
1. Groundwater Monitoring Records ^''Readily available G Up to date G N/A
Remarks &]t C/-A
8. Leachate Extraction Records G Readily available G Up to date 4WA
Remarks
9. Discharge Compliance Records
G Air G Readily available G Up to date (fWj.
G Water (effluent) G Readily available G Up to date (TWA
Remarks
10. Daily Access/Security Logs G Readily available G Up to date O1^/A
t»any Access/f>ecurity JLags
Remarks Dj fJffl
-------
IV. O&M COSTS
2.
1. O&M Organization
G State in-house G Contractor for State
G PRP in-house 3"l5ontractor for PRP
G Federal Facility in-house G Contractor for Federal Facility
G Other
O&M Cost Records 0 If-—. &T »-J0 ^ ^
G Readily available G Up to date ( ' '
G Funding mechanism/agreement in place
Original O&M cost estimate G Breakdown attached
Total annual cost by year for review period if available
From
To
G Breakdown attached
From
Date
To
Date
Total cost
G Breakdown attached
From
Date
To
Date
Total cost
G Breakdown attached
From
Date
To
Date
Total cost
G Breakdown attached
From
Date
To
Date
Total cost
G Breakdown attached
Date
Date
Total cost
3. Unanticipated or Unusually High O&M Costs During Review Period
Describe costs and reasons:
V. ACCESS AND INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS /Applicable C N/A
A. Fencing
1. Fencing damaged G Location shown on site map .G Gates secured G N/A,
Remarks OCLltf rA/tyl U k*L U*
h
B. Other Access Restrictions
1. Signs and other security measures , G Location shown on site map G N/A
Remarks [AvvxUV £ t>n ^ /Kf) &Q. AJsf faA .
- p-4
-------
C. Institutional Controls (ICs)
1. Implementation and enforcement
Site conditions imply ICs not properly implemented G Yes GfNo G N/A
Site conditions imply ICs not being fully enforced GYes O'No G N/A
Type of monitoring (e.g., self-reporting, drive by)
Frequency
Responsible party/agency gfA, Ad C O-, , U-fi,
Contact CTptkj ju- rj)
I Name Title Date Phone no.
Reporting is up-to-date GYes G No 3^/A
Reports are verified by the lead agency G Yes G No (5 N/A
Specific requirements in deed or decision documents have been met O^es G No G N/A
Violations have been reported GYes G/No GN/A
Other problems or suggestions: G Report attached .
pi. AjLj-iMjJ >7 S/ArZ LjJtytu
2. Adequacy G ICs are adequate G ICs are inadequate G N/A
Remarks
D. General
Vandalism/trespassing GvLocation shown on site map G No vandalism evident
Remarks (aLwU. S^j I
2. Land use changes on site G N/A
Remarks_
3. Land use changes off site G N/A
Remarks_
VI. GENERAL SITE CONDITIONS
A. Roads G Applicable G N/A
1. Roads damaged G Location shown on site map G Roads adequateG
Remarks
Du 4r - f • $
-------
B.
Other Site Conditions
Remarks
s
VII. LANDFILL COVERS Applicable G N/A
A.
Landfill Surface
1.
Settlement (Low spots) G Location shown on site map ^i^ettlement not evident
Areal extent Depth
Remarks
2.
Cracks G Location shown on site map .gft^rackmg not evident
Lengths Widths Depths
Remarks
3.
Erosion G Location shown on site map G Erosion not evident
Areal extent Depth
Remarks
4.
Holes G Location shown on site map c^ffoles not evident
Areal extent Depth
Remarks
5.
Vegetative Cover G Grass (*4" ^ * G
-------
Wet Areas/Water Damage
G Wet areas
G Ponding
G Seeps
G Soft subgrade
Remarks
Itt areas/water damage not evident
G Location shown on site map Areal extent_
G Location shown on site map Areal extent
G Location shown on site map Areal extent_
G Location shown on site map Areal extent_
G Slides G Location shown on site map (^No evidence of slope instability
9.
Slope Instability
Areal extent
Remarks
B. Benches G Applicable S'N/A
(Horizontally constructed mounds of earth placed across a steep landfill side slope to interrupt the slope
in order to slow down the velocity of surface runoff and intercept and convey the runoff to a lined
channel.)
1.
Flows Bypass Bench
Remarks
G Location shown on site map
G N/A or okay
2.
Bench Breached
Remarks
G Location shown on site map
G N/A or okay
j.
Bench Overtopped
Remarks
G Location shown on site map
G N/A or okay
C. Letdown Channels G Applicable
(Channel lined with erosion control mats, riprap, grout bags, or gabions that descend down the steep side
slope of the cover and will allow the runoff water collected by the benches to move off of the landfill
cover without creating erosion gullies.)
1.
Settlement
Areal extent_
Remarks
G Location shown on site map
Depth
G No evidence of settlement
Material Degradation
Material type
Remarks
G Location shown on site map
Areal extent
G No evidence of degradation
Erosion
Areal extent^
Remarks
G Location shown on site map
Depth
G No evidence of erosion
Do 4- -
-------
Undercutting
Areal extent
Remarks
G Location shown on site map
Depth
g^o'evidence of undercutting
5.
Obstructions Type
G Location shown on site map
Size
Remarks
" obstructions
Areal extent
6.
TyPe_
Exp€$sive Vegetative Growth
"GNo evidence of excessive growth
G Vegetation in channels does not obstruct flow
G Location shown on site map
Remarks
Areal extent
fiK/Vpplicable
D. Cover Penetrations
GN/A
1.
G Active (^'Passive
G a^Vents
"G Properly secured/locked ^^Functioning
G Evidence of leakage at penetration
GN/A
Remarks
^Routinely sampled ^tjood condition
G Needs Maintenance
Gas Monitoring Probes „
G-^roperly secured/locked S^unctioning G"ftoutinely sampled -S
-------
E. Gas Collection and Treatment
G Applicable
l.
Gas Treatment Facilities
G Flaring G Thermal destruction
G Good conditionG Needs Maintenance
Remarks
G Collection for reuse
Gas Collection Wells, Manifolds and Piping
G Good condition G Needs Maintenance
Remarks
Gas Monitoring Facilities (e.g., gas monitoring of adjacent homes or buildings)
G Good condition G Needs Maintenance G N/A
Remarks
F. Cover Drainage Layer
G Applicable G N/A
1. Outlet Pipes Inspected
Remarks
G Functioning
2. Outlet Rock Inspected
Remarks —
unctioning G N/A ,
G. Detention/Sedimentation Ponds
G Applicable
/A
Siltation Areal extent_
G Siltation not evident
Remarks
Depth
GN/A
Erosion Areal extent_
G Erosion not evident
Remarks
Depth_
3.
Outlet Works
Remarks
G Functioning
GN/A
4.
Dam
Remarks
G Functioning
GN/A
- p.°i
-------
H. Retaining Walls G Applicable ST^/A
Deformations G Location shown on site map G Deformation not evident
Horizontal displacement Vertical displacement
Rotational displacement
Remarks
2. Degradation G Location shown on site map G Degradation not evident
Remarks
I. Perimeter Ditches/Off-Site Discharge G Applicable GN/A
~L Siltation G Location shown on site map ^Siltation not evident
Areal extent Depth
Remarks
2. Vegetative Growth G Location shown on site map G N/A
0'Vegetation does not impede flow
Areal extent Type
Remarks
3. Erosion G Location shown on site map JS^rosion not evident
Areal extent Depth
Remarks
jg^unctic
4. Discharge Structure
Remarks
scharge Structure JgTunctioning. GN/A / . ,
VIII. VERTICAL BARRIER WALLS G Applicable (MA
1. Settlement G Location shown on site map G Settlement not evident
Areal extent Depth '
Remarks
Performance Monitoring Type of monitoring
G Performance not monitored
Frequency G Evidence of breaching
Head differential
Remarks
0^4" •" (i-to
-------
OSWER No. 9355.7-03B-P
IX. GROUNDWATER7SURFACE WATER REMEDIES G Applicable {jpN/A ^
eT"N/A
A. Groundwater Extraction Wells, Pumps, and Pipelines G Applicable gN/A
1. Pumps, Wellhead Plumbing, and Electrical
G Good condition G All required wells properly operating G Needs Maintenance G N/A
Remarks
2. Extraction System Pipelines, Valves, Valve Boxes, and Other Appurtenances
G Good condition G Needs Maintenance
Remarks ^
3. Spare Parts and Equipment
G Readily available G Good condition G Requires upgrade G Needs to be provided
Remarks
B. Surface Water Collection Structures, Pumps, and Pipelines G Applicable
/A
1. Collection Structures, Pumps, and Electrical
G Good condition G Needs Maintenance
Remarks
2. Surface Water Collection System Pipelines, Valves, Valve Boxes, and Other Appurtenances
G Good condition G Needs Maintenance
Remarks
Spare Parts and Equipment c
G Readily available G Good condition G Requires upgrade G Needs to be provided
Remarks
t>U4r -
-------
C. Treatment System
G Applicable HeH!A
1. Treatment Train (Check components that apply)
G Metals removal G Oil/water separation G Bioremediation
G Air stripping G Carbon adsorbers
G Filters
G Additive (e.g., chelation agent, flocculent)
G Others
G Good condition G Needs Maintenance
G Sampling ports properly marked and functional
G Sampling/maintenance log displayed and up to date
G Equipment properly identified
G Quantity of groundwater treated annually
G Quantity of surface water treated annually
Remarks
2. Electrical Enclosures and Panels (properly rated and functional)
G N/A G Good condition G Needs Maintenance
Remarks
3. Tanks, Vaults, Storage Vessels
G N/A G Good conditionG Proper secondary containment G Needs Maintenance
Remarks
4. Discharge Structure and Appurtenances
G N/A G Good condition G Needs Maintenance
Remarks
5. Treatment Building(s)
G N/A G Good condition (esp. roof and doorways) G Needs repair
G Chemicals and equipment properly stored
Remarks
6. Monitoring Wells (pump and treatment remedy)
G Properly secured/locked G Functioning G Routinely sampled G Good condition
G All required wells located G Needs Maintenance G N/A
Remarks
D. Monitoring Data
1.
Mojjrrtoring Data
Gns routinely submitted on time
of acceptable quality
2.
Monitoring data suggests:
G Groundwater plume is effectively contained
G Contaminant concentrations are declining
QV4r - f
-------
D. Monitored Natural Attenuation
1. Monitoring Wells (natural attenuation remedy)
G Properly secured/locked G Functioning G Routinely sampled G Good condition
G All required wells located G Needs Maintenance s-wK
Remarks
X. OTHER REMEDIES
If there are remedies applied at the site which are not covered above, attach an inspection sheet describing
the physical nature and condition of any facility associated with the remedy. An example would be soil
vapor extraction.
XL OVERALL OBSERVATIONS
A. Implementation of the Remedy
Describe issues and observations relating to whether the remedy is effective and functioning as designed.
Begin with a brief statement of what the remedy is to accomplish (i.e., to contain contaminant plume,
minimize infiltration and gas emission, etc.). .
/jUj tiSL a jug Of/^ •
B. Adequacy of O&M
Describe issues and observations related to the implementation and scope of O&M procedures. In
particular, discuss their relationship to the current and long-term protectiveness of the remedy.
0^4 . p./^
-------
C. Early Indicators of Potential Remedy Problems
Describe issues and observations such as unexpected changes in the cost or scope of O&M or a high
frequency of unscheduled repairs, that suggest that the protectiveness of the remedy may be
compromised in the future.
Ajjtdfit "
v a !» Jsfnt nA/f tl i.\ A jk i -/rt ' iO/X /. ,
/j j-^jL ' [l-J.'flli, IcAf ij to (A
' ~f\Ji "/t>
D. Opportunities for Optimization
Describe possible opportunities for optimization in monitoring tasks or the operation of the remedy.
0^4? - p.14
-------
Attachment 5
Restrictive Covenant for OU 2
-------
M /v\ 0**4 £
DNRE Reference No.: RC RRD-20I-10-0I0
This Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Environmental Protection Easement
("Declaration") is made by and between Georgia-Pacific LLC, a Delaware limited liability
company ("Grantor"), having an address of 133 Peachtree Street, N.E., Atlanta, Georgia 30303;
and the Michigan Department of Natural Resources and the Environment ("DNRE", the successor
agency to the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ) pursuant to Executive
Order 2009-45, effective January 17, 2010), having an address c/o Director, Michigan Department
of Natural Resources and the Environment, P.O. Box 30473, Lansing, Michigan 48909-7973, shall be
considered as the Grantee. (Collectively referred to as "Parties").
A. Grantor is the owner of the real property located in Kalamazoo County and legally
described in Exhibit 1 attached hereto ("Property").
B. The Property is part of operable unit 2 of the Allied Paper, IncJPortage Creek/Kalamazoo
River Superfund Site ("Site"), DNRE Site ID No. 39000051, for which a Record of Decision
("ROD") has been issued by the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("U.S. EPA") for
the purpose of carrying out Response Activities, as defined below, needed to address
environmental contamination at the Site. The MDEQ concurred with the ROD in a letter dated
September 26, 2006.
C. The United Stales Environmental Protection Agency has, pursuant to Section 122 of the
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act ("CERCLA"), entered
into a Consent Decree ("CD") with the Parties for the design and implementation of Response
Activities at the Property. The CD, which bears Docket Number 1-09-CV-429, requires that Grantor
place certain limitations on the use of the Property as therein described.
RECITALS
STMl OF MtCHtttN I
-------
Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, Kalamazoo, MI
Declaration of Restrictive Covenants
Page 2 of 13
D. By this Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Environmental Protection Easement,
Grantor assumes no additional liability to the United States or the State of Michigan with regard to
the Property. Grantee assumes no liability with regard to the Property by this Declaration of
Restrictive Covenants and Environmental Protection Easement.
E. The Site was placed on the National Priorities List ("NPL") in 1990 and is a facility as that
term is defined in Section 101(9) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation
and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. ("CERCLA") and Section 20101(0) of Part 201,
Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451, as amended, MCL
324.20101(0) et seq. ("NREPA"). Hazardous substances, including polychforinated biphenyls
("PCBs") have been released and/or disposed of on the Property. The hazardous substances were
contained in a landfill from the prior manufacturing activities associated with the Site. Prior to
recording this Declaration, Response Activities have been undertaken to remove certain
contaminated soils and waste debris.
F. At the time of recording of this Declaration, U.S. EPA has determined that the hazardous
substances at the Property present a threat to human health through direct contact or ingestion, and that
the land use and resource restrictions set forth below are required to prevent unacceptable exposures.
G. The restrictions contained in this Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and
Environmental Protection Easement are based upon information available to the U.S. EPA and
DNRE at the tirrie the ROD was issued. Failure of the Response Activities to achieve and
maintain the criteria, exposure controls, and requirements specified in the ROD; future changes in
the environmental condition of the Property, the applicable cleanup criteria or the discovery of
environmental conditions at the Property that were not accounted for in the ROD; or the use of the
Property in a manner inconsistent with the restrictions described herein, may result in this
Declaration not being protective of public health, safety, and welfare, and the environment.
Information pertaining to the environmental conditions at the Property and Response Activities
undertaken at the Site is on file with the DNRE, Remediation and Redevelopment Division. Site
Identification Number: 39000051.
DEFINITIONS
"MDEQ" shall mean the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, its successor
entities, and those persons or entities acting on its behalf;
"DNRE" shall mean the Michigan Department of Natural Resources and the Environment, the
successor agency to the MDEQ pursuant to Executive Order 2009-45, effective January 17,2010.
"NREPA" shail mean Part 201, Environmental Remediation, of the Natural Resources
and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451, MCL 324.101 et seq, as amended.
2010-023169 07/22/2010 03:37:52 PH
Pages: 2 of 22 REST
T^riothy A.^Snow CouMy Clerk/Rooist°r Kalamazoo ^ouhty M
2 Hill KMMItfi'lM WT, WNVMMWM'i ill!
-------
Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, Kalamazoo, MI
Declaration of Restrictive Covenants
Page 3 of 13
"Owner" shall mean, at any given time, the then current title holder of the Property or any
portion thereof;
"Response Activities" shall mean, consistent with section 101(25) of CERCLA, such
Activities as have been or may be necessary to conduct any removal, remedy or remedial action,
as those terms are defined in sections 101(23) and 101(24) of CERCLA, on the Property and/or
at the Site, including enforcement activities related thereto;
"U.S. EPA" shall mean the United States Environmental Protection Agency, its successor
entities and those persons or entities acting on its behalf.
All other terms used in this document which are defined in Part 3, Definitions, of the
NREPA; Part 201 of the NREPA; or the Part 201 Administrative Rules ("Part 201 Rules"), 1990
AACS R 299.5105 et seq., shall have the same meaning in this document as in Parts 3 and 201 of
the NREPA and the Part 201 Rules, as of the recording date of this Declaration.
NOW THEREFORE, the parties agree as follows:
1. Recitals. The foregoing Recitals shall not be interpreted as mere recitals, but shall be
deemed part of this Declaration and shall be enforceable hereunder.
2. Purpose. The purpose of this Declaration is to create restrictions in Grantor's real
property rights, which will run with the land for as long as necessary to facilitate the remediation
of environmental contamination described in the ROD as determined or modified by U.S. EPA;
to grant a right of access to Grantee and its assigns and representatives to monitor and conduct
Response Activities; to protect human health and the environment by reducing the risk of
exposure to contaminants of concern; and to provide for the long-term protectiveness of the
remediation.
3. Grant. Grantor, on behalf of itself, its successors and assigns, in consideration of the
terms of the Consent Decree in the case of the United States of America v. Georgia-Pacific,
LLC, does hereby covenant and declare that the Property shall be subject to the restrictions on
use set forth below, warrants that Grantor has good and sufficient title to the Property described
in Exhibit 1, and does give, grant, declare and convey to the Grantee, and its assigns and
representatives, the perpetual right to enforce said use restrictions. Grantor further, on behalf of
itself, its successors and assigns, in consideration of the settlement terms set forth in the CD,
does give, grant, declare and convey to the Grantee, and its assigns and representatives: 1) an
environmental protection easement of the nature and character, and for the purposes hereinafter
set forth, with respect to the Property; and 2) the right to enforce said easement.
4. Third Party Beneficiary. The Grantor, on behalf of itself and its successors, transferees,
and assigns, hereby agrees that the United States, acting by and through the U.S. EPA its
successors and assigns shall be a third party beneficiary ("Third Party Beneficiary") of all the
2010-023169 07/22/2010 03:37:52 PJ1
MILLER CftNFIELD RKT
II
-------
Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, Kalamazoo, MI
Declaration of Restrictive Covenants
Page 4 of 13
benefits and rights set out in the restrictions, covenants, easements, exceptions, notifications,
conditions and agreements herein, and that the Third Party Beneficiary shall have the right to
enforce the restrictions described herein as if it was a party hereto. No other rights in third
parties are intended by this Declaration, and no other person or entity shall have any rights or
authorities hereunder to enforce these restrictions, terms, conditions or obligations beyond the
parties hereto, their successors, assigns, subsequent owners of the Property and the Third Party
Beneficiary.
5. Restrictions on Use. Grantor, on behalf of itself, its successors and assigns or other
persons acquiring an interest in the Property and their authorized agents, employees, or persons
acting under their direction and control, covenants and declares that the Property shall be subject
to the restrictions on use set forth below, and intends that said restrictions and covenants run with
the land and may be enforced in perpetuity against any and all Owners by Grantee and the Third
Party Beneficiary and their successors and assigns. Owner, its successors and assigns shall:
a) Not use the Property in a manner that causes existing contamination to migrate
beyond the boundaries of the Property, increases the cost of Response Activities, or
otherwise exacerbates the existing soil and groundwater contamination located on
the Property. The term exacerbation is more specifically defined in Section
20101(J)(n) of the NREPA, MCL 324.20101 (l)(n).
b) prohibit and shall not use the Property in a manner that may interfere with
Response Activities at the Property, including interim response, remedial action,
operation and maintenance, monitoring, or other measures necessary to assure the
effectiveness and integrity of the remedial action.
c) Restrict the uses of the Properly to those uses compatible with industrial use
consistent with the assumptions and basis for the cleanup criteria established
pursuant to Section 20I20a(l)(i) of the NREPA and generally described in the
Description of Allowable Uses, attached hereto as Exhibit 3. The following uses
allowed under the Kalamazoo Light Industrial District zoning designation are
prohibited:
i) Wholesale and retail sale of goods, merchandise, and services;
ii) Repair garages and service stations;
iii) ' Veterinary hospitals;
iv) Recreational uses;
v) Hotels, boarding and lodging houses, motor courts, and motels;
vi) Funeral parlors;
vii) Skating rinks and bowling alleys;
viii) Drive-in theatres; 2010-023169 07/22/2010 03:37:52 PR
. x rr i Paget: 4 of 22 REST
ix) Kennels, miller canfield . county m
Timothy ft. Snow Count.y Clerk/Register Kslamwoo Couniy m
4
-------
Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, Kalamazoo, MI
Declaration of Restrictive Covenants
Page 5 of 13
Cleanup criteria for specific categories of land use are located in the Government
Documents section of the Library of Michigan.
d) Not construct or use wells or other devices on the Property to extract
groundwater for consumption, irrigation, or any other use, except for wells
and devices that are necessary for Response Activities, testing and monitoring
groundwater contamination levels in accordance with plans approved by the
DNRE or U.S. EPA. Short term dewatering for construction purposes is
permitted provided the dewatering, including management and disposal of the
groundwater, is conducted in accordance with all applicable local, state, and
federal laws and regulations and does not cause or result in a new release,
exacerbation of existing contamination, or any other violation of local, state, and
federal environmental laws and regulations including, but not limited to, Part 201
of the NRJEPA.
e) Prohibit any excavation or other intrusive activity on the Property that could
affect the integrity of the cap placed over the landfill areas, except during short
term construction or repair projects or for purposes of further treating or
remediating the subject contamination. Any excavation or other intrusive activity,
including removing, altering, or disturbing the landfill cap, that could affect the
integrity of the cap, must be replaced with a cover that provides at least an
equivalent degree of protection as the original barrier within 14 days of
completion of the work. Repair and/or replacement of the barrier must be
completed unless additional sampling is conducted that demonstrates that a cap in
the area is no longer necessary and this determination is reviewed and approved
by the U.S. EPA.
f) Prohibit the construction of buildings or structures on the Property unless the
buildings or structures are built with slab-on-grade construction (no basements or
crawl spaces) and an evaluation of the potential for any hazardous substances,
including methane, to volatilize into indoor air is performed to assure the
protection of persons who may be present in the buildings. If necessary, such
construction shall incorporate engineering controls designed to eliminate the
potential for subsurface vapor phase hazardous substances to migrate into the new
building or structure at concentrations greater than applicable criteria. Any
building construction plans shall be submitted to and approved by the U.S. EPA.
g) Allow the installation of permanent markers that have been approved by the
U.S. EPA, in consultation with DNRE, within the Property boundaries. These
permanent markers shall more or less describe the restricted area and the nature of the
2010-023169 07/22/2010 03:37:52 PM
„ Pases: 5 of 22 REST
5 IllLLER CflNFIELD
Timothy A. Snow County Clerk/Rsglsler Kalaaizoo County MI
¦niVM^WMMrWWIKMriM ill)
-------
I
Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, Kalamazoo, MI
Declaration of Restrictive Covenants
Page 6 of 13
prohibitions: specified in the provisions of this Restrictive Covenant and the liber and
page numbers of this Restrictive Covenant as recorded in the Kalamazoo County
Register of Deeds Office. The Owner shall not remove, cover, obscure, or otherwise
alter or interfere with any permanent markers placed on the Property at the locations
generally depicted in Exhibit 2. Owner shall keep vegetation and other materials
clear of any permanent markers to assure that the markers are readily visible.
6. Access. As part of the easement granted herein, Grantor does give, grant, declare and
convey to the Grantee, and its assigns and representatives: an irrevocable and continuing right of
access at all reasonable times to the Property for the purposes of:
a) monitoring, overseeing and/or implementing the Response Activities described
in the ROD or any other U.S. EPA or DNRE decision document for the
Property or the Site, and conducting any necessary inspection and repair of any
operation and maintenance equipment, including the inspection of records or
documents related thereto.
b) verifying any data or information submitted to the U.S. EPA and/or the DNRE,
and determining and monitoring compliance with the ROD and this
Declaration, any other U.S. EPA or DNRE decision document, and any
implement ing statement of work or work plan;
c) verifying that no action is being taken on the Property in violation of the terms
of this Declaration or of any federal or state environmental laws or regulations;
d) conducting and/or monitoring investigations relating to the nature and extent
of contamination on or near the Property and the Site including, without
limitation, sampling of air, water, sediments, soils, and specifically, without
limitation, obtaining split or duplicate samples;
e) conducting periodic reviews of the Response Activities at the Property and at
the Site, including but not limited to, reviews required by applicable statutes
and/or regulations; and
f) implementing additional or new Response Activities, if the remedial action
selected in the ROD or any other U.S. EPA and/or DNRE decision document
results in any hazardous substances, pollutant or contaminants remaining at the
Site above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure, and
U.S. EPA, in consultation with DNRE and pursuant to Section 121(c) of
CERCLA, determines that, upon its completion, the selected remedy for the
Site will not be protective of public health, welfare or the environment; or
2010-023169 07/22/2010 03;37:52 PM
Pases: <5 of 22 RE5T
MILLER CflNFIELD
Timothy ft. Snow County Clerk/Register K*l»m»zoo County HI
i
-------
I
Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, Kalamazoo, MI
Declaration of Restrictive Covenants
Page 7 of 13
g) implementing additional or new response activities, as that term is defined in
Section 20101(l)(ee) of the NREPA, if the remedial action selected in the
ROD or any other DNRE and/or U.S. EPA decision document results in any
hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants remaining at the Site above
the criteria developed pursuant to Section 20120(a)( 1 )(i) of the NREPA, and
DNRE, in consultation with U.S. EPA, determines that, upon its completion,
the remedy will not be protective of the public health, safety, welfare or the
environment.
7. Contaminated Soil/Residuals Management. Soils and residuals underlying the landfill
cap at the Property were, at the time of recording of this Notice, polychlorinated biphenyl (PCB)-
containing material that is or may be regulated under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA),
15 USC 2601 etseq, or Part 115, Solid Waste Management, of the NREPA, MCL 324.11501 et
seq. If the Owner undertakes any excavation or otherwise disturbs the soils or residuals beneath
the cap, the Owner shall, at that time, confirm whether these materials are regulated under TSCA
or Part 115 of the NREPA. If so, the Owner shall handle and dispose of the soils and residuals in
full compliance with all relevant requirements of state and federal laws. If the soils or residuals
are not regulated under TSCA or Part 115 at the time of excavation or disturbance, the Owner
shall manage such soils, media and/or debris and all other soils located on the Property in
accordance with the requirements of Section 20120c of the NREPA, the Part 201 Administrative
Rules promulgated thereunder, and all other relevant state and federal laws.
8. DNRE Entry, Access, and Response Authority. Nothing in this Declaration shall limit
or otherwise affect DNRE's right of entry and access, or authorities to take Response
Activities as defined in this Declaration, as well as in Section 20101(l)(ee) Part 201 of the
NREPA, under CERCLA, the National Contingency Plan, 40 C.F.R. Part 300, the NREPA,
and any successor statutory provisions, or other state or federal law.
9. U.S. EPA Entry, Access, and Response Authority. Nothing in this Declaration shall
limit or otherwise affect U.S. EPA's right of entry and access, or authorities to take Response
Activities as defined in this Declaration, as well as in CERCLA, the National Contingency
Plan, 40 C.F.R. Part 300, and any successor statutory provisions, or other state or federal
law.
10. Term. This Restrictive Covenant and Environmental Protection Easement shall run
with the Property until terminated or revoked pursuant to paragraph 10, below, and shall be binding
on the Owner; future owners; and all current and future successors, lessees, easement holders,
their assigns, and their authorized agents, employees, or persons acting under their direction and
control.
11 ¦ Modification. The Restrictive Covenants and Environmental Protection Easement
contained herein shall continue for so long as necessary to accomplish the Response
2010-023169 07/22/2010 03!37:52 PM
Rasas; 7 of 22 REST
, niLLER CANFIELD
timothy ft. Snow County Clsrk/Raglstsr Kalamazoo County HI
-------
Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, Kalamazoo, MI
Declaration of Restrictive Covenants
Page 8 of 13
Activities described in the CD, and shall not be modified, suspended, terminated or revoked
without express written authorization by U.S. EPA, with the approval of DNRE. The Grantor
or any subsequent owner of the Property may seek to modify or terminate, in whole or in part,
the restrictions set forth herein by submitting to U.S. EPA a written application that identifies
each such restriction to be terminated or modified, describes the terms of each proposed
modification, and sets out any proposed revisions to the environmental easement/restrictive
covenants in this Declaration. Each application for termination or modification of any
restriction or easement set forth herein shall include a demonstration by the applicant that the
requested termination or modification will not interfere with, impair or reduce:
a) the effectiveness of any measures undertaken pursuant to the CD;
b) the long term protectiveness of the remediation; or
c) protection of human health and the environment.
If U.S. EPA makes a determination that an application satisfies the requirements of
this paragraph, including the criteria specified in (a) through (c), U.S. EPA will notify the
owner of the Property in writing. If U.S. EPA does not respond in writing within 90 days to
an application to modify or terminate any restrictions, U.S. EPA shall be deemed to have
denied Owner's application. Any modification to or rescission of this Declaration of
Restrictive Covenants and Environmental Protection Easement shall be filed with the appropriate
Registrar of Deeds and a certified copy shall be returned to DNRE and U.S. EPA at the addresses
listed below.
12. Enforcement. The Grantor, Grantee or Third Party Beneficiary, each acting
independently and without the others, shall be entitled to enforce the terms of this Declaration in
a judicial action seeking specific performance or other applicable remedies at law or in equity. The
right to so enforce the conditions and restrictions in this Declaration are in addition to any other
remedies that may be available, including, but not limited to, remedies under CERCLA. Whether
to enforce the terms of this Declaration or to participate in an enforcement action brought by any
of the others shall be at the sole discretion of the Grantor, Grantee and/or the Third Party Beneficiary
and any forbearance, delay or omission to exercise any of their rights under this Declaration in the
event of a breach of any term of this Declaration shall not be deemed a waiver by any such party of
any such term, or any other term, or any rights of any of the Grantor, Grantee or Third Party
Beneficiary under this Declaration. This Declaration and the rights and restrictions granted
herein shall not inure to the benefit of the public in general.
13. Transfer of Interest. The Owner shall provide notice to the DNRE and to U.S. EPA of the
Owner's intent to transfer any interest in the Property, or any portion thereof, at least fourteen (14)
business days prior to consummating the conveyance. A conveyance of title, easement, or other interest
in the Property shall not be consummated by the Owner without complete provision for compliance
2010-023169 07/22/2010 03:37:52 PM
Paons: 8 of 22 REST •
( MILLER CANFIELD
t Timothy A. Snow County CJark/Register Kalamazoo County MI
-------
Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, Kalamazoo, MI
Declaration of Restrictive Covenants
Page 9 of 13
with the terms and conditions of this Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Environmental
Protection Easement and the applicable provisions of Section 20116 of the NREPA, as determined
by U.S. EPA and DNRE. The Owner shall include in any instrument conveying any interest in any
portion of the Property, including but not limited to, deeds, leases, and mortgages, a notice which
is in substantially the following form:
NOTICE: THE INTEREST CONVEYED HEREBY IS SUBJECT TO A
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AND
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION EASEMENT, DATED ,
2009, AND RECORDED WITH THE KALAMAZOO COUNTY REGISTER
OF DEEDS, DOC. NO. . THESE RIGHTS AND
RESTRICTIONS RUN WITH THE LAND AND ARE ENFORCEABLE BY THE
GRANTOR, GRANTEE AND THE THIRD PARTY BENEFICIARY
IDENTIFIED THEREIN.
14. Reservation of Defenses. Nothing in this Declaration shall be construed to enlarge the
jurisdiction of federal courts, to create subject matter jurisdiction to adjudicate any claims against
U.S. EPA or DNRE, or otherwise to operate as a waiver of any sovereign immunity of the United
States or the State of Michigan, and the United States and DNRE expressly reserve all rights and
defenses they may have in connection with any action initiated pursuant to this Declaration. Nothing
herein shall be construed as Grantor's waiver of any rights or defenses available at law, in equity,
provided by any statute or by any state and federal constitution.
15. Notices. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, or communication that is required
to be made or obtained under this Declaration shall be made in writing and include a statement that the
notice is being made pursuant to the requirements of this Declaration and shall be served either personally
or sent via first class mail, postage prepaid, as follows:
For the U.S. EPA:
Director
Superfund Division (SR-6J)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5
77 West Jackson Blvd.
Chicago, IL 60604
with a copy to:
Office of Regional counsel (C-14J)
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5
77 West Jackson Blvd. ,nioI
ru. TT 2010-023169 07/22/2010 03;37-52 PM
Chicago, IL 60604 Pa?": 9 of 22 rest rn
6 niLLER CflNFIELD
MUUU %lTi».C^/Re9l*,er County ni
9
-------
Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfijnd Site, Kalamazoo, MI
Declaration of Restrictive Covenants
Pagei0ofl3
For the DNRE:
Chief
Remediation and Redevelopment Division
Michigan Department of Natural Resources and the Environment
P.O. Box 30426
Lansing, MI 48909-7926
16. Miscellaneous.
a) Controlling Law. The interpretation and performance of this Declaration shall be
governed by the laws of the United States as to the obligations referred to in the CD, and
by the laws and regulations of the State of Michigan for all other purposes hereunder
(without reference to choice of laws principles thereof). The right to enforce the
conditions and restrictions in this instrument are in addition to other rights and
remedies that may be available/including, but not limited to, administrative and
judicial remedies under CERCLA or Part 201 of the NREPA.
b) Liberal Construction. Any general rule of construction to the contrary
notwithstanding, this Declaration shall be liberally construed to affect the purpose of
this Declaration and the policy and purpose of CERCLA and the land use
restrictions and prospective use limitations of the State of Michigan. If any
provision of this Declaration is found to be ambiguous, an interpretation consistent with
the purpose of this Declaration that would render the provision valid shall be favored
over any interpretation that would render it invalid.
c) Severability. If any provision of this Declaration is held to be invalid by any court
of competent jurisdiction, the invalidity of such provision shall not affect the validity
of any other provision hereof and all other provisions shall continue unimpaired and
in full force and effect.
d) Entire Agreement. This Declaration supersedes all prior discussions, negotiations,
understandings, or agreements relating to the matters addressed herein, all of which are
merged herein.
e) Successors. The covenants, terms, conditions, and restrictions of this Declaration
shall be binding upon, and inure to the benefit of Grantor and Grantee and their agents,
successors, and assign and any subsequent owners, occupants or other persons
acquiring ail interest in the Property and their respective agents, successors and assigns.
The rights, but not the obligations or authorities, of the US. EPA are freely assignable
to any public entity, subject to the notice to the Grantor, its successors and assigns, as
their interests appear in the public tide records kept and maintained by the Kalamazoo
County Registrar of Deeds.
2010-023169 07/22/2010 03:37:52 Ptt
Passe: 10 of 22 REST
Timothy ft0Snow County Clertt/Registor Kalamazoo County M
Bin wmhjh ¦
-------
Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, Kalamazoo, MI
Declaration of Restrictive Covenants
Page 11 of 13
17, Exhibits.
Exhibit 1—Legal Description of the Property.
Exhibit 2 — Survey of the Property generally depicting the landfill relative to the
Property boundaries, and the location of the permanent markers.
Exhibit 3 — Description of Allowable Uses
18. Authority to Execute Restrictive Covenant and Environmental Protection
Easement. The undersigned person executing this Declaration on behalf of the Owner represents and
certifies that the Grantor has good and sufficient title to the Property described in Exhibit 1 and that he
or she is duly authorized and has been empowered to execute and deliver this Declaration of
Restrictive Covenants and Environmental Protection Easement.
2010-023169 07/22/2010 03:37:52 PM
P«oes: 11 of 22 REST
MILLER CANFIELD
Timothy ft.-Snow County Clerk/Raoister Kalamazoo County MI
nil riiwMwniMy n
n
-------
Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, Kalamazoo, MI
Declaration of Restrictive Covenants
Page 12 of 13
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County Registrar of Deeds has caused this
Declaration of Restrictive G«veriants and Environmental Protection Easement to be
executed on this of . 2010.
FOR Georgia-Pacific, LLC
Signature: / / Date: 07/2Z/Z&l & . 2010
Name (print): Garry T/Griffith ^ /Y
Title: U/rtC&f ftM IXYmrf
Address: 133 Peachtree Street, N.E.
Atlanta, GA 30303
STATE OF MICHIGAN )
)
COUNTY OF KALAMAZOO )
On this^^day of v) ^ 1 V , 2010, before me appeared Garry T. Griffith, the .^tf
flp £» 5gKjt/,c o of Georgia-Pacific, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, known to be
the person who executed the foregoing document.
Y\
f\)AVZ- y , Notary Public
UcL\\ ^ County,
My Commission Expires: O / -/ o - ^3
-------
Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, Kalamazoo, MI
Declaration of Restrictive Covenants
Page 13 of 13
FOR the Michigan Department of Natural Resources and the Environment
Signature; Date:_ 2010
Name (prinfl: fiAAfLoc^
/Itsit v-*L3y?)Y*-*4- bi\M4$cr*.
Address: ^ Remediation and Redevelopment Division
Michigan Department of
Natural Resources and the Environment
P.O. Box 30426
Lansing, MI 48909-7926
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COUNTY OF INGHAM
On this AD^ay of Qll/flj-' 2010, before me appeared1
}gj^ of the Michigan Department of Natural Resource
igan Department of Natural Resources ^and the Envir^
lown t&be the person who executed the foregoing document.
KATHLEEN J. SRUBA
NOTATY PU8UC - STATE OF MSCHKJAN
COUNTY OF EATON
My Conuirtwlon Exp^SiptlS, 2012
Acting in the County —
My Commission Expires:
, Notary Public
County, Michigan
2010-023169 07/22/2013 03:37:52 Pfl
Pages; 13 of 22 REST
Timothy Sriou County Clerk/Raslster (Ulamazoo County MI
13
-------
Prepared by and after recording return to:
Ronald E. Baylor, Esq.
Miller, Canfield, Paddock and Stone, P.L.C.
277 South Rose Street, Suite 5000
Kalamazoo, Michigan 49007
269-381-7030
2010-023169 07/22/2010 03:37:52 PM
Pases: (4 of 22 REST
CULLER CANFIELD
Timothy ft. Snou County Clerk/Register Kalamazoo County MI
liMLUJ IULIUIIL JUJUUIJ UJLI MJll UJ.f LUU g|
-------
EXHIBIT 1 - Legal Description
CONSENT DECREE
FOR THE DESIGN AND IMPLEMENTATION OF CERTAIN RESPONSE ACTIONS
AT OPERABLE UNIT 2 OF THE
ALLIED PAPER, INC./PORTAGE CREEK/KALAMAZOO RIVER SUPERFUND SITE
A. Willow Boulevard Landfill, including the Willow Boulevard Drainaaewav
Tax ID No. 39-06-24-195-010:
Real estate situated in the Township of Kalamazoo, County of Kalamazoo, State of Michigan,
described as follows:
Commencing at the West lA post of Section 24, T2S, R11W, Kalamazoo
Township, Kalamazoo County, Michigan; thence North 00°00'00" East along the
West line of said Section, 480.00 feet for the place of beginning of the land
hereinafter described; thence along an intermediate traverse line along the former
and present bank of the Kalamazoo River for the next 11 courses: North
03°28'14" East, 124.71 feet; thence North 09°00'57" East, 100.85 feet; thence
North 55°30'25" East, 107.12 feet; thence South 86°49'05" East, 263.42 feet;
thence north 66°36'14" East, 131.42 feet; thence South 64°46>29" East, 172.14
feet; thence South 54°56'07" East, 60.53 feet; thence South 55°08'59" East,
229.48 feet; thence South 18°53'55" West, 103.80 feet; thence South 32°58'13"
East, 62.74 feet; thence South 64°02'06" East, 28.26 feet; thence South 54°17'40"
East, 165.34 feet to the most Northerly corner of Lot "A", Field Addition, as
recorded in Liber 7 of Plats on Page 19, Kalamazoo County Records; thence
Westerly along the Northerly boundary of Field Addition and the Southerly bank
of the former Kalamazoo River location, 1,200 feet, more or less, to the place of
beginning. Together with all land lying between the intermediate traverse line
and along the former and present bank of the Kalamazoo River.
B. A-Site Landfill including the Area South of the A-Site Berm (including former Olmstead
Creek): the Area East of Davis Creek: and the AMW-3A Area:
Real estate situated in the Township of Kalamazoo, County of Kalamazoo, State of Michigan,
described as follows:
Parcels 4 & 6. Tax ID Nos. 39-06-24-306-980 (Parcel 4); 39-06-24-195-010 (Parcel 6):
Commencing at the East 1/4 post of Section 24, T. 2 S., R. 11 W., Kalamazoo
Township, Kalamazoo County, Michigan; thence North 89°-4r-27" West along
the East and West 1/4 line, 2,648.87 feet to the center 1/4 post of said Section and
the place of beginning of the land hereinafter described; thence continuing along
2010-023169 07/22/2010 03:37:52 PM
Pages: 15 of 22 REST
MILLER CANFIELD
«m?Lh£ Clerk/Reaiiter K*lam»zoo County HI
-------
the East and West 1/4 line, North 89°-39'-47" West, 160.00 feet; thence South 12°-
25-11" East, 321.07 feet; thence North 89°-39'-47" West parallel with the East and
West 1/4 line, 150.00 feet to the Northeast corner of Lot 6, Field Addition, as
recorded in Liber 7 of Plats on Page 19, Kalamazoo County Records; thence along
a Reference Line along the original location of Olmstead Creek (no longer exists)
as defined in the recorded plat of Field Addition for the next 19 courses: North
06°-59'-22" West, 123.39 feet; thence North 88o-34'-50" West, 185.73 feet; thence
North 810-15'-19" West, 30.05 feet; thence South 34°-28,-39" West, 49.94 feet;
thence South 6T-2\'45v West, 44.10 feet; thence North 76°-30,-07" West, 79.72
feet; thence South 89°-12'-27" West, 146.25 feet; thence North 65°-00'-00" East,
48,96 feet; thence North 25°-02'-44" West, 119.53 feet; thence South 65°-07'-20"
West, 152.04 feet; thence North 58°-20'-09" West, 99.86 feet; thence North 64°-
00'-40" West, 99.73 feet; thence South 82°-37'-27" West, 74.56 feet to the
Northwest corner of Lot 25 of said Field Addition; thence continuing along said
Reference Line, North 30°-47'-39" East, 150.00 feet; thence North 69°-09'-52"
West, 174.77 feet; thence North 09°-35'-04" West, 111.38 feet; thence South 81°-
07'-40" West, 100.97 feet; thence North 38°-30*-10" West, 100.00 feet; thence
South 75°-53'-l7" West, 100.00 feet to the end of said Reference Line and the
most Easterly corner of Lot "A" of Field Addition; thence Westerly along the
Southerly line of Lot "A", 196.91 feet along a non-tangent curve to the left with a
radius of 591.00 feet and a chord bearing South 86°-34'-39" West, 196.00 feet to
the most Westerly corner of Lot "A"; thence North 61°-06'-40" East along the
Northerly line of Lot "A", 128.40 feet to the most Northerly corner of Lot "A" and
the beginning of an Intermediate Traverse line along the former and present
Kalamazoo River; thence along said Traverse line along the former bank of the
Kalamazoo River for the next 5 courses: North 54°-17'-40" West, 165.34 feet;
thence North 65°-02'-06" West, 28.26 feet; thence North 32°-58'-13" West, 62.74
feet; thence North 18°-53'-55" East, 103.80 feet; thence North 37o-44'-01" East,
47.17 feet to the end of the Traverse line along the former River bank and the
beginning of an Intermediate Traverse line along the present Kalamazoo River;
thence along said Traverse line for the next 12 courses: North 82°-'59'-59" East,
155.85 feet; thence North 88°-53'-28" East, 322.27 feet; thence North 80°-45'-46"
East, 162.22 feet; thence North 77°-49'-31" East, 115.64 feet; thence South 87°-
20'-00" East, 198.40 feet; thence North 81°-39'-50n East, 163.96 feet; thence South
88°-52'-19" East, 120.25 feet; thence North 80°-43'-58" East, 160.64 feet; thence
South 78°-28'-42" East, 38.00 feet; thence North 77o-12'-10" East, 90.18 feet;
thence North 79°-43,-14" East, 210.00 feet; thence North 18°-16'-32" East, 40.00
feet to the North and South 1/4 line of said Section and the end of the Intermediate
Traverse line; thence South 00°-08'-38" East along said 1/4 line, 817.50 feet to the
place of beginning. Together with all land lying between the Reference Line and
the location of Olmstead Creek as established by the plat of Field Addition. Also
all land lying between the Intermediate Traverse line along the former and present
Kalamazoo River. Containing 29.65 acres ±.
2010-023159 07/22/2010 03:37:52 PM
Paeas: 16 of 22 REST
niLLER CflNFIELD
Timothy ft. Snow County Clerk/Register Kalamazoo County Ml
Ni mil
-------
Parcel 1 l.Tax ID Nos. 39-06-24-305-360, 39-06-24-305-420, 39-06-24-305-430:
Real estate situated in the Township of Kalamazoo, County of Kalamazoo, State of Michigan,
described as follows:
Lots 36, 42 and 43, Field Addition according to the Plat therof as recorded in
Liber 7 of Plats on Page 19, Kalamazoo County Records.
Lot 36 contains 0.36 acres ±, Lots 42 and 43 contain 0.36 acres ±.
Parcel 13. Tax ID No. 39-06-24-340-016:
Real estate situated in the Township of Kalamazoo, County of Kalamazoo, State of Michigan,
described as follows:
Beginning at the center of Section 24, T2S, R11W; thence South along the North
and South lA line 667.17 feet; thence Northwesterly parallel with Lake Street
244.73 feet; thence Northerly to its intersection with Olmstead Creek and the
East line of the recorded Plat of Field Addition, according to the Plat thereof as
recorded in Liber 7 of Plats on Page 19, Kalamazoo County Records; thence
Easterly 150 feet to the centerline of Olmstead Drain; thence Northerly along said
drain to the East and West % line of said Section; thence Easterly thereon 160
feet to the place of beginning.
Being more particularly described as follows:
Commencing at the East % Post, Section 24, T2S, R11W, Kalamazoo Township,
Kalamazoo County, Michigan; thence North 89°4P27" West along the East and
West V* line of said Section, 2,648.87 feet to the center % Post of said Section;
thence South 00°02'33" West along the North and South lA line, 667.17 feet;
thence North 82 02'22" West parallel with Lake Street, 242.33 feet (recorded as
244.73 feet) to the East line of Field Addition according to the Plat thereof as •
recorded in Liber 7 of Plats on Page 19, Kalamazoo County records; thence
North 00°04'51" West along the East line of said Plat, 321,88 feet to the former
location of Olmstead Creek; thence South 89°39'47" East parallel with the East
and West % line, 150.00 feet to the center line of former, location of Olmstead
Drain; thence North 12°25'11" West along the former location of said drain,
321.07 feet to the East and West XA line of said Section; thence south 89°39'47"
East thereon, 160.00 feet to the beginning. Containing 2.77 acres ±.
2010-023169 07/22/2010 03:37;52 PM
Pusei; 17 of 22 REST
MlLER CANFIELD
Timothy ft. Snow County Clerk/Register Kalamazoo County MI
-------
EXHIBIT 2 - Survey of Property and Permanent Marker Locations
2010-023169 07/Z2/2010 03s37:52 PH
Pages: IB of 22 REST
MILLER CANFIELD
Timothy ft. Snow County Clark/Register Kalamazoo County MI
-------
(
EXHIBIT 3 - Description of Allowable Uses
The primary activity at the Property is and shall continue to be industrial in nature (e.g.,
manufacturing, utilities, industrial research and development, petroleum bulk storage).
Access to the property is and shall continue to be reliably restricted consistent with its use (e.g.,
by fences, security personnel, or both).
The allowable land use includes property that is currently zoned industrial or is anticipated to be
zoned as industrial. This may include different zoning designations, depending on the
community, such as "light industrial" or "heavy industrial," but does not include any use the
zoning designation may include that allows for residential use or permanent residence on the
property. Inactive or abandoned properties can be included in this category if the use was and/or
will be industrial, as described above and access is controlled as necessary to assure
unacceptable exposures do not occur. The industrial category does not include any form of
residential use, farms or agricultural use, gasoline service stations, and other establishments
where children may commonly be present.
i
i
2010-023169 07/22/2010 03:37:52 Ptl
Pases: 19 or 22 REST
MILLER CftNFIELO
Timothy ft. Snow County Clerk/Rsglsler Kalamazoo County HI
'.IWLwr m uo.d
-------
&
- t*
Lt3 M
Is 3
wll
«;I MI
w i
^3V I'mvh snanj ,w)
P\ 1
J " W6«"WaLffFRS-
UOfiOSE AVEHUC
(Ma MLB ML*.)
Mom
THIS DRAWNO
REPRESENTS ONLY A
SKETCH OF THC
PARCEL AND IS NOT
INTENDED TO BE
interpreted AS A
boundary survey.
= PERMANENT MARKER
= 150"
PARCEL SKETCH OF PARCELS 4, 8
-------
PARCEL SKETCH OF PARCEL 12
LOCATED IN SECTION 24, T. 2 S., R. 11 W.
KALAMAZOO TOWNSHIP, KALAMAZOO COUNTY, MICHIGAN
BY
Preiri&Newfrof
EngmeOT»Shim^r»BEnvironmentdfeSoili laboratory
= PERMANENT MARKER ' 7123STADIUM DRIVE
KALAMAZOO, MICHIGAN 49009
PHONE: (269) 372-1158
-------
PARCEL SKETCH OF PARCEL 13
LOCATED IN SECTION 24, T. 2 S., R. 11 W.
KALAMAZOO TOWNSHIP, KALAMAZOO COUNTY. MICHIGAN
BY
Prem&dNevvfaof
Engineer • Surveyor! ¦ Environmental &Soil* Laboratory
7123 STADIUM DRIVE
KALAMAZOO, MICHIGAN 49009
PHONE: (269) 372-115B
MAY 19, 2010
PR0NI
SCALE: 1* = 100'
= PERMANENT MARKER
THJS GRAYING REPRESJMIS OMLV A SWrflSc Of
Of THE PARCEL AND IS HOT IHTDfMSWer,.,,upiiftl
IKTCRPRETED AS A BOUNDARY »* \
/ / MiLLIftON
i, t UNO J , j
• SUBVEVOft 1*3
**28416/ /
B^ft HDf A. UUMON
UCtMSED UNO SURVEYOR fZMIS
2010-023169 07/22/2010 03:37:52 PM
Puti: 22 of 22 REST
nrltEft CANFIELD , . „
Tleothy ft. Snow County C)erk/Re9ist«r K*)ftn«Z0» County I
B!
-------
Attachment 6
Restrictive Covenant for OU 4
-------
1111
USER
«S6? 1
£ " 1
~ 3
declaration of restrictive covenant
Grantor:
Plainwell Inc.
"wrwwr
RLtESW COUNTY
RECORDED
23 RPR 28B4 9:&M1 R
JOYCE fi. IWTTS
BEBISTEK OT DFFflS
O
c3
T>
rx>
to
to
ro
CD
o
-------
¦illlinilllHI UBEB 2662 pme 619
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
MDEQ Reference No.: RC-KRD 03-052
U.S. EPA Site No.: 059B ,
This Declaration of Restrictive Covenant ("Restrictive Covenant") has been recorded
with the Allegan County Register of Deeds for the puipose of protecting public health, safety,
and welfare, and the environment by prohibiting or restricting activities that could result in
unacceptable exposure to environmental contamination present at the 1201 Street Landfill
property, as legally described in Exhibit 1 attached hereto ("Property").
The Property is associated with the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River
Superfund Site (the "Site"). The Site was placed on the National Priorities List on August 30,
1990, and is a facility, as that term is defined in Part 201, Environmental Remediation, of the
Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451, as amended, MCL
324.20101 et seq. ("NREPA"). The Property comprises a portion of the 12th Street Operable
Unit #4 of the Site for which on-going remedial actions are being conducted in accordance with
the Record of Decision ("ROD") issued by the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
("MDEQ") and concurred with by the United States Environmental Protection Agency
("USEPA") on September 28, 2001 pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation, and Liability Act, 42 USC 9601 et seq., ("CERCLA"). Information pertaining to
the environmental conditions at the Property and the remedial actions to be undertaken at the
Property is on file with the USEPA and the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
("MDEQ"), Remediation and Redevelopment Division.
This Restrictive Covenant has been recorded to: 1) restrict unacceptable exposures to
hazardous substances located on the Property; 2) assure that the use of Property is consistent with
the exposure assumptions and control measures required pursuant to the ROD; and 3) to prevent
damage or disturbance of any element of the remedial action constructed on the Property. The
restrictions contained in this Restrictive Covenant are based upon information available to the
USEPA and MDEQ al the time the ROD was issued. Failure of the response activities to achieve
and maintain the criteria, exposure controls, and requirements specified in the ROD; future
changes in the environmental condition of the Property or changes in the cleanup criteria
developed under CERCLA and the NREPA; the discovery of environmental conditions at the
Property that were not accounted for in the ROD; or use of the Property in a manner inconsistent
with the restrictions described herein, may result in this Restrictive Covenant not being
protective of public health, safety, and welfare, and the environment.
Property Identification Number: 0317-024-047-00
Exhibit 2 provides a survey of the Property that is subject to the land use or resource use
restrictions specified herein.
Summary of Remedial Actions
The Property was historically used as a land fill "for wastes and residuals associated with
the manufacturing and recycling of paper. Response activities to be undertaken at the Property
a
o
CM
C»
cr
a_
<£
a
<_>
Li f
or
-------
¦Illlilllllllin »2662 p«620
R26GZ 620 3
as part of the remedial action required under the ROD to assure the protection of public health,
safety and welfare, and the environment and ensure the integrity of the remedy include, but are
not necessarily limited to: the construction of a landfill cap and containment systems to contain
paper residuals and soils and sediments contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls ("PCBs)
and prevent the erosion of PCB contaminated materials into the Kalamazoo River; construction
and maintenance of a fence; construction, operation and maintenance of groundwater monitoring
system; and establishment of the land use and resource use restrictions contained herein.
Definitions
"MDEQ" means the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, its successor
entities, and those persons or entities acting on its behalf.
"Owner" means, at any given time, the then current title holder of the Property or any
portion thereof.
"Owners Subsequent to Plainwell" means, at any given time, the then current title holder
of the Property or any portion thereof, except for Plainwell Inc.
"Plainwell" shall mean Plainwell Inc., the owner of the Property as of the date of the
execution of this Restrictive Covenant, and the Owner for as long as Plainwell Inc. is a current
title holder of the Property or any portion thereof.
"USEPA" shall mean the United States Environmental Protection Agency, its successor
entities and those persons or entities acting on its behalf.
All other terms used in this document which are defined in Part 3, Definitions, of the
NREPA; Part 201 of the NREPA; or the Part 201 Administrative Rules ('Tart 201 Rules"), 1990
AACS R 299.5101 et seq., shall have the same meaning in this document as in Parts 3 and 201 of
the NREPA and the Part 201 Rules, as of the date of filing of this Restrictive Covenant.
NOW THEREFORE,
Plainwell Inc., as Owner of the Property, hereby declares and covenants that the Property
shall be subject to the following restrictions and conditions:
Declaration of Land Use or Resource Use Restrictions
1. The Owner shall prohibit all uses of the Property that are not compatible with the
Property's zoned industrial land use designation, the limited industrial land use category under
Section 20120a(l)(i) of the NREPA or other use that is consistent with the assumptions and basis
for the cleanup criteria developed pursuant to Section 20120a(l)(i) of the NREPA. Cleanup
criteria for land use-based response activities are located in the Government Documents Section
of the State of Michigan Library.
2. The Owner shall prohibit use of the Property or portions thereof, for any of the
following purposes:
2
-------
¦illlimillllllllllll UBEB 2662 ph621
R2SS2 621 4
(a) A residence, including any mobile home or factory built housing, constructed
or installed for use as residential human habitation;
(b) A hospital for humans.
(c) A public or private school for persons under 21 years of age.
(d) A day care center for children.
(e) Any purpose involving residential occupancy on a 24-hour basis.
(f) Any other use that would disturb or penetrate the landfill cover or erosion
control system as set forth in the ROD.
3. Owners Subsequent to Plainwell shall prohibit activities, and Plainwell shall not
perform any activities, on the Property that may result in exposures above levels established in
the ROD. These prohibited activities include:
(a) Any excavation, drilling, penetration or other disturbance of the surface or
subsurface soils on the Property except as necessitated for compliance with the O&M
plan or conducted in accordance with any work plan approved or modified by U.S. EPA
with MDEQ concurrence. All excavation, drilling, penetration or other disturbance of the
surface or subsurface soils on the Property must be conducted in accordance with a health
and safety plan that complies with the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 20
CFR 1910.120 and the Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Act.
(b) Any construction of buildings on the Property unless plans are submitted to
and approved by the MDEQ and U.S. EPA. Any new construction must satisfy the
indoor air inhalation criteria of Part 201.
4. Owners Subsequent to Plainwell shall prohibit activities, and Plainwell shall not
perform any activities, on the Property that may interfere with any element of the ROD,
including the performance of operation and maintenance activities, monitoring, or other
measures necessary to ensure the effectiveness and integrity of the remedy.
5. The MDEQ or USEPA may require modifications to the restrictions contained in this
Restrictive Covenant as necessary to assure the integrity and effectiveness of the remedial action
required under the ROD or assure the protection of the public health, safety, welfare and the
environment.
6. Owners Subsequent to Plainwell shall comply with the applicable requirements of
Section 20107a of the NREPA and Part 10 of the Part 201 Administrative Rules.
7. Permanent Markers. The Owner shall not remove, cover, obscure, or otherwise alter
or interfere with the permanent markers placed on the Property pursuant to the ROD. Owners
Subsequent to Plainwell shall keep vegetation and other materials clear of the permanent markers
to assure that the markers are readily visible.
3
-------
¦llllllllilll «2662 fK622
R25fc2 WZ 5
8. Contaminated Soil Management. Owners Subsequent to Plainwell shall manage all
soils, media and/or debris located on the Property in accordance with, and Plainwell shall refrain
from managing soils, media and/or debris located on the Property in contravention of, the
applicable requirements of Section 20120c of the NREPA; Part 111, Hazardous Waste
Management, of the NREPA; Subtitle C of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42
U.S.C. Section 6901 et seq.; the administrative rules promulgated thereunder; and all other
relevant state and federal laws.
9. Access. The Owner shall grant to the MDEQ, USEPA, as a third-party beneficiaiy,
and their designated representatives an irrevocable, permanent and continuing right of access to
enter the Property at reasonable times for the purpose of:
(a) Overseeing and/or implementing the response actions required in the ROD,
including but not limited to installation of a landfill cover system that complies with the
relevant portions of Part 201 of the NREPA and conducting any necessary inspection and
repair of the capped areas;
(b) Verifying any data or information submitted to USEPA and/or MDEQ and
determining and monitoring compliance with the ROD and any implementing Statement
of Work;
(c) Verifying that no action is being taken on the Property in violation of the
terms of this instrument or of any federal or state environmental laws or regulations;
(d) Monitoring response actions at the 12th St. Operable Unit and at the Site and
conducting investigations relating to contamination on or near the Site, including, without
limitations, sampling of air, water, sediments, soils, and specifically, without limitation,
obtaining split or duplicate samples;
(e) Conducting periodic reviews of the response action, including but not limited
to, reviews required by applicable statutes and/or regulations; and
(f) Implementing additional or new response actions if USEPA and the MDEQ
determine: i) that such actions are necessary to protect public health, safety, welfare, or
the environment because either the response action has proven to be ineffective or
because new technology has been developed which will accomplish the purposes of the
response action in a significantly more efficient or cost effective manner; and, ii) that the
additional or new response actions will not impose any significantly greater burden on the
Property or unduly interfere with the then existing uses of the Property.
Nothing in this Restrictive Covenant shall limit or otherwise affect USEPA's or MDEQ's
right of entry and access or authorities to take response activities pursuant to CERCLA, the
National Contingency Plan, 40 C.F.R. Part 300, Part 201 of the NREPA and the successor
statutory provisions, or state or federal law.
10. Transfer of Interest. The Owner shall provide notice to the USEPA and MDEQ of the
Owner's intent to transfer any interest in the Property at least fourteen (14) business days prior to
consummating the conveyance. A conveyance of title, easement, or other interest in the Property
4
-------
IIIUIIIIIfllM liber 2662 w623
A2G68 S53 6
shall not be consummated by the Owner unless the Owner complies with the applicable
provisions of Section 20116 of the NREPA. A copy of this Restrictive Covenant shall be
provided to all future owners, heirs, successors,, lessees, easement holders, assigns, and
transferees by the person transferring the interest. The Owner shall include in any instrument
conveying any interest in the Property or portion thereof, including but, not limited to, deeds,
leases, and mortgages a notice which is in substantially the following form:
NOTICE: THE INTEREST CONVEYED HEREBY IS SUBJECT TO A
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT, DATED , 200_, AND
RECORDED WITH THE ALLEGAN COUNTY REGISTER OF DEEDS, LIBER ,
PAGE .
11. Notices. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, or communication that is
required to be made or obtained under this Restrictive Covenant shall be made in writing and
include a statement that the notice is being made pursuant to the requirements of this Restrictive
Covenant, MDEQ Reference Number RC-RRD-03-052 and U.S. EPA Site No. 059B and shall
be served either personally or sent via first class mail, postage prepaid, as follows:
For USEPA: Mr. Timothy Prendiville
Remedial Project Manager
U.S. EPA
77 West Jackson Blvd. SR-6J
Chicago, Illinois 60604
Eileen L. Furey
Associate Regional Counsel
U.S. EPA Region 5
77 West Jackson Blvd. C-14J
Chicago, IL 60604
For MDEQ: Director
Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
P.O. Box 30473
Lansing, Michigan 48909-7973
12. Term and Enforcement of Restrictive Covenant. This Restrictive Covenant shall run
with the Property and shall be binding on the Owner; future owners; and all current and future
successors, lessees, easement holders, their assigns, and their authorized agents, employees, or
persons acting under their direction and control. This Restrictive Covenant may only be
modified or rescinded with the written approval of the USEPA and MDEQ.
The State of Michigan, through the MDEQ, the Owner, and the United States on behalf of
USEPA, as a third party beneficiary, may enforce the restrictions set forth in this Restrictive
Covenant by legal action in a court of competent jurisdiction.
13. Severability. If any provision of this Restrictive Covenant is held to be invalid by any
court of competent jurisdiction, the invalidity of such provision shall not affect the validity of
5
-------
nuiimniiiinw p«624
A26E2 62* 7
any other provisions hereof, and all such other provisions shall continue unimpaired and in full
force and effect.
14. Authority to Execute Restrictive Covenant. The undersigned person executing this
Restrictive Covenant is the Owner and represents and certifies that he or she is duly authorized
and has been empowered to execute and deliver this Restrictive Covenant.
15. Nothing in this Restrictive Covenant affects Plainwell's obligations, if any, under Part
201 of the NREPA, CERCLA, or other State or federal laws, subject to the terms and limitations
of the Environmental Settlement Agreement, dated as of October 29, 2003, as may be amended
from time to time, among: (a) the United States of America, on behalf of the United States
Environmental Protection Agency, the United States Department of the Interior, and the National
Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of the United States Department of Commerce, and
including all departments, agencies and instrumentalities of the United States; (b) the State of
Michigan, on behalf of Michael A. Cox, Attorney General for the State of Michigan, the
Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, and all other departments, agencies and
instrumentalities of the State of Michigan; (c) Colonial Heights Packaging, Inc.; (d) Philip
Morris USA, Inc.; (e) Chesapeake Corporation; (f) Simpson Paper Company; (g) Plainwell
Holding Company; and (h) Plainwell Inc., the final version of which, sifter publication in the
Federal Register for the thirty-day public comment period specified by 42 U.S.C. § 9622(i), will
be filed with the United States District Court for the District of Delaware.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Plainwell Inc. has caused this Restrictive Covenant to be
executed on this day of , 2004.
Plainwell Inc.
6
-------
STATE OF MICHIGAN
ue 2662 page 625
A26S2 625 0
COUNTY OF ALLEGAN
Personally came before me this 1.Q day of (V [a. CcJ\ . 2004, the above-named Jeff
Arnesen as Chief Financial Officer of Plainwell, Inc. to me known to be the person who executed
the foregoing instrument an acknowledge the same.
RENEE ARLEEN WEISS
NOTARY PUBLIC
MINNESOTA
R- We;^>s>
[Print or type name]
[Commissioned in] County
My Commission Expires: 3!Lc^5
. HClUQPiO
~SajT\ 31.
This instrument was prepared by
And after recording, should be returned to:
Pamela E. Barker
Godfrey & Kahn, S.C.
780 North Water Street
Milwaukee, WT 53202
7
-------
11111111111111111)111 iK9 2662 p«626
RS6S2 fiSE 9
EXHIBIT 1
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
All that part of the east 'A, lying West and South of the Kalamazoo River and described as:
Commencing at a point 2078.3 feet North of the South % post of said Section, thence East 377
feet, thence North 264 feet, thence East 255 feet, to the low water mark of the Kalamazoo River,
thence Northerly and Westerly along said low water mark of the Kalamazoo River to the North
and South V< line of Section 24, thence South along said % line to the point of beginning, Section
24, Town 1 North, Range 12 West. Together with an easement for ingress and egress running
from subject property to Highway M-89 as set forth in deed recorded in Liber 487 on Page 112.
-------
EXHIBIT 2
FT
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
-/V '/t Ctft.j sec-r/a*/ 2+
LIBER 2662 PAGE 627
f
%$\&>!-+a-£
ft/lGEi- S
23.BfAc.lJi-
i
fc 5
I
s
I
N
I
o g «,
S2EL
5fe52:
o « o,
»h2
Q 2 tq I
Z fS y ¦
'(¦bw
O O o
fe§5s;
S8yj2Ji~£\
5^9:
SB3'3Z'16'E
1^3 1
377.00
® / syit Cox., S£cr/av <2f-
M:
V
4
5 J9 I
"* * RWBX. T/£C . /V1>T -^£Tm
LEGEM:,
O - 1/2* IRON SET
• - CORNER FOUND
R - "RECORDED AS"
&' /So'
6oo *
BEARING SOURCE; Pmor &e/iei/ey Pt^s7a/
LOCATION:.
^jL
OTS£(SO
, SECTION_^2_ T/V -R tz&.
Tip., m MICHIGAN.
CERTIFIED Tf> S/ft Psoas fj.»/*/coE£-c. t~<,.
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE SURVEYED AND MAPPED THE LAND
ABOVE PUTTED AND/OR DESCRIBED ON THIS DATE, AND THAT THE
RATIO OF CLOSURE ON THE UNADJUSTED HELD OBSERVATIONS WAS ¦
t--. AND THAT All OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF P.A. 132,
1970 HA^ BEEN COUPUED WITH.
DATE; le-'B-l*
BERYL M. JONES,
Ml# 23514 ~?£ze>6ue"
WIGHTMAN MOORED, INC.
itii inwii i»|t—/V
114 CHD1MVT ST. AlUOA*, M 4»010
(•<<) (75—14*3 FAX (71-M4
-------
JOYCE A. WATTS
ALLEGAN COUNTY
REGISTER OF OGED5 OFFICE
4/23/2004 F:(Ks+l Aft
RECEIPT R5053u, REGISTER 3
Cashier: L3
ftESTRlCf J0H5 Ml. 00
TDThL »
CHECK
CHANGE
Ml.00
HI. CO
10.00
-------
LIBER 2811 PAGE 584
"STflTTorHICHIGRN
RILEGRN COUNTY
RECOROCQ
25 KflR 2805 8-30=43 AH
joyce fl. uflns
REGISTER OT DEEPS
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AND
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION EASEMENT
MDEQ Reference No.: RC-RJRD-03-052
U.S. EPA Site No.: 059B
This Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Environmental Protection Easement is made by
and between Plainwell Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Grantor; the Michigan Department of
Environmental Quality ("MDEQ" or "Grantee"), having an address c/o Director, Michigan
Department of Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 30473, Lansing, Michigan 48909-7973, Grantee,
and the United States of America and its assigns ("Third Party Beneficiary"), having an address c/o
the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("U.S. EPA"), Attn: Director, Superfimd
Division, Region 5, 77 W. Jackson Blvd. SR-6J, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
This Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Environmental Protection Easement has been
recorded with the Allegan County Register of Deeds for the purpose of protecting public health,
safety, and welfare, and the environment by: (1) granting aright of access to the U.S. EPA and
MDEQ and their authorized representatives to monitor and conduct Response Activities, as that term
is defined below; and (2) restricting unacceptable exposures to hazardous substances located on the
12lh Street Landfill property, as legally described on Exhibit i hereto ("Property"); (3) assuring that
the use of Property is consistent with the exposure assumptions and control measures required
pursuant to the Record of Decision ("ROD") issued by MDEQ and concurred with by the U.S. EPA
on September 28, 2001 pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and
Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq. ("CERCLA"); and (4) preventing damage or disturbance of
any element of the remedial action constructed on the Properly.
The Property is part of the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site
(the "Site"). The Site was placed on the National Priorities List on August 30, 1990, and is a facility,
as that term is defined in Section 101(9) of CERCLA and Section 20101(0) of Part 201,
Environmental Remediation, of the Natural Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA
451, as amended, MCL 324.20101(0) e( seq. ("NREPA"). The Property comprises a portion of the
12th Street Operable Unit #4 of the Site for which on-going remedial actions are being conducted in
accordance with the ROD. Information pertaining to the environmental conditions at the Property
and the remedial actions to be undertaken at the Property is on file with the U.S. EPA and the MDEQ,
V33
vs
cx>
o
a
§
*3
I=»
XI
JO
«jr>
i r.
%
:*o
o-l. ,
. .J \ l' C-
-------
LIBER 2811 PAGE 585
Remediation and Redevelopment Division.
The restrictions contained in this Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Environmental
Protection Easement are based upon information available to the U.S. EPA and MDEQ at the time the
ROD was issued. Failure of the remedial action to achieve and maintain the criteria, exposure
controls, and requirements specified in the ROD; future changes in the environmental condition of the
Property or changes in the cleanup criteria developed under CERCLA and the NREPA; the discovery
of environmental conditions at the Property that were not accounted for in the ROD; or use of the
Property in a manner inconsistent with the restrictions described herein, may result in this Declaration
of Restrictive Covenants and Environmental Protection Easement not being protective of public
health, safety, and welfare, and the environment.
Property Identification Number: 0317-024-047-00
Exhibit 2 provides a survey of the Property that is subject to the land use or resource use
restrictions specified herein.
Summary of Response Activities
The Property was historically used as a landfill for wastes and residuals associated with the
manufacturing and recycling of paper. Between 1993 and 1997 Plainwell Inc. conducted a remedial
investigation and feasibility study regarding the nature and extent of contamination at the Property.
Remedial activities required by the ROD to assure the protection of public health, safety and welfare, and
the environment and ensure the integrity of the remedy include, but are not necessarily limited to: the
construction of a landfill cap and containment systems to contain paper residuals and soils and sediments
contaminated with polychlorinated biphenyls ("PCBs) and prevent the erosion of PCB contaminated
materials into the Kalamazoo River, construction and maintenance of a fence; construction, operation and
maintenance of groundwater monitoring system; and establishment of the land use and resource use
restrictions contained herein.
Definitions
"MDEQ" means the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, its successor entities, and
those persons or entities acting on its behalf.
"Owner" means, at any given time, the then current rifle holder of the Property or any portion
thereof.
"Owners Subsequent to Plainwell" means, at any given time, the then current title holder of the
Property or any portion thereof except for Plainwell Inc.
"Plainwell" shall mean Plainwell Inc., the owner of the Property as of the date of the
execution of this Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Environmental Protection Easement, and
the Owner for as long as Plainwell Inc. is a current title holder of the Property or any portion thereof.
"Response Activities" shall mean, consistent with Section 101(25) of CERCLA, such actions
-------
UBER 2811 PAGE 586
as have been or may be necessary to conduct any removal, remedy or remedial action, as those terms
are defined in Sections 101(23) and 101(24) of CERCLA, at the Property and/or at the Site, including
enforcement activities related thereto.
"U.S. EPA" shall mean the United States Environmental Protection Agency, its successor entities
and those persons or entities acting on its behalf.
All other terms used in this document which are defined in Part 3, Definitions, of the NREPA;
Part 201 of the NREPA; or the Part 201 Administrative Rules ("Part 201 Rules"), 1990 AACS R
299.5101 et seq., shall have the same meaning in this document as in Parts 3 and 201 of the NREPA
and the Part 201 Rules, as of the date of filing of this Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and
Environmental Protection Easement.
NOW THEREFORE,
Grantor, on behalf of itself, its successors and assigns, in consideration of the terms of the
Settlement Agreement in the jointly administered cases in the United States District Court for the
District of Delaware: In re: Plainwell. Inc.. et al.. Case No. 00-4350 (JWV), and Weyerhaeuser
v. Plainwell. Inc. and Plainwell Holding Company. Case No. 04-CV-16 (KAJ), covenants and
declares that the Property shall be subject to the restrictions on use set forth below, and conveys
and warrants to the Grantee, and its assigns and to the United States of America, and its assigns,
as Third Party Beneficiary: 1) an environmental protection easement, the nature, character, and
purposes for which are set forth herein; and 2) the right to enforce said use restrictions,
Declaration of Land Use or Resource Use Restrictions
1. The Owner shall prohibit all uses of the Property that are not compatible with the Property's
zoned industrial land use designation, the limited industrial land use category under Section
20120a(l)(i) of the NREPA or other use that is consistent with the assumptions and basis for the
cleanup criteria developed pursuant to Section 20l20a(l)(i) of the NREPA. Cleanup criteria for land
use-based Response Activities are located in the Government Documents Section of the State of
Michigan Library.
1. The Owner shall prohibit use of the Property or portions thereof, for any of the following purposes-.
(a) A residence, including any mobile home or factory built housing, constructed or installed for
use as residential human habitation;
(b) A hospital for humans.
(c) A public or private school for persons under 21 years of age.
(d) A day care center for children,
(e) Any purpose involving residential occupancy on a 24-hour basis.
-------
UBER 2811 PAGE 587
(f) Any other use that would disturb or penetrate the landfill cover or erosion control system as
set forth in the ROD.
3. Owners Subsequent to Plainwel] shall prohibit activities, and Plaimvell shall not perform any'
activities, on the Property that may result in exposures above levels established in the ROD. These
prohibited activities include:
(a) Any excavation, drilling, penetration or other disturbance of the surface or subsurface
soils on the Property except as necessitated for compliance with the O&M plan or conducted
in accordance with any work plan approved or modified by U.S. EPA with MDEQ
concurrence. All excavation, drilling, penetration or other disturbance of the surface or
subsurface soils on the Property must be conducted in accordance with a health and safety
plan that complies with the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970, 20 C.F.R. 1910.120
and the Michigan Occupational Safety and Health Act.
(b) Any construction of buildings on the Property unless plans are submitted to and
approved by the MDEQ and U.S. EPA. Any new construction must satisfy the indoor air
inhalation criteria of Part 201.
4. Owners Subsequent to Plainwell shall prohibit activities, and Plainwell shall not perform any
activities, on the Property that may interfere with any element of the ROD, including the performance
of operation and maintenance activities, monitoring, or other measures necessary to ensure the
effectiveness and integrity of the remedy.
5. The MDEQ or U.S. EPA may require modifications to the restrictions contained in this
Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Environmental Protection Easement as necessary to assure
the integrity and effectiveness of the remedial action required under the ROD or assure the protection
of the public health, safety, welfare and the environment.
6. Owners Subsequent to Plainwell shall comply with the applicable requirements of Section 20107a
of the NREPA and Part 10 of the Part 201 Administrative Rules.
7. Permanent Markers. The Owner shall not remove, cover, obscure, or otherwise alter or interfere
with the permanent markers placed on the Property pursuant to the ROD. Owners Subsequent to
Plainwell shall keep vegetation and other materials clear of the permanent markers to assure that the
markers are readily visible.
8. Contaminated Soil Management. Owners Subsequent to Plainwell shall manage all soils, media
and/or debris located on the Property in accordance with, and Plainwell shall refrain from managing
soils, media and/or debris located on the Property in contravention ok the applicable requirements of
Section 20120c of the NREPA; Part 111, Hazardous Waste Management, of the NREPA; Subtitle C
of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, 42 U.S.C. Section 6901 et seq.\ the administrative
rules promulgated thereunder, and all other relevant state and federal laws.
Environmental Protection Easement
9. Access. Grantor grants to Grantee, and its assigns, and to the United States of America, and its
1
-------
EXHIBIT 2
LIBER 2811 PAGE 593
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
/V 'A Catt.) -TSar/ass
J
I
;<6 /Sy& secr/ass
%
Sjf "«¦* RWeg. r/gr. //or "j£r"
"T"
VEGEHO^
O -~1/2'IW>N SET "
• - CORNER FOUND
R - "RECORDED AS*
a' /So' x'.
600'
ptSsis
^ M.O.S Sf 9
gSgSsg*
^ w ° Z
BEARING SOURCE: PRI&R. JTVKtf&y
LOCATION;
t'A.
otsgcso
, SECTION g-7 , T /V -R IZ&.
, 1W., CO., MICHIGAN.
CERTIFIED TO S-iMPXe*/ rtfUfStost-t. pf?r>jsjn ^a.
I HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SURVEYED AND MAPPED THE LAND
ABOVE PUTTED m/OR DESCRIBED OH THIS DATE, ANO THAT THE
RATIO OF CLOSURE OH THE UNADJUSTED FIELD OBSERVATIONS WAS •
M&
mGHTMAN MOORED, INC
' M fi A
\u cwsthvt art, mugah, w hmio
(HQ S73-W4J FAX 175-WU
-------
LIBER 2811 PAGE 592
EXHIBIT 1
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTY
All that part of the east lying West and South of the Kalamazoo River and described as:
Commencing at a point 2078.3 feet North of the South Va post of said Section, thence East 377
feet, thence North 264 feet, thence East 255 feet, to the low water mark of the Kalamazoo River,
thence Northerly and Westerly along said low water mark of the Kalamazoo River to the North
and South Va line of Section 24, thence South along said Vt line to the point of beginning, Section
24, Town 1 North, Range 12 West. Together with an easement for ingress and egress running
from subject property to Highway M-89 as set forth in deed recorded in Liber 487 on Page 112.
-------
LIBER 2811 page591
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
Personally came before me this day of
2005, the above-
named Jeff Arnesen as Chief Financial Officer of P ainwell, Inc., to me known to
be the person who executed the foregoing instrument and acknowledged the
same.
RENEE ARLEEN WEISS
NOTARY FUBltC - MINNESOTA
MY C0W«SS)0N EXPIRES OIOMOtO
Notary Public
[Print or type name]
Commissioned in County Hennepin
My Commission Expires:
TSa-^ 51 . %b\0
This instrument was prepared by
and after recording, should be returned to:
Pamela E. Barker
Godfrey & Kahn, S.C,
780 North Water Street
Milwaukee, WI 53202
-------
LIBER 2811 PAGE 590
Grantor, its successors and assigns, including all lessees, easement holders, their assigns, and their
authorized agents, employees, or persons acting under their direction and control. This Declaration of
Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Environmental Protection Easements and Environmental
Protection Easement may only be modified or rescinded with the written approval of the U.S. EPA and
MDEQ.
The State of Michigan, through the MDEQ, the Owner, and the United States on behalf of U.S. EPA,
as a Third Party Beneficiary, may enforce the restrictions set forth in this Declaration of Declaration of
Restrictive Covenants and Environmental Protection Easements and Environmental Protection Easement
by legal action in a court of competent jurisdiction.
! 3. Severability. If any provision of this instrument is held to be invalid by any court of competent
jurisdiction, the invalidity of such provision shall not affect the validity of any other provisions hereof
and all sue.& other provisions shall continue unimpaired and in full force and effect.
14. Authority to Execute Declaration of Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Environmental
Protection Easements and Environmental Protection Easement. The undersigned person executing this
instrument is the Owner and represents and certifies that he or she is duly authorized and has been
empowered to execute and deliver this Declaration of Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and
Environmental Protection Easements and Environmental Easement.
15. Nothing in this Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Environmental Protection Easement
affects Plainwell's obligations, if any, under Part 201 of the NREPA, CERCLA, or other State or
federal laws, subject to the terms and limitations of the Environmental Settlement Agreement, dated
as of October 29, 2003, as may be amended from time to time, among: (a) the United States of
America, an behalf of the United States Environmental Protection Agency, the United States
Department of the Interior, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration of the United
States Department of Commerce, and including all departments, agencies and instrumentalities of the
United States; (b) the State of Michigan, on behalf of Michael A. Cox, Attorney General for the State
of Michigan, the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, and all other departments, agencies
and instrumentalities of the State of Michigan; (e) Colonial Heights Packaging, Inc.; (d) Philip Morris
USA, Inc.; (e) Chesapeake Corporation; (f) Simpson Paper Company (g) Plainwell Holding
Company; and (h) Plainwell Inc., the final version of which, after publication in the Federal Register
for the thirty-day public comment period specified by 42 U.S.C. § 9622(i), will be flied with the
United States District Court for the District of Delaware.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Plainwell Inc. has caused this Declaration of Restrictive
Covenants and Environmental Protection Easement to be
executed on this/^day of , 2005.
-------
USER 2811 PAGE 589
transferees by the person transferring the interest. The Owner shall include in any instrument conveying
any interest in the Property or portion thereafter including but, not limited to, deeds, leases, and
mortgages a notice which is in substantially the following form:
NOTICE: THE INTEREST CONVEYED HEREBY IS SUBJECT TO A DECLARATION OF
RESTRICTIVE COVENANTS AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION EASEMENT, DATED
200_„ AND RECORDED WITH THE ALLEGAN COUNTY REGISTER OF DEEDS, LIBER
, PAGE
II. Notices. Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, or communication that is required to be
made or obtained under this Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Environmental Protection
Easement shall be made in writing and include a statement that the notice is being made pursuant to the
requirements of this Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Environmental Protection Easement,
MDEQ Reference Number RC-RRD-03-052 and U.S. EPA Site No. 059B, and shall be served either
personally or sent via first class mail, postage prepaid, as follows:
For U.S. EPA:
Director
Superfund Division
U.S. EPA
77 West Jackson Blvd. SR-6J
Chicago, Illinois 60604
with a copy to: Eileen L. Furey.
Associate Regional Counsel
U.S. EPA Region 5
77 West Jackson Blvd. C-T4J
Chicago, IL 60604
For MDEQ: - Director
Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
P.O. Box 30473
Lansing, Michigan 48909-7973
with a copy to: Suzanne D. Sonneborn
Assistant Attorney General
Environment, Natural Resources, and Agriculture Division
Michigan Department of Attorney General
525 W. Ottawa St.
Lansing, Michigan 48933
12. Term and Enforcement of Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Environmental Protection
Easement. This Declaration of Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Environmental Protection
Easements and Environmental Protection Easement shall run with the land and shall be binding on the
-------
LIBER 2811 PAGE 588
assigns, a Third Party Beneficiary, an irrevocable and continuing right of access at all reasonable times
to the Mill Property for the purposes of:
(a) Overseeing and/or implementing the remedial action required in the ROD, including but
not limited to installation of a landfill cover system that complies with the relevant portions of
Part 201 of the NREPA and conducting any necessary inspection and repair of the capped
areas;
(b) Verifying any data or information submitted to U.S. EPA and/or MDEQ and determining
and monitoring compliance with the ROD and any implementing Statement of Work;
(c) Verifying that no action is being taken on the Property in violation of the terms of this
instrument or of any federal or state environmental laws or regulations;
(d) Monitoring Response Activities at the 12th St. Operable Unit and at the Site and conducting
investigations relating to contamination on or near the Site, including, without limitations,
sampling of air, water, sediments, soils, and specifically, without limitation, obtaining split or
duplicate samples;
(e) Conducting periodic reviews of the Response Activities at the Property and at the Site,
including but not limited to, reviews required by applicable statutes and/or regulations; and
(f) Implementing additional or new Response Activities if U.S. EPA and the MDEQ
determine:
i) that such activities are necessary to protect public health, safety, welfare, or the
environment because either the remedial action has proven to be ineffective or because
new technology has been developed which will accomplish the purposes of the
remedial action in a significantly more efficient or cost effective manner; and
ii) that the additional or new Response Activities will not impose any significantly
greater burden on the Property or unduly interfere with the then existing uses of the
Property.
Nothing in this instrument shall limit or otherwise affect U.S. EPA's or MDEQ's right of entry
and access or authorities to take Response Activities as defined in this instrument, as well as in
Section 20101(l)(ee) of Part 201 of the NREPA, under CERCLA, the National Contingency Plan,
the National Contingency Plan, 40 C.F.R. Part 300, the NREPA, and any successor
statutory provisions, or other state or federal law.
10. Transfer of Interest. The Owner shall provide notice to the U.S. EPA and MDEQ of the Owner's
intent to transfer any interest in the Property at least fourteen (14) business days prior to consummating
the conveyance. A conveyance of title, easement, or other interest in the Property shall not be
consummated by the Owner unless the Owner complies with the applicable provisions of Section 20116
of the NREPA. A copy of this Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Environmental Protection
Easement shall be provided to all future owners, heirs, successors, lessees, easement holders, assigns, and
-------
Amendment to Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Environmental Protection Easement
MDEQ Reference No.: RC-RRD-03-052
U.S. EPA Site No.: 059B
Pursuant to Paragraph 12 of the Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Environmental
Protection Easement executed on March 16, 2005 and recorded on March 25, 2005 in the
Allegan County Register of Deeds at Liber 2811, pages 584-593 ("2005 Declaration of
Restrictive Covenant," or "2005 DRC"), the undersigned Parties agree to modify the 2005 DRC
as set forth in this document ("Amendment to Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and
Environmental Protection Easement," or "Amendment").
Parties
Weyerhaeuser Company purchased the Property as defined in the 2005 DRC from
Plainwell, Inc. by deed dated August 29,2008. Weyerhaeuser Company subsequently conveyed
the Property to its subsidiary, Weyerhaeuser NR Company (WNR) by deed dated January 1,
2009. WNR is both an Owner and an Owner Subsequent to Plainwell Inc. as defined in the 2005
DRC. In accordance with the terms of the 2005 DRC, the obligations and restrictions of the
2005 DRC are applicable to and binding on WNR at the time of the execution of this
Amendment. WNR is authorized to execute this Amendment. The Michigan Department of
Environmental Quality (MDEQ), as the Grantee of the 2005 DRC, and the United States of
America, by and through the United States Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA), as the
Third Party Beneficiary of the 2005 DRC, are the other two Parties to this Amendment. (WNR,
MDEQ and U.S.EPA are referred to collectively as the "Parties'7.)
-------
Amending Language:
The Parties agree to amend the 2005 DRC as follows:
1. The definition of "owner" in the Definitions section on page 585 of Liber 2811 is
amended to read as follows:
"'Owner' means, at any given time, the then current title holder of the Property or any
portion thereof."
2. Paragraph 3 on page 587 of Liber 281L is amended to add subparagraph (3)(c):
"(c) Any construction of or use of wells or other devices on the Property to extract
groundwater for consumption, irrigation, or any other use, except for wells and devices
that are necessary for Response Activities or testing and monitoring groundwater
contamination levels in accordance with plans approved by the MDEQ or the U.S. EPA is
prohibited. Short-term dewatering for construction purposes is permitted provided the
dewatcring, including management and disposal of the groundwater, is conducted in
accordance with all applicable local, state, and federal laws and regulations and does not
cause or result in a new release, exacerbation of existing contamination, or any other
violation of local, state, and federal environmental laws and regulations including, but not
limited to, Part 201 of theNREPA."
3. Paragraph 11 on page 589 of Liber 2811 is amended as follows:
• Strike "Eileen L. Furey" and add "Leslie Kirby-Miles" for U.S. EPA Associate Regional
Counsel contact.
• Strike "Suzanne D. Sonneborn" and add "Assistant in Charge" for Michigan Department
of Attorney General contact.
The Amendment will become effective upon all Parties signatures. The remainder of the
Declaration of Restrictive Covenants and Environmental Protection Easement remains in
full force and effect.
Weyerhaeuser NR Company
STATE OF WASHINGTON )
)ss,
COUNTY OF KING )
-------
On (his day of , 2012, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and
for the State of Washington, personally appeared ,
known to me to be the of Weyerhaeuser NR. Company, the corporation that
executed the foregoing instrument, and acknowledged the said instrument to be the free and
voluntary act of said corporation, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned, and on oath stated
that he is authorized to execute said instrument.
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL hereto affixed the day and year first above
written.
Name
NOTARY PUBLIC in and for the State of
Washington, residing at
My commission expires
-------
Anne P. Couture
Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
Acting Chief, Remediation Division
STATE OF MICHIGAN
COUNTY OF
On this day of 'Ik-'/U-
[J A /-j t
for the State of Michigan, personally appeared / j-n-fj ( ' ( Wu ct.Ti.7'.:',
known to me and executed (he foregoing instrument ,.v).) , and acknowledged
the said instrument to be the free and voluntary act, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned,
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL hereto affixed the day and year first above
written.
)
)ss.
)
, 2012, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and
Name
i'l. i.)\U. Ut ^
NOTARY PUBLlfc in and for the State of
Michigan, residing at
County of Appointment: ,
-------
£ K/J-
Richard C. Karl, Director
Supcrfiind Division
U.S. EPA
STATE OF ILLINOIS )
)ss.
COUNTY OF CooK )
On this tt^day of , 2012, before me, the undersigned, a Notary Public in and
for the State of Illinois, personally appeared IIjCUAfi-D C. K-rtA known
to me and executed the foregoing instrument. Amendment to Declaration of Restrictive
Covenants and Environmental Protection Easement, and acknowledged the said instrument to be
the free and voluntary act, for the uses and purposes therein mentioned.
WITNESS MY HAND AND OFFICIAL SEAL hereto affixed the day and year first above
written.
Name
OFROAL8EAL
JOHNVFAGKXO
NOTARY PUBUC-8TATE OF IUJN0t8
MY COMMISSION EXPtR£S£3/t3/14 !
Illinois, residing at CHt
-------
Attachment 7
Restrictive Covenant for OU 7
-------
1 LIBER 2811 PAGE 594
SlHIt OF MICHIGAN
ALLEGAN COUNTY
RECORDED
25 MflR 2005 8:30:43
JOYCE R WATTS
REGISTER nr nrfnc
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION EASEMENT AND
DECLARATION OF RESTRICTIVE COVENANT
MDEQ Reference No: RC-RRD-201-05-001
U.S. EPA Site No: 059B
This Environmental Protection Easement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenant is
made by and between Plainwell Inc., a Delaware, Corporation, ("Grantor"); the Michigan
Department of Environmental Quality ("MDEQ" or "Grantee"), having an address c/o
Director, Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, P.O. Box 30473, Lansing, Michigan
48909-7973; and the United States of America and its assigns ("Third Party Beneficiary"),
having an address c/o the United States Environmental Protection Agency ("U.S. EPA"), Attn:
Director, Superfund Division, Region 5, 77 W. Jackson Blvd. SR-6J, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
This Environmental Protection Easement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenant has
been recorded with the Allegan County Register of Deeds for the purpose of protecting public
health, safety and welfare, and the environment by: (1) granting a right of access to the U.S.
EPA and the MDEQ and their authorized representatives to monitor and conduct Response
Activities, as that term is defined below; and (2) prohibiting or restricting activities that could
result in unacceptable exposure to environmental contamination present at the Plainwell mill
property, as legally described in Exhibit 1 attached hereto ("Mill Property").
The Mill Property is part of the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River
Superfund Site (the "Site"). The Site was placed on the National Priorities List ("NPL") on
August 30, 1990, and is a facility, as that term is defined in Section 101(9) of the Comprehensive
Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, 42 U.S.C. § 9601 et seq.
("CERCLA") and Section 20101(0) of Part 201, Environmental Remediation, of the Natural
Resources and Environmental Protection Act, 1994 PA 451, as amended, MCL 324.20101(0) et
seq. ("NREPA"). The Mill Property has been subject to Response Activities pursuant to the
NREPA, in a manner consistent with CERCLA, for environmental contamination related to the
Site. Response Activities at the Mill Property are the subject of a Consent Decree entered into by
the United States and Weyerhaeuser Company, which was lodged with the District Court of
Delaware on January 3, 2005, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit 2 (the "Consent
Decree"). Information pertaining to the environmental conditions at the Mill Property and
Response Activities undertaken at the Site is on file with U.S. EPA and the MDEQ, Remediation
and Redevelopment Division.
l
-------
Illllllllllllllllil liber 2811 «595
--•"511 535 =
The restrictions contained in this Restrictive Covenant are based upon information
available to U.S. EPA and the MDEQ at the date this instrument is recorded. The discovery of
environmental conditions at the Mill Property unknown as of the recording date of this
instrument, or use of the Mill Property in a manner inconsistent with the restrictions described
herein, may result in this Restrictive Covenant not being protective of public health, safety, and
welfare, and the environment.
Property Identification Number: See Exhibit 5 attached
Exhibit 1 provides a legal description and survey of the Mill Property that is subject to the land
use or resource use restrictions specified herein.
Summary of Response Activities
The Mill Property was historically used to manufacture and recycle paper. In 1997,
Plainwell Inc. conducted a Phase I Environmental Assessment and Phase II Investigation for the
Mill Property. Based on the results of the Phase I and Phase II investigations, as well as other
information regarding the Mill Property, U.S. EPA and MDEQ concluded that Response
Activities should be performed to ensure the protection of human health and the environment.
Pursuant to the Consent Decree, Weyerhaeuser will perform a Remedial Investigation/Feasibility
Study regarding the nature and extent of hazardous contamination at the Mill Property, and will
perform the remedial action to be selected by U.S. EPA in a Record of Decision ("ROD") for the
Mill Property.
Definitions
"MDEQ" means the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality, its successor
entities, if any, and those authorized persons or entities acting on its behalf.
"Owner" means, at any given time, the then current title holder of the Mill Property, or
any portion thereof.
"Owners Subsequent to Plainwell" means, at any given time, the then current title holder
of the Mill Property or any portion thereof, except for Plainwell Inc.
"Plainwell" shall mean Plainwell Inc., the owner of the Mill Property as of the date of the
execution of this Environmental Protection Easement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenant,
and the Owner for as long as Plainwell Inc. is a current title holder of the Mill Property or any
portion thereof.
"Response Activities" shall mean, consistent with Section 101(25) of CERCLA, such
actions as have been or may be necessary to conduct any removal, remedy or remedial action, as
those terms are defined in Sections 101(23) and 101(24) of CERCLA, at the Mill Property and/or
at the Site, including enforcement activities related thereto.
"U.S. EPA" shall mean the United States Environmental Protection Agency, its successor
entities and those persons or entities acting on its behalf.
2
-------
!l I ! I! I LIBEfl 2811 PAGE 596
a.taii 59E 3
All other terms used in this document which are defined in Part 3, Definitions, of the
NREPA; Part 201 of the NREPA; or the Part 201 Administrative Rules ("Part 201 Rules"), 1990
AACS R 299.5101 et seq., shall have the same meaning in this document as in Parts 3 and 201 of
the NREPA and the Part 201 Rules, as of the recording date of this instrument.
NOW THEREFORE,
Grantor, on behalf of itself, its successors and assigns, in consideration of the terms of the
Settlement Agreement in the jointly administered cases in the United States District Court for the
District of Delaware: In Re: Plainwell. Inc.. et al.. Case No. 00-4350 (JWV), and Weyerhaeuser
v. Plainwell. Inc. and Plainwell Holding Company. Case No. 04-CV-16 (KAJ), covenants and
declares that the Mill Property shall be subject to the restrictions on use set forth below, and
conveys and warrants to the Grantee, and its assigns and to the United States of America, and its
assigns, as Third Party Beneficiary: 1) an environmental protection easement, the nature,
character, and purposes for which are set forth herein; and 2) the right to enforce said use
restrictions.
Environmental Protection Easement
1. Access. Grantor grants to Grantee, and its assigns, and to the United States of America, and
its assigns, as Third Party Beneficiary, an irrevocable and continuing right of access at all
reasonable times to the Mill Property for purposes of:
a) Conducting and/or monitoring investigations relating to the nature and extent of
contamination on or near the Mill Property and/or the Kalamazoo River Operable Unit of
the Site including, without limitation, sampling of air, water, sediments, soils, and
specifically, without limitation, obtaining split or duplicate samples;
b) Monitoring and/or implementing the Response Activities to be selected in a ROD for
the Mill Property and/or the Kalamazoo River Operable Unit of the Site;
c) Verifying any data or information submitted to U.S. EPA and/or the MDEQ and
determining and monitoring compliance with the Consent Decree, any ROD relating to
Mill Property and/or the Site and any implementing statement of work;
d) Verifying that no action is being taken on the Mill Property in violation of the terms of
this instrument, or in violation of any federal or state environmental laws or regulations
applicable to any Response Activities at the Mill Property or at the Site;
e) Conducting periodic reviews of Response Activities at the Mill Property and at the
Site, including but not limited to, reviews required by applicable statutes and/or
regulations;
f) implementing additional or new Response Activities, as that term is defined above, if
the remedial action selected in the ROD for the Mill Property and/or the Kalamazoo
River Operable Unit results in any hazardous substances, pollutants or contaminants
remaining at the Site above levels that allow for unlimited use and unrestricted exposure,
and U.S. EPA, in consultation with MDEQ and pursuant to Section 121(c) of CERCLA,
determines that, upon its completion, the selected remedy for the Mill Property or the
3
-------
R II |!| LIBER 2811 PAGE 597
s?ai i 5s~
Kalamazoo River OU will not be protective of public health, welfare or the environment;
or
g) implementing additional or new response activities, as that term is defined in Section
20101 (l)(ee) of the NREPA, if the remedial action selected in the ROD for the Mill
Property and/or the Kalamazoo River Operable Unit results in any hazardous substances,
pollutants or contaminants remaining at the Site above the criteria developed pursuant to
Section 20120a(l)(a) of the NREPA, and MDEQ, in consultation with U.S. EPA,
determines that, upon its completion, the selected remedy will not be protective of the
public health, safety, or welfare, or the environment.
Nothing in this instrument shall limit or otherwise affect U.S. EPA's or the MDEQ's right of
entry and access, or authorities to take Response Activities as defined in this instrument, as well
as in Section 20101(l)(ee) Part 201 of the NREPA, under CERCLA, the National Contingency
Plan, 40 C.F.R. Part 300, the NREPA, and any successor statutory provisions, or other state or
federal law.
Declaration of Land Use or Resource Use Restrictions
2. Owners Subsequent to Plainwell shall comply with the applicable due care requirements
of Section 20107a of the NREPA and Part 10 of the Part 201 Administrative Rules. Owners
Subsequent to Plainwell shall exercise due care with respect to any hazardous substance at the
Mill Property and, pursuant to CERCLA, will take reasonable steps to stop any continuing
release of a hazardous substance; prevent any threatened future release; and prevent or limit
human, environmental or natural resource exposure to any previously released hazardous
substance.
3. Owners Subsequent to Plainwell shall not use the Mill Property in a manner that causes
existing contamination to migrate beyond the boundaries of the Mill Property, increases the cost
of Response Activities, or otherwise exacerbates the existing contamination located on the Mill
Property. The term exacerbation is more specifically defined in Section 20101(l)(n) of the
NREPA.
4. As Response Activities are performed at the Mill Property and at the Site, the MDEQ and
U.S. EPA may require modifications to the restrictions contained in this Environmental
Protection Easement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenant to implement necessary Response
Activities at the Mill Property or the Site, or to assure the integrity and effectiveness of the
remedial action to be selected for the Mill Property and/or the Kalamazoo River Operable Unit of
the Site.
5. The Owner shall restrict activities at the Mill Property that may interfere with Response
Activities at the Mill Property or the Site, including interim response, remedial action, operation
and maintenance, monitoring, or other measures necessary to assure the effectiveness and
integrity of the remedial action.
Term, Modification and Enforcement of Environmental Protection Easement and
Declaration of Restrictive Covenant
4
-------
Illllllllllilli LIBER 2811 Pffi598
*29 1 1 598 5
6. This Environmental Protection tasement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenant shall
run with land and be binding on the Grantor, its successors and assigns, including all lessees,
easement holders, their assigns, and their authorized agents, employees, or persons acting under
their direction and control. This Environmental Protection Easement and Declaration of
Restrictive Covenant will expire upon the earlier of: (1) notice in the Federal Register
announcing deletion of the Site from the NPL because U.S. EPA and the State of Michigan have
determined that the Site poses no threat to human health, welfare or the environment, and
therefore no additional Response Activities, as that term is defined in this instrument or in
Section 20101(l)(ee) of the NREPA, are necessary; or (2) recision of the instrument upon written
approval of U.S. EPA and MDEQ pursuant to Paragraph 7, below.
7. The Owner may request in writing to U.S. EPA and the MDEQ, at the address given
below, modifications to or recision of this instrument. This instrument may be modified or
rescinded only with the written approval of U.S. EPA and the MDEQ. Any modification to or
recision of this Environmental Protection Easement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenant
shall be filed with the appropriate Registrar of Deeds by the then Owner and a certified copy
shall be returned to the MDEQ and U.S. EPA at the addresses listed above.
8. The State of Michigan, through the MDEQ, the Owner, and the United States on behalf of
U.S. EPA, as a Third Party Beneficiary, may enforce the easement and restrictions set forth in
this Environmental Protection Easement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenant by legal action
in a court of competent jurisdiction.
9. Severability. If any provision of this Environmental Protection Easement and
Declaration of Restrictive Covenant is held to be invalid by any court of competent jurisdiction,
the invalidity of such provision shall not affect the validity of any other provision hereof, and all
other such provisions shall continue unimpaired and in full force and effect.
10. Transfer of Interest: The Owner shall provide notice to the MDEQ and U.S. EPA of the
Owner's intent to transfer any interest in the Mill Property, or any portion thereof, fourteen (14)
days prior to consummating the conveyance. A conveyance of title, easement, or other interest in
the Mill Property shall not be consummated by the Owner unless the Owner complies with the
applicable provisions of Section 20116 of the NREPA. The Owner shall include in any
instrument conveying any interest in any portion of the Mill Property, including but not limited
to deeds, leases and mortgages, a notice which is in substantially the following form:
Notice: The Interest conveyed hereby is subject to a Declaration of
Environmental Protection Easement and Declaration of Restrictive
Covenant, Dated , 200_ Recorded with the Allegan County Register
of Deeds, Liber , Page ,
11. Notices: Any notice, demand, request, consent, approval, or communication that is required
to be made or obtained under this instrument shall be made in writing and include a statement
that the notice is being made pursuant to the requirements of this Environmental Protection
Easement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenant, MDEQ Reference Number RC-RRD-201-05-
001, and U.S. EPA Site No. 059B, and shall be served either personally or sent via first class
mail, postage prepaid, as follows:
For U.S. EPA: Director
5
-------
Illllllllllllllllllllllinil! libeh 2811 page599
Superfund Division
U.S. EPA Region 5
77 W. Jackson Blvd. SR-6J
Chicago, Illinois 60604
With a copy to: Eileen L. Furey
Associate Regional Counsel
U.S. EPA Region 5
77 W. Jackson Blvd. C-14J
Chicago, Illinois 60604
For the MDEQ: Director
Michigan Department of Environmental Quality
P.O. Box 30473
Lansing, Michigan 48909-7973
With a copy to: Suzanne D. Sonnebom
Assistant Attorney General
Environment, Natural Resources, and Agriculture Division
Michigan Department of Attorney General
525 W. Ottawa St.
Lansing, Michigan 48933
12. Authority to Execute Environmental Protection Easement and Declaration of
Restrictive Covenant. The undersigned person executing this Environmental Protection
Easement and Declaration of Restrictive Covenant is the Owner and represents and certifies that
he or she is duly authorized and has been empowered to execute and deliver this Instrument.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Plainwell Inc. has caused this Environmental Protection Easement
and Declaration of Restrictive Covenant to be executed on this )L? day of
IVWrcW , 2005.
PLAINWELL INC.
JejTAntesen
-Chief Financial Officer
6
-------
STATE OF MINNESOTA
COUNTY OF HENNEPIN
LIBER
2811 pmje600
Personally came before me this day of , 2005, the above-named Jeff Arnesen
as Chief Financial Officer of Plainwell, Inc., to me known to be the person who executed the
foregoing instrument and acknowledged the same.
v Notary Public
^f.nee Krlfer^
[Print or type name]
Commissioned in County Hennepin
My Commission Expires: 3) • Zol Q
¦**rf atrrt4
RENEEARLEEN WEISS
NOTAHY PUBLIC - MINNESOTA
M* COMMISSION EXPIRES 01/31/2010
This instrument was prepared by
and after recording, should be returned to:
Pamela E. Barker
Godfrey & Kahn, S.C.
780 North Water Street
Milwaukee, WI 53202
7
-------
¦IllllilllllU LIBER 2811 PAGE601
EXHIBIT 1
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PLAINWELL MILL PROPERTY
P.P. 0355-020-001-10
PARCEL B-l: COMMENCING NORTH 58 DEGREES 23' WEST 171.82 RODS FROM THE
EAST QUARTER POST OF SECTION 30; THENCE NORTH 31 DEGREES 37' EAST 640
FEET; THENCE NORTH 58 DEGREES 23' WEST 150 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 31
DEGREES 37' WEST 475 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58 DEGREES 23' EAST 66 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 31 DEGREES 37' WEST 165 FEET TO CENTER OF HIGHWAY;
THENCE SOUTH 58 DEGREES 23' EAST 84 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING.
P.P. 0355-030-077-00
PARCEL B-2: COMMENCING AT A POINT NORTH 58 DEGREES 23' WEST 176.91
RODS FROM THE EAST 1/4 POST OF SECTION 30, TOWN 1 NORTH, RANGE 11 WEST;
THENCE NORTH 31 DEGREES 37' EAST 165 FEET; THENCE NORTH 58 DEGREES 23'
WEST 66 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 31 DEGREES 37' WEST 165 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 58
DEGREES 23' EAST 66 FEET TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING.
P.P. 0355-030-077-10
PARCEL C-l: COMMENCING AT A POINT NORTH 58 DEGREES 23' WEST, 180.91 RODS
FROM T~LE EAST 1/4 POST OF SECTION 30, TOWN 1 NORTH, RANGE 11 WEST
THENCE NORTH 31 DEGREES 37' EAST 640 FEET; THENCE NORTH 58 DEGREES 23'
WEST 312.4 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28 DEGREES 17' WEST 641.3 FEET TO CENTER OF
HIGHWAY; THENCE SOUTH 58 DEGREES 23' EAST 275 FEET TO SAID POINT OF
BEGINNING, EXCEPTING AND RESERVING A STRIP OF LAND 183.3 FEET WIDE OFF
THE WESTERLY SIDE THEREOF.
P.P. 0355-030-077-20
PARCEL C-2: PART OF THE NORTH 1/2 OF SECTION 30, TOWN 1 NORTH, RANGE
11 WEST, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: THE EAST 91 2/3 FEET OF THE WEST 183 1/3
FEET OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PREMISES; COMMENCING AT A POINT
NORTH 58 DEGREES 23' WEST 180.91 RODS FROM THE EAST 1/4 POST OF SECTION
30, TOWN 1 NORTH, RANGE 11 WEST; THENCE NORTH 31 DEGREES 37' EAST 640.0
FEET; THENCE NORTH 58 DEGREES 23' WEST 312.4 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28
DEGREES 17' WEST 641.3 FEET TO CENTER OF HIGHWAY; THENCE SOUTH 58
DEGREES 23' EAST 275 FEET TO SAID POINT OF BEGINNING.
-------
11II 111 IIIII III I 111 II 111 LIBER 2811 PAGE 602
1=1=0 ; :
P.P. 0355-030-077-30
PARCEL D: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 4, LASHER'S
ADDITION TO THE VILLAGE (NOW CITY) OF PLAINWELL, THENCE WESTERLY
ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF WEST ALLEGAN STREET 165 FEET; THENCE
NORTHERLY 462 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY 165 FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF
LASHER'S ADDITION; THENCE SOUTHERLY TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING, BEING
IN THE NORTHEAST 1/4 OF SECTION 30, TOWN 1 NORTH RANGE 11 WEST.
P.P. 0355-030-080-00
PARCELS 1, 2 AND 3: LOT 43 TO 48, INCLUSIVE, CORPORATION PLAT AND LOT
75, CORPORATION PLAT, EXCEPT THAT PART LYING WEST OF LOT 27
NORTHEASTERLY OF THE MILL RACE AND LOT 120, CORPORATION PLAT.
ALSO LOTS 1-12 AND LOTS 49-59, WHITNEY ADDITION. ALSO LOTS 1-16
LASHERS ADDITION.
P.P. 0355-160-043-00
PARCEL 4: VACATED RIVER STREET LOCATED IN RIVER VIEW ADDITION, ALSO
THAT PART OF MICHIGAN AVENUE, VACATED, LYING BETWEEN THE SOUTHERLY
SIDE OF RIVER STREET AND NORTHERLY OF A LINE CONNECTING THE
SOUTHERLY SIDE OF LOT 25, BLOCK 1, AND SOUTHERLY SIDE OF LOT 21, BLOCK 2,
RIVER VIEW ADDITION, ALSO THAT PART OF PROSPECT AVENUE, VACATED,
LYING BETWEEN THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF RIVER STREET AND NORTHERLY OF
SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 40, BLOCK I, RIVERVIEW
ADDITION, ALSO LOTS 25 THRU 40, BLOCK 1, ALSO LOTS 16 THRU 30, BLOCK 2,
RIVERVIEW ADDITION.
P.P. 0355-280-013-00
PARCEL 5: COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 25, BLOCK 2,
RIVERVIEW ADDITION; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY PARALLEL WITH ALLEGAN
STREET 463 FEET; THENCE NORTH 31 DEGREES 32' EAST TO THE LEFT BANK OF
KALAMAZOO RIVER; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON SAID RIVER BANK TO THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF RIVERVIEW ADDITION; THENCE SOUTH 31 DEGREES 37'
WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID ADDITION, 189 FEET TO POINT OF
BEGINNING, SECTION 30, TOWN 1 NORTH, RANGE 11 WEST.
P.P. 0355-030-076-00
PARCEL 7: COMMENCING ON THE WEST LINE OF LASHER'S ADDITION 495 FEET ON
SAID ADDITION LINE FROM THE CENTER LINE OF ALLEGAN STREET; THENCE
NORTH 58 DEGREES 23' WEST 231 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 31 DEGREES 37' WEST
57.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 58 DEGREES 23' WEST 99 FEET TO THE EAST LINE OF
RIVERVIEW ADDITION: THENCE NORTH 31 DEGREES 37' EAST TO LEFT BANK OF
THE KALAMAZOO RIVER; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ON SAID RIVER BANK TO
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 16, LASHER'S ADDITION; THENCE
SOUTHWESTERLY TO BEGINNING. SECTION 30, TOWN 1 NORTH, RANGE 11 WEST.
PARCEL 7 WAS FORMERLY DESCRIBED AS COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST
CORNER OF LOT 16 OF LASHER'S ADDITION TO THE VILLAGE (NOW CITY) OF
PLAINWELL, MICHIGAN, ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF OF RECORD AND ON
-------
Ill III III III 111 111 111 11!1:1-' LIBER 2811 PAGE 603
~'<£9 1 1 623 10
FILE IN THE OFFICE OF THE REGISTER OF DEEDS FOR SAID COUNTY, SAID POINT
BEING 462 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE NORTH LINE OF ALLEGAN STREET;
THENCE WESTERLY 226.4 FEET TO A POINT 49S FEET NORTHERLY OF THE NORTH
LINE OF ALLEGAN STREET, MEASURED ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE EAST
LINE OF PROSPECT AVENUE, AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF RIVER VIEW ADDITION,
ACCORDING TO THE PLAT THEREOF OF RECORD AND ON FILE IN THE OFFICE OF
THE REGISTER OF DEEDS FOR SAID COUNTY; THENCE SOUTHERLY PARALLEL
WITH THE EAST LINE OF PROSPECT AVENUE AS SHOWN ON THE PLAT OF SAID
R.IVERVIEW ADDITION, TO A POLNT 437.25 FEET NORTHERLY OF THE NORTH LINE
OF SAID ALLEGAN STREET, MEASURED ALONG A LINE PARALLEL WITH THE EAST
LINE OF SAID PROSPECT AVENUE; THENCE WESTERLY 99 FEET TO A POINT 437.25
FEET NORTHERLY, AS MEASURED ALONG THE EASTERLY LINE OF SAID
PROSPECT AVENUE, OF THE NORTH LINE OF ALLEGAN STREET AND ON THE EAST
LINE OF SAID PROSPECT AVENUE; THENCE NORTHERLY ON THE EASTERLY LINE
OF SAID PROSPECT AVENUE AND THE NORTHERLY EXTENSION THEREOF TO THE
KALAMAZOO RIVER; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ALONG SAID RIVER TO THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 16 OF SAID LASHER'S ADDITION; THENCE ALONG
THE WEST LINE OF SAID LOT 16 TO THE PLACE OF BEGINNING.
C-l
-------
SHEET ^ OF—
BY:.
DATE:
BERYL M.^JONES.^HiS Ml# 235U
WIGHTMAN MOORED, INC,
UH hwiN
tU CHESTNUT ST. ALIEOAN, Ml 40010
(616) 673-4465 FAX *73-6404
-------
SHtt.1 -> OF—g—
l!ll!!!!!llllllli!!!!l!ll!l!ili!illl uber 2811 pa«605
1 1 £05 1-
PARCEL C-l
COMMENCING AT A POINT NORTH 580-23' WEST, 180.91 RODS (2985.02 FEET) FROM THE EAST
1/4 POST OF SECTION 30, TOWN 1 NORTH, RANGE 11 WEST; THENCE NORTH 31°-3T EAST 640
FEET; THENCE NORTH 58°-23' WEST 312.4 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28M7 WEST 641.3 FEET TO
CENTER OF HIGHWAY; THENCE SOUTH 58°-23' EAST 275 FEET TO SAID POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPTING AND RESERVING A STRIP OF LAND 183.3 FEET WIDE OFF THE WESTERLY SIDE
THEREOF.
PARCEL C-2
PART OF THE NORTH 112 OF SECTION 30, TOWN 1 NORTH, RANGE 11 WEST. DESCRIBED AS '
FOLLOWS: THE EAST 91 2/3 FEET (91.66 FEET) OF THE WEST 183 1/3 FEET (183.33 FEET) OF THE
FOLLOWING DESCRIBED PREMISES; COMMENCING AT A POINT NORTH 58°-23' WEST 180.91
RODS FROM THE EAST 1/4 POST OF SECTION 10, TOWN 1 NORTH, RANGE 11 WEST; THENCE
NORTH 31°-37 EAST 640.0 FEET; THENCE NORTH 58°-23' WEST 312.4 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 28°-
1? WEST 641.3 FEET TO CENTER OF HIGHWAY; THENCE SOUTH 58°-23' EAST 275 FEET TO SAID
POINT OF BEGINNING.
PARCEL 5
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 25, BLOCK 2, RIVER VIEW ADDITION;
THENCE NORTHWESTERLY PARALLEL WITH ALLEGAN STREET 463 FEET; THENCE NORTH
31°-32' EAST TO THE LEFT BANK OF KALAMAZOO RIVER; THENCE SOUTHERLY ON SAID
RIVER BANK TO THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF RIVERVIEW ADDITION; THENCE SOUTH 31°-
37" WEST ALONG THE WEST LINE OF SAID ADDITION, 189 FEET TO POINT OF BEGINNING.
SECTION 30, TOWN 1 NORTH, RANGE 11 WEST.
W1GHTMAN MOORED, INC.
114 CHESTNUT ST. AU.EOAN. MI 49010
(eta) 673-5405 FAX <73-5464
-------
SH EET_5l_ OF^£Z
surveyor's certificate
LIBER
2811
ST
r 10T-8
AaT's V
J
r
PARCEL D
COMMENCING AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF LOT 4, LASHER'S ADDITION TO THE
V1LLAOE (NOW CITY) OF PLAINWELL; THENCE WESTERLY ALONG THE NORTH LINE OF
WEST ALLEGAN STREET 165 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 462 FEET; THENCE EASTERLY 165
FEET TO THE WEST LINE OF LASHER'S ADDITION; THENCE SOUTHERLY TO THE PLACE OF
BEGINNING, BEING IN THE NORTHWEST 1/4 OF SECTION 30, TOWN 1 NORTH, RANGE 11
WEST.
LEGEND^
O - 1/2" IRON SET .
• - CORNER FOUND lYl'lff T ' I \°
R - "RECORDED AS" BEARING SOURCE: 's
LOCATION:
'/z- SECTION_Z£_ T /A/-R t/uJ .
C >-ry or P/ffMtefWP.. ftuea/v*/ nn., MICHIGAN.
CERTIFIED TO- .
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SURVEYED AND MAPPED THE LAND
ABOVE PLATTED AND/OR DESCRIBED ON THIS DATE, AND THAT THE
RATIO OF CLOSURE ON THE UNADJUSTED FIELD OBSERVATIONS WAS
/». ooa'AND THAT ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF P.A. 132,
1970 HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH.
BY:
BERYL U. JONE:
DATE:
Ml# 23514
^/sX*>Sa "GiZaiW
WIGHTMAN MOORED, INC.
M >>¦)>< H Cm&Jthf tn|tei«»| A
114 CHESTNl/T ST. ALLEOAN, Ml 40010
(C16) 875-S4M FAX
-------
SHPFT S OF &
SURVEYOR'S certificate.
LIBER
2811 page 607
's£==s>'± i« 41 *05'§.-7 ^
07 269* 00 y
/V
/ /
h S //, •'K>- fA-. A-A /
>#/»? A\' fy / \ t* / nV >vs^ / /
? AAV\4 Ax*'"-•//
p\ ^/As "v *m y/-••
#\\ "-k ^ / A^ y /
< > \X{ /\0 / x \ A /
i v^'^'. V . V / x /s* // / e o (
V /*' V ^ X %«ho V / X fA <
&»* V>n;>x^ ^ /
f. Vo' V k,;-, c;~T;X "13 v "*"e> /4^ *>'
/£'' /a" //' X. ^ x > ^wCx^
7/' ^ o> C /,o / x^AX > *
(if »- //% / vf ••••/,/ ,
••• * . x ' * x 0
:>? / /X. . . N< $ v ^ '
jIM •%¦ W * /„ >^x / *>
Mrx"x X/*A -''A //
^ // X %, x / ^ A # x-/ Vv
^Jl * / X ""••/ *x. // f
/#\/x /x"x x /< /
X / ^ /« A'/ X -
X' '>V / / X
0>/
(V
OoS
'<*Ay
x*-„
-V
k
>
k
„0
0
'b
w Q
w W - <
S3fSS
§ y 9 si a
5 3 i z *
S^SSv
S3 m d. o -
Pi C? ^ 9^ f-4
./7/>,'+ . AND THAT ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF P.A. 132,
1970 HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH.
DATE: W^/
PLS Ml# 23514
fflGHTMAN MOORED, INC.
Urf kmtn mi tmlkl HM| ^
114 CHESTNUT ST. AUXOAN. Ml 49010
(»1«) «79-e4«S FAX C73-04M
-------
SHEET. 6 OF S.
SURVEYOR'S CERTIFICATE
i\
\
PARCEL 4
VACATED RIVER STREET LOCATED IN RIVERVIEW ADDITION, ALSO THAT PART OF
MICHIGAN AVENUE, VACATED, LYING BETWEEN THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF RIVER STREET
AND NORTHERLY OF A LINE CONNECTING THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF LOTS 25, BLOCK 1, AND
SOUTHERLY SIDE OF LOT 21. BLOCK 2, RIVERVIEW ADDITION, ALSO THAT PART OF
PROSPECT AVENUE, VACATED, LYING BETWEEN THE SOUTHERLY SIDE OF RIVER STREET
AND NORTHERLY OF SOUTHERLY EXTENSION OF SOUTHERLY LINE OF LOT 40, BLOCK 1,
RIVERVIEW ADDITION, ALSO LOTS 25 THRU 40, BLOCK I, ALSO LOTS 16 THRU 30, BLOCK 2,
RIVERVIEW ADDITION.
J£GEM:_
O - 1/2" IRON SET
• - CORNER FOUND
R - "RECORDED AS"
& ' SO' We' .
BEARING SOURCE: 73'Vex.uie*; AbP/r/esS
LOCATION: ^ , SFICTION , T /V -R //& ,
G/r/ as P/*/a//v£u TWP., aiiEg#*/ pp.. MICHIGAN.
CERTIFIED TO: Ss/^pse-v Plyt/vtuSU- g <£o.
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SURVEYED AND MAPPED THE UNO
ABOVE PLATTED AND/OR DESCRIBED ON THIS DATE, AND THAT THE
RATIO OF CLOSURE ON THE UNADJUSTED HELD OBSERVATIONS WAS
AND THAT ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF P.A. 132,
1970 HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH.
DATE: '0//b/4a
BERYL M
Ml# 23514 ^¦
i£SS*r
fflGHTMAN MOORED, INC.
114 CHESTNl/T ST. ALLEOAN, Ml 40010
B73-W65 FAX 07S-B464
-------
sheet_j2_of_<2_
COMMENCING ON THE WEST UNE OF LASHER'S ADDITION 495 FEET ON SAID ADDITION
LINE FROM THE CENTER LINE OF ALLEGAN STREET; THENCE NORTH 58°-23' WEST 231 FEET;
THENCE SOUTH 31°-37 WEST 57.25 FEET; THENCE NORTH 58°-23' WEST 99 FEET TO THE EAST
LINE OF RIVERVIEW ADDITION; THENCE NORTH 31°-3? EAST TO LEFT BANK OF THE
KALAMAZOO RIVER; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY ON SAID RIVER BANK TO THE NORTHWEST
CORNER OF LOT 16, LASHER'S ADDITION; THENCE SOUTHWESTERLY TO BEGINNING.
SECTION 30, TOWN 1 NORTH, RANGE 11 WEST.
LEGEM.
O - 1/2'
R
IRON SET
CORNER FOUND
"RECORDED AS"
a ' so' /oo'
ZO& •
BEARING SOURCE; s rfod/ r/o*/
LOCATION:.
Mexr/t '/z. SECTIONT J a/ -R // (J .
cz/ry co.. MICHIGAN.
CERTIFIED TO; s-sMPSt?"
HEREBY CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SURVEYED AND MAPPED THE LAND
ABOVE PUTTED AND/OR DESCRIBED ON THIS DATE, AND THAT THE
RATIO OF CLOSURE ON THE UNADJUSTED FIELD OBSERVATIONS WAS
/fi.ooo' . AND THAT ALL OF THE REQUIREMENTS OF P.A. 132,
1970 HAVE BEEN COMPLIED WITH.
DATE:
lo -/« j
23514 S/!>
mssf
TflGHTMAN MOORED, INC
114 CHESTNUT ST. ALLEOAN, Ml 40010
(616) 673-6463 FAX 673-6464
-------
LIBER 2811 PAGE 610
EXHIBIT 2
[n«v fcteot
in pvvc^ewL jj&jiew
T© S<2£ . 1
-------
APPENDICES
-------
Appendix A
Newspaper Public Notices
-------
KALAMAZOO GAZETTE
THURSDAY. SEPTEMBER 20.2012 JUS
Obama leads slightly in Michigan
BY DAVID EGGERT
Df GG£RH§Wl IVf XOM
LANSING — President Ba-
rack Obama is slightly leading
challenger Mitt Romney in the
latest poll of likely Michigan
voters.
The Marketing Resource
Group poll of 600 likely vot-
ers. conducted Sept. 10 through
Friday, showed the Democratic
incumbent and Vice President
Joe Biden with 47.5 percent and
his Republican rival and run-
ning mate Paul Ryan with 423
percent. The margin of sam-
pling error was plus or minus
4 percentage points, meaning
Obama had a slight edge. Michigan Gov. Rick Snyder, left, endorses Mitt Romney
Eight percent were February in Farmington Hills,
undecided.
Obama was up about 6 per- King said more indepen-
centage points the last time the dents are undecided than in the
Lansing-based firm polled, in spring poll, meaning Obama has
March. yet to close the deal with that
Paul King. MRG's director all-important group, leaving
of survey research, said a big the door open for Romney.
concern for Romney is the "That is a group that has
suburban-Detroit swing coun- been shifting back and forth
ty if Oakland, where Obama throughout this campaign. The
was leading 54 percent to 38 issue of unemployment and the
percent. economy is overshadowing ev-
-They seem to be falling ervthing." he said, saying some
in the president's direction, independents are not sold that
which is not good news for the Obama can turn around the
Romney campaign." he R3id. economy.
Other highlights from the
poll:
"Better off? Respondents
were split on whether they
are better or worse off than
four years ago — a question
Romney has been pushing on
the campaign trail. Thirty-
seven percent said they were
better off. and 40 percent,
worse off. Twenty percent
volunteered they were doing
the same.
• Economy is king: Asked to
name the issue they were
most concerned about. 76
percent said unemployment/
layoffs/jobs security and the
"If Oakland County goes big
for one candidate or another,
typically the state of Michigan
does the same."
The last time a GOP presi-
dential candidate won the
vote-rich county was 1992,
when President George H.W.
Bush narrowly held it but lost
the statewide election to Bill
Clinton.
Romney grew up in the
county, and it is a place where
Republicans want to do well.
Among self-described inde-
pendents. Obama was leading
45 percent to 38 percent, with
16 percent undecided.
economy.
Auto bailout: The federal gov-
ernment's rescue of the auto
industry continued to enjoy
significant support in this
auto-heavy state. Sixty-one
percent said they supported
it, and 32 percent opposed
it.
Obamacare: The federal
health care law evenly split
the potential electorate, with
45 percent in favor and 47
percent against. Romney has
said he would repeal most of
the Affordable Care Act and
replace it with something eke
while keeping some popular
provisions.
Gender Though Obama and
Romney were about even
among male voters (Obama
had a 3-percentage-point
edge), the president enjoyed
a seven-point lead with fe-
male voters. Romney needs
to win over more men to off-
set women favoring Obama.
Women 55 and older have
helped Romney narrow the
gender gap a bit. even though
younger women — particu-
larly age 18-34 — are backing
~~~~~~~~
ELECTION
Obama in droves. King said.
¦ Likeability: Fifty-two percent
of respondents had a favor-
able impression of Obama,
and 44 percent had an unfa-
vorable impression. That is
about the same as in March,
when he had a 53 percent fa-
vorability rating and 44 per-
cent unfavorablility rating. A
question on Romney's like-
ability was not asked.
• Job approval: Fifty percent
approved of the job Obama
is doing, while 46 percent
disapproved. Those numbers
are similar to six months ago,
when he had a 50 percent ap-
proval rating and 45 percent
disapproval rating.
• How's the race in your area?
Romney was up in the Flint-
Saginaw-Bay City market
(50-38), Cadillac-Traverse
Ciry-Sault Ste. Marie (44-41)
and Upper Peninsula-north-
ern Michigan (56-44). Obama
fared better in metropolitan
Detroit (52-39), Grand Rapids-
Kalamazoo-West Michigan
(46-44) and Lansing-Mid-
Michigan (47-40).
WHIN YOU IMAGINE
THEIR FUTURE
SwMbA'H&JL Ha*! I
59*.
f-4
V
V
u
I (• • •
hi k ft-
Imagine a confident,
beautiful smile.
• Chtfdren and Adults
• Fun and rewarding environment
• Speoaitztng In metal braces,
dear braces. Imrtsalign", and
early treatment appliances
• Free consultation
S
SAGE
ORTHODONTICS
Jomie Sage. DOS MS
Poll: Stabenow has edge
on Hoekstra in U.S. Senate race
BY TIM martin The latest average does not in- past week and earlier had run
1HAnTN4sMliVE.COM elude the Marketing Resource TV ads. A Hoekstra fundraiser
Group poll: Real Clear Poli- with former Republican presi-
LANSING—A statewide poll tics rates the race as leaning dential hopeful Rick Santo-
shows incumbent Democratic Democratic. rum is set for TWsday in West
ILS. Sen. Debbie Stabenow An MRG poll from March Michigan,
with an edge on Republican had Stabenow with a five-point MRG typically does work for
challenger Pete Hoekstra in lead over Hoekstra in what was Republican candidates.
Michigan's U.S. Senate race. then a hypothetical matchup.
The Marketing Resource The race "really hasn't moved
Group survey shows Stabenow at all" said Paul King, director
with 46.2 percent of the vote of survey research at MRG. But
and Hoekstra with 40.2 per- King said Stabenow has been
coil Nearly 14 percent of the under the 50 percent mark in
respondents said they were un- many recent polls, which could
decided or didn't know whom give Hoekstra "a shot" to catch
they would vote for if the elec- her by Election Day.
tion were right now. or they Stabenow appeared to be
refused to answer. doing best among young re-
The statewide poll of 600 spondents, particularly women
likely voters by the Lansing- between the ages of 18 and 34.
based firm was conducted Sept. About 45 percent of over-
10-15 using live telephone inter- all respondents said they
views, including 20 percent by had a favorable impression
cellphone The poll has a mar- of Stabenow. and 39 percent
gin of error of plus or minus 4 said they had an "unfavorable"
percentage points. impression.
The poll appears roughly in Stabenow is seeking her
line with other recent surveys third term as a U.S. senator,
of voters about Michigan's U.S. Her campaign launched its first
Senate race. An averaging of TV advertisement of the dec-
recent polls compiled by Real tion season this week.
Clear Politics has Stabenow Hoekstra. a former congress-
with 48.7 percent support and man from West Michigan, has
Hoekstra with 40J percent, run Internet ads within the
Weeknight
Specials
Family Night
PIZZA PASTA SUBS SALADS Every Tuesday & Sunday
5ince
\976f
3307 Stadium Di.
382-5544
6202 S. Wostnodgo
323-3855
Southland AMI
www.bilbospizza.com
NEW! MLIVE NEWSAPP FOR
DETROIT FOOTBALL.
EPA Begins Review
of Allied Paper/Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site
Kalamazoo, AlJegan and Douglas counties. Michigan
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is conducting a five-year review of the Allied Paper /Portage
Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site extending from Kalamazoo. Mich, to Lake Michigan near Saugatuck.
The Superfund law requires regular checkups of sites thai have been cleaned up - with waste managed on-site -
to make sure the cleanup continues to protect people and the environment. This is the second five-year review of
this site.
EPA's cleanup of PCB contamination includes removal of contaminated soil and sediment in portions of the
Kalamazoo River and Portage Creek, reviewing Georgia-Pacific plans for future Kalamazoo River cleanup, the
consolidation and capping the Willow Boulevard/A-site landfill, the 12th Street landfill, the King Highway
landfill, and the completion of the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Studies at both the Allied Landfill and
Plainwell Mill.
EPA expects to complete the review by October 18th. More site information is available at the following
libraries:
.Allegan Public Library
331 Ilubbard SL
Allegan
Charles Ransom Library
180 S. Sherwood
Plainwell
Kalamazoo Public Library
315 S. Rose St
Kalamazoo
Otsego District Library
219 S. Farmer Sl
Otsego
Saugatuck-Douelas Library
10 Mi*crSt
Douglas
Waldo Library
Western Michigan University
1903 W. Michigan Ave.
Kalamazoo
The five-year review is an opportunity for you lo tell EPA about site conditions and any concerns you have.
Contact:
Don de Blasio
Community Involvement Specialist
EPA Community Involvement and Outreach Section (ST-7J)
77 W. Jackson Blvd.
Chicago. 1L 60604
312- 886-4360
Toll-free: 800-621-8431.
Ext. 64360, weekdays 10 a.m. - 5:30 p.m.
James Saric
Remedial Project Manager
EPA Superfund Division (SR-6J)
77 W. Jackson Blvd.
Chicago, IL 60604
312-886-0992
Toll-free: 800-621-8431.
Exl 66151. weekdays 10 a.m.-5:30 p.n
You may also call Region 5 toll-free at 800-621-8431,8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.. weekdays.
-------
*10 September 27, 2012
The Allegon County Mews ww.ollsynne^.co
Spring Arbor University
,„?ff Afbor Universily has announced a lisl of May
AIlLLEl ^ es' Alleean Coun!y students i™|„de
WaS^.^raDJSSTKlm8;
KayeRv"* Swanson: and Wa.vland-
Michigan Technological University
Bcduna. Sebastian Fryer, -Jessica Hodgson. Dusun
i '\sbley Mdntyre, Taylor McKinstiy, Ernih < Hr!e,
Seth Osbom and Andrew Smith; and Wayland—Nicholas
Broft, Angela Case. Patrick Chandler, Nathan Pesch and
Katherine Ragan.
DePaul University
DePaul Uni vers if)" has announced a lisl of its summer
2012 graduates. Allegan County students include:
Douglas—Elizabeth Depree; and Otsego—Emily
Hampsten.
Rinkus
Jerod Rinkus of Saugatuck graduated in May 2012 from
Clarion University with a master's degree in library sci-
ence.
^ — ^ouniy iNews www.alleQon^.co
pelting bee at fair recognizes winners
Coumy'toS' sS? 5"°"^ Sch~" -
County third-, f„UIS.£% S \.T'¥ HiSt°riCal H^eotaty School
fifth-grade students from si, k„ow -aboul Wh"r P'al"well, second-place
schools participated in the schoolsl^the MumJ ^ Brooke Hogne from Brandon
33rd innuaJ Jewell School The winners inrh h a ?-eipen?31^ m Martin, and
Spellmg Bee. *h:_j included: third-place Ellle DuChen-
The competition was DHcaito ? &""" Hopkins Bemcntaiy.
-Sutuniay. Sept. 15 in the his- HeSary ^™^ ^ cornea* ™l«
~^Kipation «
student use computers.
Elementary schools will
also see the addition of 90
net books. Part of the goal
behind this purchase is to pre-
pare for the Smarter Balanced
Test.
The test expected to replace
the MEAP in two years; stu-
dents arc required to take
parts of the test online.
Otsego Elementary
given Spelling Bee meda
compliments of the Mkhigs
Association of Retire
School Personnel. T)
Alfcyaa County Fair boar
contributes free tickets to :h
participants and their fen;
Lyon
David Lyon of Saugatuck recently graduated from
Grand Valley State University with a masicr's degree in
education.
Ferris State University
Ferris State University has announced a list of its spring
2012 graduates. Allegan County students include:
Allegan—Kelsey Kiella; Dorr—Bryan Andres, Jamin
Bishop. Cody Commons, Patrick Damveld, Nathan
Darling, Daniel Koperski, Camerar? Lear, Andrew Steffes
and Jeffrey Talsma; FennviUe—Brian Dell; Hamilton—
Karen Slenk; Martin—Samuel Westendorp; Otsego—
Kristy Bates, Dennis Goodenough and Jeny Westhoff;
Plainweil—Sarah Crookston and Gayle Evans;
Pullman—Brooke Blake and Brandon Rhodes:
Saugatuck—Katelyn Bekken. Tristan Sisbach and
Rebecca Wheeler and Wavland—JaneJ Bksrh-.iu. Mailhew
Mcmdcrtsjna and Matthew VanDuvn.
The universH v ateo announced a list tvf student-, it has
placed on the spring 2012 honor* list. To be eligible for
the list, siittjcnb, must maintain a 3,5 grade point average.
V.Lzrui r aunty students include: Allegan—Bud KiW*v.
Bnan Salisbury Joshua Vhnbniggen ;«-.d Gage Wanders;
Dorr Bryan Andres. C"dy Common.-*. K tmberly Henney.
Kcih Lr.iv.ii-, Coh;»ii Lain. Jsy i.enhaft, Mika Mcginms.
Z •< Imy Rewa, tnc Rummeh. Ashley Schaaulorf. Thomas
Snyder, Natalie Weber and June WjtolT; f'enm ille—Brian
Dell: Hamilton—Derek Brouwci Sucey Klein, Jsyne
Kites and Rachel Ward: Hopkins -Ln iU Barnhurdt;
Otsego Kristy Rates, Malloty Bold and ( ixiy Barmell.
PlaiaweU—i ynr Bingham Sarah Crooks*®, Jessica
Sourfflaixi Justin Tuinstra and Artfiut Ueck Pullman—
Br -oke ar.d Brandon Rhodes: Saugatuck—Allison
Jetiknv; and Rebecca Wheeler Sbelbyvflle—Me».«i Staple
and Sarah Staple: and Waylaad—Jane* Uiericin, Lmdsey
S'osL Michael RnsAowski. Kristen StahL less TohoHc and
Sainamtha Watson.
Stone
Amanda Stone of Hoplint feu* been named to the
Kendall College of \n and Design of Ferns Slate
Ura'verstty spring ^>12 prrv'dcfit's U. )ndarsi;ip
at Dr-juson Univmhy
She is a member oi the vla?s of 2016 and received the
IVmsdii Founders Scholarship, u-hich nxo^ni/Ks aca
dctrne achievement, k-ndervhrp and pefMmai ;nent.
Otsego
Technology i,..
also expandnfg
kindergarten
grade.
^ ist ruicz gff
Best Sports Column ^
© Q
in the National Newspaper ;y\\
^ Association 2012 Better ^
%Q Newspaper Contest
•tig MJ tUUUW _ sfSZH' ^T' -
EPA Begins Review
of Allied Paper/Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site
Kalamazoo. Allegan and Douglas counties, Michigan
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency is conducting a five-year review of the Allied Paper/Portage
C'reekyK a lamazoo River Superfund Site extending from Kalamazoo, Mich, to Lake Jvlichigan near Saugatuck.
The Superfund law requires regular checkups of sites that have been cleaned up - with waste managed on-site -
Jo make sure the cleanup continues to protect people and she environment This is the second five-year review of
this site.
FPA's cleanup of PCB contamination includes removal of contaminated soil and sediment in portions of the
Kalamazoo River and Portage Creek, reviewing Oeorgia-J'acilk plans for future Kalamazoo River cleanup, the
consolidation and capping the Willow Boulevard/A-site landfill, the 12th Street landfill, the King Highway
landfill, and the completion of the Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Studies at both the Allied Landfill and
Plainweil Mill.
EPA expects to complete the review by October IRth. More site information is available at the following
jibrarics:
Allegan Public L«brar>
331 Hubbard Sl
AJIcrgan
Charles Ransom LHwarv
180 S. Sherwood
Plainweil
Kalamazoo Public Library
315 S. Rose St.
Kalatna&io
Otsego Dislrict Libran
21S S - FarmerSL
Otsego
S-iugatuck-Douglas Library
10 Mixer St,
Douglas
Waldo Library
Weflern Michtgan University
19413 W. Michigan Ave.
Kalamazo<3
The five-year review is an opportunity for you to tell EPA about site conditions and any concerns you have.
Contact:
Don de Klasio
Community Involvemem Specialist
EPA Community Involvement and Outreach Section (SI-7J)
77 W. Jackson Blvd.
Chicago. 11. W604
312-886-4360
Toll-free: 800-621-K431,
Ext. 64360, weekdays 10 a m. ~ 5:30 p.m.
James Saric
Remedial Project Manager
EPA Superfund Division (SR-6J)
77 W. Jackajn Blvd.
Chicago, IL 60604
312-8864)992
Toll-free: 800-621-8431.
Ext. 66151. weekdays 10 a.m. - 5:30 pin.
You may also call Region 5 toll-free at 800-^1-8431,8:30 a.m, to 4:30 pjn., weekdays.
-------
ttr^.ofiegonnews.com/unK>n_eii!f?pnst- Ihir •'Enipipfw;
S^sfember 24. 2012 5
Talk
from Page 4-
paper, or i itbo-d^cUHiciits that
would suggest what the man
was winching. The best guess
is the pipe as the photo was
taken approximately at the
same time as the other photo
and is only about four build-
ings south of the Patterson-
Clement building.
The three photos came to
the Union Enterprise as a
donated collection of glass
negatives.
The Saii^tuck/Dfragias
Historical Socveiy rrsade a
DVD of the negatives and
Stamm provided the research
to place times and names with
as many of the photographs as
possible.
The rest of the photographs
can be viewed at the Charles
A. Ransom District Library.
Tcxla/s Construction
As for the lonsiruprion
going on today. PlainwellV
economic developer Emilie
Schada has a detailed descrip-
tion of the construction going
on in Plainwell. Acceding to
the email letter she sends out.
the Mill Race bridge will be
completed this week, also the
water and sewer project is
nearly completed.
Projects still ongoing
include the painting of the M-
$V overpass c ouf :
i-.-tw. £*po« Dec 31,2012. Of? & valid ;
& -u- • • rr-incoi.ijnaicm wnhjny -jfhm.:
; Order Now' CaHTolI Fw. V&SS-3«7-6fl32
nate ffitl 'Jfe do nr. ii» >
I*sejifafo/t«sfea*J's41»*
-------
Record
September 27, 2012
Area vies for national Prettiest fainted Places award
from P^ge 1 -
By Scott Suluvan
Editor
Saugatuck-Douglas, long home
of artist painters, does OK by dec-
orative painters too
The community is one of eight
Michigan nominees in lite Pami
Quality Institute's Prettiest Painted
Places in the USA competition.
The contest, meant to show how
an attractive paint color scheme can
Festival
Michigan Showcase, conduct-
ed seminars. provided -speak-
ing panels and pmi-fiim ques
tior.-and-answer sessions with
casts and crews.
But meeting budgets, plus
finding •> castes m a tew® thai
doe- in« have a movie the-
ater. It&s become more diffi-
cult. the WIT founder said.
The festival in 2010 cost
the nonprofit more than
S250.{)00 lo operate, accord-
ing in the most recent
Internal Revenue Service
documents available.
Mov ie tickets sold and fgm
brought in S16-1.654 Contn-
bvtirmv and erauls accounted
for $^5,275. leav ii»s organiz-
es with S9$92.
"That's not much to get us
started on the next year's fes-
tival." Uepjcc sajd. Then
came a third week of-Junc
scheduling conflict leaving
organizers unable to use the
Saugatuck Center for the
Arts, a matter DePree called
"spirit breaking."
"We have a busy sclteduk
and pri»>? rom:n»ir»ci»tC' said
SCA executive director
Kristin Armstrong "It helps
us, if something haro»e> we
know andean wi rk thine- out
enhance the curb appeal of my
structure's—and by extension, com-
munity's- exterior, is backed by
Dow Corp. in cooperation with The
Wall Street Journal.The New York
Tunes. HGTV and USA Today.
Saugatuck-Douglas joins Bay
View. Franfcenmuth. Grand Rapids.
Howard City. PctoSkey. Iravt- se
City and the Village of On>nint:nc
vying with nearly 200 nominees
from other states for reevmal and
national honors. according 10
Saugatuck-Dough*. Convention &
Visitors Bureau executive director
Felicia Fairchild
Judges with expertise in color
•¦election, exterior painting and
home improvement will review the
entries, conduct additional re.-rch
and make selected stie visits
Finalise will be announced in late
September, and the nation's 12
"i^reti lost Painted Places" will be
revealed in mid-October.
Twenty-one photos of area homes
" ... businesses were selected and
- rutted for the contest. Fairchild
kucL
The Point Quality Institute has
conducted this competition twice
befoie. most recently in 2000.
"We feel ihere is no better way to
den wwi rate the importance of exte-
rior puira color than to foeus on
these hc.iyitrul rcal-worid cornm uni-
ties that lake so much pride in their
appearance." said PQI paint and
color expert Debbie Zimmer.
Nominees range from well-known
places >ucii as Cape Cod. Mass., and
Najja, Calif., to less-known sites
such its Vashon-Maury Island.
Wash and BellBuckle.Tenn.
in advance. Stifl, we're only
one of their smaller vcmici.
"Tlve SCA loves hosting
t) tc foti vai and hope we can
do vii aium" she said.
WFF organisers announced
Sept. 4 they would take appli-
cation!. through Sept 14 From
other west Michigan cities to
host the festival.
"Our mmknt has ahvay*
been for Waterfront to eco-
nomically and artistically
benefit the entire region, as
well as to ^kmkuc it> >ept.
7 that his chv > a> .-et-Wma
the festival, 1
M Live com reported Sep*.
IS that Grand Haven '> city
0U5E
SATURDAYS. SEPTEMBER 29 THRU OCTOBER 20
^ Siira l Opm (must be in line fey 10pm'j
South Haven Family Campground
33403 64til Street. Ssutli Hasen. Ml 4M90
www.f3cebook.com/TerrorlnThePark
council hail discussed the
festival, with some members
concerned a commitment
might only be one year.
DePree outlined his board'\
issues m a Sejl. S email to
Saugatuck city manager Kirk
H-uiKT and Mavor Jane
Veiplank
"We have been unable to
attract enough sponsor dol
rs i.' cover all the costs of
holding the festival in
Saugatuck." he stated. "It is
very cosily to create tempo-
rary theater-. each year.
"It was spirit leaking to
lo^c the Saugatuck Center
for the Ann w hen WFF was a
catalyst for the conversion of
Rich's. Pic Factory (into the
SCA facility) 12 years ago.''
DePree continued. "We have
been unable to come to a res-
oliitton with SCA adminis-
trator* to use any of iIk tma-
munity center for WFF.
"The festival has Iteen run-
ning in Saugamck on a shoe-
string budget witboul enough
regicirtil sponsiir^hips to
makxlam the italwnally rec-
ognized festival at a Icscl shut
it needs to be \iperai*rtg
"These majod seasttns
t along uiih several other
minor reasons i have resulted
in widespread volunteer
fatigue for repeating the
event each year exclusively
in Saugatuck. if you have
any ideas or solutions on
hov. to restilve these issues,
pfease let as know,
"WFF volunteers have put
in an etwrmoas amount ot
blood, sweat, tears and years
and don't want to call rt quits.
As it currently stands, moving
around west Michigan is the
only path we see to survival."
the foamier vaid.
DePree told Harrier in an
email Sept. 20, "We are nol
demanding din.it tax dollars he
alkx-ate<) toward WFF but
railiei art asking for more
as&i^ance
"Sever al other communitie:.
met tin- Sept. 14 proposal
deadline and are ofleriiie spe-
cific solutions of how ihe
WFF could take place in their
town. Community leader,
merchants, business organiza-
tions ami a'sii^nis are rally-
Itclp with
oi^wship. ad
aijraicach-
i j&nderstund
espt insrhli'
.all the
\»plions. M.eing that the non-
piiifii oreiinization is now in a
red zone.
"If there is enough commu
nrfy enthusiasm to keep WFF
in Saugatuck. is there a way
thai we. as a community, can
solve the issues? They are
currently beyond what our
¦.mall volunteer administra-
tor! can cackle.
"Both of my sisters live m
Saugatuck, my bouse is just
lf» minutes outside of
Saugatuck. and approxi mate -
ly If) percent of the ^-VFF
weekend event voJurrtccrs
live in Saugatuck. So we
would of course like for it to
be possible to make this
work again in Saugaltu-k T
the festival f< Minder said
New Hours .... New Menu
Including VEGETARIAN. GLUTEN-FREE,
VEGAN ... (and steaks, fish, pasta ...J
The Grill Room
CASUAL FOOD & DRINKS
DINNER from 5:00 TOES, thru SATURDAY S
- 1 OftBhieStarontH^RQrfh
I P^rhrr^Alr % efgeol Saugoluctt
V^ I\_-aJL Ul UUR y,v,w.cieaibro',-t,i.'ar i com
EPA Begins Review
of Allied Paper/Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site
Kalamazoo, Allegan and Douglas counties, Michigan
U.S. Environmental PrtaecucMi Agency is conducting a Bve-year review of the Allied Pap>er/Portage
Creek Kalamazoo River Superfnnu Site extending iiom Kalamazoo, Mich, to Lake Michigan near Saugatuck.
The Superfund law requires tegular checkups of sites that have been cleaned up - with waste managed on-site -
to make sure the cleanup continues to protect people and the environment. This is the second five-year review of
this site.
EPA's cleanup of PCB contamination Includes removal of contaminated soil and sediment in portions of the
Kalamazoo River and Pottage Creek, reviewing Georgia-Pacific plans for future Kalamazoo River cleanup, the
consolidation and capping the Willow Boulevard A-site landfill, the 12th Street landfill, the King Highway
landfill, and the complex ion of the Remedial In vestiv-aiion/Feasibility Studies at both the Allied Landfill and
Plain well Mil!
EPA expects to complete the review by October ?8tb. Mores^e infwmation is available at the following
libraries:
Allegan Public Library
331 Hubbard St.
Allegan
Charles Ransom Library
180 S. Sherwood
Plainwell
blalam h/ihi P»ih!>e 1 .ibtary
«5S. Rt«eSt.
Kalamazoo
Otsego l>tstna Library
219 S. Farmer St.
Otsego
Saugatuck-Dougias Libr^
10 Mixer Sl
Douglas
Waldo Library
We tens Michigan I fiiversm
I9ti,l W. Michigan Ave
Kalamazoo
The five-year feview is an opportunity far you to
Comdex
CP \ about -iteconditions and an. o . - : vouliave.
Don de Btasio
Community Involvement Specialist
EPA Community involvement and Ottfreach Sev r r S! "i •
77 W.Jackson Blvd.
Cbieae<».!Lb<*n . SR t,J.
77 W 8l> d.
Oitajii.ll fiDTiM
31 Z-SMtJSWZ
Ton-free: XUD^»21-Ai3l.
6ict 66151, %»s»Lvla^ 10 a_m. - 5:30
Ym mm also call Regimi 5 toll-free i—Jnaf t* ia. a
hja^-acirsiHns Stan, corveq^r n
th-5
Chris Smither
in Concert
pCT 6 | 3.00 PM | SJQ
¦ Qn*cS Ok atoaivtv !>€¦ Scgrt J. #•
wrttm Nt the tyorid' v. ,.r u- *•—.
400 Cuivgr Slrest Ssygaiuck
2 S3 857-23991 info^sc4a,org
Info & tickets online; www^c4e,org
iLemsr
Arts
-------
Appendix B
List of Documents Reviewed for the Five-Year Review
-------
This Five-Year Review consisted of a review of the following relevant documents.
For the Willow Boulevard/A -Site Landfill OU2:
• Remedial Investigation/Focused Feasibility Study Report, Willow Boulevard/A-Site
Landfill Operable Unit 2, Kalamazoo, Michigan, Allied Paper, Inc., Portage Creek,
Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, November 2004;
• Record of Decision for the Willow Boulevard/A-Site Landfill OU2 of the Allied Paper,
Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, City of Kalamazoo, Michigan,
September 2006;
• Final (Revised) Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage
Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, April 2003;
• Final (Revised) Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment for the Allied Paper,
Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, May 2003;
• Final Remedial Design Report for the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River
Superfund Site, Willow Boulevard/A-Site Landfill, Operable Unit 2, April 27, 2011;
• Final Remedial Action Work Plan for the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek7Kalamazoo
River Superfund Site, Willow Boulevard/A-Site Landfill, Operable Unit 2, April 28,
2011;and
• Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants and Environmental Protection Easements July
22, 2010.
For the King Highway Landfill OU3:
• Record of Decision for the King Highway Landfill Operable Unit 3 of the Allied Paper,
Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, City of Kalamazoo, Michigan,
February 1998;
• Final Report for Completion of Construction Volume 1 of 9, King Highway Landfill
Operable Unit 3 and Five Former Georgia-Pacific Lagoons, May 2004;
• Consent Decree for the Design and Implementation Of Certain Response Action At
Operable Unit #4 and the Plainwell Inc. Mill Property of the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage
Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, February 15, 2005;
• Administrative Order by Consent for Response Activity at the King Highway Landfill-
OU3, MDEQ Reference No. AOC-ERD-99-OlO, February 2000;
-------
Remedial Investigation Report, King Highway Landfill Operable Unit, July 1994;
• Post-Closure Operation and Maintenance Plan, King Highway Landfill Operable Unit ot
the Allied Paper, Inc/Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, draft Final June
2004;
• Appendix J to the Final Report for Completion of Construction, King Highway Landfill
Operable Unit 3 and Five Former Georgia-Pacific Lagoons, May 2004;
• Landfill Gas Monitoring Plan, King Highway Landfill Operable Unit, June 2002;
• Risk Assessment, King Highway Landfill Operable Unit, Allied Paper, Inc/Portage
Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, August 1994;
• Technical Memorandum 6, King Highway Landfill Operable Unit, Allied Paper,
Inc/Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, March 1994;
• Institutional Control Study Report, King Highway Landfill Operable Unit 3 and Five
Former Georgia-Pacific Corporation Mill Lagoons, September 2007; and
• Georgia-Pacific LLC Kalamazoo Mill Property - Sampling Plan for Area Northwest of
Former Mill Lagoon 1. November 2008.
For the 12,h Street Landfill OU4:
• Consent Decree for the Design and Implementation Of Certain Response Action At
Operable Unit #4 And The Plainwell Inc. Mill Property Of The Allied Paper, Inc./Portage
Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, December 2004;
• Record of Decision for the 12th Street Landfill Operable Unit 4 of the Allied Paper,
Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, City of Kalamazoo, Michigan,
September 2001;
• Remedial Investigation/Feasibility Study Technical Memorandum 8, 12th Street Landfill
Operable Unit, Plainwell, Michigan, Allied Paper, Inc., Portage Creek, Kalamazoo River
Superfund Site, May 31, 1994;
• Final Remedial Design Report for the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River
Superfund Site, 12th Street Landfill, Operable Unit 4, March 2010;
• Final Remedial Action Work Plan for the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo
River Superfund Site, 12th Street Landfill, Operable Unit 4, April 9, 2010;
• October 2011 Quarterly Groundwater Sampling Results, 12th Street Landfill, Operable
Unit 4, Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, January 2012;
-------
• April 2012 Quarterly Groundwater Sampling Results, 12th Street Landfill, Operable Unit
4, Allied Paper, Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, July 2012;
• Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants and Environmental ProtectionEasements,
March 25, 2005; and
• Amendment to Declaration of Restrictions and Covenants and Environmental Protection
Easements , June 12. 2012.
-------
Appendix C
List of Data Reviewed for the Five-Year Review
-------
This Five-Year Review consisted of a review of the following relevant data.
• King Highway Landfill Operable Unit Hydrogeological Monitoring Plan, Final
September 2002;
• Attachment B, 1998 Groundwater Monitoring Reports, King Highway Landfill Operable
Unit Hydrogeological Monitoring Plan;
• Attachment C, 2001 Groundwater Monitoring Reports, King Highway Landfill Operable
Unit Hydrogeological Monitoring Plan;
• Attachment F to the 1998 King Highway Landfill Operable Unit Hydrogeological
Monitoring Plan, Draft July 1998;
• Post-Closure Groundwater Sampling Analytical Results from 1993-2007, for the King
Highway Landfill Operable Unit 3 of the Allied Paper Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo
River Superfund Site, transmitted via e-mail on September 10, 2007, by Pat McQuire
with Georgia-Pacific;
• Draft Final King Highway Landfill Operable Unit 3 and Five Former Georgia-Pacific
Lagoons, Final Report for Completion of Construction, September 2003;
• Final (Revised) Baseline Ecological Risk Assessment for the Allied Paper, Inc./Portage
Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, April 2003; and
• Final (Revised) Baseline Human Health Risk Assessment for the Allied Paper,
Inc./Portage Creek/Kalamazoo River Superfund Site, May 2003.
• King Highway Landfill OU3 Proposed modification to the HMP, February 2011
• King Highway Landfill IOU3 Pore water sampling plan 2012
• Stressed vegetation and landfill subsidence investigation plan, 2012
• King Highway Landfill 2003 to 2012 Post-Closure Landfill Inspection Forms
• Monthly progress reports for OU2, OU3 and OU4
• OU3 and OU4 Quarterly Landfill gas monitoring reports
• OU3 and OU4 Groundwater quality monitoring reports
• Emergency Response Plan Documentation Report for Former Plainwell Paper Mill
Banks, February 2009; and
• Draft Remedial Investigation Report for Former Plainwell, Inc. Mill Property, June 2011.
------- |